Meta-Analysis of Catheter Ablation versus Medical Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Without Heart Failure.

INTRODUCTION: Catheter ablation has shown to reduce mortality in patient with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction. Its effect on mortality in patients without HF has not been well elucidated. METHODS: Thirteen randomized controlled trials encompassing 3856 patients were selected using PubMed, Embase and the CENTRAL till April 2019. Estimates were reported as random effects risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Compared with medical therapy, catheter ablation did not reduce the risk of all-cause mortality (RR, 0.86, 95% CI, 0.62-1.19, P=0.36; I2=0), stroke (RR, 0.55, 95% CI, 0.18-1.66, P=0.29; I2=0), need for cardioversion (RR, 0.84, 95% CI, 0.66-1.08, P=0.17; I2=0) or pacemaker (RR, 0.59, 95% CI, 0.34-1.01, P=0.06; I2=0). However, ablation reduced the RR of cardiac hospitalization (0.37, 95% CI, 0.18-0.77, P=0.01; I2=86), and recurrent atrial arrhythmia (0.46, 95% CI, 0.35-0.60, P<0.001; I2=87). There were non-significant differences among treatment groups with respect to major bleeding (RR, 1.89, 95% CI, 0.59-6.08, P=0.29; I2=15), and pulmonary vein stenosis (RR, 3.00, 95% CI, 0.83-10.87, P=0.09; I2=0), but had significantly higher rates of pericardial tamponade (RR, 4.46, 95 % CI, 1.70-11.72, P<0.001; I2=0). CONCLUSIONS: Catheter ablation did not improve survival compared with medical therapy in patients with AF without HF. Catheter ablation reduced cardiac hospitalization and recurrent atrial arrhythmia at the expense of pericardial tamponade.

Atrial Fibrillation is a Risk Factor for Worse Outcomes in Patients with End Stage Liver Disease.

BACKGROUND: Liver disease is a risk factor for development of atrial fibrillation (AF). We aim to study inpatient mortality and resource utilization of end-stage liver disease (ESLD) patients with AF from a nationally representative United States population sample. METHODS: For the purpose of our study, we utilized data from National Inpatient Sample for calendar years 2005-2015. Patients with ESLD and AF were identified using relevant International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. Key outcomes of inpatient mortality and resource utilization were assessed. We also constructed a multiple logistic regression model to determine predictors of mortality in ESLD patients. Propensity matching was also done to balance confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of 309,959 ESLD patients were included in final analysis. Out of these, about 32,858 (10.6%) patients have concomitant AF. ESLD patients with AF were older and had higher burden of key co-morbidities such as heart failure, diabetes and hypertension. Mortality was significantly higher in both unmatched (12.3% vs. 9.2%, p < 0.01) and matched cohorts (12.2% vs. 10.8%, p < 0.01). Additionally, ESLD patients with AF have longer length of stay, increased facility discharge and cost of hospitalization compared to ESLD patients with out AF. In multivariate analysis, AF is an independent predictor of mortality in ESLD patients. CONCLUSIONS: AF portends worse outcomes in patients with ESLD. Strong index of suspicion is warranted to timely identify AF in this patient population.