Pandemic Care Through Collaboration: Lessons From a COVID-19 Field Hospital.

During the surge of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections in March and April 2020, many skilled-nursing facilities in the Boston area closed to COVID-19 post-acute admissions because of infection control concerns and staffing shortages. Local government and health care leaders collaborated to establish a 1000-bed field hospital for patients with COVID-19, with 500 respite beds for the undomiciled and 500 post-acute care (PAC) beds within 9 days. The PAC hospital provided care for 394 patients over 7 weeks, from April 10 to June 2, 2020. In this report, we describe our implementation strategy, including organization structure, admissions criteria, and clinical services. Partnership with government, military, and local health care organizations was essential for logistical and medical support. In addition, dynamic workflows necessitated clear communication pathways, clinical operations expertise, and highly adaptable staff.

Comparison of outcomes and safety of "facilitated" versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Recent studies have documented that use of "facilitated" percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) may be harmful. In-hospital outcomes in 1,553 consecutive patients with STEMI without cardiogenic shock who underwent PCI at a single tertiary center within 6 hours of presentation were analyzed. The study group included 767 patients who underwent primary PCI who initially presented to the tertiary center and were triaged for emergent PCI and 786 patients who underwent facilitated PCI who were pretreated at a community hospital with a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet inhibitor and/or intravenous thrombolytic therapy before transfer for catheter-based therapy. Compared with patients who underwent primary PCI, the facilitated PCI group had longer door-to-balloon times (162 +/- 57 vs 113 +/- 61 minutes), higher baseline infarct-vessel TIMI 3 flow rates (52.8% vs 25.4%; p <0.001), and no increase in major adverse in-hospital outcomes. In patients treated with door-to-balloon times >90 and < or =150 minutes, patients who underwent facilitated PCI had fewer composite major adverse clinical events (combined mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, emergent repeated PCI, hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic stroke, and nonintracranial TIMI major bleeding) compared with patients who underwent primary PCI (relative risk 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.26 to 0.96, p = 0.034). In conclusion, facilitated PCI can be safely used to increase pharmacologic reperfusion before catheter-based therapy in patients with STEMI without an increase in clinical hazard and with fewer major adverse clinical events in patients treated with door-to-balloon times >90 and < or =150 minutes.

Long-term efficacy and safety of sirolimus-eluting vs bare-metal stents.

BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have documented persistent clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES)in reducing the need for target vessel revascularization without an increase in myocardial infarction (MI) or mortality, the long-term safety and efficacy of CYPHER stent use in routine clinical practice, including off-label stent implantation, remains uncertain. METHODS: We compared long-term clinical outcomes in 2,550 patients treated with one or more SES with 1,022 patients treated with one or more bare metal or heparin-coated stents (BMS). The study groups included 1,058 SES patients (41.5%) and 488 BMS patients (47.7%) with off-label indications. A propensity-score method was utilized to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. Patients were followed for up to five years for the occurrence of all-cause mortality, MI and repeat target vessel revascularization. RESULTS: Compared to BMS patients, SES patients demonstrated significantly improved event-free survival with respect to all-cause mortality (RR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.80, P = 0.014) and repeat target vessel revascularization (RR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.99 to 3.73, P < 0.001), with no significant difference in the incidence of cumulative MI. A landmark analysis, examining composite adverse events occurring six months after stent implantation in the two study groups, demonstrated no increased late hazard associated with SES use (relative risk, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.46). CONCLUSIONS: Use of SES in routine clinical practice, including off-label indications, is associated with improved long-term mortality, reduced need for repeat target vessel revascularization and no increase in MI compared to BMS.