Comparative outcome analysis of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia in lumbar fusion surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal anesthesia (SA) has been shown in several studies to be a viable alternative to general anesthesia (GA) in laminectomies, discectomies, and microdiscectomies. However, the use of SA in spinal fusion surgery has been very scarcely documented in the current literature. Here we present a comparison of SA to GA in lumbar fusion surgery in terms of perioperative outcomes and cost. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients who underwent 1- or 2-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery by a single surgeon, at a single institution, from 2015 to 2018. Data collected included demographics, operative and recovery times, nausea/vomiting, postoperative pain, and opioid requirement. Costs were included in the analysis if they were: 1) non-fixed; 2) incurred in the operating room (OR); and 3) directly related to patient care. All cost data represents net costs and was obtained from the hospital revenue cycle team. Patients were grouped for statistical analysis based on anesthetic modality. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients received SA and 46 received GA. Both groups were similar in terms of age, gender, BMI, number of levels operated upon, preoperative diagnosis, and medical comorbidities. The SA group spent less time in the OR (163.86 ± 9.02 vs. 195.63 ± 11.27 min, p < 0.05), PACU (82.00 ± 7.17 vs. 102.98 ± 8.46 min, p < 0.05), and under anesthesia (175.03 ± 9.31 vs. 204.98 ± 10.15 min, p < 0.05) than the GA group. Post-surgery OR time was significantly less with SA than with GA (6.00 ± 1.09 vs. 17.26 ± 3.05 min, p < 0.05); however, pre-surgery OR time was similar between groups (50.17 ± 3.08 vs. 56.17 ± 5.34 min, p = 0.061). The SA group also experienced less maximum postoperative pain (3.31 ± 1.41 out of 10 vs. 5.96 ± 0.84/10, p < 0.05) and required less opioid analgesics (2.38 ± 1.37 vs. 5.39 ± 0.84 doses, p < 0.05). Both groups experienced similar nausea or vomiting rates and adverse events postoperatively. Net operative cost was found to be $812.31 (5.6%) less with SA than with GA, although this difference was not significant (p = 0.225). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, SA is almost never used in lumbar fusion, and a cost-effectiveness comparison with GA has not been recorded. In this retrospective study, we demonstrate that the use of SA in lumbar fusion surgery leads to significantly shorter operative and recovery times, less postoperative pain and opioid usage, and slight cost savings over GA. Thus, we conclude that this anesthetic modality represents a safe and cost-effective alternative to GA in lumbar fusion.

Comparing Surgical Treatments for Spondylolysis: Review on Current Research.

STUDY DESIGN: Narrative review. OBJECTIVE: To compare the various surgical methods of repairing spondylolysis defects in regard to improving pain, restoration of function, radiographic improvement, and complication rate. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spondylolysis is a defect in the pars interarticularis of the vertebral arch, typically in the lumbar vertebra. Treatment can be nonoperative and/or surgical. There are various types of surgical repair including spinal compression, fusion, and direct pars repair. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the English literature was performed utilizing Medline, Embase, and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria included papers or abstracts that evaluated the surgical techniques. Exclusion criteria included non-English-language papers or abstracts with inadequate information about outcomes. RESULTS: Postoperative pain levels and patient function were consistently improved, regardless of surgical technique chosen. Positive clinical outcomes after surgery were seen more often in patients under age 20 and those who underwent minimally invasive repairs. Positive radiographic improvements were reported broadly, although some reported higher rates of nonunion with spinal compression. Complication rates were low throughout and minimally invasive techniques reported decreased blood loss and shorter hospital stays. CONCLUSIONS: Present surgical options appear largely comparable in terms of their ability to provide meaningful treatment for spondylolysis where conservative treatments have failed or otherwise remain unattempted.

Treatment of Isolated Serosanguinous Incision Drainage after Thoracolumbar Surgery: Is Surgical Management Always Necessary?

Background: There is no consensus regarding how to care for a patient presenting with early isolated incision drainage after thoracolumbar spine surgery. Although drainage is the most common presenting symptom of surgical site infection (SSI), it has low specificity for SSI in the absence of other symptoms. Given that invasive treatment for SSI is costly and high risk, it would be beneficial to determine whether antibiotic treatment alone is sufficient for isolated drainage and what factors predispose to failure of this conservative strategy. Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed a clinical database of patients who underwent thoracolumbar spine surgery at a single center between 2012-2017. Patients were included if serosanguinous drainage was present within six weeks of surgery without other signs and symptoms of infection such as fever, chills, purulent discharge, fluctuance, wound dehiscence, or erythema. Results: Fifty-eight patients met the study inclusion criteria. After initial conservative management with antibiotics, drainage resolved in 51 patients. The seven patients with drainage that did not resolve were treated with operative surgical washout. Although the groups were similar in most respects, there was a significant difference in the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, which is a marker of overall health (surgical group score 2.89 ± 0.33 versus 2.06 ± 0.61; p < 0.0001). In addition, patients with greater estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, operative time, and spinal levels treated were more likely to require surgical washout, although these differences were not statistically significant. Groups were similar with respect to age, Body Mass Index, smoking status, diabetes mellitus status, revision versus primary surgery, and drainage latency. Conclusion: Most patients who present with isolated serosanguinous incision drainage within six weeks of surgery may be managed successfully using antibiotics only. Patients who fail to respond to conservative therapy have significantly worse general health, as indicated by the ASA score.

An Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Lumbar Spine Surgery in Various Hospital Settings.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative cost-effectiveness of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia for lumbar laminectomy and microdiscectomy surgery performed in an academic versus private practice hospital setting. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed charts of 188 consecutive patients who underwent lumbar laminectomy or microdiscectomy by a single surgeon from 2012 to 2016 at either an academic or a private practice hospital setting. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were recorded and direct variable costs were calculated. RESULTS: At the academic institution, the direct cost of a lumbar laminectomy or microdiscectomy surgery under general anesthesia was determined to be 9.93% greater than with spinal anesthesia (P = .040). The greatest difference was seen with operating room costs, in which general anesthesia was associated with 18.74% greater costs than spinal anesthesia (P = .016). There was no significant difference in cost at the private practice hospital setting. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that use of spinal anesthesia for lumbar laminectomy leads to less operating room, postanesthesia care unit, and anesthesia times, lower levels of postoperative pain, and no increased rate of other complications compared with general anesthesia at an academic institution as compared to a private practice setting. Spinal anesthesia is 9.93% less expensive than general anesthesia, indicating substantial cost-saving potential. With no sacrifice of patient outcomes and the added benefit of less pain and recovery time, Spinal anesthesia represents a more cost-effective alternative to general anesthesia in lumbar spine surgery in the academic hospital setting.

Nonmaleficence in medical training: Balancing patient care and efficient education.

The principle of nonmaleficence requires that every medical action be weighed against all benefits, risks, and consequences, occasionally deeming no treatment to be the best treatment. In medical education, it also applies to performing tasks appropriate to an individual's level of competence and training. Students, residents, and attending physicians alike maintain a beneficence-based responsibility to patients, and attending physicians have a fiduciary responsibility to educate younger generations of doctors.

Current advances in the treatment of medial and lateral epicondylitis.

Despite advances elucidating the causes of lateral and medial epicondylitis, the standard of care remains conservative management with NSAIDs, physical therapy, bracing, and rest. Scar tissue formation provoked by conservative management creates a tendon lacking the biomechanical properties and mechanical strength of normal tendon. The following review analyzes novel therapies to regenerate tendon and regain function in patients with epicondylitis. These treatments include PRP injection, BMAC, collagen-producing cell injection, and stem cell treatments. While these treatments are in early stages of investigation, they may warrant further consideration based on prospects of pain alleviation, function enhancement, and improved healing.

Medical optimization of lumbar fusion in the osteoporotic patient.

PURPOSE: In patients undergoing lumbar fusion, osteoporosis has been shown to lead to poorer outcomes and greater incidence of fusion-related complications. Given the undesirable effect of osteoporosis on lumbar fusion surgery, a number of medications have been proposed for use in the peri- and postoperative period to mitigate risks and enhance outcomes. The purpose of this review was to summarize and synthesize the current literature regarding medical management of osteoporosis in the context of lumbar fusion surgery. METHODS: A literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted in October 2016, using permutations of various search terms related to osteoporosis, medications, and lumbar fusion. RESULTS: Teriparatide injections may lead to faster, more successful fusion, and may reduce fusion-related complications. Bisphosphonate therapy likely does not hinder fusion outcomes and may be useful in reducing certain complications of fusion in osteoporotic patients. Calcitonin and selective estrogen receptor modulator therapy show mixed results, but more research is necessary to make a recommendation. Vitamin D deficiency is associated with poor fusion outcomes, but evidence for supplementation in patients with normal serum levels is weak. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the current body of research appears to support the use of teriparatide therapy to enhance lumbar fusion outcomes in the osteoporotic patient, although the extent of research on this topic is limited. Additionally, very little evidence exists to cease any of the mentioned osteoporosis treatments prior to lumbar fusion.

Bone graft materials for posterolateral fusion made simple: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Iliac crest has long been the gold standard for lumbar fusion, but concerns over donor site morbidity have led to a wide variety of bone graft substitutes. Despite prolific research, a general consensus is yet to be reached on bone graft materials that lead to optimal fusion. PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to evaluate the current literature for bone graft material options that maximize fusion rate in posterolateral lumbar fusion surgery. DESIGN: Systematic Review. METHODS: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Web of Science was conducted. Included studies were published from January 2000 to July 2015, were clinical human research studies involving available autograft, allograft, or synthetic bone graft options in posterolateral lumbar spine fusion, and reported radiographic fusion rate as a primary end outcome. This research had no funding source and the authors have no conflicts to declare. RESULTS: 81 articles underwent full-text review, and 48 were included in this study. 18 studies assessed fusion rate by plain radiographs alone (37.5%), while 6 used CT scan (12.5%), and 24 used both (50.0%). 45 studies looked at ICBG in conjunction with LAG (29), BCP(1), APC (2), BMPs (6), or DBM (1). Aggregate mean fusion rates among these ranged from 68.0 to 91.5%. 22 studies evaluated fusion rates of LAG, either isolated (3) or combined with ceramic extenders (8), DBM (4), BMP (1), BMA (4), APC (1), or ICBG(1). Aggregate mean fusion rate ranged from 75 to 95.5%. With the exception of studies involving allograft (mean fusion rate 40.0%), the mean fusion rate for all other graft combinations exceeded 70.0%. CONCLUSIONS: While our results find that LAG+BMA provided highest fusion rate, most material options analyzed in this study provide comparable fusion outcomes. The ideal graft option must incorporate a combination of materials with osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic properties. Our results represent the robust and dynamic nature of the current state of lumbar graft technology. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip: a history of innovation.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a relatively common malady that has profound consequences in the infant if left untreated. Effective and early treatment of DDH has been praised as one of the most successful ventures of modern pediatric orthopedics. Yet, before the modern management of DDH came into existence, there were extensive technological developments in the field of harnesses, casts, and traction methods. This paper aims to identify the centuries-old history of advancement in DDH treatment and the many important people involved. Their devices, thoughts, and ideas continue to have a profound impact on the current practice of orthopedic surgery.

Physical Activity Diminishes Symptomatic Decline in Chronic Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review.

Physical activity has been shown to positively influence a number of parameters in chronic schizophrenia, including cognition, social well being, and quality of life. Here, we present a systematic review of randomized controlled trials reporting on reduction of positive and negative symptoms using PANSS grading after the implementation of a physical activity protocol. Review of 64 articles yielded 6 relevant to our discussion. We found that physical activity significantly improved aggregate total PANSS score as well as positive symptoms PANSS score. While negative PANSS score showe a trend toward improvement, this was nonsignificant. Overall, we find the various forms of physical activity discussed within to be an appropriate adjunct to standard pharmacotherapy for the reduction of symptoms in chronic schizophrenia.

Long-Acting Injectable Paliperidone Palmitate: A Review of Efficacy and Safety.

OBJECTIVE: Summarize and synthesize the current literature regarding long-acting injectable paliperidone palmitate for the treatment of schizophrenia. METHODS: A literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science was conducted in February 2016, using the following search terms in varying permutations: schizophrenia; antipsychotic medication; long-acting injectable; paliperidone palmitate; 3-monthly injectable. RESULTS: Once-monthly injectable paliperidone palmitate (PDP) has demonstrated comparable efficacy as 1st-generation long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIAs) in reducing disease severity and re-hospitalizations in schizophrenic patients. However, PDP leads to significantly less extrapyramidal symptoms than these older medications indicating a superior safety profile. Compared to oral 2nd-generation antipsychotics, PDP has shown less incidence of disease relapse related to medication non-compliance, particularly in real world populations. It also showed a similar safety profile as oral 2nd-generation antipsychotics, but with greater incidence of mild injection-site pain. A novel 3-monthly formulation of PDP has shown similar safety and efficacy as once-monthly PDP compared to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, both 1-month and 3-month formulations of PDP are safe and effective in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. They may be most effective in patients with prior failed treatment of oral antipsychotics or other LAIAs, in patients with a history of medication noncompliance, or in patients with an individual preference for less frequent dosing.

Spinal fusion surgery: A historical perspective.

The vast majority of technological advances in spinal fusion surgery have occurred within the past 50 years. Despite this, there existed a rich history of innovation, ingenuity, and resourcefulness among the spine surgeons of centuries before. Here, we pay tribute to this history, highlighting the important characters, their devices, and their thoughts, as they sought to alleviate human suffering from spinal deformity.

Minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A literature review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Spinal fusion surgery for scoliosis can be performed using a traditional open approach, or by following a minimally invasive approach. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is associated with theoretical advantages, such as reduced blood loss and a shorter hospital stay, yet there is no consensus in the literature with regard to the best treatment approach for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). PURPOSE: To assess the clinical outcomes of patients with AIS treated with either an open or minimally invasive approach. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of English-language studies for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. PATIENT SAMPLE: Pooled results from level 1 and 2 studies. METHODS: We carried out a systematic literature search of EMBASE and MEDLINE, identifying studies investigating MIS in the treatment of AIS. Percentages of curvature correction were pooled and analysed. RESULTS: The literature search returned 50 articles, of which we determined 4 studies to be relevant. The pooled percentage curve correction across these groups was 62.05% for the MIS group and 70% for the open surgery group. Although these data are significant (p = 0.001), the available studies are of variable quality, and sample sizes small. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis can be managed with either a traditional open approach or a minimally invasive approach. The data suggests that open surgery offers an advantage in terms of curve correction, compared to minimally invasive surgery, however more investigation (in the form of robust randomized control trials) is needed before conclusive clinical suggestions can be recommended.

E-learning in orthopedic surgery training: A systematic review.

E-learning is the use of internet-based resources in education. In the field of surgical education, this definition includes the use of virtual patient cases, digital modeling, online tutorials, as well as video recordings of surgical procedures and lectures. In recent years, e-learning has increasingly been considered a viable alternative to traditional teaching within a number of surgical fields. Here we present (1) a systematic review of literature assessing the efficacy of e-learning modules for orthopedic education and (2) a discussion of their relevance. A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted according to the guidelines defined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement (PRISMA). The search yielded a total of 255 non-duplicate citations that were screened using predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria. A total of 9 full text articles met inclusion criteria, which included the use of an objective outcome measure to evaluate an orthopedic e-learning module. Six studies assessed knowledge using a multiple-choice test and 4 assessed skills using a clinical exam. All studies showed positive score improvement pre- to post-intervention, and a majority showed greater score improvement than standard teaching methods in both knowledge (4/6 studies) and clinical skills (3/4 studies). E-learning represents an effective supplement or even alternative to standard teaching techniques within orthopedic education for both medical students and residents. Future work should focus on validating specific e-learning programs using standardized outcome measures and assessing long-term knowledge retention using e-learning platforms.