The Impact of COVID-19 on Breast Cancer Care: A Qualitative Analysis of Surgeons' Perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: While studies have documented delays in breast cancer (BC) care during the COVID-19 pandemic due to healthcare restrictions, there have been no studies on the experiences, and, particularly, the challenges with providing care faced by breast surgeons during this unprecedented time. This paper aims to understand the perspectives of breast surgeons regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on BC care. METHODS: We used purposeful and snowball sampling to identify breast surgeons in Ontario, Canada. One-on-one qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted exploring the impact of the pandemic on BC treatment, psychosocial well-being of patients and providers, and the future state of BC care. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using Thematic Analysis. RESULTS: A total of 10 breast surgeons (5 community and 5 academic) were interviewed. Breast surgeons reported that the pandemic led to increased multidisciplinary collaboration and innovations in delivery of BC surgery (e.g., increased use of regional anesthesia). Multiple surgeons identified that the pandemic created disparities in BC care based geographic location and that existing disparities in care based on ethnicity or marginalization were exacerbated. Last, surgeons identified that virtual care improved, but also created some challenges to how BC care was delivered, with many hoping for this to be continued after the pandemic was over. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, breast surgeons identified unique challenges and solutions to BC care delivery during the pandemic. Concerns regarding disparities in care based on geographic location and marginalized patients require further study to improve future BC care.

Abducens nerve palsy due to clivus metastasis in a patient with breast carcinoma: A rare case.

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer, comprising 25 % of all diagnosed cancers, predominantly affects women globally. While bone metastasis is common, occurrences at the clivus or skull base are rarely documented. Treatment varies from surgery in early stages to a multifaceted approach for advanced cases, incorporating chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery based on staging and histology. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 40-year-old female presented with a rapidly enlarging lump in her left breast and diplopia on right gaze. Histology was positive for invasive breast cancer (no special type) and Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography demonstrated metastatic deposits in multiple vertebrae and bilateral ilium. Further, magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and orbits revealed metastatic deposits in the clivus which extended up-to medial wall of the cavernous sinus, causing compression of the right abducens nerve. Multidisciplinary Tumor Board review recommended chemoradiotherapy. DISCUSSION: Metastases from breast cancer can occur locally or to distant sites like lymph nodes, bones, lungs, liver, and brain. Unusual symptoms, such as new-onset diplopia, trigger further investigation. Although bone metastases occur in 50-65 % of cases, clivus metastasis is rare. Treatment aims at extending survival, symptom management, and enhancing quality of life through chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Outcomes hinge on metastatic burden and regional therapy responsiveness. Distant metastases substantially reduce the 5-year survival rate from 80 % to approximately 25 %, but cases often improve with regional interventions. CONCLUSION: Although an extremely rare occurrence, clivus metastasis might be considered in patients with a history of malignancy, in particular, breast malignancy, presenting with new-onset sixth nerve palsy.

#COVID19 and #Breastcancer: A Qualitative Analysis of Tweets.

Rapid and efficient communication regarding quickly evolving medical information was paramount for healthcare providers and patients throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Over the last several years, social media platforms such as Twitter have emerged as important tools for health promotion, virtual learning among healthcare providers, and patient support. We conducted a qualitative thematic content analysis on tweets using the hashtags #BreastSurgery, #BreastCancer, #BreastOncology, #Pandemic, and #COVID19. Advocacy organizations were the most frequent authors of tweets captured in this dataset, and most tweets came from the United States of America (64%). Seventy-three codes were generated from the data, and, through iterative, inductive analysis, three major themes were developed: patient hesitancy and vulnerability, increased efforts in knowledge sharing, and evolving best practices. We found that Twitter was an effective way to share evolving best practices, education, and collective experiences among key stakeholders. As Twitter is increasingly used as a tool for health promotion and knowledge translation, a better understanding of how key stakeholders engage with healthcare-related topics on the platform can help optimize the use of this powerful tool.

High Risk Breast Cancer Screening is a Double Edged Sword: A Qualitative Study of Patient Perspectives on the Ontario High Risk Breast Cancer Screening Program.

BACKGROUND: MRI-based breast cancer screening for high-risk women has been associated with false positives. This study explored the benefits and drawbacks of MRI-based screening using in-depth patient interviews. METHODS: This was a qualitative study of interviews with women participating in the High Risk Ontario Breast Screening Program. Women enrolled at two centers who had completed at least one round of screening were invited to participate. Recruitment was suspended when thematic saturation was reached. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted and transcribed verbatim. Emergent themes were identified and a coding framework established. RESULTS: 21 women (median age 41 years) participated in telephone interviews. Women had been in the program a median of 4 years (IQR 1-5), and 71% had experienced at least one abnormal screen. Eight participants (38%) had undergone biopsies. Six women (29%) were BRCA mutation carriers. MRIs were described as intimidating, uncomfortable, and claustrophobic. Participants were concerned about long-term exposure to gadolinium contrast. Compared to MRI, mammography alone was viewed as painful, less sensitive, and a "useless…waste of time." MRI provided a "psychological safety net" that outweighed the distress associated with abnormal screens. Many women accepted this trade-off as a "two-edged sword" that was "worth it" and provided a sense of control. Suggestions for improvement included more information regarding the risks of MRI, and access to counselling. CONCLUSIONS: Women participating in MRI-based screening strongly value reassurance from a highly sensitive screening test. This outweighed the distress of abnormal screens. There are areas for improvement around patient communication and psychosocial support.

Raoultella Planticola associated necrotizing appendicitis: A novel case report.

INTRODUCTION: Raoultella Planticola is a gram negative, aerobic, rod bacteria found in water and soil and is rarely reported to cause infections in humans. This case study is the first of its kind in reporting R. planticola appendicitis. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report a case of a woman presenting with a two-day history of increased weakness, fatigue and anorexia, localized pain to the right lower quadrant, and elevated white blood cell count. CT results demonstrated acute uncomplicated appendicitis which was managed via laparoscopic appendectomy. The patient became febrile on the day of the procedure and was found to have R. planticola bacteremia which was treated with amoxicillin-clavulanate. She was discharged on postoperative day two and reported an unremarkable recovery at her five-week follow-up appointment. DISCUSSION: R. planticola is a common organism that is rarely, though increasingly, associated with human infection. Interestingly, prior to hospitalization, this patient did not have any risk factors commonly associated with R. planticola infection, such as seafood consumption. However, she may have had gastrointestinal tract colonization with R. planticola prior to onset of appendicitis and appendectomy. Bacteremia likely resulted from micro-perforation of the appendix. CONCLUSION: Although infection with R. planticola is typically benign when treated appropriately, this pathogen has homology with Klebsiella species, and has the potential to acquire antimicrobial resistance. The case presented here suggests that R. planticola should be considered as a potential source of bacteremia in inflammatory/infectious gastrointestinal tract diseases even in the absence of typical risk factors.

"Where do we go from here?" Health system frustrations expressed by patients with multimorbidity, their caregivers and family physicians.

OBJECTIVES: This study explored the care challenges experienced by older patients with multimorbidity, their informal caregivers and family physicians. APPROACH: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 patients, their informal caregivers and family physicians. Qualitative description was used to identify key themes in the interview transcripts. RESULTS: Participants experienced many common challenges when managing multimorbidity, including a lack of decision-making support, poor communication and uncoordinated health services. Within these themes, unique perspectives specific to the role of being a patient, caregiver or family physician emerged. CONCLUSION: The study adds to a limited evidence base on the experience of patients with multimorbidity. By including the perspectives of their family caregivers and physicians, we provide important insight into the management of multimorbidity and recommend the uptake of specific strategies to address them.

A qualitative descriptive study on the alignment of care goals between older persons with multi-morbidities, their family physicians and informal caregivers.

BACKGROUND: Goal setting is a recommended approach in clinical care that can help individuals with multi-morbidities and their caregivers manage chronic conditions. In this paper, the types of goals that were important for older persons with multi-morbidities were explored from the perspectives of patients, their caregivers and physicians. Comparisons of goals were made across each patient, caregiver and physician triad to determine alignment. METHODS: The study was a qualitative descriptive study facilitated through semi-structured one-on-one interviews. The study took place between May and October 2012 at a Family Health Team located in Ontario, Canada. The sample included 28 family medicine patients, their informal caregivers and family physicians. Socio-demographic data were analyzed via descriptive statistics in SPSS Version 17. Open ended questions pertaining to patient goals of care were analyzed thematically using NVivo9. Themes were derived on patient care goals for each of the participant groups (patients, caregivers and family physicians). Following this, alignment of goals across each of the triads was examined. Goal alignment was defined as concurrence on at least one goal by all three parties in a particular triad (i.e., patient, caregiver and family physician). RESULTS: Just over half of the patients were male (56%); they had an average age of 82.3 years and 4.61 health conditions. Most of the caregivers were female (82%); and 61% were a spouse of the care recipient. At the aggregate level, common goals expressed among patients, caregivers and family physicians were the maintenance of functional independence of patients and the management of their symptoms or functional challenges. Despite these common goals at the aggregate level, little alignment of goals was found when looking across patient-caregiver and physician triads. Lack of alignment tended to occur when patients had unstable or declining functional or cognitive health; when safety threats were noted; and when enhanced care services were required. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that goal divergence tends to occur when patients are less medically stable. While goal divergence may be expected due to the different roles and responsibilities of each of the players involved, these perspectives should be illuminated when building care plans. Further research is required to observe the extent to which goal setting occurs in family practice as well as how it can be embedded as a standard of practice.