Examining patient reported outcome measures for phantom limb pain: measurement use in a sample of Veterans with amputation.

PURPOSE: Phantom limb pain (PLP) is treated with medications and non-drug treatments. Best clinical practices for measuring treatment outcomes have not been defined. The objective of this study was to evaluate the internal consistency of patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) in a sample of Veterans with lower limb amputation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Veteran phone survey included administering PROMs [1) PLP numeric rating scale (NRS), 2) general pain NRS, 3) Pain, Enjoyment, and General Activity (PEG) scale, 4) Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference Short Form 6b Replacement, 5) PROMIS Short Form Depression 4a and 6) PROMIS Short Form Anxiety 4a]. RESULTS: Fifty Veterans (48 male, 2 female; average age: 66 years) completed PROMs. In our sample, 40 Veterans (80%) experienced PLP with an average PLP NRS of 5 (±3.4). Internal consistency of each measure was good to excellent based on Cronbach's alpha co-efficient of >0.80. Correlations were moderate between PLP NRS and all other measures (≤0.32). Although many Veterans expressed bothersome PLP, the scores reflecting pain interference and impact on function were lower than pain intensity. Consistent use of outcome measures is needed to determine the effect of interventions for amputation-related pain.

The majority of Veterans reported phantom limb pain and residual limb pain, though the frequency and duration of the pain conditions varied.Clinicians should use caution when using only the numeric rating scale to assess pain, as it may not give enough information to fully evaluate the pain experience.It is recommended that clinicians evaluate phantom limb pain separate from general pain to best serve patients' needs.

Clinician perspectives on postamputation pain assessment and rehabilitation interventions.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore self-reported Veterans Affairs (VA) amputation clinician perspectives and clinical practices regarding the measurement and treatment for amputation-related pain. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey with 73 VA rehabilitation clinicians within the VA Health Care System. RESULTS: The most frequent clinical backgrounds of respondents included physical therapists (36%), prosthetists (32%), and physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist (21%). Forty-one clinicians (56%) reported using pain outcome measures with a preference for average pain intensity numeric rating scale (generic) (97%), average phantom limb pain intensity numeric rating scale (80%), or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference (12%) measures. Clinicians' most frequently recommended interventions were compression garments, desensitization, and physical therapy. Clinicians identified mindset, cognition, and motivation as factors that facilitate a patient's response to treatments. Conversely, clinicians identified poor adherence, lack of belief in interventions, and preference for traditional pain interventions (e.g., medications) as common barriers to improvement. We asked about the frequently used treatment of graded motor imagery. Although graded motor imagery was originally developed with 3 phases (limb laterality, explicit motor imagery, mirror therapy), clinicians reported primarily using explicit motor imagery and mirror therapy. RESULTS: Most clinicians who use standardized pain measures prefer intensity ratings. Clinicians select pain interventions based on the patient's presentation. This work contributes to the understanding of factors influencing clinicians' treatment selection for nondrug interventions. Future work that includes qualitative components could further discern implementation barriers to amputation pain rehabilitation interventions for greater consistency in practice.

Virtual Reality Game Selection for Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation: A Therapist's Wish List for Game Developers.

This project explored the selection process of commercially available virtual reality (VR) games for traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Occupational therapy practitioners (OTPs) developed a classification framework that they used to evaluate VR games. The classification framework focused on movements required to effectively play the game, cognitive demand, position for game play, ease in menu navigation, and perceived therapeutic applications. OTPs used the ratings to aid in game selection and identified relevant game examples that allowed customizable settings and basic navigation with a game focus on functional activities. The OTPs and the research team identified the need for further work on accessibility and adaptability of game features (e.g., difficulty and limb usage) allowing for more individualization to optimize outcomes of VR-enhanced rehabilitation. The classification framework was useful in evaluating the potential therapeutic benefit of commercially available VR games. However, trial of the game by clinicians prior to use was still warranted.

Veteran Perspectives on Phantom Limb Pain and Non-Drug Interventions.

Background: Phantom limb pain (PLP) commonly occurs post-amputation and can negatively affect the daily functioning of persons with amputation. Best practices for medication and non-drug management remain unclear. Objective: To better understand the PLP experience and patients' familiarity with treatments, phone interviews were conducted at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Regional Amputation Center in Veterans with amputations. Methods: Fifty Veteran participants (average age 66, 96% male) with lower limb amputation were recruited for phone-based data collection of patient-reported outcomes (ie, demographics using the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales-Revised (TAPES-R) and pain experience using the Phantom Phenomena Questionnaire) to characterize the population and a semi-structured interview. Notes taken during interviews were analyzed using the Krueger and Casey constant comparison analysis method. Results: Participants had an average of 15 years since amputation, and 80% reported PLP as identified with the Phantom Phenomena Questionnaire. Investigators identified several core themes from the qualitative interviews including 1) high variability in the experience of PLP, 2) acceptance and resilience, and 3) PLP treatment perceptions. The majority of participants reported trying common non-drug treatments with none endorsed consistently as highly effective. Conclusion: More research is needed to inform identification and implementation of clinical best practices for non-drug interventions for PLP and understand the factors that influence engagement in non-drug interventions. The participants in this study were largely male, so these results may not be generalizable to females.

Footwear limitations in women prosthesis users relate to more than preference.

BACKGROUND: The option to wear desired footwear may be an important part of community reintegration after lower-limb amputation. OBJECTIVES: This study explored outcomes related to footwear, health, and participation in women Veterans with lower-limb amputation. METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire was mailed to all women Veterans age 18-82 years with major lower-limb amputation(s) who had received prosthetics services in the US Department of Veterans Affairs (N = 538). The questionnaire assessed Perceived Challenges (including clothing limitations, prosthetic foot limitations [width, height, and shape], and shoe avoidance for safety concerns), type of footwear used and preference, and included subscales from the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System, Amputee Body Image Scale Prosthetic Limb Users' Survey of Mobility, Community Participation Index, Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale, and Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire. Bivariate correlations examined relationships between a composite measure of Perceived Challenges and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred questionnaires were returned (18.6% response rate; 3 excluded for limited prosthesis use). The Perceived Challenges score was significantly correlated with scores for the Amputee Body Image Scale-Revised (r = 0.24, p = 0.019), Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (ability to participate: r = -0.25, p = 0.014), Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (utility: r = -0.32, p = 0.001, appearance: r = -0.48, p < 0.001), Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (r = -0.20, p = 0.046), and Prosthetic Limb Users' Survey of Mobility (r = -0.21, p = 0.036), but not depression or anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Women who have greater issues with how their prosthesis affects the shoes and clothing they can wear also have poorer body image, reduced functional capabilities, and lower reported participation in activities. Improved prosthetic foot design may help to improve social participation and other important outcomes for women prosthesis users.