Clinical significance of intraperitoneal paclitaxel combined with systemic chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Despite investigations of intraperitoneal paclitaxel as a personalized treatment for peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer, few studies have evaluated its prognostic impact on conversion surgery for unresectable gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis. Our study aimed to close this gap in knowledge. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 128 patients who underwent chemotherapy for peritoneal metastasis from gastric cancer and assigned them into intraperitoneal (IP) (n = 36) and non-IP (n = 92) groups, based on the use of intraperitoneal paclitaxel plus systemic chemotherapy. RESULTS: Disease control rates were 94% and 69% in the IP and non-IP groups, respectively, with the former having a significantly higher tumor response rate than the latter (p < 0.01). The median survival times in the IP and non-IP groups were 665 and 359 days, respectively, with the former having significantly better prognosis than the latter (p = 0.02). Fifteen (42%) and sixteen (17%) patients underwent conversion surgery after chemotherapy in the IP and non-IP groups, respectively, with the former having a significantly higher conversion surgery induction rate than the latter (p < 0.01). Although the prognosis of the conversion surgery group was significantly better than that of the non-conversion surgery group (p < 0.01), there was no significant difference in prognosis between patients in the IP and non-IP groups who underwent conversion surgery (p = 0.22). Multivariate analysis identified performance status and conversion surgery as independent prognostic factors (all p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that the IP chemotherapy was one of important factors for conversion surgery induction, while it was not a risk factor for prognosis.

[A Case of Curative Resection Following TNT for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer with Liver Metastasis].

The standard treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer is preoperative chemoradiotherapy(CRT)in Europe and the United States, while that is surgical excision and lateral pelvic lymph node dissection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in Japan. Recently, total neoadjuvant therapy(TNT), which combines neoadjuvant chemotherapy and preoperative CRT, have been popular. We performed curative excision for initially locally advanced rectal cancer with liver metastasis after TNT. A 61- year-old woman was diagnosed as having rectal cancer with liver metastasis and invasion of the uterus, vagina, bladder, and left ureter. The patient underwent 8 courses of FOLFOX plus bevacizumab, followed by radiotherapy, and totally pelvic excision for the primary tumor. Because of liver metastasis progression, hepatectomy was performed after 6 courses of FOLFIRI plus panitumumab. The patient has been cancer free for 20 months to date. TNT is considered to be an effective strategy for the treatment of large locally advanced rectal cancer.

Curative resection after chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for postoperative recurrence of pancreatic tail cancer in the abdominal wall: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Locoregional recurrence and metastasis to the liver, peritoneum, and lung are the most common recurrent patterns of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after radical resection. Recurrence in the abdominal wall is extremely rare. Herein, we report our experience with a patient who had recurrent PDAC in the abdominal wall with long-term survival by means of multidisciplinary therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 76-year-old Japanese woman was diagnosed with resectable pancreatic tail cancer. She underwent distal pancreatectomy with regional lymphadenectomy after two cycles of gemcitabine plus S-1 as neoadjuvant therapy. She also received eight cycles of S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy. Approximately 14 months after the initial surgery, imaging examinations identified a mass suggesting recurrence in the abdominal wall at the middle wound that involved the transverse colon. After two cycles of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, chemoradiotherapy (S-1 plus 45 Gy) and seven cycles of modified FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) were administered. The patient did not develop any new recurrent lesions during chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy. Therefore, the recurrent lesion in the abdominal wall and the involved transverse colon were resected. We confirmed the lack of peritoneal dissemination during surgery. Pathological examination revealed that the resected lesion was metastasis of primary PDAC, and the surgical margin was 1 mm. However, re-recurrence localized in the abdominal wall was detected 9 months later. The re-recurrent lesion was diagnosed as local recurrence of the first recurrent lesion. We performed a second resection of the abdominal wall using a femoral myocutaneous flap to achieve sufficient surgical margin. The pathological findings of the resected specimen were the same as those of the previous specimens, and the resection margin was negative. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful. Seven years after the initial surgery and 3 years and 7 months after the third surgery, the patient is alive with no signs of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival could be achieved by radical resection with sufficient surgical margins for recurrence of PDAC in the abdominal wall if new other recurrent lesions, including peritoneal dissemination, are prevented through chemotherapy.