Comparison of AmpFire and MY09/11 assays for HPV genotyping in anogenital specimen of Rwandan men who have sex with men.

Introduction: The AmpFire HPV genotyping Assay (Atila Biosystems, Mountain View, CA, USA) is a new test for which there are few data regarding its analytic performance and reliability. Using anal and penile swab specimens from a cohort study of men who have sex with men (MSM) in Rwanda, we compared high-risk HPV (hrHPV) detection by AmpFire done at two laboratories, one at University of California San Francisco (UCSF) and the other Rwanda Military Hospital, and well-validated MY09/11-based assay done at UCSF. Methods: Anal and penile specimens collected from 338 MSM from March 2016 to September 2016 were tested for high-risk HPV genotypes (hrHPV) by MY09/11, AmpFire UCSF and AmpFire RMH. Cohen's kappa coefficient was used to test for reproducibility. Results: The hrHPV positivity by MY09/11 and AmpFire UCSF was 13% and 20.7% (k = 0.73) for anal specimens and was 26.3% and 32.6% (k = 0.67) for penile specimens. Specifically, good reproducibility was for types 16 and 18 (k = 0.69 and k = 0.71) for anal specimens and (k = 0.50 and k = 0.72) for penile specimens. The hrHPV positivity by AmpFire at UCSF and RMH was 20.7% for both laboratories (k = 0.87) for anal specimens and was 34.9% and 31.9% (k = 0.89) for penile specimens. Specifically, excellent reproducibility was for types 16 and 18 for anal specimens (k = 0.80 and k = 1.00) and penile specimens (k = 0.85 and k = 0.91). Conclusion: Results show that MY09/11 and AmpFire assays have good reproducibility while the AmpFire UCSF and RMH assays have excellent reproducibility. These results show that AmpFire is a promising HPV genotyping test.

Agreement between Xpert and AmpFire tests for high-risk human papillomavirus among HIV-positive women in Rwanda.

Background: High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) may cause more than 99% of cervical cancers worldwide. Little is known about performance differences in tests for hrHPV. Objective: This study analysed agreement for detection of hrHPV between the established, clinically validated Xpert HPV assay and the novel isothermal amplification-based AmpFire HPV genotyping assay. Methods: This study was nested in a larger project on cervical cancer screening among approximately 5000 women living with HIV in Kigali, Rwanda. This sub-study included 298 participants who underwent initial screening for cervical cancer using the Xpert HPV assay and visual inspection with acetic acid in 2017 and tested positive by either or both. Participants were rescreened using colposcopy, and cervical samples were collected between June 2018 and June 2019. Samples were then tested for HPV using the Xpert HPV assay and AmpFire HPV genotyping assay. Agreement between results from both tests was analysed using an exact version of McNemar test and chi-square test. Results: Overall agreement and kappa value for detection of hrHPV by Xpert and AmpFire were 89% and 0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.70-0.85). AmpFire was marginally more likely to diagnose hrHPV-positive than Xpert (p = 0.05), due primarily to the extra positivity for HPV16 (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Overall, there was good to excellent agreement between the Xpert and AmpFire when testing hrHPV types among women living with HIV. AmpFire was more likely to test extra cases of HPV16, the most carcinogenic HPV type, but the clinical meaning of detecting additional HPV16 infections remains unknown.

Safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir for re-treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in patients with previous direct-acting antiviral treatment failure in Rwanda (SHARED-3): a single-arm trial.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 4 non-a/d subtypes, which frequently have NS5A resistance-associated substitutions, are highly prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa. These subtypes, particularly genotype 4r, have been associated with higher rates of failure of treatment regimens containing the NS5A inhibitors ledipasvir or daclatasvir, which are the most accessible direct-acting antivirals in low-income countries. Clinical evidence regarding the efficacy of re-treatment options for these subtypes is limited. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir for the treatment of adults in Rwanda with chronic HCV infection, predominantly of genotype 4, and a history of direct-acting antiviral treatment failure. METHODS: In this single-arm prospective trial, we enrolled adults (aged ≥18 years) with a HCV RNA titre of at least 1000 IU/mL, and a documented history of direct-acting antiviral failure. Patients were assessed for eligibility at a single study site after referral from hospitals with HCV treatment programmes throughout Rwanda, and participants for whom sofosbuvir-ledipasvir treatment had failed in the previous SHARED trial were also included. Participants with decompensated liver disease or hepatitis B virus co-infection were excluded. Participants were treated once daily with an oral fixed-dose combination tablet containing sofosbuvir (400 mg), velpatasvir (100 mg), and voxilaprevir (100 mg) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with a sustained virological response 12 weeks after completion of treatment (SVR12) in the intention-to-treat population. Viral sequencing of NS3, NS5A, and NS5B genes was done at baseline in all participants and at end of follow-up (week 24) in participants with treatment failure. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03888729) and is completed. FINDINGS: Between Sept 23, 2019, and Jan 10, 2020, 49 individuals were screened and 40 participants were enrolled. 20 (50%) were female, 20 (50%) were male, median age was 63 years (IQR 56-68), and median HCV viral load was 6·2 log10 IU/mL (5·8-6·5) at baseline. The genotype subtypes identified were 4r (18 [45%] participants), 4k (six [15%]), 4b (five [13%]), 4q (four [10%]), 4l (two [5%]), 4a (one [3%]), 4m (one [3%]), and 3h (one [3%]). One (3%) genotype 4 isolate could not be subtyped, and one (3%) isolate was of unknown genotype. All successfully sequenced isolates (33 [83%]) had at least two NS5A resistance-associated substitutions and 25 (63%) had three or more. 39 (98% [95% CI 87-100]) participants had SVR12. Seven (18%) participants had a total of ten grade 3, 4, or 5 adverse events, including three (8%) cases of hypertension, and one (3%) case each of cataract, diabetes, gastrointestinal bleeding, joint pain, low back pain, vaginal cancer, and sudden death. Four of these events were categorised as serious adverse events resulting in hospitalisation. The one sudden death occurred at home from an unknown cause 4 weeks after the completion of treatment. No serious adverse event was determined to be related to the study drug or resulted in treatment discontinuation. INTERPRETATION: A 12 week course of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir is safe and efficacious for the re-treatment of individuals infected with HCV genotype 4 non-a/d subtypes with frequent baseline NS5A resistance-associated substitutions, following failure of previous direct-acting antiviral treatment. Improved affordability and access to sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir in regions with these subtypes is crucial. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.

Safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir to treat chronic hepatitis C virus infection in treatment-naive patients in Rwanda (SHARED-3): a single-arm trial.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 4 is the predominant type of HCV found in sub-Saharan Africa. Various genotype 4 subtypes, such as 4r, frequently have resistance-associated substitutions that can increase rates of treatment failure with common direct-acting antiviral regimens. In-vitro studies suggest that the NS5A inhibitor velpatasvir is effective against viral isolates containing such resistance-associated substitutions, but its clinical efficacy against genotype 4 non-a/d subtypes in sub-Saharan Africa remains to be confirmed. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir among adults chronically infected with HCV and naive to direct-acting antiviral treatment in Rwanda, where genotype 4 non-a/d subtypes predominate. METHODS: In this single-arm prospective trial, we enrolled adults (age ≥18 years) in Rwanda who had chronic HCV infection and a plasma HCV RNA titre of at least 1000 IU/mL. Patients were referred from hospitals with HCV treatment programmes throughout Rwanda and were sequentially enrolled and assessed for eligibility at a single study site. Individuals with decompensated liver disease or hepatitis B virus co-infection were excluded. Participants were given an oral fixed-dose combination tablet of sofosbuvir (400 mg) and velpatasvir (100 mg) once-daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with a sustained virological response 12 weeks after completion of treatment (SVR12) in the intention-to-treat population. Viral sequencing of the NS5A and NS5B genes was done at baseline for all participants and end of follow-up (week 24) for participants who did not have SVR12. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03888729) and is completed. FINDINGS: Between Sept 23, 2019, and Jan 10, 2020, 73 individuals were screened for eligibility, of whom 12 (16%) were excluded and 61 (84%) were enrolled. 40 (66%) participants were female, 21 (34%) were male, median age was 64 years (IQR 51-74), and median baseline HCV viral load was 5·7 log10 IU/mL (5·2-6·2). The genotypes identified among the participants were 4k (28 [46%] participants), 4r (11 [18%]), 4v (eight [13%]), 4q (five [8%]), 4l (three [5%]), 4b (one [2%]), 4c (one [2%]), and one undetermined genotype 4 subtype. Three isolates could not be sequenced and were of indeterminate genotype. Of the 55 HCV isolates that were successfully sequenced, all had at least two NS5A resistance-associated substitutions. 59 (97% [95% CI 89-99]) participants had SVR12. 18 (30%) participants had grade 3 adverse events (including 12 [20%] with hypertension), and none had grade 4 adverse events. Four (7%) participants had serious adverse events, including one asthma exacerbation, one abscess, one uterine myoma, and one pelvic fracture related to a motor vehicle accident. No serious adverse events were attributed to the study drug and no adverse event resulted in discontinuation of the study drug. INTERPRETATION: A 12-week regimen of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir is safe and efficacious in treating chronic HCV genotype 4 infection in patients in Rwanda. This regimen could be an effective treatment option in regions known to have a high prevalence of HCV genotype 4 of diverse non-a/d subtypes. FUNDING: Gilead Sciences.

Type-specific persistence, clearance and incidence of high-risk HPV among screen-positive Rwandan women living with HIV.

BACKGROUND: Persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) is a critical step in cervical carcinogenesis. We report on type-specific hrHPV persistence, clearance and incidence among screen-positive Rwandan women living with HIV (WLWH). METHODS: This was a nested analysis from a large cervical cancer screening study of ~ 5000 Rwandan WLWH. Women who tested positive for hrHPV and/or visual inspection with acetic acid were referred to colposcopy. For a subset of women (n = 298) who were ≥ 6 months delayed in receiving colposcopy, we tested their screening and colposcopy visit specimens using the AmpFire HPV genotyping assay that tests 14 hrHPV types (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, and 68) individually. RESULTS: The mean, median (interquartile range [IQR]) and range of time between the screening and colposcopy visits were 644, 650 (490-820.5) and 197-1161 days, respectively. Mean, median (IQR) and range of age at the screening visit were 38, 37 (34-43) and 30-54 years, respectively. Two-hundred eighty-three (95.0%) had CD4 count (cells per mm3) data available at baseline with mean, median (IQR) and range of 592, 513 (346-717) and 0-7290, respectively. Two-hundred thirty-five WLWH were positive for at least one hrHPV type at the screening visit, of whom 50.2% had at least one HPV type-specific infection persist; 37.2% of all HPV infections detected at the screening visit persisted. Compared to all other HPV types in aggregate, HPV16 (vs. non-HPV16 types) (47.7%, p = 0.03) and HPV33 (vs. non-HPV33 types) (56.7%, p = 0.03) were significantly more likely, and HPV39 (vs. non-HPV39 types) (6.7%, p = 0.01), HPV51 (vs. non-HPV51 types) (15.6%, p < 0.01), and HPV66 (vs. non-HPV66 types (17.9%, p = 0.04) were significantly less likely, to persist. Lower CD4 counts were associated with having any persistent hrHPV infection (ptrend = 0.04) and multiple persistent hrHPV infections (ptrend = 0.04). CONCLUSION: There is a significant proportion of WLWH with persistent hrHPV infection, emphasizing the need to vaccinate them against HPV prior to becoming sexually active.

Twelve-Year Trend in the Prevalence of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection Among Rwandan Women Living With HIV.

BACKGROUND: We examined the trend in prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) cervical infection among Rwandan women living with HIV (WLWH) over 12 years. METHODS: Prevalence of cervical hrHPV DNA was measured in 3 studies at 3 different time periods in 3 different groups of WLWH using 3 different but comparable hrHPV tests: a MY09/MY11 PCR test in 2005 (RWISA; n = 497), careHPV in 2009-2010 (HPV Demonstration; n = 1242), and Xpert HPV test in 2016-2018 (U54; n = 4734). Prevalences were adjusted for age and CD4 cell count. RESULTS: HrHPV prevalence decreased over time from 42.5% to 32.2% to 26.5% (P < .001). CD4 cell counts improved over time (Ptrend <.001) so that the percentage of WLWH with CD4 counts of ≥500 cells/µL increased from 7.7% in 2005 to 42.2% in 2009-2010 and 61.1% in 2016-2018. Thus, after adjustment for differences in CD4 counts and age, hrHPV prevalences were more similar over time: 32.6% for RWISA, 30.6% for HPV Demonstration, and 27.1% for U54 (P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of hrHPV among WLWH has decreased over the past decade, most likely the result of improved immune reconstitution due to better HIV care and management in Rwanda.

Factors associated with tungiasis among primary school children: a cross-sectional study in a rural district in Rwanda.

BACKGROUND: Tungiasis is a relatively frequent ectoparasitosis in low-income settings, yet its morbidity and social impact are still not well understood due to the scarcity of information. In Rwanda, data on the magnitude and conditions leading to the tungiasis is rare. This study sought to determine the prevalence and factors associated with tungiasis among primary school children in Rwandan setting. METHOD: A descriptive cross-sectional study utilising systematic random sampling method was adopted to select 384 children from three primary schools. From July to October 2018, data were collected on socio-demographic characteristics of children, parents, and households. Logistic regression was applied to analyse socio-demographic factors associated with tungiasis with a level of significance set at P-value< 0.05. RESULTS: Prevalence of tungiasis among three primary schools was 23%. Factors associated with tungiasis included walking barefoot (AOR: 78.41; 95% CI: 17.91-343.10), irregular wearing of shoes (AOR: 24.73; 95% CI: 6.27-97.41), having dirty feet (AOR: 12.69; 95% CI: 4.93-32.64), wearing dirty clothes (AOR: 12.69; 95% CI: 4.18-38.50), and living in a house with earthen plastered floor (AOR: 28.79; 95% CI: 7.11-116.57). Children infected with tungiasis attended class less frequently (AOR: 19.16, 95%CI: 7.20-50.97) and scored lower (AOR: 110.85, 95%CI: 43.08-285.20) than those non-infected. The low school attendance and poor performance could be partly explained by difficulty of walking, lack of concentration during school activities, and isolation or discrimination from classmates. CONCLUSION: Tungiasis was a public health challenge among school going children in a rural Rwandan setting. This study revealed that children affected with tungiasis had poor hygiene, inadequate housing environments and consequently poor school attendance and performance. Improving socio-economic conditions of households with special emphasis on hygiene of family members and housing conditions, would contribute to preventing tungiasis.

Protocol for the study of cervical cancer screening technologies in HIV-infected women living in Rwanda.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal method(s) for screening HIV-infected women, especially for those living in sub-Saharan Africa, for cervical precancer and early cancer has yet to be established. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A convenience sample of >5000 Rwandan women, ages 30-54 years and living with HIV infection, is being consented and enroled into a cross-sectional study of cervical cancer screening strategies. Participants are completing an administered short risk factor questionnaire and being screened for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) using the Xpert HPV assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, California, USA), unaided visual inspection after acetic acid (VIA) and aided VIA using the Enhanced Visual Assessment (EVA) system (Mobile ODT, Tel Aviv, Israel). Women positive for hrHPV and/or by unaided VIA undergo colposcopy, which includes the collection of two cervical specimens prior to undergoing a four-quadrant microbiopsy protocol. The colposcopy-collected specimens are being tested by dual immunocytochemical staining for p16INK4a and Ki-67 (CINtec PLUS Cytology, Ventana, Tucson, Arizona, USA) and for E6 or E7 oncoprotein for 8 hrHPV genotypes (HPV16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 45, 52 and 58) using the next-generation AV Avantage hrHPV E6/E7 test (Arbor Vita Corporation, Freemont, California, USA). Women with a local pathology diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) or more severe (CIN2+) or pathology review diagnosis of CIN grade three or more severe (CIN3+) will receive treatment. Clinical performance and cost-effectiveness (eg, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values) of different screening strategies and algorithms will be evaluated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by local and institutional review boards for human subjects research. At the completion of the study, results will be disseminated to the scientific community through peer-reviewed publication and to the Rwandan stakeholders through an external advisory panel.