Determinants of quality of life in adults with epilepsy: a multicenter, cross-sectional study from Germany.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of quality of life (QoL) has become an important indicator for chronic neurological diseases. While these conditions often limit personal independence and autonomy, they are also associated with treatment-related problems and reduced life expectancy. Epilepsy has a tremendous impact on the QoL of patients and their families, which is often underestimated by practitioners. The aim of this work was to identify relevant factors affecting QoL in adults with epilepsy. METHODS: This cross-sectional, multicenter study was conducted at four specialized epilepsy centers in Germany. Patients diagnosed with epilepsy completed a standardized questionnaire focusing on QoL and aspects of healthcare in epilepsy. Univariate regression analyses and pairwise comparisons were performed to identify variables of decreased QoL represented by the overall Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31) score. The variables were then considered in a multivariate regression analysis after multicollinearity analysis. RESULTS: Complete datasets for the QOLIE-31 were available for 476 patients (279 [58.6%] female, 197 [41.4%] male, mean age 40.3 years [range 18-83 years]). Multivariate regression analysis revealed significant associations between low QoL and a high score on the Liverpool Adverse Events Profile (LAEP; beta=-0.28, p < 0.001), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - depression subscale (HADS-D; beta=-0.27, p < 0.001), Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory in Epilepsy (NDDI-E; beta=-0.19, p < 0.001), revised Epilepsy Stigma Scale (beta=-0.09, p = 0.027), or Seizure Worry Scale (beta=-0.18, p < 0.001) and high seizure frequency (beta = 0.14, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Epilepsy patients had reduced QoL, with a variety of associated factors. In addition to disease severity, as measured by seizure frequency, the patient's tolerability of anti-seizure medications and the presence of depression, stigma, and worry about new seizures were strongly associated with poor QoL. Diagnosed comorbid depression was underrepresented in the cohort; therefore, therapeutic decisions should always consider individual psychobehavioral and disease-specific aspects. Signs of drug-related adverse events, depression, fear, or stigmatization should be actively sought to ensure that patients receive personalized and optimized treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00022024; Universal Trial Number: U1111-1252-5331).

Morphometric correlates in patients with functional seizures with and without comorbid epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Functional seizures (FS) or psychogenic, non-epileptic seizures (PNES) are episodic alterations of behaviour with similar semiology to epileptic seizures but which are not caused by epileptic brain activity. Epilepsy patients show a high risk in developing FS; therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine morphometric correlates in patients with FS as well as in epilepsy patients with FS by comparing them separately to healthy controls (HC). METHODS: Twenty-one clinical three-dimensional (3D) T1-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of patients with FS (FS group) and 15 patients with FS and epilepsy (EFS group) were retrospectively compared with one control group of 21 age- and gender-matched HC. Two separate general linear model analyses were conducted via FreeSurfer version 6.0. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 21 FS patients (66.7% females, n = 14) with a median age at the time of the scan of 24 years (range 17-44 years); 15 EFS patients (80% females, n = 12) with a median age at the time of the scan of 27 years (range 16-43 years); and 21 healthy subjects (66.7% females, n = 14) with a median age at the time of the scan of 24 years (range 19-38 years). Both patient groups showed an increased Cth in the right prefrontal lobe: in the FS group in the right superior frontal, rostral middle frontal gyri and the right orbitofrontal cortex and, in the EFS group, in the right superior frontal gyrus and the right orbitofrontal cortex. Decreases in Cth were present in the right lateral occipital lobe in the FS group, while also in both hemispheres in the EFS group, namely the left paracentral, superior frontal, caudal middle frontal, lateral occipital and right superior frontal gyri. Neither group showed changes in curvature. CONCLUSION: These results suggest alterations in regions of emotional processing and executive control in patients with FS regardless of the presence of epilepsy.

Perception of memory performance after first seizure in patients with and without an epilepsy diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES: Memory complaints in patients with epilepsy have been well-studied. Although memory complaints are commonly reported by patients with chronic epilepsy, to date, few studies exist on memory complaints at the onset of epilepsy. The present study investigated the presence of memory complaints and their relation to mood and memory performance in patients after their first seizure. Thereby, we examined differences between individuals who received a diagnosis of epilepsy immediately with the occurrence of their first seizure and those who were diagnosed as having the first epileptic seizure, without fulfilling the ILAE criteria for the diagnosis of epilepsy. METHODS: Sixty-one patients participated in the study and completed, among others, a memory task and questionnaires on memory complaints and depression after their first epileptic seizure. We investigated the level of memory complaints and their correlation and accuracy in classification with a memory measure. We compared patients who received an epilepsy diagnosis after the first seizure with those who did not. RESULTS: Memory complaints did not correlate with objective memory performance. Classification into impaired/unimpaired showed low concordance between memory complaints and neuropsychological memory measures. After their first epileptic seizure, patients reported few memory complaints overall (10%), and there were no differences in memory complaints between patients with and without an epilepsy diagnosis. CONCLUSION: At epilepsy onset, in contrast to established epilepsies, memory complaints are rare. Although influences of anticonvulsant drugs and seizures are not present at the beginning of epilepsy, this substantial absence of memory complaints at epilepsy onset emphasizes the need for comprehensive neurological and psychological treatment early with the given diagnosis. Treatment should focus on anticonvulsant drug regimens, patients' concerns and convey realistic expectations.

Examination of the Flynn effect in German patients with epilepsy assessed with the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) III and IV.

The Flynn effect describes an increase in intelligence quotient (IQ) in the general population of about 3 points per decade. While this effect is well established in healthy individuals, research exploring the link to brain pathologies is scarce. We investigated the Flynn effect in a German sample of 203 patients with epilepsy with left, right, and bilateral lesions. Intelligence quotient values were obtained using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales (WAIS) III and IV. Our results showed a stable Flynn effect with nearly no difference in adjusted full scale IQ (FSIQ) scores (0.02 IQ points) between the WAIS-III and WAIS-IV samples. There were no significant interactions between the side of pathology and corrected IQ values. Our sample showed a tendency towards performing worse in the WAIS-IV in three out of four subscales independently of the Flynn effect, pointing out methodological differences between the newer Wechsler editions. However, although patients with bilateral lesions performed worst across all subscales, they exhibited a similar pattern as patients with lesions in the left or right hemisphere, indicating that also more severe forms of brain pathologies can profit from the mechanisms behind the Flynn effect.

First clinical postmarketing experiences in the treatment of epilepsies with brivaracetam: a retrospective observational multicentre study.

OBJECTIVES: Brivaracetam (BRV) is the latest approved antiepileptic drug and acts as a synaptic vesicle protein 2A ligand. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of BRV in the clinical setting. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational multicentre study. SETTING: We retrospectively collected clinical data of patients who received BRV in 10 epilepsy centres using a questionnaire that was answered by the reporting neurologist. PARTICIPANTS: Data of 615 epilepsy patients treated with BRV were included in the study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy regarding seizure frequency and tolerability of BRV were evaluated. Descriptive statistics complemented by X2 contingency tests and effect sizes were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 44% of the patients had a decreased, 38% a stable and 18% an increased seizure frequency. 17% of patients achieved seizure freedom after initiation of BRV. The seizure frequency decreased in 63% of 19 patients with BRV monotherapy. 27% reported adverse effects, but only 10% of patients with monotherapy. Brivaracetam was significantly more often associated with decreased seizure frequency in levetiracetam (LEV) naïve patients (p=0.012), but BRV also led to a decreased seizure frequency in 42% of patients who had been treated with LEV before, including 17% of patients who were completely seizure free. Adverse effects under LEV improved in 62% and deteriorated in 2% of patients after the switch to BRV. At latest follow-up (mean±SD = 26.3±6.5 months), 68% were still on BRV. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that results of the phase III studies on BRV match data from real life clinical settings. Brivaracetam seems to be a useful alternative in patients who have suffered adverse effects while taking LEV.