Real-World Analysis of Nivolumab and Atezolizumab Efficacy in Previously Treated Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Nivolumab (anti-PD-1 antibody) and atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1 antibody) have shown superior survival outcomes and improved adverse effects compared to standard chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the efficacy of both treatments has not been directly compared in clinical trials. This retrospective, single-centre study was performed from June 2015 to December 2020 and included a cohort of 158 previously treated patients with stage IV or recurrent NSCLC who received PD-1 (nivolumab) (n = 89) or PD-L1 (atezolizumab) (n = 69) inhibitors at the Virgen del Rocío Hospital in Seville. The objective response rate (ORR) was 22.5% in the nivolumab group and 14.5% in the atezolizumab group (p = 0.140). Multivariate analysis did not show significant differences between the two groups for PFS and OS (PFS hazard ratio (HR): 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.55−1.17, p = 0.260; OS HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.52−1.21, p = 0.281). Adverse events of all grades occurred in 68 patients in the nivolumab group (76.4%) and in 34 patients in the atezolizumab group (49.3%) (p < 0.001). Atezolizumab and nivolumab did not show statistically significant differences in survival outcomes in patients with NSCLC, even when stratified by histological subtype (squamous versus nonsquamous). However, the safety analysis suggested a more favourable toxicity profile for atezolizumab.

Correlation of peripheral blood biomarkers with clinical outcomes in NSCLC patients with high PD-L1 expression treated with pembrolizumab.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are currently the standard therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, there is no well-established prognostic biomarker. We investigated the relationship between survival outcomes and three peripheral blood biomarkers, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), as well as a new score termed the risk blood biomarker (RBB), calculated from the combination of the neutrophil-monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (NMLR) and white blood cell count (WBC). METHODS: This study included patients with stage IV or recurrent NSCLC confirmed with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50% who received pembrolizumab monotherapy as first-line treatment at the Virgen del Rocío University Hospital in Seville, Spain. To establish the relationship between baseline peripheral blood biomarkers and survival outcomes, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), we used the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were included in this study. In multivariate analysis, baseline NLR and PLR showed a strong association with PFS [NLR hazard ratio (HR): 0.19, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.09-0.44, P<0.001; PLR HR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.23-0.92, P=0.03] and OS (NLR HR: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.02-0.19, P<0.001; PLR HR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.13-0.67, P=0.004), and the MLR was associated with OS (MLR HR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.15-0.76, P=0.01). According to the RBB score, groups with lower scores were associated with superior PFS (group 0: HR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.06-0.41, P<0.001 and group 1: HR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.12-0.73, P=0.01) and OS (group 0: HR: 0.04, 95% CI: 0.01-0.17, P<0.001 and group 1: HR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.05-0.42, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Low baseline NLR, MLR and PLR are significantly associated with better PFS, and low baseline NLR and PLR are associated with better OS. Additionally, we identified three subgroups of patients using the RBB score, and low scores were associated with improved survival outcomes and response to therapy.