Effectiveness of Switch to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA) Biosimilars versus Maintenance of ESA Originators in the Real-Life Setting: Matched-Control Study in Hemodialysis Patients.

BACKGROUND: In hemodialysis (HD), switching from erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) originators to biosimilars is associated with the need for doses approximately 10% higher, according to industry-driven studies. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy on anemia control of switching from ESA originators to biosimilars in daily clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively selected consecutive HD patients receiving stable intravenous ESA doses, and who had not been transfused in the previous 6 months, from 12 non-profit Italian centers. Patients switched from originators to biosimilars (n = 163) were matched with those maintained on ESA originators (n = 163) using a propensity score approach. The study duration was 24 weeks, and the primary endpoint was the mean dose difference (MDD), defined as the difference between the switch and control groups of ESA dose changes during the study (time-weighted average ESA dose minus baseline ESA dose). RESULTS: Age (70 ± 13 years), male sex (63%), diabetes (29%), history of cardiovascular disease (40%), body weight (68 ± 14 kg), vascular access (86% arteriovenous fistula), hemoglobin [Hb] (11.2 ± 0.9 g/dL) and ESA dose (8504 ± 6370 IU/week) were similar in the two groups. Hb remained unchanged during the study in both groups. Conversely, ESA dose remained unchanged in the control group and progressively increased in the switch group from week 8 to 24. The time-weighted average of the ESA dose was higher in the switch group than in the control group (10,503 ± 7389 vs. 7981 ± 5858 IU/week; p = 0.001), leading to a significant MDD of 2423 IU/week (95% confidence interval [CI] 1615-3321), corresponding to a 39.6% (95% CI 24.7-54.6) higher dose of biosimilars compared with originators. The time-weighted average of Hb was 0.2 g/dL lower in the switch group, with a more frequent ESA hyporesponsiveness (14.7 vs. 2.5%). Iron parameters and other resistance factors remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: In stable dialysis patients, switching from ESA originators to biosimilars requires 40% higher doses to maintain anemia control.

Divert to ULTRA: differences in infused volumes and clearance in two on-line hemodiafiltration treatments.

BACKGROUND: Mixed diffusive-convective dialysis therapies offer greater removal capabilities than conventional dialysis. The aim of this study was to compare two different on-line, post-dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) treatments with regard to achieved convective volume and middle-molecule dialysis efficiency: standard volume control (sOL-HDF) and automated control of the transmembrane pressure (TMP) (UC-HDF). METHODS: We enrolled 30 ESRD patients (55.9 ± 14.0 years, 20/10 M/F) in a randomized, prospective, cross-over study. The patients received a 3-month period of sOL-HDF followed by UC-HDF for a further 3 months, or vice versa, using the same dialysis machine. In sOL-HDF, fixed exchange volumes were set according to a filtration fraction greater than or equal to 25%. In UC-HDF therapy, the exchanged volume was driven by a biofeedback system controlling the TMP and its set point in a double loop. Patients maintained their treatment time, dialyzer, blood flow rate, and anticoagulant regimen unchanged throughout the study. RESULTS: Greater convective volumes were achieved in UC-HDF than in sOL-HDF (23.8 ± 3.9 vs.19.8 ± 4.8 L; p<0.001) with high pre-dialysis Ht value (sOL-HDF 34.0 ± 4.5% and UC-HDF 34.0 ± 4.4%; p = 0.91). The average clearance values of ß2m and P were higher in UC-HDF than in sOL-HDF (respectively 123 ± 24 vs. 111 ± 22 ml/min, p<0.002 and 158 ± 26 vs. 152 ± 25 ml/min, p<0.05). Moreover, the UC-HDF mode led to a significantly increased rate of call-free sessions from 88% to 97% (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the biofeedback module, applied to the automatic control of TMP in on-line HDF, results in higher convective volumes and correspondingly higher ß2m and P clearances. By making the HDF treatment more automated and less complex to perform, it significantly reduced the staff workload.

Automatic adaptive system dialysis for hemodialysis-associated hypotension and intolerance: a noncontrolled multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis is complicated by a high incidence of intradialytic hypotension and disequilibrium symptoms caused by hypovolemia and a decrease in extracellular osmolarity. Automatic adaptive system dialysis (AASD) is a proprietary dialysis system that provides automated elaboration of dialysate and ultrafiltration profiles based on the prescribed decrease in body weight and sodium content. STUDY DESIGN: A noncontrolled (single arm), multicenter, prospective, clinical trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 55 patients with intradialytic hypotension or disequilibrium syndrome in 15 dialysis units were studied over a 1-month interval using standard treatment (642 sessions) followed by 6 months using AASD (2,376 sessions). INTERVENTION: AASD (bicarbonate dialysis with dialysate sodium concentration and ultrafiltration rate profiles determined by the automated procedure). OUTCOMES: Primary and major secondary outcomes were the frequency of intradialytic hypotension and symptoms (hypotensive events, headache, nausea, vomiting, and cramps), respectively. RESULTS: More stable intradialytic systolic and diastolic blood pressures with lower heart rate were found using AASD compared with standard treatment. Sessions complicated by hypotension decreased from 58.7% ± 7.3% to 0.9% ± 0.6% (P < 0.001). The incidence of other disequilibrium syndrome symptoms was lower in patients receiving AASD. There were no differences in end-session body weight, interdialytic weight gain, or presession natremia between the standard and AASD treatment periods. LIMITATIONS: A noncontrolled (single arm) study, no crossover from AASD to standard treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the long-term clinical efficacy of AASD for intradialytic hypotension and disequilibrium symptoms in a large number of patients and dialysis sessions.

A vitamin E-coated polysulfone membrane reduces serum levels of inflammatory markers and resistance to erythropoietin-stimulating agents in hemodialysis patients: results of a randomized cross-over multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND: Oxidative stress is prevalent in dialysis patients and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease and anemia. Vitamin E is a fat-soluble antioxidant that plays a central role in reducing lipid peroxidation and inhibiting the generation of reactive oxygen species. The aim of this cross-over randomized study was to compare the effects of a vitamin E-coated polysulfone (Vit E PS) membrane and a non-vitamin E-coated polysulfone (PS) membrane on inflammatory markers and resistance to erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs). METHODS: After a 1-month run-in period of standard bicarbonate dialysis with a synthetic membrane, 62 patients of both genders, and older than 18 years, dialysis vintage 48 ± 27 months, BMI 22 ± 3 (from 13 different dialysis units) were randomized (A-B or B-A) in a cross-over design to Vit E PS (treatment A) and to PS (treatment B) both for 6 months. C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) concentrations were determined by a sandwich enzyme immunoassay at baseline and every 2 months; red blood cell count, ESA dose and ESA resistance index (ERI) were assessed monthly. RESULTS: Hemoglobin (Hb) levels significantly increased in the Vit E PS group from 11.1 ± 0.6 g/dl at baseline to 11.5 ± 0.7 at 6 months (p < 0.001) and remained unchanged in the PS group. Although ESA dosage remained stable during the observation periods in both groups, ERI was significantly reduced in the Vit E PS group from 10.3 ± 2.2 IU-dl/kg/g Hb week at baseline to 9.2 ± 1.7 at 6 months (p < 0.001). No significant variation of ERI was observed in the PS group. A significant reduction in plasma CRP and IL-6 levels was observed in the Vit E PS group: CRP from 6.7 ± 4.8 to 4.8 ± 2.2 mg/l (p < 0.001) and IL-6 from 12.1 ± 1.4 to 7.5 ± 0.4 pg/ml (p < 0.05). In the PS group, CRP varied from 6.2 ± 4.0 to 6.4 ± 3.7, and IL-6 from 10.6 ± 2.1 to 9.6 ± 3.5 (p = n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with Vit E PS membranes seems to lead to a reduction in ESA dosage in HD patients; in addition, a low chronic inflammatory response may contribute to a sparing effect on exogenous ESA requirements.

Model-based analysis of potassium removal during hemodialysis.

Potassium ion (K(+)) kinetics in intra- and extracellular compartments during dialysis was studied by means of a double-pool computer model, which included potassium-dependent active transport (Na-K-ATPase pump) in 38 patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. Each patient was treated for 2 weeks with a constant K(+) dialysate concentration (K(+)(CONST) therapy) and afterward for 2 weeks with a time-varying (profiled) K(+) dialysate concentration (K(+)(PROF) therapy). The two therapies induced different levels of K(+) plasma concentration (K(+)(CONST): 3.71 +/- 0.88 mmol/L vs. K(+)(PROF): 3.97 +/- 0.64 mmol/L, time-averaged values, P < 0.01). The computer model was tuned to accurately fit plasmatic K(+) measured in the course and 1 h after K(+)(CONST) and K(+)(PROF) therapies and was then used to simulate the kinetics of intra- and extracellular K(+). Model-based analysis showed that almost all the K(+) removal in the first 90 min of dialysis was derived from the extracellular compartment. The different K(+) time course in the dialysate and the consequently different Na-K pump activity resulted in a different sharing of removed potassium mass at the end of dialysis: 56% +/- 17% from the extracellular compartment in K(+)(PROF) versus 41% +/- 14% in K(+)(CONST). At the end of both therapies, the K(+) distribution was largely unbalanced, and, in the next 3 h, K(+) continued to flow in the extracellular space (about 24 mmol). After rebalancing, about 80% of the K(+) mass that was removed derived from the intracellular compartment. In conclusion, the Na-K pump plays a major role in K(+) apportionment between extracellular and intracellular compartments, and potassium dialysate concentration strongly influences pump activity.

Effects on inflammatory and nutritional markers of haemodiafiltration with online regeneration of ultrafiltrate (HFR) vs online haemodiafiltration: a cross-over randomized multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: HFR [double chamber haemodiafiltration (HDF) with reinfusion of regenerated ultrafiltrate] is a novel dialytic method which combines the processes of diffusion, convection and adsorbance. In this technique an adsorbent cartridge of resin and charcoal may regenerate the ultrafiltrate suggesting its use as an endogenous substitution fluid. The aim of this multicentre randomized cross-over study was to compare HFR to online HDF in terms of inflammatory and nutritional parameters. METHODS: After a 1 month run-in period of standard bicarbonate dialysis (HD) with a synthetic membrane, 25 chronic dialytic patients were randomized (A-B or B-A) to be treated by HFR (A) with a two-chamber filter (SG 8 Plus - high permeability Polysulphone HF 0.7 m2 + SMC 1.95 sqm; Bellco, Mirandola, Italy) or by online sterile bicarbonate HDF. Each study period of 4 months was separated by 1 month of HD and the entire length of the study was 10 months. CRP levels were measured by a highly sensitive nephelometric assay (Dade, Behring) with a sensitivity of 0.1 microg/ml. Cytokine concentrations were determined by EIA [Interleukin (IL) 6, Biosource, USA and IL-10 Bender MED-Systems, Vienna]. The sensitivity thresholds were < 5 pg/ml for IL-6 and < 8 pg/ml for IL-10. Serum leptin was determined with a ELISA method (Biosource, USA). All parameters were determined monthly in patients starting a midweek dialytic session. RESULTS: Plasma CRP and IL-6 were significantly reduced during the 4 months of HFR and HDF: CRP from 8.0 +/- 3.2 to 5.6 +/- 3.4 mg/l with HFR (P < 0.05) and from 9.4 +/- 4.3 to 5.9 +/- 3.9 mg/l with HDF (P < 0.05). IL-6 decreased from 14.8 +/- 6.3 to 10.1 +/- 3.2 with HFR (P < 0.02) and from 12.1 +/- 4.2 to 9.6 +/- 3.7 with HDF (P = ns) with a percentage decrease after 4 months of 32% with HFR vs 21% with HDF. During the 1 month wash-out period with HD, CRP increased from 5.7 +/- 3.6 to 8.7 +/- 3.9 mg/l (P < 0.01) and IL-6 from 10 +/- 3.4 to 13.5 +/- 5.2 pg/ml (P < 0.01). A significant increase in IL-10 was detected either in HFR (from 4.8 +/- 2.1 to 6.89 +/- 1.7 pg/ml) and in HDF (from 3.3 +/- 1.7 to 8.95 +/- 4.3 pg/ml; P < 0.05) after 4 months. No significant variation in serum leptin levels were observed during the study. CRP and IL-6 were highly correlated (r = 0.54; P < 0.001) as was serum albumin and prealbumin (r = 0.39; P < 0.001). Serum albumin was negatively correlated with CRP (r = -0.26; P < 0.01) and IL-6 (r = -0.19; P < 0.05); serum prealbumin was correlated with IL-6 (r = 0.37; P < 0.001) and with CRP (r = 0.24; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Haemodiafiltration with online regeneration of ultrafiltrate and online HDF are highly biocompatible techniques and no significant difference between HFR and online HDF was observed in terms of reduction of inflammatory markers. Further studies with a longer follow-up are needed to evaluate the clinical relevance of the online endogenous reinfusion to counteract the chronic inflammatory state of the uraemic patient.