Cardiac surgery after mediastinal radiation: extent of exposure influences outcome.

OBJECTIVES: Mediastinal radiation for thoracic malignancies uses multiple treatment fields and doses. We investigated whether more extensive radiation exposure is associated with more hospital complications and worse survival after cardiac surgery. METHODS: From January 2000 to January 2005, 230 patients underwent cardiac surgery after 3 levels of mediastinal radiation: extensive (Hodgkin disease, thymoma, and testicular cancer; n = 70), variable (eg, non-Hodgkin lymphoma and lung cancer; n = 35); and tangential (breast cancer; n = 125). Hospital complications were recorded prospectively, and time-related survival was assessed by patient follow-up (mean follow-up, 2.2 +/- 1.4 years). RESULTS: Patients receiving extensive exposure were youngest (51 vs 64 vs 72 years), with the longest radiation-to-operation interval (25 vs 13 vs 14 years), and had the most diastolic dysfunction, left main stenosis of greater than 70% (21% vs 9% vs 8%), and aortic regurgitation (79% vs 54% vs 50%). Patients receiving extensive and variable exposure had the poorest pulmonary function (percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second, 57% vs 54% vs 67%; percent predicted forced vital capacity, 56% vs 63% vs 66%). All groups received a similar mix of cardiac procedures. Hospital deaths (13% vs 8.6% vs 2.4%) and respiratory complications (24% vs 20% vs 9.6%) were higher after more extensive radiation, and survival was poorer (4-year survival, 64% vs 57% vs 80%) than for patients receiving tangential radiation exposure, and it deviated more from expected matched-population life tables. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing cardiac surgery after thoracic radiation, radiation exposure is heterogeneous, and therefore these patients cannot be managed and assessed as a single uniform cohort. Extensively irradiated patients are more likely to develop radiation heart disease, which increases perioperative morbidity and decreases short- and long-term survival.

Minimally invasive left ventricular epicardial lead placement: surgical techniques for heart failure resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: Epicardial lead placement for biventricular pacing is often a rescue procedure after failed coronary sinus cannulation. This study aims to determine perioperative and early postoperative outcome of minimally invasive left ventricular lead placement as a management strategy for heart failure, comparing minithoracotomy and endoscopic approaches. METHODS: From October 2002 through October 2003, 41 patients underwent minimally invasive left ventricular lead placement, 23 (56%) by minithoracotomy and 18 (44%) endoscopically. Thirty-one (76%) were males, 19 (46%) had previous cardiac surgery, 21 (51%) had ischemic cardiomyopathy, 17 (41%) were in New York Heart Association class III or IV, and 28 (65%) had implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. RESULTS: There were no in-hospital deaths, intraoperative complications, or failures to implant the left ventricular lead. Median operative time was longer for the endoscopic approach (188 minutes) than for minithoracotomy (151 minutes; p = 0.006). Preoperatively, the endoscopic group had more mitral regurgitation (median, 2.5 versus 1.0, respectively; p = 0.009). QRS duration was shorter postoperatively (mean change from preoperative, -32 +/- 24 ms; p < 0.0001); this change was unrelated to surgical approach. Impedance also was less postoperatively (mean change, -490 +/- 300 ohms; p < 0.0001), and the change was unrelated to surgical approach. Changes were greater the larger their preoperative values (p < 0.0001). Threshold increased with follow-up time (adjusted p < 0.0001), but impedance decreased (adjusted p = 0.0009); these trends were similar for both approaches. No changes were evident in left ventricular dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive left ventricular epicardial lead placement is safe and effective, offering selection of the best pacing site with minimal morbidity; it can be considered a primary option for resynchronization therapy.

Apical right ventriculotomy for closure of apical ventricular septal defects.

BACKGROUND: Apical ventricular septal defects (VSDs) are difficult to visualize through a transatrial approach, while the use of a left ventriculotomy may result in progressive ventricular dysfunction. Transcatheter closure has not been reliable, especially in small infants. Apical right ventriculotomy provides good exposure, preserves left ventricular function, and allows secure closure of apical VSDs. METHODS: From November 1994 through April 2002, nine children, median age 8 months (range, 74 days to 2.5 years) underwent 10 operations for VSD closure via apical right ventriculotomy (one patient with a residual defect underwent successful VSD closure via a second apical right ventriculotomy). Two patients were status post pulmonary artery banding and two patients had previous unsuccessful attempts at closure via a transatrial approach. RESULTS: There was no hospital mortality; there were 2 late deaths (78% survival; 95% confidence interval [CI], 45% to 94%), 3 months and 4 years postoperatively. Postoperative echocardiography demonstrated no residual VSDs in 3 and insignificant residual VSDs in 4 of the survivors. All survivors currently exhibit normal biventricular function during a median follow-up of 25 months (range, 11 to 104 months). CONCLUSIONS: Apical right ventriculotomy provides excellent exposure allowing safe and effective closure of apical VSDs. The observed late morbidity and mortality reflects the complexity that often exists in these cases due to additional irreparable lesions.

Bleeding following coronary surgery after preoperative low-molecular-weight heparin.

Low-molecular-weight heparin and acetyl salicylic acid have become an established treatment for unstable angina. A retrospective study on our database of one year was carried out to see what impact preoperative low-molecular-weight heparin versus none had on the postoperative course of 473 patients having coronary surgery exclusively. Apart from the fact that the low-molecular-weight heparin patients had a higher New York Heart Association classification and marginally more grafts, longer bypass and cross-clamp time, the preoperative characteristics and surgery of the two groups were similar. The low-molecular-weight heparin group had twice as many (9.7% versus 4.7%) re-operations for bleeding, 46% versus 26% had blood transfusion and 22.3% versus 12.6% plasma transfusion. The postoperative outcome was otherwise similar. Preoperative treatment of unstable angina with low-molecular-weight heparin carries a definite risk of postoperative bleeding. Although this study did not reveal any serious consequences, bleeding, transfusions and re-operations are associated with infections, wound healing problems and death. The indications and length of treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin in unstable angina patients have to be appropriate and the perioperative management of these patients has to address the bleeding tendency.