Development of a mobile laboratory system in hydrogen fuel cell buses and evaluation of the performance for COVID-19 RT-PCR testing.

We designed and developed two new types of hydrogen fuel cell (HFC) buses (motorcoach and minibus) with a mobile laboratory system. Feasibility studies have been performed for mobile laboratory testing, particularly for the laboratory performance of COVID-19 RT-PCR (PCR). We evaluated the driving range capability, PCR sample size capacity, turnaround time (TAT), and analytical performance for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. Saliva samples were used for the current study, and the analytical performance was compared with that of the reference PCR. The estimated driving range and sample size capacity of the HFC and HFC minibus were 432 km and 2847 samples, respectively, for the HFC motorcoach and 313 km and 1949 samples for the HFC minibus. For the TAT, the median time between sample submission and completion of PCR was 86 min for the motorcoach and 76 min for the minibus, and the median time between sample submission and electronic reporting of the result to each visitor was 182 min for the motorcoach and 194 min for the minibus. A secondary analysis of 1574 HFC mobile laboratory testing samples was conducted, and all negative samples were found to be negative by reference PCR. Furthermore, all samples were confirmed to be positive by reference PCR or other molecular examinations.

The evaluation of the utility of the GENECUBE HQ SARS-CoV-2 for anterior nasal samples and saliva samples with a new rapid examination protocol.

INTRODUCTION: GENECUBE® is a rapid molecular identification system, and previous studies demonstrated that GENECUBE® HQ SARS-CoV-2 showed excellent analytical performance for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) with nasopharyngeal samples. However, other respiratory samples have not been evaluated. METHODS: This prospective comparison between GENECUBE® HQ SARS-CoV-2 and reference real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 using anterior nasal samples and saliva samples. Additionally, we evaluated a new rapid examination protocol using GENECUBE® HQ SARS-CoV-2 for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 with saliva samples. For the rapid protocol, in the preparation of saliva samples, purification and extraction processes were adjusted, and the total process time was shortened to approximately 35 minutes. RESULTS: For 359 anterior nasal samples, the total-, positive-, and negative concordance of the two assays was 99.7% (358/359), 98.1% (51/52), and 100% (307/307), respectively. For saliva samples, the total-, positive-, and negative concordance of the two assays was 99.6% (239/240), 100% (56/56), and 99.5% (183/184), respectively. With the new protocol, total-, positive-, and negative concordance of the two assays was 98.8% (237/240), 100% (56/56), and 98.4% (181/184), respectively. In all discordance cases, SARS-CoV-2 was detected by additional molecular examinations. CONCLUSION: GENECUBE® HQ SARS-CoV-2 provided high analytical performance for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in anterior nasal samples and saliva samples.

A Prospective Evaluation of the Analytical Performance of GENECUBE® HQ SARS-CoV-2 and GENECUBE® FLU A/B.

BACKGROUND: Molecular tests are the mainstay of detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, their accessibility can be limited by the long examination time and inability to evaluate multiple samples at once. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the analytical performance of the newly developed rapid molecular assays GENECUBE® HQ SARS-CoV-2 and GENECUBE® FLU A/B. METHOD: This prospective study was conducted between 14 December 2020 and 9 January 2021 at a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) center. Samples were collected from the nasopharynx with flocked swabs. Molecular tests were performed with the GENECUBE® system and reference reverse transcription (RT)-PCR, and the results of the two assays were compared. RESULT: Among 1065 samples, 81 (7.6%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 on the reference RT-PCR. Three showed discordance between GENECUBE® HQ SARS-CoV-2 and the reference RT-PCR; the total, positive, and negative samples of concordance for the two assays were 99.7%, 100%, and 99.7%, respectively. All discordant cases were positive with GENECUBE® HQ SARS-CoV-2 and negative with the reference RT-PCR. SARS-CoV-2 was detected in all three samples using another molecular assay for SARS-CoV-2. For GENECUBE® FLU A/B, the total, positive, and negative samples of concordance for the two assays were 99.5%, 100%, and 99.1%. CONCLUSION: The GENECUBE® HQ SARS-CoV-2 and GENECUBE® FLU A/B demonstrated sufficient analytical performance to detect SARS-CoV-2 and influenza virus A/B.

Influence of In Vitro Hemolysis on 80 Different Laboratory Tests.

BACKGROUND: In vitro hemolysis is probably the most common pre-analytic problem in laboratory medicine. However, it introduces variation into results in unknown ways. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the quantitative effects of hemolysis on 80 different, routine laboratory tests. METHODS: We examined the ratio of hemolysis in our hospital from January 1 to March 31, 2015. Next, to study the effect of in vitro hemolysis of whole blood, we added lysed erythrocytes to pooled specimens of serum or plasma to give hemoglobin concentrations of 0.9 to 8.1 g/L and 2.8 to 14 g/L, respectively, and a rating by colorimetry of 0 to 4+ hemolyzed. Then, 80 different laboratory tests were determined with a Hitachi 7700 autoanalyzer for biochemical tests and with AIA 2000, Cobas 6000, and Lumipulus G1200 machines for other tests. RESULTS: Hemolysis occurred in a total in 8.6% of the specimens in our hospital. Significant correlations with the hemolysis ratio were observed in 43 of 80 laboratory tests. At apparent hemolysis, 11 test levels increased and 7 test levels decreased due to hemolysis. Among the 11 tests, potassium, aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, thymol turbidity test (TTT), zinc sulfate turbidity test (ZTT), and hyaluronic acid tests showed proportional increases due to hemolysis. CONCLUSIONS: Hemolysis is a common problem for accuracy in many routine laboratory tests. Although the quantitative effects of hemolysis can only be roughly estimated in this report, the approximate extent of change in specific laboratory tests is useful for establishing a baseline for future hemolytic studies.

Dendritic differentiation of cerebellar Purkinje cells is promoted by ryanodine receptors expressed by Purkinje and granule cells.

Cerebellar Purkinje cells have the most elaborate dendritic trees among neurons in the brain. We examined the roles of ryanodine receptor (RyR), an intracellular Ca(2+) release channel, in the dendrite formation of Purkinje cells using cerebellar cell cultures. In the cerebellum, Purkinje cells express RyR1 and RyR2, whereas granule cells express RyR2. When ryanodine (10 µM), a blocker of RyR, was added to the culture medium, the elongation and branching of Purkinje cell dendrites were markedly inhibited. When we transferred small interfering RNA (siRNA) against RyR1 into Purkinje cells using single-cell electroporation, dendritic branching but not elongation of the electroporated Purkinje cells was inhibited. On the other hand, transfection of RyR2 siRNA into granule cells also inhibited dendritic branching of Purkinje cells. Furthermore, ryanodine reduced the levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the culture medium. The ryanodine-induced inhibition of dendritic differentiation was partially rescued when BDNF was exogenously added to the culture medium in addition to ryanodine. Overall, these results suggest that RyRs expressed by both Purkinje and granule cells play important roles in promoting the dendritic differentiation of Purkinje cells and that RyR2 expressed by granule cells is involved in the secretion of BDNF from granule cells.