Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Virtual Stroke Rehabilitation Interim Consensus Statement 2022.

ABSTRACT: The seventh edition of the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations for Rehabilitation and Recovery following Stroke includes a new section devoted to the provision of virtual stroke rehabilitation. This consensus statement uses Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations methodology and Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II principles. A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. An expert writing group reviewed all evidence and developed recommendations, as well as consensus-based clinical considerations where evidence was insufficient for a recommendation. All recommendations underwent internal and external review. These recommendations apply to hospital, ambulatory care, and community-based settings where virtual stroke rehabilitation is provided. This guidance is relevant to health professionals, people living with stroke, healthcare administrators, and funders. Recommendations address issues of access, eligibility, consent and privacy, technology and planning, training and competency (for healthcare providers, patients and their families), assessment, service delivery, and evaluation. Virtual stroke rehabilitation has been shown to safely and effectively increase access to rehabilitation therapies and care providers, and uptake of these recommendations should be a priority in rehabilitation settings. They are key drivers of access to high-quality evidence-based stroke care regardless of geographical location and personal circumstances in Canada.

Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Secondary Prevention of Stroke Update 2020.

The 2020 update of the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations (CSBPR) for the Secondary Prevention of Stroke includes current evidence-based recommendations and expert opinions intended for use by clinicians across a broad range of settings. They provide guidance for the prevention of ischemic stroke recurrence through the identification and management of modifiable vascular risk factors. Recommendations address triage, diagnostic testing, lifestyle behaviors, vaping, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, other cardiac conditions, antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies, and carotid and vertebral artery disease. This update of the previous 2017 guideline contains several new or revised recommendations. Recommendations regarding triage and initial assessment of acute transient ischemic attack (TIA) and minor stroke have been simplified, and selected aspects of the etiological stroke workup are revised. Updated treatment recommendations based on new evidence have been made for dual antiplatelet therapy for TIA and minor stroke; anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation; embolic strokes of undetermined source; low-density lipoprotein lowering; hypertriglyceridemia; diabetes treatment; and patent foramen ovale management. A new section has been added to provide practical guidance regarding temporary interruption of antithrombotic therapy for surgical procedures. Cancer-associated ischemic stroke is addressed. A section on virtual care delivery of secondary stroke prevention services in included to highlight a shifting paradigm of care delivery made more urgent by the global pandemic. In addition, where appropriate, sex differences as they pertain to treatments have been addressed. The CSBPR include supporting materials such as implementation resources to facilitate the adoption of evidence into practice and performance measures to enable monitoring of uptake and effectiveness of recommendations.

Ankle-foot orthoses improve walking but do not reduce dual-task costs after stroke.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive-motor interference, as measured by dual-task walking (performing a mental task while walking), affects many clinical populations. Ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are lower-leg splints prescribed to provide stability to the foot and ankle, as well as prevent foot drop, a gait deficit common after stroke. AFO use has been shown to improve gait parameters such as speed and step time, which are often negatively impacted by dual-task walking. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to establish whether AFOs could protect against cognitive-motor interference, as measured by dual-task walking, following post-stroke hemiplegia. METHODS: A total of 21 individuals with post-stroke hemiplegia that use an AFO completed a dual-task walking paradigm in the form of a 2 (walking with vs. without a concurrent cognitive task) by 2 (walking with vs. without an AFO) repeated-measures design. Changes to both motor and cognitive performance were analyzed. RESULTS: The results suggest that the use of an AFO improves gait overall in both single- and dual-task walking, particularly with respect to stride regularity, but there were no interactions to suggest that AFOs reduce the cognitive-motor dual-task costs themselves. A lack of differences in cognitive performance during dual-task walking with and without the AFO suggests that the AFO's benefit to motor performance cannot be attributed to task prioritization. CONCLUSIONS: These data support the use of AFOs to improve certain gait parameters for post-stroke hemiplegia, but AFOs do not appear to protect against cognitive-motor interference during dual-task walking. Future research should pursue alternate therapeutics for ameliorating task-specific declines under cognitively demanding circumstances.

Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage, 7th Edition Update 2020.

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage is a particularly devastating type of stroke with greater morbidity and mortality compared with ischemic stroke and can account for half or more of all deaths from stroke. The seventh update of the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations includes a new stand-alone module on intracerebral hemorrhage, with a focus on elements of care that are unique or affect persons disproportionately relative to ischemic stroke. Prior to this edition, intracerebral hemorrhage was included in the Acute Stroke Management module and was limited to its management during the first 12 h. With the growing evidence on intracerebral hemorrhage, a separate module focused on this topic across the care continuum was added. In addition to topics related to initial clinical management, neuroimaging, blood pressure management, and surgical management, new sections have been introduced addressing topics surrounding inpatient complications such as venous thromboembolism, seizure management, and increased intracranial pressure, rehabilitation as well as issues related to secondary management including lifestyle management, maintaining a normal blood pressure and antithrombotic therapy, are addressed. The Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations (CSBPR) are intended to provide up-to-date evidence-based guidelines for the prevention and management of stroke and to promote optimal recovery and reintegration for people who have experienced stroke, including patients, families, and informal caregivers.

Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Rehabilitation, Recovery, and Community Participation following Stroke. Part Two: Transitions and Community Participation Following Stroke.

The sixth update of the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations for Transitions and Community Participation following Stroke is a comprehensive set of evidence-based guidelines addressing issues faced by people following an acute stroke event. Establishing a coordinated and seamless system of care that supports progress achieved during the initial recovery stages throughout the transition to the community is more essential than ever as the medical complexity of people with stroke is also on the rise. All members of the health-care team engaged with people with stroke, their families, and caregivers are responsible for partnerships and collaborations to ensure successful transitions and return to the community following stroke. These guidelines reinforce the growing and changing body of research evidence available to guide ongoing screening, assessment, and management of individuals following stroke as they move from one phase and stage of care to the next without "falling through the cracks." It also recognizes the growing role of family and informal caregivers in providing significant hours of support that disrupt their own lives and responsibilities and addresses their support and educational needs. According to Statistics Canada, in 2012, eight million Canadians provided care to family members or friends with a long-term health condition, disability, or problems associated with aging. These recommendations incorporate aspects that were previously in the rehabilitation module for the purposes of streamlining, and both modules should be reviewed in order to provide comprehensive care addressing recovery and community reintegration and participation. These recommendations cover topics related to support and education of people with stroke, families, and caregivers during transitions and community reintegration. They include interprofessional planning and communication, return to driving, vocational roles, leisure activities and relationships and sexuality, and transition to long-term care.

Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Rehabilitation, Recovery, and Community Participation following Stroke. Part One: Rehabilitation and Recovery Following Stroke; 6th Edition Update 2019.

The sixth update of the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Rehabilitation, Recovery, and Reintegration following Stroke. Part one: Rehabilitation and Recovery Following Stroke is a comprehensive set of evidence-based guidelines addressing issues surrounding impairments, activity limitations, and participation restrictions following stroke. Rehabilitation is a critical component of recovery, essential for helping patients to regain lost skills, relearn tasks, and regain independence. Following a stroke, many people typically require rehabilitation for persisting deficits related to hemiparesis, upper-limb dysfunction, pain, impaired balance, swallowing, and vision, neglect, and limitations with mobility, activities of daily living, and communication. This module addresses interventions related to these issues as well as the structure in which they are provided, since rehabilitation can be provided on an inpatient, outpatient, or community basis. These guidelines also recognize that rehabilitation needs of people with stroke may change over time and therefore intermittent reassessment is important. Recommendations are appropriate for use by all healthcare providers and system planners who organize and provide care to patients following stroke across a broad range of settings. Unlike the previous set of recommendations, in which pediatric stroke was included, this set of recommendations includes primarily adult rehabilitation, recognizing many of these therapies may be applicable in children. Recommendations related to community reintegration, which were previously included within this rehabilitation module, can now be found in the companion module, Rehabilitation, Recovery, and Community Participation following Stroke. Part Two: Transitions and Community Participation Following Stroke.

People With Lived Experience at the Centre of Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: A Model for Guideline Developers.

Actively engaging people with lived experience (PWLE) in stroke-related clinical practice guideline development has not been effectively implemented. This pilot project evaluated the feasibility, perceived value, and effectiveness of the Community Consultation and Review Panel (CCRP), a new model to engage PWLE in the writing and review of Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations. Responses to a standardized evaluation tool indicated that participants perceived the CCRP as valued, impactful, effective, and beneficial to stroke care. This project successfully demonstrated that values, experiences, and recommendations of PWLE can be effectively incorporated into guideline content and is applicable to all guideline development processes.

Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Mood, Cognition and Fatigue following Stroke, 6th edition update 2019.

The 2019 update of the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations (CSBPR) for Mood, Cognition and Fatigue following Stroke is a comprehensive set of evidence-based guidelines addressing three important issues that can negatively impact the lives of people who have had a stroke. These include post-stroke depression and anxiety, vascular cognitive impairment, and post-stroke fatigue. Following stroke, approximately 20% to 50% of all persons may be affected by at least one of these conditions. There may also be overlap between conditions, particularly fatigue and depression. If not recognized and treated in a timely matter, these conditions can lead to worse long-term outcomes. The theme of this edition of the CSBPR is Partnerships and Collaborations, which stresses the importance of integration and coordination across the healthcare system to ensure timely and seamless care to optimize recovery and outcomes. Accordingly, these recommendations place strong emphasis on the importance of timely screening and assessments, and timely and adequate initiation of treatment across care settings. Ideally, when screening is suggestive of a mood or cognition issue, patients and families should be referred for in-depth assessment by healthcare providers with expertise in these areas. As the complexity of patients treated for stroke increases, continuity of care and strong communication among healthcare professionals, and between members of the healthcare team and the patient and their family is an even bigger imperative, as stressed throughout the recommendations, as they are critical elements to ensure smooth transitions from acute care to active rehabilitation and reintegration into their community.

Powered wheelchair skills training for persons with stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to test the hypothesis that people with stroke who receive formal powered wheelchair skills training improve their wheelchair skills to a significantly greater extent than participants in a control group who do not and to explore the influence of spatial neglect. DESIGN: Seventeen participants with stroke (including nine with spatial neglect) were randomly allocated to intervention (n = 9) or control (n = 8) groups. Those in the intervention group received up to five 30-min training sessions based on the Wheelchair Skills Training Program 4.1. The powered Wheelchair Skills Test version 4.1 was administered at baseline (T1) and after training (T2). RESULTS: A rank order analysis of covariance on the T2 Wheelchair Skills Test score, having adjusted for the T1 score, showed a significant effect caused by group (P = 0.0001). A secondary analysis showed no significant effect caused by spatial neglect (P = 0.923). CONCLUSIONS: People with stroke who receive formal powered wheelchair skills training improve their powered wheelchair skills to a significantly greater extent (30%) than participants who do not (0%). The extent of change was not affected by the presence of spatial neglect. These findings have significance for the wheelchair provision process and the rehabilitation of people with stroke.

Ability of people with stroke to learn powered wheelchair skills: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: Our primary objective was to test the hypothesis that people with stroke can learn to use powered wheelchairs safely and effectively. Our secondary objective was to explore the influence of visuospatial neglect on the ability to learn powered wheelchair skills. DESIGN: Prospective, uncontrolled pilot study using within-participant comparisons. SETTING: Rehabilitation center. PARTICIPANTS: Inpatients (N=10; 6 with visuospatial neglect), all with a primary diagnosis of stroke. INTERVENTIONS: Participants received 5 wheelchair skills training sessions of up to 30 minutes each using the Wheelchair Skills Training Program (version 3.2). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Powered wheelchair skills were tested before and after training using the Wheelchair Skills Test, Power Mobility version 3.2 (WST-P). RESULTS: The group's total mean WST-P scores improved from 25.5% of skills passed at baseline to 71.5% posttraining (P=.002). The participants with neglect improved their WST-P scores to the same extent as the participants without neglect, although their pretraining and posttraining scores were lower. The training and testing sessions were well tolerated by the participants, and there were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Many people with stroke, with or without visuospatial neglect, can learn to use powered wheelchairs safely and effectively with appropriate training.

Rates and predictors of manual and powered wheelchair use for persons with stroke: a retrospective study in a Canadian rehabilitation center.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the rates of manual and powered wheelchair use at discharge for people with stroke admitted to a rehabilitation center and to determine whether any predictors of wheelchair use at discharge could be identified. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Rehabilitation center. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive former inpatients (N=100) with a primary diagnosis of stroke, a sample of convenience. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We reviewed the inpatient health records to determine the rates of wheelchair use at discharge and to record some readily available demographic and clinical data that might serve as predictors of wheelchair use. RESULTS: At discharge, 40 people (40%) were using manual wheelchairs, 1 person (1%) was using a powered wheelchair, and 59 (59%) were not using a wheelchair. Of the patients who were walkers on admission (ie, walking FIM scores of 6 or 7), none (0%) used wheelchairs at discharge. Of those with nonwalking FIM scores (1-5) on admission, 56% were using wheelchairs at discharge. Multivariate analyses revealed that the adjusted odds ratios of using a wheelchair (manual or powered) were 3.33 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-8.33) for those with left-hemisphere versus right-hemisphere strokes (P=.010), .94 (CI, .91-.96) for each point rise in the total raw FIM score on admission (P<.0001), and 19.46 (CI, 6.33-59.81) if the total admission FIM score was less than 80 versus greater than or equal to 80 (P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: On discharge from our rehabilitation center, 40% of people with stroke were using manual wheelchairs and 1% powered wheelchairs. People who were not walking on admission, those with left-hemisphere strokes, and those with lower total admission FIM scores were more likely to use a wheelchair. These findings may permit clinicians to predict wheelchair use better early in the rehabilitation process, when it can affect rehabilitation planning.

Are wheelchair-skills assessment and training relevant for long-standing wheelchair users? Two case reports.

PURPOSE: We present two case reports that shed light on the question of whether routine periodic wheelchair-skills assessment and training are relevant for long-standing wheelchair users. CASE 1: A 60-year-old man with a 15-year history of T12 complete paraplegia sustained an intertrochanteric fracture of his femur due to a tip-over accident that occurred 2 days after a follow-up clinic visit at which no limitations in wheelchair-skill performance were identified. If a procedure had been in place to identify and correct his wheelchair-skill deficiencies, this injury might have been prevented. CASE 2: A 34-year-old woman with spina bifida, whose wheelchair use had gradually increased, came to our attention during the provision of a new wheelchair. She was able to significantly improve her wheelchair abilities through training. The newly learned skills enhanced her community participation. CONCLUSIONS: These cases suggest that, even in long-standing wheelchair users, wheelchair skills should be routinely assessed as part of the periodic functional assessment and, when the skill level is determined to be less than appropriate for that person, formal training should be offered.

The wheelchair skills test (version 2.4): measurement properties.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the measurement properties of the Wheelchair Skills Test (WST), version 2.4. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Rehabilitation center. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 298 subjects (169 wheelchair users, 129 able-bodied subjects) ranging in age from 17 to 88 years. INTERVENTION: We videotaped subjects as they attempted the 50 skills of the WST 2.4. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The test-retest, intrarater, and interrater reliabilities were determined on a subset of 20 wheelchair users. We assessed construct validity by evaluating whether the WST detected expected changes and concurrent validity by seeing how well total WST scores correlated with criterion measures. RESULTS: The mean time +/- standard deviation taken to administer the WST was 27.0+/-9.3 minutes. There were no serious adverse incidents, and the test was well tolerated. For the test-retest, intrarater and interrater reliabilities, the intraclass correlation coefficients for the total scores were.904,.959, and.968. For individual skills, the percentage concordance ranged from 73% to 100%. Regarding construct validity, there was a slightly negative Pearson correlation between total WST score and age (-.434). Gender was identified as a significant factor on multiple regression analysis (P<.001). Wheelchair users with more than 21 days of experience scored higher than those with less experience (65.0% vs 59.6%; P=.01). Participants with stroke and related disorders had a mean score (55.0%+/-13.9%) that was significantly lower than those in other diagnostic categories (P<.05). Participants using conventional wheelchairs had lower scores than those in lightweight ones (66.4% vs 75.1%; P<.001). Regarding concurrent validity, Spearman rank correlations between total WST scores and the global assessments of the wheelchair users' therapists and admission and discharge FIM instrument scores were.394,.38, and.31. CONCLUSIONS: The WST 2.4 is practical and safe, and its measurement properties are very good to excellent. Further study is needed to determine its usefulness in various clinical settings.