Gastric cancer specific drug delivery with hydrophilic peptide probe conjugation.

Cancer-specific diagnosis is challenging. Phage display is an approach that could contribute to finding new specific biomarkers. In this study, we developed a new peptide probe specific for gastric cancer and validated it for gastric cancer-specific theranostics. We isolated linear peptides by screening a combinatorial phage library for a cancer stem cell marker, LGR5 protein. Among these, peptides with high selectivity against gastric cancer cells were selected and examined for therapeutic poteintial in vitro as well as in vivo. Through leucine-rich G protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR5) protein-based phage display, we obtained a hydrophilic 7-mer peptide sequence (STCTRSR, named STC). Both the STC-peptide-conjugated fluorescent dye and chlorin e6 (Ce6) displayed a significantly higher intensity in gastric cancer cells compared to that in healthy cells. In mice with gastric cancer, the fluorescence in the tumors was 3.4× more intense when treated with the Ce6-STC conjugate compared to that with free Ce6 and conferred higher phototoxicity after single laser irradiation. Repeated photodynamic therapy could further reduce the tumor volume after treating these mice with the Ce6-STC conjugate. The treatment with the Ce6-STC conjugate exhibited a significantly lower fluorescence in the liver than that with free Ce6. In conclusion, we confirmed that the STC peptide is a gastric cancer-specific probe that could be useful in gastric cancer theranostics. In conclusion, considering its targeting ability and hydrophilicity, various hydrophobic chemotherapeutic agents could be revisited for gastric cancer treatment in combination with the probe described in this study.

Duodenal mucosal resurfacing with photodynamic therapy using methylene blue in a mouse model.

BACKGROUND: The duodenum has emerged as a key player in metabolic diseases. The objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intra-duodenal PDT using methylene blue in managing glycemic control and weight reduction. METHODS: Optimal concentration of methylene blue and conditions for intra-duodenal PDT were determined through in vitro experiments. After injecting methylene blue into the duodenum, we performed intra-duodenal PDT. High-fat diet rats were used to assess the efficacy of intra-duodenal PDT through measures of oral glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, and weight change. Immunohistochemical staining was also conducted to examine GLP-1 and GIP-producing cells in the ileum and duodenum, respectively. RESULTS: Introduodenal PDT reduced villous height of duodenum at 48 h, which was fully recovered at 30 days without complications. Rats treated with PDT showed significantly lower blood glucose levels with glucose loading and improved insulin sensitivity than rats in the sham-treatment group. The PDT group also had a significant reduction in body weight compared to the sham-treatment group at 30 days after intervention, although food intake was not significantly different between the two groups. Numbers of GLP-1 and GIP producing cells in the ileum and irradiated area were significantly higher in the PDT group than in the sham-treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-duodenal PDT using methylene blue showed a feasible therapeutic modality in improving metabolic parameters. However, large animal experiments and mechanism studies are needed to determine the clinical relevance. The possibility of repeating this treatment every 30 days and its accompanying complications should be further studied.