Lessons from aviation safety: pilot monitoring, the sterile flight deck rule, and aviation-style computerised checklists in the operating room.

Commercial aviation practices including the role of the pilot monitoring, the sterile flight deck rule, and computerised checklists have direct applicability to anaesthesia care. The pilot monitoring performs specific tasks that complement the pilot flying who is directly controlling the aircraft flight path. The anaesthesia care team, with two providers, can be organised in a manner that is analogous to the two-pilot flight deck. However, solo providers, such as solo pilots, can emulate the pilot monitoring role by reading checklists aloud, and utilise non-anaesthesia providers to fulfil some of the functions of pilot monitoring. The sterile flight deck rule states that flight crew members should not engage in any non-essential or distracting activity during critical phases of flight. The application of the sterile flight deck rule in anaesthesia practice entails deliberately minimising distractions during critical phases of anaesthesia care. Checklists are commonly used in the operating room, especially the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist. However, the use of aviation-style computerised checklists offers additional benefits. Here we discuss how these commercial aviation practices may be applied in the operating room.

A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Real-time Risk of Intraoperative Hypotension in Traumatic Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of death and disability. Episodes of hypotension are associated with worse TBI outcomes. Our aim was to model the real-time risk of intraoperative hypotension in TBI patients, compare machine learning and traditional modeling techniques, and identify key contributory features from the patient monitor and medical record for the prediction of intraoperative hypotension. METHODS: The data included neurosurgical procedures in 1005 TBI patients at an academic level 1 trauma center. The clinical event was intraoperative hypotension, defined as mean arterial pressure <65 mm Hg for 5 or more consecutive minutes. Two types of models were developed: one based on preoperative patient-level predictors and one based on intraoperative predictors measured per minute. For each of these models, we took 2 approaches to predict the occurrence of a hypotensive event: a logistic regression model and a gradient boosting tree model. RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the intraoperative logistic regression model was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-0.83), and for the gradient boosting model was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.81-0.85). The area under the precision-recall curve for the intraoperative logistic regression model was 0.16 (95% CI: 0.12-0.20), and for the gradient boosting model was 0.19 (95% CI: 0.14-0.24). Model performance based on preoperative predictors was poor. Features derived from the recent trend of mean arterial pressure emerged as dominantly predictive in both intraoperative models. CONCLUSIONS: This study developed a model for real-time prediction of intraoperative hypotension in TBI patients, which can use computationally efficient machine learning techniques and a streamlined feature-set derived from patient monitor data.

Evaluation of machine learning models as decision aids for anesthesiologists.

Machine Learning (ML) models have been developed to predict perioperative clinical parameters. The objective of this study was to determine if ML models can serve as decision aids to improve anesthesiologists' prediction of peak intraoperative glucose values and postoperative opioid requirements. A web-based tool was used to present actual surgical case and patient information to 10 practicing anesthesiologists. They were asked to predict peak glucose levels and post-operative opioid requirements for 100 surgical patients with and without presenting ML model estimations of peak glucose and opioid requirements. The accuracies of the anesthesiologists' estimates with and without ML estimates as reference were compared. A questionnaire was also sent to the participating anesthesiologists to obtain their feedback on ML decision support. The accuracy of peak glucose level estimates by the anesthesiologists increased from 79.0 ± 13.7% without ML assistance to 84.7 ± 11.5% (< 0.001) when ML estimates were provided as reference. The accuracy of opioid requirement estimates increased from 18% without ML assistance to 42% (p < 0.001) when ML estimates were provided as reference. When ML estimates were provided, predictions of peak glucose improved for 8 out of the 10 anesthesiologists, while predictions of opioid requirements improved for 7 of the 10 anesthesiologists. Feedback questionnaire responses revealed that the anesthesiologist primarily used the ML estimates as reference to modify their clinical judgement. ML models can improve anesthesiologists' estimation of clinical parameters. ML predictions primarily served as reference information that modified an anesthesiologist's clinical estimate.

Application of Data Science to Quantify the Effect of Propofol Infusion on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting.

The effectiveness of propofol infusion on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is poorly understood in relation to various patient and procedure characteristics. This retrospective cohort study aimed to quantify the effectiveness of propofol infusion when administered either via total intravenous administration (TIVA) or combined intravenous anesthesia (CIVA) with inhalational agents on PONV. The relationship between propofol infusion and PONV was characterized controlling for patient demographics, procedure characteristics, PONV risk factors, and antiemetic drugs in adult patients (age ≥18 years) undergoing general anesthesia. Learned coefficients from multivariate regression models were reported as "lift" which represents the percentage change in the base likelihood of observing PONV if a variable is present versus absent. In a total of 41,490 patients, models showed that propofol infusion has a naive effect on PONV with a lift of -41% (P < .001) when using TIVA and -17% (P < .001) when using CIVA. Adding interaction terms to the model resulted in the loss of statistical significance in these relationships (lift of -30%, P = .23, when using TIVA, and -42%, P = .36, when using CIVA). It was further found that CIVA/TIVA are ineffective in short cases (CIVA * short surgery duration: lift = 49%, P < .001 and TIVA * short surgery duration: lift = 56%, P < .001).

Anesthetic Management of Brain-dead Adult and Pediatric Organ Donors: The Harborview Medical Center Experience.

INTRODUCTION: The exposure of anesthesiologists to organ recovery procedures and the anesthetic technique used during organ recovery has not been systematically studied in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on all adult and pediatric patients who were declared brain dead between January 1, 2008, and June 30, 2019, and who progressed to organ donation at Harborview Medical Center. We describe the frequency of directing anesthetic care by attending anesthesiologists, anesthetic technique, and donor management targets during organ recovery. RESULTS: In a cohort of 327 patients (286 adults and 41 children), the most common cause of brain death was traumatic brain injury (51.1%). Kidneys (94.4%) and liver (87.4%) were the most common organs recovered. On average, each year, an attending anesthesiologist cared for 1 (range: 1 to 7) brain-dead donor during organ retrieval. The average anesthetic time was 127±53.5 (mean±SD) minutes. Overall, 90% of patients received a neuromuscular blocker, 63.3% an inhaled anesthetic, and 33.9% an opioid. Donor management targets were achieved as follows: mean arterial pressure ≥70 mm Hg (93%), normothermia (96%), normoglycemia (84%), urine output >1 to 3 mL/kg/h (61%), and lung-protective ventilation (58%). CONCLUSIONS: During organ recovery from brain-dead organ donors, anesthesiologists commonly administer neuromuscular blockers, inhaled anesthetics, and opioids, and strive to achieve donor management targets. While infrequently being exposed to these cases, it is expected that all anesthesiologists be cognizant of the physiological perturbations in brain-dead donors and achieve physiological targets to preserve end-organ function. These findings warrant further examination in a larger multi-institutional cohort.

Development of an aviation-style computerized checklist displayed on a tablet computer for improving handoff communication in the post-anesthesia care unit.

Critical patient care information is often omitted or misunderstood during handoffs, which can lead to inefficiencies, delays, and sometimes patient harm. We implemented an aviation-style post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) handoff checklist displayed on a tablet computer to improve PACU handoff communication. We developed an aviation-style computerized checklist system for use in procedural rooms and adapted it for tablet computers to facilitate the performance of PACU handoffs. We then compared the proportion of PACU handoff items communicated before and after the implementation of the PACU handoff checklist on a tablet computer. A trained observer recorded the proportion of PACU handoff information items communicated, any resistance during the performance of the checklist, the type of provider participating in the handoff, and the time required to perform the handoff. We also obtained these patient outcomes: PACU length of stay, respiratory events, post-operative nausea and vomiting, and pain. A total of 209 PACU handoffs were observed before and 210 after the implementation of the tablet-based PACU handoff checklist. The average proportion of PACU handoff items communicated increased from 49.3% (95% CI 47.7-51.0%) before checklist implementation to 72.0% (95% CI 69.2-74.9%) after checklist implementation (p < 0.001). A tablet-based aviation-style handoff checklist resulted in an increase in PACU handoff items communicated, but did not have an effect on patient outcomes.

Machine learning approach to predict postoperative opioid requirements in ambulatory surgery patients.

Opioids play a critical role in acute postoperative pain management. Our objective was to develop machine learning models to predict postoperative opioid requirements in patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. To develop the models, we used a perioperative dataset of 13,700 patients (≥ 18 years) undergoing ambulatory surgery between the years 2016-2018. The data, comprising of patient, procedure and provider factors that could influence postoperative pain and opioid requirements, was randomly split into training (80%) and validation (20%) datasets. Machine learning models of different classes were developed to predict categorized levels of postoperative opioid requirements using the training dataset and then evaluated on the validation dataset. Prediction accuracy was used to differentiate model performances. The five types of models that were developed returned the following accuracies at two different stages of surgery: 1) Prior to surgery-Multinomial Logistic Regression: 71%, Naïve Bayes: 67%, Neural Network: 30%, Random Forest: 72%, Extreme Gradient Boost: 71% and 2) End of surgery-Multinomial Logistic Regression: 71%, Naïve Bayes: 63%, Neural Network: 32%, Random Forest: 72%, Extreme Gradient Boost: 70%. Analyzing the sensitivities of the best performing Random Forest model showed that the lower opioid requirements are predicted with better accuracy (89%) as compared with higher opioid requirements (43%). Feature importance (% relative importance) of model predictions showed that the type of procedure (15.4%), medical history (12.9%) and procedure duration (12.0%) were the top three features contributing to model predictions. Overall, the contribution of patient and procedure features towards model predictions were 65% and 35% respectively. Machine learning models could be used to predict postoperative opioid requirements in ambulatory surgery patients and could potentially assist in better management of their postoperative acute pain.

Forecasting a Crisis: Machine-Learning Models Predict Occurrence of Intraoperative Bradycardia Associated With Hypotension.

BACKGROUND: Predictive analytics systems may improve perioperative care by enhancing preparation for, recognition of, and response to high-risk clinical events. Bradycardia is a fairly common and unpredictable clinical event with many causes; it may be benign or become associated with hypotension requiring aggressive treatment. Our aim was to build models to predict the occurrence of clinically significant intraoperative bradycardia at 3 time points during an operative course by utilizing available preoperative electronic medical record and intraoperative anesthesia information management system data. METHODS: The analyzed data include 62,182 scheduled noncardiac procedures performed at the University of Washington Medical Center between 2012 and 2017. The clinical event was defined as severe bradycardia (heart rate <50 beats per minute) followed by hypotension (mean arterial pressure <55 mm Hg) within a 10-minute window. We developed models to predict the presence of at least 1 event following 3 time points: induction of anesthesia (TP1), start of the procedure (TP2), and 30 minutes after the start of the procedure (TP3). Predictor variables were based on data available before each time point and included preoperative patient and procedure data (TP1), followed by intraoperative minute-to-minute patient monitor, ventilator, intravenous fluid, infusion, and bolus medication data (TP2 and TP3). Machine-learning and logistic regression models were developed, and their predictive abilities were evaluated using the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The contribution of the input variables to the models were evaluated. RESULTS: The number of events was 3498 (5.6%) after TP1, 2404 (3.9%) after TP2, and 1066 (1.7%) after TP3. Heart rate was the strongest predictor for events after TP1. Occurrence of a previous event, mean heart rate, and mean pulse rates before TP2 were the strongest predictor for events after TP2. Occurrence of a previous event, mean heart rate, mean pulse rates before TP2 (and their interaction), and 15-minute slopes in heart rate and blood pressure before TP2 were the strongest predictors for events after TP3. The best performing machine-learning models including all cases produced an AUC of 0.81 (TP1), 0.87 (TP2), and 0.89 (TP3) with positive predictive values of 0.30, 0.29, and 0.15 at 95% specificity, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We developed models to predict unstable bradycardia leveraging preoperative and real-time intraoperative data. Our study demonstrates how predictive models may be utilized to predict clinical events across multiple time intervals, with a future goal of developing real-time, intraoperative, decision support.

Aviation-Style Computerized Surgical Safety Checklist Displayed on a Large Screen and Operated by the Anesthesia Provider Improves Checklist Performance.

BACKGROUND: Many hospitals have implemented surgical safety checklists based on the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist, which was associated with improved outcomes. However, the execution of the checklists is frequently incomplete. We reasoned that aviation-style computerized checklist displayed onto large, centrally located screen and operated by the anesthesia provider would improve the performance of surgical safety checklist. METHODS: We performed a prospective before and after observational study to evaluate the effect of a computerized surgical safety checklist system on checklist performance. We created checklist software and translated our 4-part surgical safety checklist from wall poster into an aviation-style computerized format displayed onto a large, centrally located screen and operated by the anesthesia provider. Direct observers recorded performance of the first part of the surgical safety checklist that was initiated before anesthetic induction, including completion of each checklist item, provider participation and distraction level, resistance to use of the checklist, and the time required for checklist completion before and after checklist system implementation. We compared trends of the proportions of cases with 100% surgical safety checklist completion over time between pre- and postintervention periods and assessed for a jump at the start of intervention using segmented logistic regression model while controlling for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: A total of 671 cases were observed before and 547 cases were observed after implementation of the computerized surgical safety checklist system. The proportion of cases in which all of the items of the surgical safety checklist were completed significantly increased from 2.1% to 86.3% after the computerized checklist system implementation (P < .001). Before computerized checklist system implementation, 488 of 671 (72.7%) cases had <75% of checklist items completed, whereas after a computerized checklist system implementation, only 3 of 547 (0.5%) cases had <75% of checklist items completed. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a computerized surgical safety checklist system resulted in an improvement in checklist performance.

Hyper-G: An Artificial Intelligence Tool for Optimal Decision-Making and Management of Blood Glucose Levels in Surgery Patients.

BACKGROUND: Hyperglycemia or high blood glucose during surgery is associated with poor postoperative outcome. Knowing in advance which patients may develop hyperglycemia allows optimal assignment of resources and earlier initiation of glucose management plan. OBJECTIVE: To develop predictive models to estimate peak glucose levels in surgical patients and to implement the best performing model as a point-of-care clinical tool to assist the surgical team to optimally manage glucose levels. METHODS: Using a large perioperative dataset (6,579 patients) of patient- and surgery-specific parameters, we developed and validated linear regression and machine learning models (random forest, extreme gradient boosting [Xg Boost], classification and regression trees [CART], and neural network) to predict the peak glucose levels during surgery. The model performances were compared in terms of mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), logarithm of the ratio of the predicted to actual value (log ratio), median prediction error, and interquartile error range. The best performing model was implemented as part of a web-based application for optimal decision-making toward glucose management during surgery. RESULTS: Accuracy of the machine learning models were higher (MAPE = 17%, log ratio = 0.029 for Xg Boost) when compared with that of the linear regression model (MAPE = 22%, log ratio = 0.041). The Xg Boost model had the smallest median prediction error (5.4 mg/dL) and the narrowest interquartile error range (-17 to 24 mg/dL) as compared with the other models. The best performing model, Xg Boost, was implemented as a web application, Hyper-G, which the perioperative providers can use at the point of care to estimate peak glucose levels during surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning models are able to accurately predict peak glucose levels during surgery. Implementation of such a model as a web-based application can facilitate optimal decision-making and advance planning of glucose management strategies.

Improving Operating Room Efficiency: Machine Learning Approach to Predict Case-Time Duration.

BACKGROUND: Accurate estimation of operative case-time duration is critical for optimizing operating room use. Current estimates are inaccurate and earlier models include data not available at the time of scheduling. Our objective was to develop statistical models in a large retrospective data set to improve estimation of case-time duration relative to current standards. STUDY DESIGN: We developed models to predict case-time duration using linear regression and supervised machine learning. For each of these models, we generated an all-inclusive model, service-specific models, and surgeon-specific models. In the latter 2 approaches, individual models were created for each surgical service and surgeon, respectively. Our data set included 46,986 scheduled operations performed at a large academic medical center from January 2014 to December 2017, with 80% used for training and 20% for model testing/validation. Predictions derived from each model were compared with our institutional standard of using average historic procedure times and surgeon estimates. Models were evaluated based on accuracy, overage (case duration > predicted + 10%), underage (case duration < predicted - 10%), and the predictive capability of being within a 10% tolerance threshold. RESULTS: The machine learning algorithm resulted in the highest predictive capability. The surgeon-specific model was superior to the service-specific model, with higher accuracy, lower percentage of overage and underage, and higher percentage of cases within the 10% threshold. The ability to predict cases within 10% improved from 32% using our institutional standard to 39% with the machine learning surgeon-specific model. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is a notable advancement toward statistical modeling of case-time duration across all surgical departments in a large tertiary medical center. Machine learning approaches can improve case duration estimations, enabling improved operating room scheduling, efficiency, and reduced costs.

Does Attending Surgeon Presence at the Preinduction Briefing Improve Operating Room Efficiency?

OBJECTIVE: To examine if attending surgeon presence at the preinduction briefing is associated with a shorter time to incision. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study and survey. SETTING: Tertiary academic medical center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 22,857 operations by 141 attending surgeons across 12 specialties between August 3, 2016, and June 21, 2018. The independent variable was attending surgeon presence at the preinduction briefing. Linear regression models compared time from room entry to incision overall, by service line, and by surgeon. We hypothesized a shorter time to incision when the attending surgeon was present and a larger effect for cases with complex surgical equipment or positioning. A survey was administered to evaluate attending surgeons' perceptions of the briefing, with a response rate of 68% (64 of 94 attending surgeons). RESULTS: Cases for which the attending surgeon was present at the preinduction briefing had a statistically significant yet operationally minor reduction in mean time to incision when compared with cases when the attending surgeon was absent. After covariate adjustment, the mean time to incision was associated with an efficiency gain of 1.8 ± 0.5 minutes (mean ± SD; P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences in the subgroups of complex surgical equipment and complex positioning or in secondary analysis comparing service lines. The surgeon was the strongest confounding variable. Survey results demonstrated mild support: 55% of attending surgeons highly prioritized attending the preinduction briefing. CONCLUSION: Attending surgeon presence at the preinduction briefing has only a minor effect on efficiency as measured by time to incision.

Feasibility and indicator outcomes using computerized clinical decision support in pediatric traumatic brain injury anesthesia care.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury anesthesia care is complex. The use of clinical decision support to improve pediatric trauma care has not been examined. AIMS: The aim of this study was to examine feasibility, reliability, and key performance indicators for traumatic brain injury anesthesia care using clinical decision support. METHODS: Clinical decision support was activated for patients under 19 years undergoing craniotomy for suspected traumatic brain injury. Anesthesia providers were prompted to adhere to process measures via on-screen alerts and notified in real time of abnormal monitor data or laboratory results (unwanted key performance indicator events). Process measures pertained to arterial line placement and blood gas draws, neuromuscular blockade, hypotension, anemia, coagulopathy, hyperglycemia, and intracranial hypertension. Unwanted key performance indicators were: hypotension, hypoxia, hypocarbia, hypercarbia, hypothermia, hyperthermia, anesthetic agent overdose; hypoxemia, coagulopathy, anemia, and hyperglycemia. Anesthesia records, vital signs, and alert logs were reviewed for 39 anesthetic cases (19 without clinical decision support and 20 with clinical decision support). RESULTS: Data from 35 patients aged 11 months to 17 years and 77% males were examined. Clinical decision support reliably identified 39/46 eligible anesthetic cases, with 85% sensitivity and 100% specificity, and was highly sensitive, detecting 89% of monitor key performance indicator events and 100% of reported lab key performance indicator events. There were no false positive alerts. Median event duration was lower in the "with clinical decision support" group for 4/7 key performance indicators. Second insult duration was lower for duration of hypocarbia (by 44%), hypotension (29%), hypothermia (12%), and hyperthermia (15%). CONCLUSION: Use of clinical decision support in pediatric traumatic brain injury anesthesia care is feasible, reliable, and may have the potential to improve key performance indicator outcomes. This observational study suggests the possibility of clinical decision support as a strategy to reduce second insults and improve traumatic brain injury guideline adherence during pediatric anesthesia care.

An electronic handoff tool to facilitate transfer of care from anesthesia to nursing in intensive care units.

Checklists are commonly used to structure the communication process between anesthesia nursing healthcare providers during the transfer of care, or handoff, of a patient after surgery. However, intraoperative information is often recalled from memory leading to omission of critical data or incomplete information exchange during the patient handoff. We describe the implementation of an electronic anesthesia information transfer tool (T2) for use in the handover of intubated patients to the intensive care unit. A pilot observational study auditing handovers against a pre-existing checklist was performed to evaluate information reporting and attendee participation. There was a modest improvement in information reporting on part of the anesthesia provider, as well as team discussions regarding the current hemodynamic status of the patient. While T2 was well-received, further evaluation of the tool in different handover settings can clarify its potential for decreasing adverse communication-related events.

Process Optimization and Digital Quality Improvement to Enhance Timely Initiation of Epidural Infusions and Postoperative Pain Control.

BACKGROUND: Although intraoperative epidural analgesia improves postoperative pain control, a recent quality improvement project demonstrated that only 59% of epidural infusions are started in the operating room before patient arrival in the postanesthesia care unit. We evaluated the combined effect of process and digital quality improvement efforts on provider compliance with starting continuous epidural infusions during surgery. METHODS: In October 2014, we instituted 2 process improvement initiatives: (1) an electronic order queue to assist the operating room pharmacy with infusate preparation; and (2) a designated workspace for the storage of equipment related to epidural catheter placement and drug infusion delivery. In addition, we implemented a digital quality improvement initiative, an Anesthesia Information Management System-mediated clinical decision support, to prompt anesthesia providers to start and document epidural infusions in pertinent patients. We assessed anesthesia provider compliance with epidural infusion initiation in the operating room and postoperative pain-related outcomes before (PRE: October 1, 2012 to September 31, 2014) and after (POST: January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2016) implementation of the quality improvement initiatives. RESULTS: Compliance with starting intraoperative epidural infusions was 59% in the PRE group and 85% in the POST group. After adjustment for confounders and preintervention time trends, segmented regression analysis demonstrated a statistically significant increase in compliance with the intervention in the POST phase (odds ratio, 2.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.73-4.49; P < .001). In the PRE and POST groups, cumulative postoperative intravenous opioid use (geometric mean) was 62 and 34 mg oral morphine equivalents, respectively. A segmented regression analysis did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference (P = .38) after adjustment for preintervention time trends. CONCLUSIONS: Process workflow optimization along with Anesthesia Information Management System-mediated digital quality improvement efforts increased compliance to intraoperative epidural infusion initiation. Adjusted for preintervention time trends, these findings coincided with a statistically insignificant decrease in postoperative opioid use in the postanesthesia care unit during the POST phase.

Association between acute phase perioperative glucose parameters and postoperative outcomes in diabetic and non-diabetic patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between acute phase perioperative hyperglycemia and postoperative outcome is poorly understood. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of diabetic and non-diabetic adult patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Mean glucose and glycemic variability during the intraoperative and immediate postoperative periods were compared to length of stay, 30-day mortality, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: . DIABETIC PATIENTS (N = 1096): Higher glycemic variability was associated with longer hospital length of stay (0.32 day per 10 mg/dL) and greater 30-day mortality risk (OR = 1.42). Higher mean glucose (OR = 1.07) and glycemic variability (OR = 1.11) were associated with higher risk of complications. NON-DIABETIC PATIENTS (N = 1012): Both higher mean glucose (0.29 day per 10 mg/dL) and higher glycemic variability (0.68 day per 10 mg/dL) were associated with longer hospital length of stay. Both higher mean glucose (OR = 1.13) and higher glycemic variability (OR = 1.21) were associated with greater risks of complications. CONCLUSIONS: Poor acute phase perioperative glycemic control is associated with poor outcome, but differently in diabetic and non-diabetic patients suggesting different glycemic management strategies for the two patient groups.

Patient characteristics and critical care workflow affect paging frequency in neurocritical care.

Indicator of response urgency (page tag), paging domains, distribution of pages by time of the day, and factors associated with neurocritical care paging remain elusive and were examined in this study. We examined the association between patient, neurocritical care workflow characteristics, and paging domains on frequency of paging using Student's t-test, Chi-square test, and analysis of covariance. A total of 1852 patients generated 36,472 pages. The most common page tagging was "for your information" (n = 15067, 41.3%), while 2.8% (n = 1006) pages were tagged urgent. Paging was most frequent for cardiovascular (12.2%), pain, agitation, distress (6.9%) and sodium (5.3%) concerns. Paging frequency was highest for mechanically ventilated patients (p < 0.001), those with indwelling intracranial pressure monitor (p < 0.04), arterial catheter (p < 0.001), central venous access catheter (p < 0.001), and in those with lower Glasgow Coma Score (p < 0.001). Patients admitted between 18:00-06:00 (aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.16-1.86) and 14:30-18:00 (aOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.14-1.86), and sodium (aOR 1.52, 95% CI 1.39-1.66), and cardiovascular concerns (aOR 1.24, 95% CI 1.15-1.32) were associated with higher night time paging frequency. Incorporating paging domains in daily workflow and their impact on outcome of paging on escalation of clinical care and patient outcomes warrants further examination.