Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Infect ; 88(5): 106153, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38588960

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the prevalence, genetic diversity, and evolution of human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV) in Barcelona from 2013 to 2023. METHODS: Respiratory specimens from patients with RTI suspicion at Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron were collected from October 2013 to May 2023 for laboratory-confirmation of respiratory viruses. Next-generation sequencing was performed in randomly-selected samples with Illumina technology. Phylogenetic analyses of whole genome sequences were performed with BEAST v1.10.4. Signals of selection and evolutionary pressures were inferred by population dynamics and evolutionary analyses. Mutations in major surface proteins were genetic and structurally characterised, emphasizing those within antigenic epitopes. RESULTS: Analyzing 139,625 samples, 5.3% were HRSV-positive (3008 HRSV-A, 3882 HRSV-B, 56 HRSV-A and -B, and 495 unsubtyped HRSV), with a higher prevalence observed in the paediatric population. Pandemic-related shifts in seasonal patterns returned to normal in 2022-2023. A total of 198 whole-genome sequences were obtained for HRSV-A (6.6% of the HRSV-A positive samples) belonging to GA2.3.5 lineage. For HRSV-B, 167 samples were sequenced (4.3% of the HRSV-B positive samples), belonging to GB5.0.2, GB5.0.4a and GB5.0.5a. HRSV-B exhibited a higher evolution rate. Post-SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, both subtypes showed increased evolutionary rates and decreased effective population size initially, followed by a sharp increase. Analyses indicated negative selective pressure on HRSV. Mutations in antigenic epitopes, including S276N and M274I in palivizumab-targeted site II, and I206M, Q209R, and S211N in nirsevimab-targeted site Ø, were identified. DISCUSSION: Particularly in the context of the large-scale use in 2023-2024 season of nirsevimab, continuous epidemiological and genomic surveillance is crucial.


Assuntos
Evolução Molecular , Genoma Viral , Filogenia , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial , Vírus Sincicial Respiratório Humano , Humanos , Vírus Sincicial Respiratório Humano/genética , Vírus Sincicial Respiratório Humano/imunologia , Vírus Sincicial Respiratório Humano/classificação , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/epidemiologia , Infecções por Vírus Respiratório Sincicial/virologia , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Masculino , Lactente , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Espanha/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Variação Genética , Anticorpos Monoclonais/imunologia , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , Mutação , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Prevalência , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Recém-Nascido
2.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 24(4): 404-416, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38211601

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Management of syphilis, a sexually transmitted infection (STI) with increasing incidence, is challenged by drug shortages, scarcity of randomised trial data, an absence of non-penicillin alternatives for pregnant women with penicillin allergy (other than desensitisation), extended parenteral administration for neurosyphilis and congenital syphilis, and macrolide resistance. Linezolid was shown to be active against Treponema pallidum, the causative agent of syphilis, in vitro and in the rabbit model. We aimed to assess the efficacy of linezolid for treating early syphilis in adults compared with the standard of care benzathine penicillin G (BPG). METHODS: We did a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy of linezolid for treating early syphilis compared with BPG. We recruited participants with serological or molecular confirmation of syphilis (either primary, secondary, or early latent) at one STI unit in a public hospital and two STI community clinics in Catalonia (Spain). Participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated block randomisation list with six participants per block, to receive either oral linezolid (600 mg once per day for 5 days) or intramuscular BPG (single dose of 2·4 million international units) and were assessed for signs and symptoms (once per week until week 6 and at week 12, week 24, and week 48) and reagin titres of non-treponemal antibodies (week 12, week 24, and week 48). The primary endpoint was treatment response, assessed using a composite endpoint that included clinical response, serological response, and absence of relapse. Clinical response was assessed at 2 weeks for primary syphilis and at 6 weeks for secondary syphilis following treatment initiation. Serological cure was defined as a four-fold decline in rapid plasma reagin titre or seroreversion at any of the 12-week, 24-week, or 48-week timepoints. The absence of relapse was defined as the presence of different molecular sequence types of T pallidum in recurrent syphilis. Non-inferiority was shown if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the difference in rates of treatment response was higher than -10%. The primary analysis was done in the per-protocol population. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05069974) and was stopped for futility after interim analysis. FINDINGS: Between Oct 20, 2021, and Sept 15, 2022, 62 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 59 were randomly assigned to linezolid (n=29) or BPG (n=30). In the per-protocol population, after 48 weeks' follow-up, 19 (70%) of 27 participants (95% CI 49·8 to 86·2) in the linezolid group had responded to treatment and 28 (100%) of 28 participants (87·7 to 100·0) in the BPG group (treatment difference -29·6, 95% CI -50·5 to -8·8), which did not meet the non-inferiority criterion. The number of drug-related adverse events (all mild or moderate) was similar in both treatment groups (five [17%] of 29, 95% CI 5·8 to 35·8 in the linezolid group vs five [17%] of 30, 5·6 to 34·7, in the BPG group). No serious adverse events were reported during follow-up. INTERPRETATION: The efficacy of linezolid at a daily dose of 600 mg for 5 days did not meet the non-inferiority criteria compared with BPG and, as a result, this treatment regimen should not be used to treat patients with early syphilis. FUNDING: European Research Council and Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias.


Assuntos
Penicilina G Benzatina , Sífilis , Adulto , Humanos , Antibacterianos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Linezolida/uso terapêutico , Macrolídeos/farmacologia , Penicilina G Benzatina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Reaginas , Recidiva , Espanha , Sífilis/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Sex Transm Infect ; 99(8): 520-526, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37802652

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Culture of Neisseria gonorrhoeae remains essential for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance. We evaluated the effect of time of specimen collection on culture yield following a positive nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). METHODS: We retrospectively assessed N. gonorrhoeae culture yield among asymptomatic individuals (largely men who have sex with men) who attended for sexual health screening and had a positive NAAT. Participants underwent either same-day testing and notification (Drassanes Exprés) or standard screening with deferred testing. RESULTS: Among 10 423 screened individuals, 809 (7.7%) tested positive for N. gonorrhoeae. A total of 995 different anatomical sites of infection culture was performed in 583 of 995 (58.6%) of anatomical sites (Drassanes Exprés 278 of 347, 80.1%; standard screening 305 of 648, 47.1%; p<0.001). Recovery was highest when culture specimens were collected within 3-7 days of screening with only a slight drop in recovery when the interval extended to 7 days . Recovery from pharynx was 38 of 149 (25.5%) within 3 days, 19 of 81 (23.4%) after 4-7 days (p=0.7245), 11 of 102 (10.7%) after 8-14 days (p<0.0036) and 1 of 22 (4.5%) with longer delays (p=0.00287). Recovery from rectum was 49 of 75 (65.3%) within 3 days, 28 of 45 (62.2%) after 4-7 days (p=0.7318), 41 of 69 (59.4%) after 8-14 days (p=0.4651) and 6 of 18 (33.3%) with longer delays (p=0.0131). Median culture specimen collection time was 1 day within Drassanes Exprés vs 8 days within standard screening. Consequently, the overall culture yield was slightly higher within Drassanes Exprés (102/278, 36.6% vs 99/305, 32.5%; p=0.2934). CONCLUSION: Reducing the interval between screening and collection of culture specimens increased N. gonorrhoeae recovery in extragenital samples. Implementing a same-day testing and notification programme increased collection of culture samples and culture yield in our setting, which may help AMR surveillance.


Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydia , Gonorreia , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero , Masculino , Humanos , Neisseria gonorrhoeae/genética , Homossexualidade Masculina , Estudos Retrospectivos , Gonorreia/diagnóstico , Gonorreia/epidemiologia , Manejo de Espécimes , Técnicas de Amplificação de Ácido Nucleico , Infecções por Chlamydia/diagnóstico , Chlamydia trachomatis
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA