Comparison of Perceived Importance and Performance of Community Pharmacists' Role in South Korea During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the roles of community pharmacists (CPs) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the differences in their role performance compared with their perceived importance, and limiting factors. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey of CPs was conducted. The CPs self-measured the importance and performance of each role during the pandemic using a 5-point Likert scale. A paired t-test was used to compare each role's importance and performance scores. A logistic regression analysis of the roles with low performance scores, despite their level of importance, was conducted to determine the factors affecting performance. The limiting factors were also surveyed. RESULTS: The 436 responses to the questionnaire were analyzed. The performance scores were significantly lower than the perceived importance scores for 15 of the 17 roles. The source and update frequency of COVID-19 information and participation in outreach pharmaceutical services were associated with low performance scores. Insufficient economic compensation, the lack of communication channels, and legal limitations were the limiting factors in performing the CPs' roles. CONCLUSIONS: The participation in outreach pharmaceutical services, economic compensation, and communication channel should be improved to motivate the CPs in performing their roles.

Quantitative Benefit-Risk Assessment of COVID-19 Vaccines Using the Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis.

In the early SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic, four major vaccines were approved despite limited efficacy and safety data through short regulatory review periods. Thus, it is necessary to assess the benefit-risk (BR) profiles of the COVID-19 vaccines. We conducted a quantitative BR assessment for four COVID-19 vaccines (mRNA-based: mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2; viral vector-based: Ad26.COV.2 and ChAdOx1-S) using multi-criteria decision analysis. Three benefit criteria and two risk criteria were considered: preventing COVID-19 infection for (1) adults aged ≥18 years; (2) seniors aged 60 years or older; and (3) severe COVID-19, adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs. Data were retrieved from clinical trials, observational studies, and county-specific AE monitoring reports. Based on the collected data, vaccines were scored for each criterion. 22 professionals weighted each criterion. The overall BR score was calculated using scores and weights. mRNA-1273 was the most preferred vaccine in pre-authorization and BNT162b2 in post-authorization. We found that the mRNA vaccine had a good balance between the benefits and risks. Using this BR assessment, the benefit-risk profile of COVID-19 vaccines can be updated with cumulated data. It will contribute to building evidence for decision making by policy makers and health professionals.

Bioequivalence and tolerability of two clopidogrel salt preparations, besylate and bisulfate: a randomized, open-label, crossover study in healthy Korean male subjects.

BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel, a potent antiplatelet agent, reduces the risk for thrombotic events in patients with atherothrombotic diseases. Clopidogrel is marketed primarily as a bisulfate salt. A different salt preparation of clopidogrel, clopidogrel besylate, has been developed and might provide an additional treatment option for patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and tolerability profiles of clopidogrel besylate with those of clopidogrel bisulfate to determine bioequivalence for the purposes of marketing approval. METHODS: A randomized, open-label, 2-period, single- and multiple-dose, comparative crossover study was conducted in healthy Korean male subjects. The subjects received either clopidogrel bisulfate or clopidogrel besylate as a single 300-mg oral loading dose (day 1) followed by a 75-mg/d (once daily) maintenance dose on days 2 to 6. After a 15-day washout period, subjects were administered the alternative salt preparation according to the same protocol. The plasma concentrations of clopidogrel and its primary metabolite (SR26334) were assessed using high-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry after administration of the loading dose. The platelet aggregation response to 10-mumol/L adenosine diphosphate was measured using turbidometric aggregometry during the single- and multiple-dosing periods and at steady state (day 6). Tolerability was monitored using physical examination, including vital sign measurements, and laboratory analysis. RESULTS: Forty-four subjects were enrolled and completed the study (mean [SD] age, 24.3 [2.7] years; weight, 70.0 [8.2] kg). The mean values for C(max), T(max), and AUC(0-t) with clopidogrel (parent drug) of clopidogrel besylate (5.2 ng/mL, 0.9 hour, and 10.1 ng/mL/h, respectively) were similar to those with clopidogrel bisulfate (5.4 ng/mL, 0.9 hour, and 10.3 ng/mL/h). The mean values for Cmax, AUC(0-t), and AUC(0-infinity) with the SR26334 of clopidogrel besylate (10.9 microg/mL, 38.8 microg/mL/h, and 43.0 microg/mL/h, respectively) were not significantly different from those with the SR26334 of clopidogrel bisulfate (11.9 microg/mL, 40.6 microg/mL/h, and 43.8 microg/mL/h). The mean values for maximal antiplatelet effect (Emax) and area under the time-effect curve (AUEC) with the 2 clopidogrel salt preparations were as follows: clopidogrel besylate, 58.8 h . % and 4299.1 h . % inhibition, respectively; and clopidogrel bisulfate, 61.7 h . % and 4406.9 h . % inhibition; these differences were not statistically significant. The 90% CIs for the ratios of the log-transformed C(max), AUC, E(max), and AUEC values were within the predetermined bioequivalence range of 80% to 125%. Three adverse events (6.8%) were reported during the study and included abdominal discomfort (1 subject [2.3%] in the group that received clopidogrel bisulfate), easy fatigability (1 subject [2.3%] immediately before administration of loading dose of clopidogrel besylate), and thrombocytopenia (1 subject [2.3%] in the group receiving the clopidogrel bisulfate). All adverse events were transient and mild. CONCLUSIONS: In these healthy Korean male subjects, the differences in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties between the 2 clopidogrel salt preparations did not reach statistical significance and met the regulatory requirements for bioequivalence. Both preparations were well tolerated.