Manufacturing of plasma-derived C1-inhibitor concentrate for treatment of patients with hereditary angioedema.

Background: Replacement therapy with plasma-derived C1-inhibitor (C1-INH) has been used for decades to treat patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE) with C1-INH deficiency. Objective: This article reviewed the rationale for using C1-INH replacement therapy in patients with HAE and the process of manufacturing plasma-derived C1-INH. Methods: The manufacture of C1-INH is an involved and carefully monitored process that includes screening and selection of prospective donors, the collection of source plasma, and purification with dedicated pathogen reduction steps. Donor eligibility is determined by restrictive criteria established and monitored by regulatory agencies as well as voluntary standards implemented by plasma collection centers that exceed government regulations. Individual and pooled donations are tested for transfusion-transmissible infections, including hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, human immunodeficiency virus, parvovirus B19, and hepatitis A virus, by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays or nucleic acid amplification technologies. Frozen plasma that is cleared for manufacturing undergoes controlled thawing and centrifugation, and the resulting supernatant (i.e., cryoprecipitate-depleted plasma) is used to manufacture several plasma-derived therapies, including C1-INH. In addition to chromatography steps, the manufacturing process consists of dedicated and effective pathogen reduction steps, including pasteurization, hydrophobic interaction chromatography or polyethylene glycol precipitation, and virus filtration. Manufacturers continuously monitor the safety profile of C1-INH products by robust pharmacovigilance processes that enable systematic collection and evaluation of all suspected adverse drug reaction reports as well as evaluation of safety information from all other sources. Results and Conclusion: These procedures used in donor screening, donation and manufacturing pool testing, manufacturing, and pharmacovigilance ensure that plasma-derived C1-INH products have the safety, quality, identity, potency, and purity that is necessary to provide the intended therapeutic effect.

Long-Term Outcomes with Subcutaneous C1-Inhibitor Replacement Therapy for Prevention of Hereditary Angioedema Attacks.

BACKGROUND: For the prevention of attacks of hereditary angioedema (HAE), the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous human C1-esterase inhibitor (C1-INH[SC]; HAEGARDA, CSL Behring) was established in the 16-week Clinical Study for Optimal Management of Preventing Angioedema with Low-Volume Subcutaneous C1-Inhibitor Replacement Therapy (COMPACT). OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term safety, occurrence of angioedema attacks, and use of rescue medication with C1-INH(SC). METHODS: Open-label, randomized, parallel-arm extension of COMPACT across 11 countries. Patients with frequent angioedema attacks, either study treatment-naive or who had completed COMPACT, were randomly assigned (1:1) to 40 IU/kg or 60 IU/kg C1-INH(SC) twice per week, with conditional uptitration to optimize prophylaxis (ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT02316353). RESULTS: A total of 126 patients with a monthly attack rate of 4.3 in 3 months before entry in COMPACT were enrolled and treated for a mean of 1.5 years; 44 patients (34.9%) had more than 2 years of exposure. Mean steady-state C1-INH functional activity increased to 66.6% with 60 IU/kg. Incidence of adverse events was low and similar in both dose groups (11.3 and 8.5 events per patient-year for 40 IU/kg and 60 IU/kg, respectively). For 40 IU/kg and 60 IU/kg, median annualized attack rates were 1.3 and 1.0, respectively, and median rescue medication use was 0.2 and 0.0 times per year, respectively. Of 23 patients receiving 60 IU/kg for more than 2 years, 19 (83%) were attack-free during months 25 to 30 of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with frequent HAE attacks, long-term replacement therapy with C1-INH(SC) is safe and exhibits a substantial and sustained prophylactic effect, with the vast majority of patients becoming free from debilitating disease symptoms.

Subcutaneous C1-esterase inhibitor to prevent hereditary angioedema attacks: Safety findings from the COMPACT trial.

BACKGROUND: The first subcutaneous (SC) C1-esterase inhibitor concentrate (C1-INH) was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in June 2017 as routine prophylaxis to prevent hereditary angioedema attacks in adolescents and adults at a dose of 60 IU/kg twice weekly based on the phase III Clinical Study for Optimal Management of Preventing Angioedema With Low-volume Subcutaneous C1-Inhibitor Replacement Therapy (COMPACT) trial. OBJECTIVE: This article aimed to evaluate the relationship of the C1-INH (SC) dose regimens tested in the COMPACT trial (40 IU/kg and 60 IU/kg twice weekly) and the occurrence of adverse events (AEs). METHODS: Patients were instructed to record any AEs in their e-diary daily. Safety and tolerability were assessed based on reported AEs, including injection-site reactions (ISRs); unsolicited AEs (AEs other than ISRs); serious AEs; thrombotic, thromboembolic, anaphylactic, hypersensitivity, sepsis, and bacteremia events; inhibitory antibodies to C1-INH; and clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory assessments. Information on ISRs was specifically solicited. RESULTS: No relationship between the dose of C1-INH (SC) and the incidence of ISRs or unsolicited AEs was observed. The proportion of injections followed by at least one ISR was 12% with C1-INH (SC) 40 IU/kg versus 5% with 60 IU/kg and 6% with placebo. No ISRs were serious or led to treatment discontinuation, and all resolved. There were no anaphylaxis, thromboembolic, sepsis, or bacteremia events reported during treatment with C1-INH (SC). All hypersensitivity AEs were nonserious, and the majority were assessed as being unrelated to treatment. No inhibitory antibodies to C1-INH were observed. CONCLUSION: C1-INH (SC) is safe and well tolerated with no dose-dependent safety concerns, as demonstrated in the COMPACT trial.Clinical trial NCT01912456, www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Evaluation of an investigational wearable injector in healthy human volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: Introduction of a wearable device for subcutaneous delivery of larger volume bolus injections would encourage patient compliance and reduce the burden on healthcare services. With one such wearable device commercially available, this study examined the safety and functionality of an investigational device in volunteers. METHODS: Four devices were applied to the subject's abdomen: 1) Investigational Device, 2) Investigational Device: subject movement, 3) Control Device: FDA-cleared syringe driver with FDA-cleared infusion set, 4) Control Device: FDA-cleared syringe driver attached to investigational device. Three milliliters of saline were infused through the four devices over 3 minutes. RESULTS: 84 devices were applied to 21 subjects. Three milliliters of saline were safely delivered subcutaneously from the investigational and control devices. Two control devices had occlusions and in each case the pump reached its high pressure limit of 12 psi. VAS pain measurements showed minimal pain for all subjects. Pain scores were significantly (p < 0.001) higher than baseline at the end of injection: mean pain level ranged from 2.0-22.0 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The investigational device performed as intended with minimal pain during needle insertion and infusion, and no leaking of fluid at the skin puncture site. Two occlusions occurred with the control devices.