Ulcer Bleeding in the United States: Epidemiology, Treatment Success, and Resource Utilization.

BACKGROUND AND GOALS: Peptic ulcer disease is the most frequent cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. We sought to establish the epidemiology and hemostasis success rate of the different treatment modalities in this setting. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample. Non-elective adult admissions with a principal diagnosis of ulcer bleeding were included. The primary outcome was endoscopic, radiologic and surgical hemostasis success rate. Secondary outcomes were patients' demographics, in-hospital mortality and resource utilization. On subgroup analysis, gastric and duodenal ulcers were studied separately. Confounders were adjusted for using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 136,425 admissions (55% gastric and 45% duodenal ulcers) were included. The mean patient age was 67 years. The majority of patients were males, Caucasians, of lower income and high comorbidity burden. The endoscopic, radiological and surgical therapy and hemostasis success rates were 33.6, 1.4, 0.1, and 95.1%, 89.1 and 66.7%, respectively. The in-hospital mortality rate was 1.9% overall, but 2.4% after successful and 11.1% after failed endoscopic hemostasis, respectively. Duodenal ulcers were associated with lower adjusted odds of successful endoscopic hemostasis, but higher odds of early and multiple endoscopies, endoscopic therapy, overall and successful radiological therapy, in-hospital mortality, longer length of stay and higher total hospitalization charges and costs. CONCLUSIONS: The ulcer bleeding endoscopic hemostasis success rate is 95.1%. Rescue therapy is associated with lower hemostasis success and more than a ten-fold increase in mortality rate. Duodenal ulcers are associated with worse treatment outcomes and higher resource utilization compared with gastric ulcers.

The Impact of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors on Arrhythmias in Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) use has become increasingly popular. Current guidelines recommend using ARNI therapy for heart failure with reduced (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). As therapies become more widely available, heart failure-associated burdens such as ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD) will become increasingly prevalent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of ARNI therapy on HFrEF and HFpEF pertaining to arrhythmogenesis and SCD. We performed a search of MEDLINE (PubMed), the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant studies. The odds ratios (ORs) of SCD, ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks were calculated. A total of 10 studies, including 6 randomized controlled trials and 4 observational studies, were included in the analysis. A total of 18,548 patients from all studies were included, with 9,328 patients in the ARNI arm and 9,220 patients in the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) arm, with a median follow-up time of 15 months. There was a significant reduction in the composite outcomes of SCD and ventricular arrhythmias in patients treated with ARNIs compared to those treated with ACEIs/ARBs (OR, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.93; P = .01; I2 = 17%; P = .29). ARNI therapy was also associated with a significant reduction in ICD shocks. There was no significant reduction in the VT, VF, AF, or SVT incidence rate in the ARNI group compared to the ACEI/ARB group. In conclusion, the use of ARNIs confers a reduction in composite outcomes of SCD and ventricular arrhythmias among patients with heart failure. These outcomes were mainly driven by SCD reduction in patients treated with ARNIs.

Opioid dependence and treatment outcomes among patients with burn injury.

BACKGROUND: Patients with burn injuries cause significant healthcare economic burden, often utilising extra-hospital resources, caregiving, and specialized care. METHODS: We present a retrospective cohort analysis of the hospitalized patients in the USA with a primary diagnosis of burn injury. Opioid dependence was identified using ICD-10 CM codes. The 30-day all-cause readmission rate was the main outcome while secondary outcomes were inhospital mortality rate, resource utilization which included hospital length of stay, total hospitalization costs and charges and surgical procedures for burn injury treatment as well as the most important five principal diagnoses for admission and readmission. RESULTS: Out of 22,348 patients included in the study, 597 had opioid dependence. Older patients (43 years, range: 38.6-47.2 years) as well as males (70.8%) were more likely to be opioid dependent. Opioid dependence was associated with higher 30-day readmission rates (aOR: 1.83, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30-2.57, p-value: <0.01), higher total hospitalization costs (aMD: $14,981, CI: $3820-$26,142, p-value: 0.01), total hospitalization charges (aMD: $47,078, CI: -$5093 to $89,063, p-value: 0.03), and a shorter mean length of stay (aMD: 5.13 days, CI: 2.60-7.66, p-value: <0.01). However, patients with and without opioid dependence had similar in-hospital mortality rates (aOR: 0.27, CI: 0.06-1.28, p-value: 0.10). CONCLUSION: We are the first to our knowledge to report the association of treatment outcomes and opioid dependence in patients hospitalized at the national level with a burn injury. We show that there were higher 30-day all-cause readmission rates and in-hospital resource utilization among patients with opioid-dependence.

Temporal trends and outcome of splenectomy in adults with immune thrombocytopenia in the USA.

Splenectomy is one of the treatments of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) with a high response rate. However, it is an irreversible procedure that can be associated with morbidity in this setting. Our aim was to study the trends of splenectomy in adults with ITP, and the factors associated with splenectomy and resource utilization during these hospitalizations. We used the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) to identify hospitalizations for adult patients with a principal diagnosis of ITP between 2007 and 2017. The primary outcome was the splenectomy trend. Secondary outcomes were (1) incidence of ITP trend, (2) in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and total hospitalization costs after splenectomy trend, and (3) independent predictors of splenectomy, length of stay, and total hospitalization costs. A total of 36,141 hospitalizations for ITP were included in the study. The splenectomy rate declined over time (16% in 2007 to 8% in 2017, trend p < 0.01) and so did the in-hospital mortality after splenectomy. Of the independent predictors of splenectomy, the strongest was elective admissions (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 22.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]:17.8-27.3, P < 0.01), while recent hospitalization year, older age, and Black (compared to Caucasian) race were associated with lower odds of splenectomy. Splenectomy tends to occur during elective admissions in urban medical centers for patients with private insurance. Despite a stable ITP hospitalization rate over the past decade and despite listing splenectomy as a second-line option for management of ITP in major guidelines, splenectomy rates consistently declined over time.