Building bi-directional referral and communication pathways across the community-clinic divide: Experiences from a systems-informed innovation project in Los Angeles.

Bi-directional communication and referral pathways (BCRPs) between clinics and community-based organizations could promote well-being among vulnerable populations with complex and overlapping health and social needs. While BCRPs are promising, establishing them is complex, involving system and process changes across diverse organizational settings. To date, few models have been implemented or empirically tested. This article describes an innovation and planning project to build a BCRP, linking patients in safety net primary care clinics to a comprehensive suite of community-based health and wellness supports in Los Angeles. During a year-long process, a multi-sector team iteratively engaged data to facilitate learning and improvement. The project proceeded through three distinct, but overlapping, phases: (1) Discovery, (2) Systems Mapping, and (3) BCRP Re-design and Testing, which were coordinated through frequent collaborative meetings. By using a stepwise systems-informed approach to collect and examine data, the team was able to generate new change ideas, dispel assumptions, and make transparent and informed decisions. It was critical to have engagement from both internal partners with knowledge of "on-the-ground" practice realities, and external stakeholders with the fresh perspective needed to identify opportunities and define an improvement agenda. These efforts represent first steps towards implementing sustainable BCRPs and realizing their full potential to dynamically bridge the community-clinic divide and improve population health. Other jurisdictions can learn from and adapt the practical data-driven approach used in Los Angeles to build BCRPs that will be thoroughly operationalized, consistently implemented, and optimized within their own unique contexts.

Using Health Navigators to Connect At-Risk Clients to Community Resources.

CONTEXT: The coupling of health care services with complementary resources that address unmet social needs is a progressively popular approach for improving health outcomes among low-income populations. Community health workers are increasingly recognized as a helpful intermediary for clients navigating community and clinical services. PROGRAM: The Wellness Center at the Historic General Hospital in East Los Angeles employs a team of community health workers, referred to as Health Navigators, who are trained to link low-income clients to resources such as chronic disease management programs, food pantries, free or low-cost legal aid, health insurance enrollment, group fitness classes, and counseling and peer support services. IMPLEMENTATION: The Center's model of practice has evolved over time, continuously increasing the breadth and depth of services provided by the Health Navigator team. Its goal has been to address clients' unmet social needs while optimizing their health outcomes through the building of stronger community-clinical linkages. EVALUATION: A program review showed that Health Navigators serve as a critical bridge for clients navigating a complex network of health and social services. They actively engage, recruit, and deliver services to clients. Since 2014, the Health Navigator team has connected more than 28 000 unique clients to resources for health and well-being. DISCUSSION: By using Health Navigators to assist clients with community resource engagement, the Center has prototyped and promoted an approach that complements clinical care, strengthening the community-clinical linkages that are needed to meaningfully manage chronic disease outside of the hospital or clinic setting.

Building Immigration-Informed, Cross-Sector Coalitions: Findings from the Los Angeles County Health Equity for Immigrants Summit.

In December 2017, the Los Angeles County Office of Immigrant Affairs and Board of Supervisors, alongside local health care and legal providers, convened the Health Equity for Immigrants and Families Summit to advance a vision for immigrant health. We describe the four critical concepts identified by stakeholders to address the varied needs of immigrants in an increasingly anti-immigrant political environment: (1) Recognizing immigration status as a modifiable social determinant of health; (2) Adopting the concept of "Immigration-Informed Care" within health care institutions; (3) Establishing immigration-focused medical-legal partnerships; and (4) Building coordinated systems based on knowledge of local stakeholders, policies, and funding mechanisms.

Assessing the Global Burden of Ischemic Heart Disease: Part 1: Methods for a Systematic Review of the Global Epidemiology of Ischemic Heart Disease in 1990 and 2010.

BACKGROUND: Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. The GBD (Global Burden of Disease, Injuries, and Risk Factors) study (GBD 2010 Study) conducted a systematic review of IHD epidemiology literature from 1980 to 2008 to inform estimates of the burden on IHD in 21 world regions in 1990 and 2010. METHODS: The disease model of IHD for the GBD 2010 Study included IHD death and 3 sequelae: myocardial infarction, heart failure, and angina pectoris. Medline, EMBASE, and LILACS were searched for IHD epidemiology studies in GBD high-income and low- and middle-income regions published between 1980 and 2008 using a systematic protocol validated by regional IHD experts. Data from included studies were supplemented with unpublished data from selected high-quality surveillance and survey studies. The epidemiologic parameters of interest were incidence, prevalence, case fatality, and mortality. RESULTS: Literature searches yielded 40,205 unique papers, of which 1,801 met initial screening criteria. Upon detailed review of full text papers, 137 published studies were included. Unpublished data were obtained from 24 additional studies. Data were sufficient for high-income regions, but missing or sparse in many low- and middle-income regions, particularly Sub-Saharan Africa. CONCLUSIONS: A systematic review for the GBD 2010 Study provided IHD epidemiology estimates for most world regions, but highlighted the lack of information about IHD in Sub-Saharan Africa and other low-income regions. More complete knowledge of the global burden of IHD will require improved IHD surveillance programs in all world regions.

Preventive care for children in the United States: quality and barriers.

Our objective was to examine the academic literature covering quality of childhood preventive care in the United States and to identify barriers that contribute to poor or disparate quality. We systematically reviewed articles related to childhood preventive care published from 1994 through 2003, focusing on 58 large observational studies and interventions addressing well-child visit frequency, developmental and psychosocial surveillance, disease screening, and anticipatory guidance. Although many children attend recommended well-child visits and receive comprehensive preventive care at those visits, many do not attend such visits. Estimates of children who attend all recommended visits range widely (from 37%-81%). In most studies, less than half is the proportion of children who receive developmental or psychosocial surveillance, adolescents who are asked about various health risks, children at risk for lead exposure who are screened, adolescents at risk for Chlamydia who are tested, or children and adolescents who receive anticipatory guidance on various topics. Major barriers include lack of insurance, lack of continuity with a clinician or place of care, lack of privacy for adolescents, lack of clinician awareness or skill, racial/ethnic barriers, language-related barriers, clinician and patient gender-related barriers, and lack of time. In summary, childhood preventive care quality is mixed, with large disparities among populations. Recent research has identified barriers that might be overcome through practice and policy interventions.