Induction of IgM, IgA and IgE antibodies in colorectal cancer patients vaccinated with a recombinant CEA protein.

PURPOSE: Previous clinical studies have indicated that natural IgM antibodies have the ability to induce apoptosis of tumor cells but IgE and IgA may also mediate tumor cell killing (in addition to IgG). The aim of the study was to analyse induction of IgM, IgA and IgE antibodies in patients vaccinated with the tumor associated antigen CEA. METHODS: Twenty-four resected CRC patients without macroscopic disease were immunized seven times with CEA ± GM-CSF. Four different dose schedules were used over a 12-month period. IgM, IgA and IgE antibody responses against recombinant CEA were determined by ELISA. Patients were monitored immunologically for 36 months and clinically for 147 months. RESULTS: GM-CSF significantly augmented the anti-CEA response for all three antibody classes. Low dose of CEA tended to induce a higher IgM, IgA or IgE anti-CEA antibody response than higher. Anti-CEA IgA antibodies could lyse CEA positive tumor cells in antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) as well as in complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). A significant correlation between survival and high IgA anti-CEA titers was noted (p = 0.02) irrespective of GM-CSF treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The observation that IgA anti-CEA antibodies were cytotoxic and associated with improved survival might indicate that also these antibodies may exert a clinical anti-tumor effect.

Clinical results of vaccine therapy for cancer: learning from history for improving the future.

Active, specific immunotherapy for cancer holds the potential of providing an approach for treating cancers, which have not been controlled by conventional therapy, with very little or no associated toxicity. Despite advances in the understanding of the immunological basis of cancer vaccine therapy as well as technological progress, clinical effectiveness of this therapy has often been frustratingly unpredictable. Hundreds of preclinical and clinical studies have been performed addressing issues related to the generation of a therapeutic immune response against tumors and exploring a diverse array of antigens, immunological adjuvants, and delivery systems for vaccinating patients against cancer. In this chapter, we have summarized a number of clinical trials performed in various cancers with focus on the clinical outcome of vaccination therapy. We have also attempted to draw objective inferences from the published data that may influence the clinical effectiveness of vaccination approaches against cancer. Collectively the data indicate that vaccine therapy is safe, and no significant autoimmune reactions are observed even on long term follow-up. The design of clinical trials have not yet been optimized, but meaningful clinical effects have been seen in B-cell malignancies, lung, prostate, colorectal cancer, and melanoma. It is also obvious that patients with limited disease or in the adjuvant settings have benefited most from this targeted therapy approach. It is imperative that future studies focus on exploring the relationship between immune and clinical responses to establish whether immune monitoring could be a reliable surrogate marker for evaluating the clinical efficacy of cancer vaccines.

Towards therapeutic vaccines for colorectal carcinoma: a review of clinical trials.

Colorectal carcinoma is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Despite the introduction of new cytotoxic drugs, improved surgical and radiotherapeutic techniques, a large proportion of colorectal carcinomas remain incurable. New targeted therapeutic strategies, including immunotherapy, are being explored as complementary treatments. Recent advances in immunology and molecular biology have opened new avenues for the clinical testing of rationally designed vaccination strategies against cancer. The present report reviews the results of therapeutic vaccine trials in colorectal carcinoma, published mainly in the past 6 years. Tumor-associated antigens (self-antigens) have been targeted by therapeutic vaccination in more than 2000 colorectal carcinoma patients. The results demonstrate that tumor antigen-specific immune responses are reproducibly induced; that is, tolerance can be reversed, without the induction of serious adverse events or autoimmune disorders. No long-term autoimmune side effects have been observed after a minimum follow-up of 4 years in over 700 patients. Over 1300 colorectal carcinoma patients with minimal residual disease have been enrolled in randomized controlled Phase II/III trials using autologous tumor cell vaccines. A significantly improved overall survival was noted for Stages I-IV colorectal carcinoma patients utilizing Newcastle-disease virus as an adjuvant. Autologous tumor cells mixed with bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) were of significant clinical benefit for patients with Stage II colon cancer. Results of randomized controlled trials targeting Ep-CAM have shown clinical benefit in subgroups of patients. Several new generation vaccines have demonstrated excellent safety profile and immunogenicity. Some studies have also demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between the induced immune response and prolonged overall survival, which should be confirmed in enlarged trials. Although it is unlikely that active specific immunotherapy will provide a standard complementary therapeutic approach for colorectal carcinoma in the near future, the results so far are encouraging. Randomized controlled vaccine trials targeting molecularly defined tumor antigens are warranted, particularly in colon carcinoma with minimal residual disease.

T-cell receptor BV gene usage in colorectal carcinoma patients immunised with recombinant Ep-CAM protein or anti-idiotypic antibody.

The tumour-associated antigen, Ep-CAM, is over-expressed in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). In the present study, a recombinant Ep-CAM protein or a human anti-idiotypic antibody (anti-Id) mimicking Ep-CAM, either alone or in combination, was used for vaccination of CRC patients (n=9). GM-CSF was given as an adjuvant cytokine. A cellular immune response was assessed by measuring anti-Ep-CAM lymphoproliferation, IFN-gamma production (ELISPOT) and by analysing the TCR BV gene usage within the CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subsets followed by CDR3 fragment analysis. A proliferative and/or IFN-gamma T-cell response was induced against the Ep-CAM protein in eight out of nine patients, and against Ep-CAM-derived peptides in nine out of nine patients. Analysis of the TCR BV gene usage showed a significantly higher usage of BV12 family in CD4+ T cells of patients both before and after immunisation than in those of healthy control donors (p<0.05). In the CD8+ T-cell subset, a significant (p<0.05) increase in the BV19 usage was noted in patients after immunisation. In individual patients, a number of TCR BV gene families in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were over-expressed mainly in post-immunisation samples. Analysis of the CDR3 length polymorphism revealed a higher degree of clonality in post-immunisation samples than in pre-immunisation samples. In vitro stimulation with Ep-CAM protein confirmed the expansion of anti-Ep-CAM T-cell clones. The results indicate that immunisation with the Ep-CAM protein and/or anti-Id entails the induction of an anti-Ep-CAM T-cell response in CRC patients, and suggest that BV19+ CD8+ T cells might be involved in a vaccine-induced immune response.

Targeting human Ep-CAM in transgenic mice by anti-idiotype and antigen based vaccines.

Anti-idiotypic antibodies (anti-Id) as surrogate TAAs have been shown to induce immunity against tumours in animals and humans. SM262 is a human monoclonal anti-Id raised against MAb 17-1A recognising Ep-CAM. Plasmids encoding the variable regions of SM262 with either murine or human Fc regions, both with and without fusion to GM-CSF were constructed. DNA was delivered by gene gun to C57BL/6 (wt) mice and mice expressing the transgene for human Ep-CAM (tg). The immunogenicity of anti-Id DNA constructs, anti-Id protein and Ep-CAM DNA vaccines was compared. SM262 plasmids induced antibodies (Abs) inhibiting MAb 17-1A binding to SM262 as well as recognising Ep-CAM in wt and tg mice. Fusion to GM-CSF evoked significantly higher Ab titres, whereas a xenogeneic Fc region had no significant effect. The highest Ab titres were elicited by protein immunisation. The original Ag was superior as compared to the anti-Id vaccines in wt but not tg mice in terms of Ab induction. A weak Ep-CAM-specific cytotoxic response was induced in wt but not tg mice. The data suggest that B cell tolerance to Ep-CAM can be circumvented by anti-Id DNA, anti-Id protein as well as Ep-CAM DNA immunisation. Fusion of GM-CSF to anti-Id increased the magnitude of the immune response with no requirement of a foreign Fc domain. Furthermore, no superiority of Ep-CAM as compared to anti-Id DNA vaccine was noted in tg mice and protein immunisation induced a more potent humoral response than DNA. The results might have implications for the design of future vaccine trials using Ep-CAM as a target structure.

Vaccination with Ep-CAM protein or anti-idiotypic antibody induces Th1-biased response against MHC class I- and II-restricted Ep-CAM epitopes in colorectal carcinoma patients.

PURPOSE: The tumor-associated antigen Ep-CAM (epithelial cell adhesion molecule) is overexpressed in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant Ep-CAM protein and a human anti-idiotypic antibody (anti-Id) mimicking Ep-CAM. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with resected American Joint Committee on Cancer stages II-IV CRC without remaining macroscopic disease received intradermal/subcutaneous injections of Ep-CAM (400 microg/dose; n = 7) or anti-Id (500 microg/dose; n = 6) at weeks 0, 2, and 6 in combination with granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (75 microg/day, for 4 consecutive days). RESULTS: Adverse reactions were mild (grade I-II). All patients immunized with the Ep-CAM protein produced Ep-CAM-specific IgG antibodies, predominantly IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses, whereas no humoral response was induced by the anti-Id vaccine. All patients, with one exception in each group, mounted an Ep-CAM-specific proliferative T-cell response. The immune response was more rapid, potent, and protracted after Ep-CAM in comparison with anti-Id vaccination. Interferon-gamma-secreting cells (ELISPOT) were detected in both immunization groups against the Ep-CAM protein as well as various Ep-CAM-derived MHC class I- and II-restricted peptides. Flow cytometry analysis showed that Ep-CAM-specific interferon-gamma- and perforin-producing cells predominantly resided within CD8(+)CD56- and CD8(dim)CD56+ T cells. CONCLUSIONS: Ep-CAM protein in combination with granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor induced a long-lasting, Th1-biased humoral and cellular immune response compared with anti-Id. Ep-CAM-specific T cells and natural killer-like T cells responding in a MHC class I- and II-restricted manner were also induced. Vaccination with Ep-CAM protein may warrant further investigation as a novel therapeutic approach to CRC.

Durable carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-specific humoral and cellular immune responses in colorectal carcinoma patients vaccinated with recombinant CEA and granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor.

PURPOSE: Previous studies have indicated that carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) might be a suitable immunotherapeutic target in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). The aim of the present study was to analyze the immunological and clinical effects of vaccination with CEA together with the adjuvant granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twenty-four resected CRC patients without macroscopic disease were immunized seven times with recombinant CEA at four different dose levels over a 12-month period. Half of the patients received GM-CSF (80 microg/day for 4 consecutive days) at each immunization. Patients were monitored immunologically for 36 months and clinically for 76 months. T-cell response was evaluated by a [(3)H]thymidine incorporation assay, and IgG response was determined by ELISA. RESULTS: Minor local side effects were common. All 12 patients (100%) in the GM-CSF group developed a CEA-specific T-cell as well as an IgG response. The corresponding figures in the CEA alone group were 9 of 12 (75%) and 8 of 12 (66%), respectively. GM-CSF significantly augmented the amplitude of the T-cell response and the IgG titers. No dose-response relationship was noted. The immune responses at 12 months persisted 24 months after the last vaccination. Anti-CEA IgG titers were associated with increased survival (P < 0.05), whereas standard prognostic factors had no relationship, with the exception of serum CEA value. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination with recombinant CEA and GM-CSF appears to be a nontoxic regimen inducing potent and durable antigen-specific IgG and T-cell response. The results of this study justify more extensive trials with recombinant CEA protein for immunotherapy of CRC.

Immunization of colorectal carcinoma patients with a recombinant canarypox virus expressing the tumor antigen Ep-CAM/KSA (ALVAC-KSA) and granulocyte macrophage colony- stimulating factor induced a tumor-specific cellular immune response.

PURPOSE: Colorectal carcinoma cells express the tumor-associated antigen epithelial cellular adhesion molecule (Ep-CAM)/KSA. Passive immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies using this antigen has shown promising results. Ep-CAM might also be a target for active specific immunotherapy. Expression of the tumor antigen in a viral vector may facilitate appropriate antigen presentation. The feasibility of an Ep-CAM/KSA-specific therapeutic vaccination was investigated in cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The full-length Ep-CAM gene was inserted into the avipox virus ALVAC (ALVAC-KSA). Twelve radically operated colorectal carcinoma patients without evidence of remaining macroscopic disease (stages I, II, and III) entered the study. The first 6 patients were immunized with three injections of ALVAC-KSA (10(7.09) CCID(50) per immunization) alone in weeks 0, 3, and 6. The subsequent 6 patients received the same schedule of ALVAC-KSA together with the adjuvant cytokine granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF; 75 micro g/day for 4 consecutive days). RESULTS: The adverse reactions to the vaccinations were mild except for local skin reactions. In the ALVAC-KSA group a weak T-cell response was induced in 2 of 6 patients. In the ALVAC-KSA/GM-CSF group a marked IFN-gamma response (enzyme-linked immunospot) was induced in 5 of 6 patients. The T-cell response appeared late, 1 month after the last immunization, with a peak at 4-5 months after immunization. No IgG antibodies against Ep-CAM were detected. Before vaccination the majority of patients had a type 1 T-cell response (IFN-gamma) against the vector, which was noted in healthy donors as well. All of the patients developed high titers of IgG antibodies against the vector, and the T-cell response was vigorously boosted. CONCLUSIONS: ALVAC-KSA, in combination with low dose local administration of GM-CSF may induce a strong, IFN-gamma T-cell response (type 1). ALVAC-KSA seems to be an interesting candidate as a cancer vaccine for future clinical development.

Immunogenic regions of the GA733-2 tumour-associated antigen recognised by autoantibodies of patients with colorectal carcinoma.

The tumour-associated antigen (TAA) GA733-2 is overexpressed by >90% of human colorectal carcinomas (CRC). The antigen has previously been shown to be recognised by B and T cells. The aim of the present study was to define B cell epitopes of GA733-2. Fifteen percent of CRC patients with no previous immunotherapy have recently been shown to elicit an anti-GA733-2 IgG antibody response. Sera of these patients ( n=136) were analysed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against 23 partly overlapping synthetic peptides (18 amino acids: aa) derived from the extracellular domain of GA733-2. An 18-aa long sequence at the N-terminal region of the antigen (peptide 2) was found to be an immunodominant B cell epitope. Fifty percent of the patients had antibodies against peptide 2, while 8% to 9% had antibodies against peptides 1, 4, 7, 8 or 20. In healthy donors ( n=30) antibodies against peptides 2 and 8 were also detected in 13% and 3% of cases respectively, while no antibodies were found against the other peptides and the complete protein. Thirteen percent of CRC patients ( n=30) with no IgG antibodies against the GA733-2 antigen elicited antibodies against peptide 2. The specificity of peptide-reactive sera was verified by inhibition ELISA. The binding of sera to GA733-2 was significantly inhibited by peptides to which CRC sera bound, but not by control peptides. Binding to peptide 2 of sera showing both peptide 2 and GA733-2 reactivity was specifically inhibited by the complete GA733-2 antigen, while binding of peptide 2-reactive sera showing no GA733-2 reactivity was not inhibited. CRC sera interfered with the binding of monoclonal antibody (mAb) 17-1A and mAb C215 that recognise distinct epitopes of GA733-2. No significant correlation was found between the presence of anti-peptide antibodies in CRC patients and clinical stage or overall survival. The results provide additional evidence for immune recognition of CRC by the host.