Lessons learned during implementation of MR-guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroids.

BACKGROUND: Although promising results have been reported for Magnetic Resonance image-guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MR-HIFU) treatment of uterine fibroids, this treatment is not yet widely implemented in clinical practice. During the implementation of a new technology, lessons are learned and an institutional learning-curve often has to be completed. The primary aim of our prospective cohort study was to characterize our learning-curve based on our clinical outcomes. Secondary aims included identifying our lessons learned during implementation of MR-HIFU on a technical, patient selection, patient counseling, medical specialists and organizational level. RESULTS: Our first seventy patients showed significant symptom reduction and improvement of quality of life at 3, 6 and 12 months after MR-HIFU treatment compared to baseline. After the first 25 cases, a clear plateau phase was reached in terms of failed treatments. The median non-perfused volume percentage of these first 25 treatments was 44.6% (range: 0-99.7), compared to a median of 74.7% (range: 0-120.6) for the subsequent treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings describe the learning-curve during the implementation of MR-HIFU and include straightforward suggestions to shorten learning-curves for future users. Moreover, the lessons we learned on technique, patient selection, patient counseling, medical specialists and organization, together with the provided supplements, may be of benefit to other institutions aiming to implement MR-HIFU treatment of uterine fibroids. Trial registration ISRCTN14634593. Registered January 12, 2021-Retrospectively registered, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN14634593 .

No benefit of intraoperative whole blood sequestration and autotransfusion during coronary artery bypass grafting: results of a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: In a randomized clinical trial of patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting, we evaluated the effect of intraoperative whole blood sequestration and autotransfusion on postoperative blood loss and the use of allogeneic blood products. METHODS: Male patients were included if it was possible to obtain at least 500 mL of autologous blood. For patients in group H (heparin autotransfusion, 50 patients; mean age 59 +/- 8 years), an average of 670 +/- 160 mL heparinized blood was drawn before bypass and reinfused after the period of the extracorporeal circulation. For patients in group C (citrate autotransfusion, 48 patients; mean age 60 +/- 10 years), 450 +/- 109 mL of citrate blood, drawn before administration of heparin, was used. Controls (N-group) consisted of 46 patients aged 62 +/- 8 years. Strict transfusion criteria were used, and blood loss and use of allogeneic blood products during the hospital stays of all patients were recorded. Mean differences with their 95% confidence intervals adjusted for potential confounders were obtained by multiple linear regression. RESULTS: The mean difference (95% confidence interval) of blood loss of group H minus N was -93 mL (-307 to 139) and for C minus N was -66 mL (-186 to 179). The mean number of allogeneic blood transfusions for group H was 0.85 +/- 1.74. Group C and group N used 0.94 +/- 1.56 and 0.84 +/- 1.24. CONCLUSION: In coronary artery bypass grafting there is no effect of heparin or citrate intraoperative whole blood sequestration with regard to blood loss or use of allogeneic blood.