Opportunities for use of one species for longer-term toxicology testing during drug development: A cross-industry evaluation.

An international expert working group representing 37 organisations (pharmaceutical/biotechnology companies, contract research organisations, academic institutions and regulatory bodies) collaborated in a data sharing exercise to evaluate the utility of two species within regulatory general toxicology studies. Anonymised data on 172 drug candidates (92 small molecules, 46 monoclonal antibodies, 15 recombinant proteins, 13 synthetic peptides and 6 antibody-drug conjugates) were submitted by 18 organisations. The use of one or two species across molecule types, the frequency for reduction to a single species within the package of general toxicology studies, and a comparison of target organ toxicities identified in each species in both short and longer-term studies were determined. Reduction to a single species for longer-term toxicity studies, as used for the development of biologicals (ICHS6(R1) guideline) was only applied for 8/133 drug candidates, but might have been possible for more, regardless of drug modality, as similar target organ toxicity profiles were identified in the short-term studies. However, definition and harmonisation around the criteria for similarity of toxicity profiles is needed to enable wider consideration of these principles. Analysis of a more robust dataset would be required to provide clear, evidence-based recommendations for expansion of these principles to small molecules or other modalities where two species toxicity testing is currently recommended.

Design and Identification of a Novel, Functionally Subtype Selective GABAA Positive Allosteric Modulator (PF-06372865).

The design, optimization, and evaluation of a series of novel imidazopyridazine-based subtype-selective positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) for the GABAA ligand-gated ion channel are described. From a set of initial hits multiple subseries were designed and evaluated based on binding affinity and functional activity. As designing in the desired level of functional selectivity proved difficult, a probability-based assessment was performed to focus the project's efforts on a single subseries that had the greatest odds of delivering the target profile. These efforts ultimately led to the identification of two precandidates from this subseries, which were advanced to preclinical safety studies and subsequently to the identification of the clinical candidate PF-06372865.

An Industry Perspective on the 2017 EMA Guideline on First-in-Human and Early Clinical Trials.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2017 issued a revised guideline on nonclinical and clinical aspects of first-in-human (FIH) and early clinical trials (CTs). External input was solicited during a draft comment phase, and although some industry suggestions were adopted, others were not. We agree that subject safety is of utmost priority, and believe that minimizing risk must be balanced with efficient and informative study designs to bring new medicines to patients.

Current nonclinical testing paradigms in support of safe clinical trials: An IQ Consortium DruSafe perspective.

The transition from nonclinical to First-in-Human (FIH) testing is one of the most challenging steps in drug development. In response to serious outcomes in a recent Phase 1 trial (sponsored by Bial), IQ Consortium/DruSafe member companies reviewed their nonclinical approach to progress small molecules safely to FIH trials. As a common practice, safety evaluation begins with target selection and continues through iterative in silico and in vitro screening to identify molecules with increased probability of acceptable in vivo safety profiles. High attrition routinely occurs during this phase. In vivo exploratory and pivotal FIH-enabling toxicity studies are then conducted to identify molecules with a favorable benefit-risk profile for humans. The recent serious incident has reemphasized the importance of nonclinical testing plans that are customized to the target, the molecule, and the intended clinical plan. Despite the challenges and inherent risks of transitioning from nonclinical to clinical testing, Phase 1 studies have a remarkably good safety record. Given the rapid scientific evolution of safety evaluation, testing paradigms and regulatory guidance must evolve with emerging science. The authors posit that the practices described herein, together with science-based risk assessment and management, support safe FIH trials while advancing development of important new medicines.