Study of mechanical effects of lumbar disc arthroplasty on facet joints at the index level/adjacent levels by using a validated finite element analysis.

Introduction: Lumbar disc arthroplasty is a surgical procedure designed to treat degenerative disc disease by replacing the affected disc with a mobile prosthesis. Several types of implants fall under the term total disc replacement, such as ball-and-socket, mobile core or elastic prostheses. Some studies have shown that facet arthritis can develop after arthroplasty, without much precision on the mechanical impact of the different implant technologies on the facet joints. This study aims to create validated patient-specific finite element models of the intact and post-arthroplasty lumbar spine in order to compare the mechanical response of ball-and-socket and elastic prostheses. Methods: Intact models were developed from CT-scans of human lumbar spine specimens (L4-S1), and arthroplasty models were obtained by replacing the L4-L5 disc with total disc replacement implants. Pure moments were applied to reproduce physiological loadings of flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. Results: Models with ball-and-socket prosthesis showed increased values in both range of motion and pressure at the index level and lower values at the adjacent level. The mechanical behaviour of the elastic prosthesis and intact models were comparable. The dissipated friction energy in the facet joints followed a similar trend. Conclusion: Although both implants responded to the total disc replacement designation, the mechanical effects in terms of range of motion and facet joint loads varied significantly not only between prostheses but also between specimens. This confirms the interest that patient-specific surgical planning using finite element analysis could have in helping surgeons to choose the appropriate implant for each patient.

Mismatch between rod bending and actual post-operative lordosis in lumbar arthrodesis with poly axial screws.

BACKGROUND: The question of rod bending is essential during posterior lumbar fusion. The role of posterior instrumentation during spinal surgery remains to be defined. Despite an appropriate bending, a mismatch between rod lordosis and lumbar lordosis can occur. There is no study on the link between rod bending and lordosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate parameters that explain the mismatch between lumbar lordosis and rod bending in lumbar surgery using polyaxial screws. HYPOTHESIS: Radiological parameters explain the mismatch between the rod and the lordosis. METHODS: This study was monocentric, retrospective, descriptive and analytic. All patients with posterior L3L5 fusion in an university-affiliated hospital in 2017 were included. Patients with past surgical history of anterior fusion on the levels L3L5, Coronal malalignment with a Cobb angle superior to 5°, the use of dynamic fixation systems were excluded. We measured on immediate post-operative standing profile x-ray: pelvic incidency, lumbar lordosis, lordosis of the instrumented segment, the distance between posterior wall and rod (EcarT) which reflect how homogeneously the screws are put in depth, the angle between screw and rod (thetaMA), the angle between screw and superior endplate (lambdaMA), the rod lordosis. Univariate and multivariate analysis were conducted to see if there was a link between all those parameters and the mismatch: vertebral lordosis-rod lordosis. RESULTS: A total of 74 patients were included, mean age was 67. Eighteen were 360° fusion and 56 were postero-lateral fusions. There was no statistical association between demographic data, pelvic parameters, use of interbody devices and the mismatch. There was a statistical association between thetaMA, lambdaMA, EcarT and the mismatch (P<0,0001). A multivariate linear regression model was developed to create a new index: Mismatch analysis index. CONCLUSION: Our study is the first on the link between rod bending and lumbar lordosis. Three radiologic factors are involved in not obtaining the planned lordosis in short lumbar fusion with polyaxial screws. Two factors depend on the way the surgeon positions screw parallel to the superior vertebral endplate(lambdaMA), and with a homogeneous depth (EcarT). And the last factor: ThetaMA is depending on the surgical technique (compression on screws, osteotomies, monoaxial screws, use of interbody devices). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.