Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Biomed Tech (Berl) ; 57(1): 45-51, 2012 Jan 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22718591

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This case series aimed to explore the clinical outcome of sinus floor elevation surgery using a crestal approach technique in case of severely resorbed maxillae. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventeen edentulous patients received 20 implants and sinus floor elevation in posterior maxillae with residual crestal height of 1.2-5.0 mm and >7 mm. Drilling perforation was performed until the sinus floor was felt; the sinus mucosa was then lifted and magnesium-enriched hydroxyapatite granules (Mg-e HAP) were placed; and implants were immediately inserted. Four months later, definitive crowns were cemented, and patients were followed up for 24 months. Implant failures and complications 24 months after prosthetic loading were noted, and radiographic regenerated bone height was measured. RESULTS: No patient dropped out, and all implants were successfully osseointegrated. There was minimal postoperative patient discomfort, and the only complication was a minimal perforation of the sinus membrane with no negative consequences. At the time of implant insertion, the residual crestal height mean value was 4.12 mm. After surgery and at the last follow-up, the mean heights of bone were 13.51 and 12.98 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: The procedure was able to obtain sinus elevation and implant osseointegration.


Assuntos
Reabsorção Óssea/cirurgia , Implantes Dentários para Um Único Dente , Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante , Doenças Maxilares/cirurgia , Seio Maxilar/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Levantamento do Assoalho do Seio Maxilar/métodos , Reabsorção Óssea/diagnóstico por imagem , Implantação Dentária/métodos , Falha de Restauração Dentária , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Doenças Maxilares/diagnóstico por imagem , Seio Maxilar/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Radiografia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 23(5): 526-35, 2012 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22150876

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To radiographically analyze extraction sites left untreated or treated using a socket preservation technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 20 patients scheduled for single extraction in the maxilla from second to second premolar were enrolled in this study. All sites showed a bone defect >5 mm at the buccal wall and no soft tissue recession. At baseline (T0), tooth extraction was performed; subsequently, sites were randomly allocated to the control (CG: left to heal without grafting) or test group (TG: grafted using hydroxyapatite). Two months later (T1), implants were inserted and eventual GBR procedure was performed. Three months later, the definitive crown was placed. Follow up was 24 months (T2). A cone-beam computed tomographic examination (CT) was performed at each time point. At each radiographic analysis, horizontal and vertical widths of the sockets were measured. Comparisons between CG and TG were performed by a Wilcoxon non-parametric test. RESULTS: At the end of the study, no patient dropped out and all implants inserted (10 in each group) resulted integrated. GBR procedures were performed at T1 only in the CG. In the CG, the mean value of the horizontal width in the coronal CT slices was 0.98 mm (± 0.37), 7.70 mm (± 0.92), 7.45 mm (± 0.69) at T0, T1 (after bone regeneration) and T2, respectively. In the TG, the mean value of the horizontal width in the coronal CT slices was 0.96 mm (± 0.41), 8.97 mm (± 1.91), 9.48 mm (± 1.56); at T2, it was 9.52 mm (± 1.87) at T0 (pre- and post-socket preservation) T1 and T2, respectively. At each follow up, the mean horizontal bone width in TG was statistically significantly greater than in the control group (P < 0.05). At T0, mean value of the vertical bone defect length (BDL) was 6.93 mm for TG, 6.5 mm for CG. At T1 and T2, mean BDL value was 0 for both groups. Statistically significant difference was not found between TC and CG at any time point (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This randomized controlled trial suggested that in sites with buccal bone defects >5 mm, the application of HA can minimize alveolar crest resorption following tooth extraction. Furthermore, compared with traditional regenerative procedure carried out following socket healing, this preservation technique seems to result in better horizontal regeneration of the buccal bone wall.


Assuntos
Perda do Osso Alveolar/cirurgia , Aumento do Rebordo Alveolar/métodos , Extração Dentária , Alvéolo Dental/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Materiais Biocompatíveis/uso terapêutico , Regeneração Óssea , Implantes Dentários , Durapatita/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Maxila/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Eur J Oral Implantol ; 4(2): 145-52, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21808764

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This case series aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome of a crestal approach technique in sinus floor elevation surgery with insertion of an alloplastic material. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 50 edentulous patients received 64 implants and sinus floor elevation in posterior maxillae with residual crestal height 1.2 to 9.8 mm, and larger than 7 mm in width. Drilling perforation was performed until the sinus floor was felt. The sinus mucosa was then lifted. Hydroxyapatite granules were placed and implants were immediately inserted. Three months later, definitive crowns were cemented and patients were followed up for 18 months. Outcome measures were implant failures, complications and radiographic bone height gain measured 18 months after prosthetic loading. RESULTS: No patient dropped out and all implants were successfully osseointegrated. Only minimal postoperative patient discomfort was reported. Only one complication occurred: a minor perforation of the sinus membrane with no negative consequences. At the time of implant insertion, the residual bone height mean value was 6.20 mm (±2.22). After surgery and at the last follow-up, the mean height of bone was 15.26 (±3.19) and 15.40 mm (±4.21), respectively. CONCLUSION: The procedure was able to obtain sinus elevation and implant osseointegration.


Assuntos
Implantação Dentária Endóssea , Arcada Parcialmente Edêntula/diagnóstico por imagem , Seio Maxilar/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Pré-Protéticos Bucais/instrumentação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Pré-Protéticos Bucais/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Regeneração Óssea , Substitutos Ósseos , Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico , Instrumentos Odontológicos , Durapatita , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Osseointegração , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA