RESUMO
Objective: Anxiety disorder (AD) is a common disabling disease. The prolonged disease course may lead to impaired cognitive performance, brain function, and a bad prognosis. Few studies have examined the effect of disease course on brain function by electroencephalogram (EEG). Methods: Resting-state EEG analysis was performed in 34 AD patients. The 34 patients with AD were divided into two groups according to the duration of their illness: anxious state (AS) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Then, EEG features, including univariate power spectral density (PSD), fuzzy entropy (FE), and multivariable functional connectivity (FC), were extracted and compared between AS and GAD. These features were evaluated by three previously validated machine learning methods to test the accuracy of classification in AS and GAD. Results: Significant decreased PSD and FE in GAD were detected compared with AS, especially in the Alpha 2 band. In addition, FC analysis indicated that GAD patients' connection between the left and right hemispheres decreased. Based on machine learning, AS and GAD are classified on a six-month criterion with the highest classification accuracy of up to 0.99 ± 0.0015. Conclusion: The brain function of patients is more severely impaired in AD patients with longer illness duration. Resting-state EEG demonstrated to be a promising examination in the classification in GAD and AS using machine learning methods with better classification accuracy.
RESUMO
Narcolepsy is characterized by uncontrollable excessive daytime sleepiness, paroxysmal cataplexy, sleep paralysis, and hallucinations. It is often misdiagnosed as psychiatric disorders such as depression and schizophrenia, resulting from the overlap in symptoms and a lack of understanding of narcolepsy. In the present study, three cases of narcolepsy misdiagnosed as depression, dissociative disorder, and schizophrenia are presented to emphasize the high occurrence of the misdiagnosis of narcolepsy in clinical practice. The main reasons for this dilemma are attributed to the lack of adequate sleep, medicine, education, as well as specialized professional technicians. A multi-disciplinary team composed of psychiatrists and sleep specialists should be established to deal with this problem.
RESUMO
Objective: Bipolar depression (BD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) are both common affective disorders. The common depression episodes make it difficult to distinguish between them, even for experienced clinicians. Failure to properly diagnose them in a timely manner leads to inappropriate treatment strategies. Therefore, it is important to distinguish between BD and MDD. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a nomogram model that distinguishes BD from MDD based on the characteristics of lymphocyte subsets. Materials and methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was performed. Blood samples were obtained from participants who met the inclusion criteria. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model was used for factor selection. A differential diagnosis nomogram for BD and MDD was developed using multivariable logistic regression and the area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated, as well as the internal validation using a bootstrap algorithm with 1,000 repetitions. Calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the calibration and clinical utility of the nomogram, respectively. Results: A total of 166 participants who were diagnosed with BD (83 cases) or MDD (83 cases), as well as 101 healthy controls (HCs) between June 2018 and January 2022 were enrolled in this study. CD19+ B cells, CD3+ T cells, CD3-CD16/56+ NK cells, and total lymphocyte counts were strong predictors of the diagnosis of BD and MDD and were included in the differential diagnosis nomogram. The AUC of the nomogram and internal validation were 0.922 (95%; CI, 0.879-0.965), and 0.911 (95% CI, 0.838-0.844), respectively. The calibration curve used to discriminate BD from MDD showed optimal agreement between the nomogram and the actual diagnosis. The results of DCA showed that the net clinical benefit was significant. Conclusion: This is an easy-to-use, repeatable, and economical nomogram for differential diagnosis that can help clinicians in the individual diagnosis of BD and MDD patients, reduce the risk of misdiagnosis, facilitate the formulation of appropriate treatment strategies and intervention plans.
RESUMO
Introduction: S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B) is a neurotrophic factor that regulates neuronal growth and plasticity by activating astrocytes and microglia through the production of cytokines involved in Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD). However, few studies have combined S100B and cytokines to explore their role as neuro-inflammatory biomarkers in GAD. Methods: Serum S100B and cytokines (IL-1ß, IL-2, IL-4, and IL-10) of 108 untreated GAD cases and 123 healthy controls (HC) were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), while Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) scores and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) scores were measured to evaluate anxiety and depression severity. This was used to help physicians identify persons having GAD. Machine learning techniques were applied for feature ordering of cytokines and S100B and the classification of persons with GAD and HC. Results: The serum S100B, IL-1ß, and IL-2 levels of GAD cases were significantly lower than HC (P < 0.001), and the IL-4 level in persons with GAD was significantly higher than HC (P < 0.001). At the same time, IL-10 had no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.215). The feature ranking distinguishing GAD from HC using machine learning ranked the features in the following order: IL-2, IL-1ß, IL-4, S100B, and IL-10. The accuracy of S100B combined with IL-1ß, IL-2, IL-4, and IL-10 in distinguishing persons with GAD from HC was 94.47 ± 2.06% using an integrated back propagation neural network based on a bagging algorithm (BPNN-Bagging). Conclusion: The serum S-100B, IL-1ß, and IL-2 levels in persons with GAD were down-regulated while IL-4 was up-regulated. The combination of S100B and cytokines had a good diagnosis value in determining GAD with an accuracy of 94.47%. Machine learning was a very effective method to study neuro-inflammatory biomarkers interacting with each other and mediated by plenty of factors.