The current state of transplant advanced practice providers: results of the advanced practice provider practice survey.

Advanced practice providers (APPs) are trained, licensed health care providers. The American Society of Transplant APP community of practice developed an electronic survey to investigate transplant APP demographics, scope of practice, and academic activities. We defined the top of scope of practice as delivering health care to the fullest extent of APP education and training as allowed by state laws and regulations. From July 11, 2020, to August 31, 2020, 307 invitations were e-mailed and survey links were distributed electronically on the community of practice hub and social media. Two hundred fifty-three APPs responded. APPs practice in inpatient and outpatient settings. Among the respondent APPs, 11.5% assist in the operating room (OR), 46.3% of inpatient and 46.6% of outpatient APPs perform procedures, and 17.8% run specialized APP clinics. 26.2% feel they do not function at the top of their scope of practice and 29.7% were expected to function as a coordinator some or all of the time. Forty-three percent gave invited lectures, 41.5% have published, and 69.2% teach physician trainees. 74.7% and 35.1%, respectively, would like to participate in research and teach but are limited by time, opportunity, and experience. APPs should practice at the top of their scope of practice. Clinical workloads and lack of time limit the ability of APP to teach and contribute to evidence-based practice.

Outcomes of Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients Stratified by Histologic Biopsy Findings.

Delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation is associated with an increased risk of graft failure. We studied the histologic findings among adult kidney transplant recipients transplanted between January 2000 and June 2015 who had DGF and had a kidney biopsy within 14 days of transplant. Death censored graft failure (DCGF) and death at 1 and 3 years after transplant were examined. A total of 269 transplant recipients fulfilled our selection criteria, of which 152 (56.51%) had acute tubular necrosis (ATN), 44 (16.4%) had acute rejection (AR), mainly T-cell mediated rejection (n = 31), 35 (13%) had ATN with AR (mainly T-cell mediated rejection, n = 26), and 38 (14.1%) had other pathology. Compared with those with ATN alone, kidney transplant recipients with AR alone had a significantly higher risk of DCGF at 1 year post transplant (adjusted hazard ratio = 3.70; 95% confidence interval 1.5-9.5; P = .006). Those with AR alone had an increased risk of DCGF at 3 years post transplant (hazard ratio = 3.10; 95% confidence interval 1.3-8.5; P = .01) in crude analyses. There was no association between DGF etiology and mortality. Early renal biopsy can be used to distinguish AR, which has protocolized treatments, from other etiologies. This could potentially alter allograft survival within 1 year of transplant complicated by DGF.

Risk factors and outcomes for delayed kidney graft function in simultaneous heart and kidney transplant recipients: A UNOS/OPTN database analysis.

There are no prior studies assessing the risk factors and outcomes for kidney delayed graft function (K-DGF) in simultaneous heart and kidney (SHK) transplant recipients. Using the OPTN/UNOS database, we sought to identify risk factors associated with the development of K-DGF in this unique population, as well as outcomes associated with K-DGF. A total of 1161 SHK transplanted between 1998 and 2018 were included in the analysis, of which 311 (27%) were in the K-DGF (+) group and 850 in the K-DGF (-) group. In the multivariable analysis, history of pretransplant dialysis (OR: 3.95; 95% CI: 2.94 to 5.29; p < .001) was significantly associated with the development of K-DGF, as was donor death from cerebrovascular accident and longer cold ischemia time of either organ. SHK recipients with K-DGF had increased mortality (HR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.52 to 2.60; p < .001) and death censored kidney graft failure (HR: 3.51; 95% CI: 2.29 to 5.36; p < .001) in the multivariable analysis. Similar outcomes were obtained when limiting our study to 2008-2018. Similar to kidney-only recipients, K-DGF in SHK recipients is associated with worse outcomes. Careful matching of recipients and donors, as well as peri-operative management, may help reduce the risk of K-DGF and the associated detrimental effects.

The Utility of Donor-specific Antibody Monitoring and the Role of Kidney Biopsy in Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Recipients With De Novo Donor-specific Antibodies.

BACKGROUND: There is limited information about the utility of donor-specific antibody (DSA) against HLA monitoring and the role of protocol kidney biopsy for de novo DSA (dnDSA) in simultaneous liver and kidney (SLK) transplant recipients. METHODS: We analyzed SLK transplant recipients transplanted between January 2005 and December 2017, who had DSA checked posttransplant. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether they developed dnDSA posttransplant (dnDSA+) or not (dnDSA-). Kidney graft rejection ±45 d of dnDSA and a kidney death-censored graft survival were the primary endpoints. RESULTS: A total of 83 SLK transplant recipients fulfilled our selection criteria. Of those, 23 were dnDSA+ and 60 were dnDSA-. Twenty-two of 23 dnDSA+ patients had DSA against class II HLA, predominantly against DQ. Fifteen recipients underwent kidney biopsy ±45 d of dnDSA. Six of these were clinically indicated due to kidney graft dysfunction. The other 9 had a protocol kidney biopsy only due to dnDSA, and 6 of these 9 had a rejection. Also, 3 recipients had sequential biopsies of both the kidney and liver grafts. Among those with sequential biopsies of both grafts, there was a difference between the organs in the rate and types of rejections. At last follow up, dnDSA was not associated with graft failure of either the kidney or liver. CONCLUSIONS: Although our study was limited by a small sample size, it suggests the potential utility of DSA monitoring and protocol kidney biopsy for dnDSA.

Delayed kidney graft function in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant recipients is associated with early pancreas allograft failure.

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication associated with significant untoward effects in kidney-alone transplantation. The incidence and outcomes following kidney delayed graft function (K-DGF) among patients undergoing simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation are less certain. We analyzed SPK recipients transplanted at our center between January 1994 and December 2017. A total of 632 recipients fulfilled the selection criteria, including 69 (11%) with K-DGF and 563 without. The incidence of K-DGF was significantly higher in recipients of organs from older donors and donation after circulatory death (DCD). The presence of K-DGF was significantly associated with an increased risk of pancreas graft failure during the first 90 days (n = 9, incidence rate [IR] 2.45/100 person-months), but not with late pancreas failure (n = 32, IR 0.84/100 person-months), kidney graft failure, or patient death. Although DCD was associated with K-DGF, it was not associated with either pancreas (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.58-1.44, P = .69) or kidney (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.66-1.82, P = .74) graft failure after adjustment for potential confounders. We found K-DGF to be a significant risk factor for pancreas graft failure but not kidney graft failure, with the major risk period being early (<90 days) posttransplant, and the major donor risk factor being older donor age.

Blessing and a curse of outpatient management of delayed graft function.

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication occurring most often after deceased donor kidney transplant with several donor characteristics as well as immunologic factors that lead to its development post-transplant. These patients require dialysis and close kidney function monitoring until sufficient allograft function is achieved. This has resulted in limited options for DGF management, either prolonged hospitalization until graft function improves to the point where dialysis is no longer needed or discharge back to their home dialysis unit with periodic follow up in the transplant clinic. DGF is associated with a higher risk for acute rejection, premature graft failure, and 30-d readmission; therefore, these patients need close monitoring, immunosuppression management, and prompt allograft biopsy if prolonged DGF is observed. This may not occur if these patients are discharged back to their home dialysis unit. To address this issue, the University of Wisconsin-Madison created a clinic in 2011 specialized in outpatient DGF management. This clinic was able to successfully reduce hospital length of stay without an increase in 30-d readmission, graft loss, and patient death.

Management of Tumor Necrosis Factor α Inhibitor Therapy After Renal Transplantation: A Comparative Analysis and Associated Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Biologic agents inhibiting the tumor necrosis factor α pathway (TNFα-Is) are used to treat systemic inflammatory diseases. The best management of these agents after renal transplantation is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate peritransplant use of TNFα-Is and associated outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective, single-center study of adult renal-transplant-recipients (RTRs) transplanted between 1/1/1998-12/31/2017, who received TNFα-Is for inflammatory disease prior to transplant. Qualifying patients were divided into 2 cohorts: patients who resumed TNFα-Is after transplant and those who did not. Outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 5256 renal transplants occurred in the study window; 14 patients met inclusion criteria. Primary indication for TNFα-I was Crohn's-disease (CD; 57.1%). Infliximab was utilized most frequently (50%). Seven RTRs resumed TNFα-I posttransplant; mean time to resumption of 10.6±4.35 months (median=6 months), 85.7% for CD. Immunosuppression was modified in 2 patients (28.6%) in response to restarting TNFα-I therapy. Seven RTRs did not resume TNFα-Is following transplant; the majority of these had rheumatic diseases. There was no significant difference in time to first bacterial or fungal infection, rejection, or patient survival between the 2 groups. Last measured estimated glomerular-filtration-rate was similar between groups (TNFα-I: 41 ± 14.2 vs 48.6 ± 8.6, P = 0.25). No patient had cytomegalovirus infection; however, 42.8% of each cohort had documented BK virus infection. Malignancy occurred more frequently in the cohort that resumed TNFα-Is (42.8% vs 14.3%, P = 0.24); however, this was not statistically significant. Conclusion and Relevance: TNFα-I therapy prior to renal-transplant is relatively uncommon. The decision to continue therapy after transplant must balance risks of infection and malignancy against inflammatory disease recurrence. A multidisciplinary treatment approach is necessary as use of TNFα-I affects immunosuppressive management and appears to affect transplant outcomes. Future studies are needed to further clarify the role of TNFα-I therapy use in RTRs with inflammatory disorders focusing on its correlation with both BK and malignancy.

Current outcomes of chronic active antibody mediated rejection - A large single center retrospective review using the updated BANFF 2013 criteria.

BACKGROUND: The updated BANFF 2013 criteria has enabled a more standardized and complete serologic and histopathologic diagnosis of chronic active antibody mediated rejection (cAMR). Little data exists on the outcomes of cAMR since the initiation of this updated criteria. METHODS: 123 consecutive patients with biopsy proven cAMR (BANFF 2013) between 2006 and 2012 were identified. RESULTS: Patients identified with cAMR were followed for a median of 9.5 (2.7-20.3) years after transplant and 4.3 (0-8.8) years after cAMR. Ninety-four (76%) recipients lost their grafts with a median survival of 1.9 years after diagnosis with cAMR. Mean C4d and allograft glomerulopathy scores were 2.6 ± 0.7 and 2.2 ± 0.8, respectively. 53.2% had class II DSA, 32.2% had both class I and II, and 14.5% had class I DSA only. Chronicity score >8 (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1-8.4, p=0.05), DSA >2500 MFI (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.1-6.8, p=0.03), Scr >3mg/dL (HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.6-6.3, p=0.001) and UPC >1g/g (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-4.5, p=0.003) were associated with a higher risk of graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: cAMR was associated with poor graft survival after diagnosis. Improved therapies and earlier detection strategies are likely needed to improve outcomes of cAMR in kidney transplant recipients.

In Kidney Transplant Recipients With a Positive Virtual Crossmatch, High PRA was Associated With Lower Incidence of Viral Infections.

BACKGROUND: There is little information on the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes associated with CMV and BK infections in sensitized patients. METHODS: We examined 254 consecutive kidney transplant recipients with positive virtual crossmatch and negative flow crossmatch. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients (43%) developed CMV disease or BK infection or nephropathy (BKVN). Specifically, 78 patients (30.7%) developed BK infection, 19 (7.5%) had BKVN, and 33 (12.9%) presented with CMV disease. Four patients (1.5%) developed both infections. Mean time from transplant to diagnosis for BK and CMV was 4.07 ± 3.10 and 8.35 ± 5.20 months, respectively. African American (HR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.37-5.07; P = 0.003), thymoglobulin induction (HR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.38-3.43; P = 0.0008), DSA greater than 500 MFI at transplant (HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.05-2.57; P = 0.03), history of diabetes (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.01-2.60; P = 0.04), CMV D+/R- (HR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.06-5.01; P = 0.03), and acute rejection (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.99-2.24; P = 0.05) were associated with increase incident of BK/CMV, whereas rituximab (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.24-0.91; P = 0.02), peak PRA greater than 80% (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.27-0.84; P = 0.01), and living donor transplant (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.87; P = 0.01) were associated with a lower likelihood of infection. Thymoglobulin induction (HR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.02-6.13; P = 0.04), and peak PRA greater than 80% (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.23-0.86; P = 0.02) remained significant predictors of infection after multivariate adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Although more than 40% of patients with a positive virtual crossmatch presented with BK infection/CMV disease, high PRA greater than 80% seemed to be protective.

Older kidney transplant patients experience less antibody-mediated rejection: a retrospective study of patients with mild to moderate sensitization.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data stratifying by age the incidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in kidney transplant patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of all adult, renal transplant recipients at a single institution between December 12, 2009, and March 16, 2011. Mildly and moderately sensitized patients were defined as patients with positive donor-specific antibody (DSA) and negative flow cross-match. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-six patients were determined to have mild to moderate pre-transplantation sensitization. Thirty percent of patients younger than 40 yr of age experienced AMR vs. 15% in the older group (p = 0.04). There was a disproportionate increase in DSA for younger patients at 12 months, particularly for antibodies to class II. Histologic presence of C4d deposition was independently associated with AMR on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Following renal transplantation, moderately sensitized patients aged 40 yr old and older were less likely to develop AMR when compared with younger patients.

C1q Binding Activity of De Novo Donor-specific HLA Antibodies in Renal Transplant Recipients With and Without Antibody-mediated Rejection.

BACKGROUND: Complement fixation by donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) is a primary mechanism for antibody-mediated damage of organ allografts. Using a recently developed kit that measures C1q binding to distinguish complement fixing and nonfixing antibodies, studies showed that C1q + DSAs have a higher risk of rejection and graft loss compared to C1q-DSA. The objective of this study was to assess the ability of the C1q-binding assay to identify clinically significant de novo DSA in renal transplant recipients and to define the properties of DSA that confer C1q binding ability. METHODS: The DSA-positive sera from 34 kidney recipients, 19 with biopsy-proven antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) + and 15 who were AMR-, were assayed in C1q-binding assays (C1q Screen; One Lambda, Inc. Canoga Park, CA). The correlation between C1q-binding activity, presence of AMR, DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values, and immunoglobulin G isotype was determined. RESULTS: Fifty-three percent (10/19) of sera from AMR+ patients had C1q + DSA, whereas only 13% (2/15) of sera from AMR- patients contained C1q + DSA. C1q + DSA exhibited significantly higher MFI values regardless of whether they were from AMR+ or AMR- patients (16,118 ± 6698 vs 6429 ± 4003; P < 0.0001). C1q + DSA converted to C1q - when diluted to a comparable MFI level as the C1q - DSA from AMR- patients, and some C1q - antibodies converted to C1q + when concentrated to MFI levels comparable to those observed for AMR+/C1q + sera. CONCLUSIONS: The C1q binding activity by de novo DSA in patients with AMR largely reflects differences in antibody strength. The C1q assay does not appear to distinguish functionally distinct DSA with clinical significance.

Initial vascular access type in patients with a failed renal transplant.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Permanent hemodialysis vascular access is crucial for RRT in ESRD patients and patients with failed renal transplants, because central venous catheters are associated with greater risk of infection and mortality than arteriovenous fistulae or arteriovenous grafts. The objective of this study was to determine the types of vascular access used by patients initiating hemodialysis after a failed renal transplant. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Data from the US Renal Data System database on 16,728 patients with a failed renal transplant and 509,643 patients with native kidney failure who initiated dialysis between January 1, 2006, and September 30, 2011 were examined. RESULTS: At initiation of dialysis, of patients with a failed transplant, 27.7% (n=4636) used an arteriovenous fistula, 6.9% (n=1146) used an arteriovenous graft, and 65.4% (n=10,946) used a central venous catheter. Conversely, 80.8% (n=411,997) of patients with native kidney failure initiated dialysis with a central venous catheter (P<0.001). Among patients with a failed transplant, predictors of central venous catheter use included women (adjusted odds ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.63 to 1.87), lack of referral to a nephrologist (odds ratio, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.72 to 2.33), diabetes (odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.06 to 1.22), peripheral vascular disease (odds ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.16 to 1.48), and being institutionalized (odds ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.23 to 1.89). Factors associated with lower odds of central venous catheter use included older age (odds ratio, 0.85 per 10 years; 95% confidence interval, 0.83 to 0.87), public insurance (odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.68 to 0.80), and current employment (odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.80 to 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Central venous catheters are used in nearly two thirds of failed renal transplant patients. These patients are usually followed closely by transplant physicians before developing ESRD after a failed transplant, but the relatively low prevalence of arteriovenous fistulae/arteriovenous grafts in this group at initiation of dialysis needs to be investigated more thoroughly.

Antithymocyte globulin is associated with a lower incidence of de novo donor-specific antibodies in moderately sensitized renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) are associated with antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and graft failure after kidney transplantation. The effects of induction immunosuppression on dnDSA are unknown. METHODS: The study population comprised 114 consecutive moderately sensitized (positive DSA and negative flow crossmatch) recipients who received deceased donor renal transplants between December 2009 and November 2011. Patients were divided into two groups based on induction immunosuppression: antithymocyte globulin (ATG) (n=85) or basiliximab (n=29) and were followed up for 36 months. RESULTS: Patients in the ATG group received a mean dose of 4.98 mg/kg ± 7.9 mg/kg, had a significantly higher PRA, and received more plasmapheresis and IVIG at the time of transplant. The incidence of dnDSA (P=0.02, HR=0.33, 95% CI 0.09-1.24) and ABMR (P=0.002, HR=0.2, 95% CI 0.04-0.87) was significantly lower in the ATG group. In multivariate regression analyses, ATG induction was the single most important variable associated with both ABMR and dnDSA. CONCLUSIONS: In moderately sensitized deceased donor renal transplant recipients, induction with ATG is associated with a reduction in the occurrence of dnDSA and ABMR when compared with basiliximab.

Increased C4d in post-reperfusion biopsies and increased donor specific antibodies at one-week post transplant are risk factors for acute rejection in mild to moderately sensitized kidney transplant recipients.

In order to define the intensity of immunosuppression, we examined risk factors for acute rejection in desensitization protocols that use baseline donor-specific antibody levels measured as mean fluorescence intensity (MFImax). The study included 146 patients transplanted with a negative flow crossmatch and a mean follow-up of 18 months with the majority (83%) followed for at least 1 year. At the time of transplant, mean-calculated panel-reactive antibody and MFImax ranged from 10.3-57.2% and 262-1691, respectively, between low- and high-risk protocols. Mean MFImax increased significantly from transplant to 1 week and 1 year. The incidence of acute rejection (mean 1.65 months) as a combination of clinical and subclinical rejection was 32%, including 14% cellular, 12% antibody-mediated, and 6% mixed rejection. In regression analyses, only C4d staining in post-reperfusion biopsies (hazard ratio 3.3, confidence interval 1.71-6.45) and increased specific antibodies at 1-week post transplant were significant predictors of rejection. A rise in MFImax by 500 was associated with a 2.8-fold risk of rejection. Thus, C4d staining in post-reperfusion biopsies and an early rise in donor specific antibodies after transplantation are risk factors for rejection in moderately sensitized patients.

Increase in proteinuria >200 mg/g after late rejection is associated with poor graft survival.

BACKGROUND: There is no information on the effects of proteinuria on outcomes following rejection. METHODS: We addressed this question in a retrospective study of 925 kidney transplant recipients between January 2003 and December 2007. Selection criteria were based on (i) biopsy proven diagnosis of a first episode of acute rejection, and (ii) available data on urine protein to creatinine (UPC) ratios at baseline (lowest serum creatinine before biopsy), time of biopsy and 1 month after biopsy. We examined the effects of a change in UPC (DeltaUPC = UPC 1 month after biopsy-baseline UPC) on outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 82 patients with both acute rejection and available data on proteinuria. Mean time (+/-SE) to acute rejection was 19 +/- 2.3 months, and patients were followed up for 38.7 +/- 2.6 months after transplant. Median DeltaUPC was 200 mg/g (95% confidence interval 0.00 to 0.300). Forty-two patients had a DeltaUPC > or =200 (high proteinuria group). Baseline characteristics were similar between high and low proteinuria groups except for more induction therapy with interleukin-2 receptor blockade in the former (71 vs. 47%, P = 0.04). Patient with DeltaUPC > or =200 had higher rates of graft loss (26 vs. 15%, P = 0.01) or combined graft loss or death (38 vs. 20%, P = 0.002 by log-rank). In univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, DeltaUPC > or =200 mg/g, sirolimus therapy 1 month after rejection and re-transplant status were significant factors associated with death-censored graft loss (hazard ratio (HR) 4.4, 14.9 and 6.2, P < or = 0.008) or combined graft loss or patient death (HR 3.8, 6.5 and 3.9, P < or = 0.03). Conclusions. An increase in proteinuria > or =200 mg/g after late acute rejection is associated with poor graft and patient outcomes. Clinical trials are needed to determine whether post-rejection anti-proteinuric strategies improve outcomes.