Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
2.
BMJ ; 370: m2479, 2020 08 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32769078
3.
J ECT ; 36(3): e22-e28, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32205737

RESUMO

Headache is a common side effect of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), but reports on its incidence vary widely. A broad array of treatment regimens have been proposed in the literature. The pathophysiology of post-ECT headache is unclear but a vascular origin has been suggested. A systematic literature search was executed in PubMed and Embase to identify relevant articles. Articles were screened on title, abstract, and full text according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Study characteristics and results concerning the incidence of post-ECT headache were extracted, and a weighted mean incidence was calculated. Forty-seven relevant articles were found, of which 36 reported on the incidence of post-ECT headache in patients and 9 on the incidence in sessions. The incidence of post-ECT headache varied greatly in the literature. The weighted mean incidence in patients was 32.8%, as 786 of a total population of 2399 patients experienced headache. The weighted mean incidence in sessions was between 9.4% (246 of 2604 sessions) and 12.1% (236/1958 sessions). The variation in incidences of post-ECT headache found might be due to different methods of measuring headache, different study designs, and different drugs used for anesthesia. The mean-weighted incidence of post-ECT headache in patients was 32.8% and in sessions between 9.4% and 12.1%.


Assuntos
Eletroconvulsoterapia/efeitos adversos , Cefaleia/etiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Fatores de Risco
4.
Am J Health Promot ; 34(8): 867-875, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32077307

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To provide a nationally representative description on the prevalences of policies, practices, programs, and supports relating to worksite wellness in US hospitals. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, self-report of hospitals participating in Workplace Health in America (WHA) survey from November 2016 through September 2017. SETTING: Hospitals across the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Random sample of 338 eligible hospitals participating in the WHA survey. MEASURES: We used previous items from the 2004 National Worksite Health Promotion survey. Key measures included presence of Worksite Health Promotion programs, evidence-based strategies, health screenings, disease management programs, incentives, work-life policies, barriers to health promotion program implementation, and occupational safety and health. ANALYSIS: Independent variables included hospital characteristics (eg, size). Dependent characteristics included worksite health promotion components. Descriptive statistics and χ2 analyses were used. RESULTS: Eighty-two percent of hospitals offered a wellness programs during the previous year with larger hospitals more likely than smaller hospitals to offer programs (P < .01). Among hospitals with wellness programs, 69% offered nutrition programs, 74% offered physical activity (PA) programs, and 84% had a policy to restrict all tobacco use. Among those with cafeterias or vending machines, 40% had a policy for healthier foods. Only 47% and 25% of hospitals offered lactation support or healthy sleep programs, respectively. CONCLUSION: Most hospitals offer wellness programs. However, there remain hospitals that do not offer wellness programs. Among those that have wellness programs, most offer supports for nutrition, PA, and tobacco control. Few hospitals offered programs on healthy sleep or lactation support.


Assuntos
Saúde Ocupacional , Local de Trabalho , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Promoção da Saúde , Hospitais , Humanos , Políticas , Prevalência , Estados Unidos
5.
BMJ ; 366: l2426, 2019 Sep 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31477566
6.
BMJ ; 366: l4961, 2019 Sep 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31477565
7.
BMJ ; 366: l4885, 2019 Aug 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31467085
10.
ACS Chem Biol ; 14(2): 164-169, 2019 02 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30620559

RESUMO

Phospholipase A2, group XVI (PLA2G16) is a thiol hydrolase from the HRASLS family that regulates lipolysis in adipose tissue and has been identified as a host factor enabling the cellular entry of picornaviruses. Chemical tools are essential to visualize and control PLA2G16 activity, but they have not been reported to date. Here, we show that MB064, which is a fluorescent lipase probe, also labels recombinant and endogenously expressed PLA2G16. Competitive activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) using MB064 enabled the discovery of α-ketoamides as the first selective PLA2G16 inhibitors. LEI110 was identified as a potent PLA2G16 inhibitor ( Ki = 20 nM) that reduces cellular arachidonic acid levels and oleic acid-induced lipolysis in human HepG2 cells. Gel-based ABPP and chemical proteomics showed that LEI110 is a selective pan-inhibitor of the HRASLS family of thiol hydrolases (i.e., PLA2G16, HRASLS2, RARRES3 and iNAT). Molecular dynamic simulations of LEI110 in the reported crystal structure of PLA2G16 provided insight in the potential ligand-protein interactions to explain its binding mode. In conclusion, we have developed the first selective inhibitor that can be used to study the cellular role of PLA2G16.


Assuntos
Amidas/química , Inibidores Enzimáticos/farmacologia , Fosfolipases A2/efeitos dos fármacos , Proteínas/química , Animais , Inibidores Enzimáticos/química , Humanos
11.
13.
BMJ ; 362: k3969, 2018 Sep 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30232175
14.
BMJ ; 358: j3601, 2017 Sep 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31055369
15.
BMJ ; 358: j3766, 2017 Aug 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31055375
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA