Out of Hospital Sudden Death in a Rural Population: Low Rates of ICD Underutilization Among Decedents.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) reduce mortality in patients at risk for life-threatening arrhythmias. Implantation of ICDs in rural or economically disadvantaged populations is suspected to be low. This study examined Out of Hospital Premature Natural Death (OHPND) and electronic medical record (EMR) data to identify rates of non-implantation of ICDs among decedents in eastern North Carolina. METHODS: OHPND cases in 2016 were identified using mortality data and matched with EMRs. Those meeting criteria for ICD implantation based on chart review were adjudicated by two electrophysiologists to determine whether they qualified for implantation. Comorbidity burden was established using Charlson's Comorbidity Index (CCI). RESULTS: Out of 1316 OHPND cases, 967 (73.4%) had EMR records. Chart review identified 70 (7.2%) potential ICD candidates with a LVEF ≤35 of which 5 (7.1%) did not meet criteria because LVEF subsequently improved. Of the remaining 65 patients, 32 (49.2%) already received an ICD, and 33 patients (50.7%) met criteria but had not received one. Reasons for non-implantation included: limited life expectancy secondary to comorbidities, principally chronic kidney disease (CKD) (N = 11, 17%), physician non-adherence to guidelines (N = 9, 14%), loss to follow-up (N = 7, 11%), patient refusal (N = 5, 8%), and death before commencing medical therapy (N = 1, 2%). Among our cohort of 967 individuals who died unexpectedly, nine (0.9%) patients may have avoided death with an ICD. CONCLUSION: This study using decedent data shows low rates of ICD-underutilization in a rural population and emphasizes the role of advanced comorbidities such as CKD in ICD-underutilization.

Lipid Profiles in Out-of-Hospital Sudden Unexpected Death.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between serum lipid measurements and the occurrence of out-of-hospital sudden unexpected death (OHSUD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared 139 OHSUD cases (43 female patients [30.9%]) and 968 controls (539 female patients [55.7%]) from Wake County, North Carolina, from March 1, 2013, through February 28, 2015. Individuals were included if they were aged 18 to 64 years and had lipid measurements in the 5 years before their death (cases) or the most recent health care encounter (controls). Covariates were abstracted from medical records for all subjects, and those with triglyceride (TG) levels greater than 400 mg/dL (to convert to mmol/L, multiply by 0.0259) were excluded for low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-related analyses. RESULTS: By linear regression using age- and sex-adjusted models, cases of OHSUD had lower adjusted mean total cholesterol (170.3±52.2 mg/dL vs 188.9±39.7 mg/dL; P<.001), LDL cholesterol (90.9±39.6 mg/dL vs 109.6±35.2 mg/dL; P<.001), and non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (121.6±49.8 mg/dL vs 134.3±39.6 mg/dL; P<.001) levels and a higher adjusted TG/HDL-C ratio (4.7±7 vs 3±2.7; P<.001) than did controls. By logistic regression using age- and sex-adjusted models, the odds of OHSUD were elevated per unit increase in TG/HDL-C ratio (1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.12). CONCLUSION: Out-of-hospital sudden unexpected death cases had more favorable levels of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and non-HDL, possibly indicating a lack of association between traditional lipid cardiovascular risk factors and sudden unexpected death. A comparatively elevated TG/HDL-C ratio in cases may corroborate an evolving hypothesis of how vasoactive and prothrombotic remnant-like lipoprotein particles contribute to sudden unexpected death.

Prominent R wave in ECG lead V1 predicts improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction after cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with or without left bundle branch block.

BACKGROUND: QRS morphology on postprocedural ECG indicating posterolateral left ventricular pacing may be predictive of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess whether a positive vector in V1 and/or negative vector in lead I on the first postprocedural ECG, suggesting posterolateral capture from CRT, correlates with improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on all patients who underwent CRT implantation at our institution between April 2008 and December 2011. Biventricular (BiV) paced QRS morphology was defined as R/S ≥1 in V1 and/or R/S ≤ 1 in lead I. The primary outcome was improvement of LVEF ≥7.5%. The χ(2) and t tests were used for analysis. RESULTS: Of 68 patients, 49 (72%) met our BiV paced QRS morphology criteria. Thirty-four of these 49 patients (69%) had improvement in LVEF. Of the 19 patients who did not meet our criteria, 17 (89%) did not have an improvement in LVEF (sensitivity 94%, specificity 53%, χ(2) = 19.04, P < .0001). The average LVEF improvement in patients who met our BiV paced QRS morphology criteria was significantly greater than in those who did not (14.27% vs 2.63%, P = .0001). Preprocedural left bundle branch block was not a predictor of echocardiographic response. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight the importance of periprocedural ECG analysis to optimize response to CRT. Moreover, patients without left bundle branch block still benefited from CRT if they met our BiV paced morphology criteria. This suggests that postprocedural left ventricular activation as reflected on the ECG may supersede the baseline conduction delay.

Relation of atrial fibrillation burden and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide.

Previous studies have noted a correlation between the presence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and elevated brain natriuretic peptide hormone level, although the exact nature of this association is unclear. Understanding the relation between AF and brain natriuretic peptide may enhance care for this patient population. The aim of this study was to establish the relationship between AF burden and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level. One hundred eighty-four patients who presented to the University of North Carolina electrophysiology clinic with AF underwent baseline questionnaires, laboratory testing (including NT-proBNP), echocardiography, and 1-week ambulatory rhythm monitoring. Multivariate linear regression was used to determine the association between AF burden and NT-proBNP level. Increased AF burden was associated with increased NT-proBNP level, and this association remained significant after adjusting for possible confounders. Compared with a 0% AF burden, those with an AF burden of 1% to 25% had a nearly 1.5-fold increase (p = 0.102), those with an AF burden of 26% to 99% had a nearly fourfold increase (p <0.001), and those with an AF burden of 100% had a nearly 4.5-fold increase (p <0.001). In conclusion, AF burden as assessed by continuous 1-week ambulatory rhythm monitoring is directly associated with NT-proBNP level. NT-proBNP may act as a useful surrogate for assessing AF burden.

Epidemiology, management, and outcomes of sustained ventricular arrhythmias after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are pivotal treatment options for patients with end-stage heart failure. Despite robust left ventricular unloading, the right ventricle remains unsupported and susceptible to hemodynamic perturbations from ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). Little is known about the epidemiology, management, resource use, and outcomes of sustained VAs in continuous-flow LVAD patients. METHODS: We reviewed data from all consecutive patients receiving a continuous-flow LVAD at the University of North Carolina from January 2006 to February 2011. Patient demographics, pharmacotherapies, resource use, and outcomes were recorded. Descriptive statistics were generated, and multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the independent association of clinical variables on the development of postimplantation VAs. RESULTS: Of 61 patients, 26 (43%) had sustained VAs after LVAD. Most were male (65%), had history of hypertension (65%), and had nonischemic cardiomyopathy (62%). Patients with VAs after LVAD more often had preimplant VAs (62% vs 14%, P < .01), prior implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (92% vs 71%, P = .04), and history of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharge (38% vs 11%, P < .01). Although length of stay was similar, those with postimplant VAs had greater rehospitalization rates, greater antiarrhythmic drug use, and frequently required external defibrillation. Using multivariable logistic regression, only history of prior VA was associated with postimplant arrhythmias (odds ratio 13.7, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Ventricular arrhythmias in LVAD patients are common, often refractory to conservative therapy, and associated with frequent rehospitalization. Post-LVAD VAs, however, did not significantly impact survival or transplantation rates. Arrhythmia burden should be considered before LVAD placement, and future study should focus on the impact of VAs on quality of life.