Optical Coherence Tomography Features in Fovea-Off Exudative vs Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.

PURPOSE: To describe the optical coherence tomography (OCT) features that can differentiate eyes with fovea-off exudative retinal detachment (ERD) vs. rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD), with particular attention to outer retinal corrugations (ORCs). DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective cross-sectional study. METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective cross-sectional study of patients diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral fovea-off ERD or primary, acute, fovea-off RRD between 2016 and 2021. This study was performed with the approval from the Research Ethics Board at the University of Toronto and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients with any ERD etiology and evidence of extensive, bullous fovea-off detachment and in the RRD group: consecutive patients with acute, primary fovea-off RRD with good quality baseline SD-OCT imaging were included. Patients with exudative choroidal neovascularization from any etiology, optic nerve pit, significant media opacity, or OCT images with poor quality or low signal strength were excluded. Primary outcome was to describe the morphological features of the macula using SD-OCT in patients diagnosed with ERD vs RRD, with specific interest in ORCs. RESULTS: 161 eyes (51 ERD and 110 RRD) of 154 patients were included. Fifty-one eyes with ERD presented with 1 of 15 etiologies. ERD were associated with a greater risk of having hyperreflective dots in the outer retina (92.2% vs 74.5%, p=0.009), hyperreflective material and dots in the subretinal fluid (72.5% vs 34.5%, p<0.001), internal limiting membrane and inner retinal undulations (70.6% vs 39.4%, p<0.001), and retinal pigment epithelium undulations (44.9% vs 6.4%, p<0.001) compared to RRD. RRD was associated with a greater risk of outer retinal corrugations (80% vs 0%, p<0.001), intraretinal fluid (90.9% vs 41.2%, p<0.001) and ellipsoid zone thickening (90% vs 66.7%, p<0.001) compared to ERD. CONCLUSION: The presence of ORCs are highly specific for RRD and absent in ERD. This is likely related to differences in the pathophysiology of the diseases process, specifically the content of the subretinal fluid. Understanding the differences in OCT morphological features of ERD vs RRD may aid with diagnosis and management.

Morphologic Features of Regulated vs. Dysregulated Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Using Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography.

OBJECTIVE: To describe varying morphological features of patients with RRD based on the extent of regulation of the subretinal space by the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) pump using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). DESIGN: Prospective clinical cohort study. Methods SETTING: St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada, from August 2020-August 2023. PARTICIPANTS: 120 consecutive eyes with primary RRD. COHORTS: Subclinical, non-progressive, localized RRD defined as regulated vs. acute, progressive, and extensive defined as dysregulated assessed with swept-source SS-OCT. MAIN OUTCOME: Morphological features of regulated vs dysregulated RRDs with SS-OCT. RESULTS: 19.2 % (23/120) of RRDs were classified as regulated and 80.8% (97/120) were dysregulated. The mean age of patients with regulated RRDs was 37.1 years (±13.7 SD) versus 62.6 years (±11.6SD) for patients with dysregulated RRDs (P<0.001). The presence of outer retinal corrugations (ORCs) on OCT was observed in 4.3%(1/23) of regulated vs 81.4% (79/97) of dysregulated RRDs (P<0.001). CME was found in 41.6%(5/12) of regulated RRDs compared to 87.3%(83/95) of dysregulated RRDs(P<0.001). ORC presence was an independent predictor of having a dysregulated RRD (P= 0.02,ß = 6.6,95 %CI [1.3 -33.2]) when controlling for age, sex, baseline VA, lens status, and RD extent. Among patients with regulated RRDs, 25.0% (3/12) were in Stage 2, 0% (0/16) in Stage 3A, 8.3% (1/12) in Stage 3B, 0% (0/16) in Stage 4, and 66.7% (8/12) in Stage 5. In patients with dysregulated RRDs, 14.7% (14/95) were in Stage 2, 15.7% (15/95) were in Stage 3A, 37.9% (36/95) in Stage 3B, 22.1% (21/95) in Stage 4, and 9.5% (9/95) in Stage 5 (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There are significant morphologic differences between regulated and dysregulated RRDs using SS-OCT. ORCs are present in almost all dysregulated cases but in a minority of regulated cases and they are an independent predictor of RPE-photoreceptor regulation status. Demographic and clinical features differentiate regulated and dysregulated RRD and understanding these differences has significant implications for optimal management and postoperative outcomes.

VALIDATION OF M-CHARTS FOR QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF METAMORPHOPSIA FOLLOWING RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT REPAIR.

PURPOSE: To validate the quantitative assessment of metamorphopsia in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) using M-CHARTS by determining its correlation with subjective reporting of metamorphopsia with a validated metamorphopsia questionnaire (modified MeMoQ). METHODS: The Research Ethics Board approved a prospective observational study carried out at St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada. Patients with primary, unilateral RRD and healthy controls were included. Metamorphopsia at 3 months was assessed with modified MeMoQ and M-CHARTS. RESULTS: One hundred patients (50 with RRD, 50 controls) were included. Seventy percent (35/50) of the RRD group had metamorphopsia with M-CHARTS and 80% (40/50) with MeMoQ. The modified MeMoQ and total M-CHARTS scores were significantly higher in patients with RRD compared with controls ( P < 0.0001). Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient was 0.934 in the RRD group. Horizontal, vertical, and total M-CHARTS scores were significantly correlated with MeMoQ scores (r s  = 0.465, P = 0.0007; r s  = 0.405, P = 0.004; r s  = 0.475, P = 0.0005, respectively). M-CHARTS was 72.7% sensitive and 94.6% specific for detection of metamorphopsia (positive score ≥ 0.2), with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.801. A stronger correlation was found in patients who scored ≥0.2 on the M-CHARTS and reported metamorphopsia with the MeMoQ (r s  = 0.454, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The authors have validated M-CHARTS as a tool to quantitatively assess metamorphopsia in patients with RRD, which is significantly correlated with patient-reported outcomes using the MeMoQ. A total score of ≥0.2 with M-CHARTS was more strongly correlated with MeMoQ.

Retinal Displacement after Scleral Buckle versus Combined Buckle and Vitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: ALIGN Scleral Buckle versus Pars Plana Vitrectomy with Scleral Buckle.

PURPOSE: To assess the risk of retinal displacement after scleral buckle (SB) versus pars plana vitrectomy with SB (PPV-SB). DESIGN: Multicenter prospective nonrandomized clinical trial. METHODS: The study took place at VitreoRetinal Surgery in Minneapolis, Minnesota, Sankara Nethralaya in Chennai, India, and St. Michael's Hospital in Toronto, Canada from July 2019 to February 2022. Patients who underwent successful SB or PPV-SB for fovea-involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with gradable postoperative fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging were included in the final analysis. Two masked graders assessed FAF images 3 months postoperatively. Metamorphopsia and aniseikonia were assessed with M-CHARTs and the New Aniseikonia Test, respectively. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with retinal displacement detected with retinal vessel printings on FAF in SB versus PPV-SB. RESULTS: Ninety-one eyes were included in this study, of which 46.2% (42 of 91) had SB and 53.8% (49 of 91) underwent PPV-SB. Three months postoperatively, 16.7% (7 of 42) in the SB group and 38.8% (19 of 49) in the PPV-SB group had evidence of retinal displacement (difference = 22.1%; odds ratio = 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-8.6; P = 0.02) on FAF. The statistical significance of this association increased after adjustment for extent of retinal detachment, baseline logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, lens status, and sex in a multivariate regression analysis (P = 0.01). Retinal displacement was detected in 22.5% (6 of 27) of patients in the SB group with external subretinal fluid drainage and 6.7% (1 of 15) of patients without external drainage (difference = 15.8%; odds ratio = 4.0; 95% CI, 0.4-36.9; P = 0.19). Mean vertical metamorphopsia, horizontal metamorphopsia (MH), and aniseikonia were similar between patients in the SB and PPV-SB groups. There was a trend to worse MH in patients with retinal displacement versus those without retinal displacement (P = 0.067). CONCLUSIONS: Scleral buckle is associated with less retinal displacement compared with PPV-SB, indicating that traditional PPV techniques cause retinal displacement. There is a trend toward increased risk of retinal displacement in SB eyes that underwent external drainage compared with SB eyes without drainage, which is consistent with our understanding that the iatrogenic movement of subretinal fluid, such as that which occurs intraoperatively during external drainage with SB, may induce retinal stretch and displacement if the retina is then fixed in the stretched position. There was a trend to worse MH at 3 months in patients with retinal displacement. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.