Esophagogastrostomy Versus Double Tract Reconstruction for Laparoscopic Proximal Gastrectomy: Short-term Outcomes Based on Nutritional Parameters and Skeletal Muscle Index.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The optimal reconstruction method for laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) remains controversial. The present study aimed to compare short-term outcomes, including assessment of nutritional parameters and skeletal muscle, between two different methods, double-tract reconstruction (DTR) versus esophagogastrostomy (EG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from patients who underwent LPG for gastric tumor(s) between 2018 and 2021, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two group: DTR (n=11) and EG (n=17). Since 2020, the authors have applied the modified side overlap with fundoplication by Yamashita (mSOFY) method as the EG technique. RESULTS: Compared with DTR, EG was associated with a shorter reconstruction time (p=0.003). Complications of grade ≥3 occurred only in the EG group [n=4 (23.5%)] and the incidence of abnormal endoscopic findings after surgery was numerically higher in the EG group (n=2 vs. n=9; p=0.047). Across virtually all data points on the line graph, the EG group exhibited greater changes in post-discharge nutritional parameters, with Skeletal Muscle Index also demonstrating significant superiority (0.83 vs. 0.89; p=0.045). CONCLUSION: Among reconstruction methods for LPG, EG demonstrated superiority over DTR in preserving nutritional parameters and skeletal muscle mass. However, further research, including larger cohorts and longer-term follow-up, is necessary to validate this finding.

Safety and Limitations of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Comparative Analysis of Short and Long-term Outcomes With Open Surgery.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Laparoscopic gastrectomy is a standard treatment strategy for gastric cancer (GC); however, the clinical impact of laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) on survival outcomes remains unclear. We compared the short- and long-term results of LTG with those of open total gastrectomy (OTG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing total gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for Stage I/II/III GC between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified into those undergoing LTG (n=143, LTG group) and OTG (n=173, OTG group). The primary outcome was relapse-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: The LTG group exhibited a higher prevalence of early T and N factors, with pStage I/II/III distribution skewed toward early-stage in a ratio of 86/24/33 compared to 38/65/69 in the OTG group (p<0.001), respectively. Longer operation time (p<0.001), less blood loss (p<0.001), fewer grade 3-4 complications (p<0.001), and shorter hospital stay (p<0.001) were observed in the LTG than in the OTG group. LTG was associated with survival benefits for patients without indication for adjuvant chemotherapy [5-year RFS rate, 96.3% vs. 73.2%; hazard ratio (HR)=0.24; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.10-0.56; p<0.001]. Among the eligibility criteria for adjuvant chemotherapy (Stage II/III excluding pT1 and pT3N0), while the LTG group received more frequently doublet-agent administration (56.5% vs. 11%, p<0.001), conversely, the OTG group exhibited slightly better long-term survival rates (5-year RFS rate, 33.9% vs. 50.2%; HR=1.31; 95%CI=0.82-2.10; p=0.251). CONCLUSION: LTG contributed to favorable short-term outcomes and demonstrated improved long-term outcomes in early-stage GC; however, careful consideration of indications is warranted for advanced GC cases.

Clinical Impact of Laparoscopic Surgery on the Long-term Survival of Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients With Regard to Facilitating Doublet Adjuvant Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The impact of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG), a standard gastric cancer (GC) management strategy, in advanced GC cases involving doublet adjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear. This study was aimed at comparing short- and long-term LG and open gastrectomy (OG) results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for stage II/III GC between 2013 and 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: patients undergoing LG (n=96, LG-group) and OG (n=148, OG-group). The primary outcome was relapse-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: Compared with the OG group, the LG group was associated with a longer operation time (373 vs. 314 min, p<0.001), less blood loss (50 vs. 448 ml, p<0.001), fewer grade 3-4 complications (5.2 vs. 17.1%, p=0.005), and a shorter hospital stay (12 vs. 15 days, p<0.001). More lymph nodes were dissected in the LG group (49 vs. 40, p<0.001). The intergroup difference in prognosis was insignificant [5-year RFS: 60.4% (LG) vs. 63.1% (OG), p=0.825]. The LG group more frequently received doublet adjuvant chemotherapy (46.8 vs. 12.7%, p<0.001) and started treatments within 6 weeks after surgery (71.1% vs. 38.9%, p=0.017), and the completion rate of doublet AC was significantly higher in the LG group (85.4% vs. 58.8%, p=0.027). Compared to OG, LG for stage III GC tended to be associated with improved prognosis (HR=0.61, 95%CI=0.33-1.09, p=0.096). CONCLUSION: LG for advanced GC may facilitate doublet regimens due to favorable postoperative outcomes and its intervention may contribute to survival benefits.

[Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Showing Marked Tumor Shrinkage after the First Dose of Nivolumab for Fourth-Line Chemotherapy].

We report a case of locally advanced gastric cancer, which showed marked tumor shrinkage after the first dose of nivolumab. A 75-year-old woman was diagnosed with locally advanced gastric cancer with pancreatic invasion and pyloric stenosis. We performed gastrojejunostomy before chemotherapy. The first-line, second-line, and third-line chemotherapies were not effective, resulting in tumor progression and necrosis with abdominal wall penetration. Her performance status was good, so we started nivolumab therapy as the fourth-line chemotherapy. Nine days after the first dose of nivolumab, she had a severe abdominal pain and a sense of fatigue. CT imaging showed a remarkable degree of tumor necrosis just beneath the skin. We diagnosed progressive disease and discontinued the chemotherapy. However, her general condition gradually improved and CT imaging 4 months after the first dose of nivolumab showed marked tumor shrinkage. We restarted nivolumab therapy and she has been alive for 2 years 10 months since the introduction of chemotherapy. It was suggested that a single dose of nivolumab only could lead to marked tumor shrinkage in chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.

Iatrogenic diaphragmatic hernia as a late complication of laparoscopic excisional biopsy of peritoneal nodules: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic diaphragmatic hernias have been reported as a rare complication of abdominal surgery, and only a few reports have suggested minimal intraoperative injury to the diaphragm as a cause. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report a rare case of delayed diaphragmatic hernia caused by laparoscopic excisional biopsy of a peritoneal lesion on the diaphragmatic peritoneum. A 70-year-old woman with gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor underwent laparoscopic partial gastrectomy and excisional biopsy for white nodules on the left diaphragmatic peritoneum using laparoscopic scissors. Slight bleeding that occurred after excisional biopsy was stopped using a soft-coagulation system. Six months after her first surgery, a left diaphragmatic defect and transverse colon migration into the thoracic cavity were detected on computed tomography. The patient subsequently underwent laparoscopic diaphragmatic hernia repair. The site at which the diaphragm defect occurred was consistent with the site of excisional biopsy. The defect was closed with interrupted suturing using non-absorbable threads, following which a composite mesh was applied above the suture site for reinforcement. DISCUSSION: This is the first report of an iatrogenic diaphragmatic hernia after diagnostic laparoscopy for peritoneal excision biopsy of the diaphragmatic surface. In the present case, the coagulation procedure for hemostasis after peritoneal resection was considered to be the cause of the diaphragmatic hernia. The heat generated by soft coagulation might have unexpectedly reached and damaged the deep areas of the diaphragmatic muscle. CONCLUSION: Surgeons performing laparoscopic excisional biopsy of the diaphragmatic peritoneum should consider the potential risk for iatrogenic diaphragmatic hernias.