Safety and effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy with agalsidase alfa in patients with Fabry disease: Post-marketing surveillance in Japan.

Fabry disease is a rare X-linked inherited multisystem disorder resulting from deficiency of the lysosomal enzyme alpha-galactosidase A. Currently, specific therapies, including enzyme replacement therapies, are available for Fabry disease, but clinical trials provide limited information on long-term safety and effectiveness. Agalsidase alfa was approved in Japan in 2006. The post-marketing surveillance study of all patients receiving agalsidase alfa to evaluate its long-term safety and effectiveness as a mandatory condition for its approval had been conducted for 8 years (from February 2007 to March 2015). A total of 493 patients were included in this analysis of safety and effectiveness. The overall mean follow-up period was 3.5 years (range, 0.0-7.9 years). The percentage of patients with adverse drug reactions was 24.5% (121/493) and 12.6% had infusion-related reactions (62/493). In the 256 patients without prior enzyme replacement therapy whose IgG antibody data were available, 17 were IgG antibody positive (6.6%). However, the chronological correlation between seroconversion and the incidence of infusion-related reactions was not clear. The mean brief pain inventory score of the worst pain decreased in patients with moderate and severe pain at baseline. Plasma Gb3 and urine sediment Gb3 in males with classical Fabry disease without prior enzyme replacement therapy significantly decreased. The mean yearly changes in eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) ranged from -2.88 to +1.00 in males with classical Fabry disease, from -2.04 to -0.95 in males with non-typical variant and from -2.64 to -1.02 in females. The lower eGFR or the more proteinuria at baseline, the faster the decrease in eGFR of the patients was observed. There was no substantial difference in cardiac parameters (left ventricular mass index, E/A wave ratio, ejection fraction, and QRS duration). In conclusion, agalsidase alfa, 0.2 mg/kg every other week, was well tolerated and controlled the progression of symptoms (especially renal and cardiac) of Fabry disease in adults. Enzyme replacement therapy should be started in Japanese patients before cardiac and/or renal symptoms of Fabry disease develop.

[Results of a post-marketing surveillance of meropenem for febrile neutropenia].

The post-marketing surveillance of meropenem (Meropen) for febrile neutropenia (FN) was conducted between July 2010 and June 2012 to evaluate safety and efficacy under actual clinical use. There were 1191 and 1124 evaluable cases for safety and efficacy respectively, of 1207 case cards collected from 180 institutions. In safety analysis, the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with use of meropenem (including abnormal laboratory findings) was 15.7% (187/1191 cases), and the main ADRs were alanine aminotransferase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, blood alkaline phosphatase increased, hepatic function abnormal, and liver disorder, which were similar to these observed in the clinical study for FN or post marketing surveillances of meropenem conducted before. In efficacy analysis, the overall efficacy was 81.8% (919/1124 cases). Also, it was 79.2% (708/894 cases) for hematological malignancy and 91.8% (213/232 cases) for solid cancer. These results confirmed meropenem (Meropen) is one of the well-tolerated and potent antimicrobial agents for febrile neutropenia.

The therapeutic advantage of combination antihypertensive drug therapy using amlodipine and irbesartan in hypertensive patients: Analysis of the post-marketing survey data from PARTNER (Practical combination therapy of Amlodin and angiotensin II Receptor blocker; safety and efficacy in patients with hypertension) study.

Two-thirds of hypertensive patients need a combination antihypertensive therapy to achieve the target blood pressure (BP). The PARTNER (Practical combination therapy of Amlodin and angiotensin II Receptor blocker; Safety and efficacy in paTieNts with hypERtension) study is a prospective specific clinical use survey examining the efficacy and safety of 12-week treatment with amlodipine (AML) and Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (ARB) in 5900 hypertensive patients. The current analysis was performed as to the BP control, adverse reactions, and the effects on laboratory data in patients treated with the combination of AML and irbesartan (IRB), namely the patients added AML to already taking IRB (AML add-on group, n = 1202) and the patients added IRB to AML (IRB add-on group, n = 1050). Both study groups showed distinct decreases in office BP at 4 week (p < 0.001) and the antihypertensive effects were sustained to 12 week (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients achieving BP < 140/90 mmHg was ∼70% in either group. Proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were significantly improved in hypertensive patients with baseline eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Serum uric acid was reduced either by adding AML or IRB, and the reductions were prominent in patients with serum uric acid >7 mg/dl. The incidence of adverse reactions was as few as 1.11% and there were no severe adverse reactions which hampered the continuation of combination therapy. In conclusion, combination antihypertensive therapy with AML and IRB effectively lowers BP without particular safety problems, reduces serum uric acid especially in patients with hyperuricemia and exhibits renoprotective effects in patients with chronic kidney disease.

[Results of a post-marketing surveillance of meropenem administered over 2 g/day for serious infectious diseases].

The post-marketing surveillance of meropenem (Meropen®) administered over 2g/day for serious infectious diseases was conducted between August 2011 and June 2013 to evaluate safety and efficacy under actual clinical use. There were 382 and 322 evaluable cases for safety and efficacy respectively, of 399 case cards collected from 87 institutions. In safety analysis, the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with use of meropenem (including abnormal laboratory findings) was 19.1% (73/382 cases), and the main ADRs were hepatic function abnormal, aspartate aminotransferase increased, alanine aminotransferase increased, liver disorder, and diarrhoea, which were similar to these observed in the post-marketing surveillances of meropenem conducted before. In efficacy analysis, the efficacy was 73.6% (237/322 cases), which is as same as 71.4% (3214/4504 cases) of post-marketing surveillance of meropenem conducted after first approval under 2 g/day for infectious diseases. These results confirmed meropenem (Meropen®) is one of the useful antimicrobial agents for serious infectious diseases.