Value contribution of blood-based neurofilament light chain as a biomarker in multiple sclerosis using multi-criteria decision analysis.

Introduction: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune demyelinating disease that represents a leading cause of non-traumatic disability among young and middle-aged adults. MS is characterized by neurodegeneration caused by axonal injury. Current clinical and radiological markers often lack the sensitivity and specificity required to detect inflammatory activity and neurodegeneration, highlighting the need for better approaches. After neuronal injury, neurofilament light chains (NfL) are released into the cerebrospinal fluid, and eventually into blood. Thus, blood-based NfL could be used as a potential biomarker for inflammatory activity, neurodegeneration, and treatment response in MS. The objective of this study was to determine the value contribution of blood-based NfL as a biomarker in MS in Spain using the Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methodology. Materials and methods: A literature review was performed, and the results were synthesized in the evidence matrix following the criteria included in the MCDA framework. The study was conducted by a multidisciplinary group of six experts. Participants were trained in MCDA and scored the evidence matrix. Results were analyzed and discussed in a group meeting through reflective MCDA discussion methodology. Results: MS was considered a severe condition as it is associated with significant disability. There are unmet needs in MS as a disease, but also in terms of biomarkers since no blood biomarker is available in clinical practice to determine disease activity, prognostic assessment, and response to treatment. The results of the present study suggest that quantification of blood-based NfL may represent a safe option to determine inflammation, neurodegeneration, and response to treatments in clinical practice, as well as to complement data to improve the sensitivity of the diagnosis. Participants considered that blood-based NfL could result in a lower use of expensive tests such as magnetic resonance imaging scans and could provide cost-savings by avoiding ineffective treatments. Lower indirect costs could also be expected due to a lower impact of disability consequences. Overall, blood-based NfL measurement is supported by high-quality evidence. Conclusion: Based on MCDA methodology and the experience of a multidisciplinary group of six stakeholders, blood-based NfL measurement might represent a high-value-option for the management of MS in Spain.

Baseline Profiles of Drug Prescriptions Prior to Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) Obtained by Latent Class Analysis (LCA), and Assessment of Their Association with Conversion to Dementia.

Polypharmacy has been linked to cognitive decline. However, interventions targeting modifiable risk factors, some of which are targets of the most commonly used drugs, could reduce the prevalence of dementia. Our aim was to determine the drug prescription regimen at baseline, prior to the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and its possible association with progression to dementia. Data were collected from the electronic medical records of 342 MCI outpatients diagnosed during 2006-2017 at their first neurology consultation. We followed the classical three-step method of statistical analysis, starting with a Latent Class Analysis (LCA) to discover subgroups of drug prescription probability. Half of the patients were under polypharmacy (≥5 drugs), 17.5% had no recorded medication, 33.3% progressed to dementia (94.7% in ≤5 years), and 84.1% of them to Alzheimer's disease (AD). According to the LCA and based on 20 therapeutic indicators obtained from 240 substances and regrouped according the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification, we identified a four-profile model: (1) low (35.7% of patients); (2) mixed (28.7%); (3) cardio-metabolic (19.3%); and (4) psychotropic (16.4%). The binomial regression logistic model showed that profiles 2 and 3 (and 4 for AD), with a higher drug prescription conditioned probability against classic risk factors, were protective than profile 1 (OR = 0.421, p = 0.004; OR = 0.278, p = 0.000; OR = 0.457, p = 0.040, respectively), despite polypharmacy being significant in profiles 2 and 3 (mean > 7 drugs) vs. profile 1 (1.4 ± 1.6) (p = 0.000). Patients in the latter group were not significantly older, although being aged 65-79 years old quadrupled (OR = 4.217, p = 000) and being >79 tripled (OR = 2.945, p = 0.010) the conversion risk compared to patients <65 years old. According to the proposed analytical model, profiling the heterogeneous association of risk factors, which were taken prior to diagnosis, could be explored as an indicator of prior care and a predictor of conversion to dementia.