[Adjuvant hormonal therapy for early breast cancer: Assessment of patients' satisfaction]. / Évaluation de la satisfaction de patientes atteintes d'un cancer du sein précoce traitées en adjuvant par hormonothérapie.

INTRODUCTION: Since the cancer plan, evaluation of professional practices is essential to ensure the implementation of high-quality health care. Assess patient satisfaction is one of the pillars of high-quality health care. The main objective of the study was to assess the satisfaction of patients with early breast cancer taking a hormonal therapy, the secondary objective was to identify factors associated with their satisfaction. METHODS: The modified EORTC OUT-PATSAT-35 questionnaire was sent to a sample of patients in Franche-Comté in order to evaluate nine dimensions of satisfaction among which interpersonal skills, provided information, and overall satisfaction. For each dimension, a satisfaction score between 0 (no satisfaction) and 100 (highest satisfaction) was measured. Logistic regression analyses were used to study the factors associated with satisfaction. RESULTS: The mean overall satisfaction score for the 280 patients who answered was 73 [0-100]. Practicing an extra-professional activity was associated with higher satisfaction for several dimensions (odds ratio between 2.80 and 4.12, P<0.05) whereas it was decreased in the case of a modified appetite (odds ratio between 0.27 and 0.52, P<0.05). No link has been shown between satisfaction and adherence. DISCUSSION: The patients were satisfied and several factors impacting their satisfaction were identified, based on a questionnaire that must evolve to take into account the ambulatory aspect of their care. During the consultations, particular attention will be paid to these factors.

Adjuvant hormonal therapy for early breast cancer: an epidemiologic study of medication adherence.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy (AHT) and to identify risk factors for medication non-adherence in clinical practice in patients with early-stage hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer (BC) previously treated with chemotherapy. METHODS: We carried out a cross-sectional, observational, prospective, and multicenter survey based on a structured self-report postal questionnaire (35 items investigating six areas). A sample of 474 patients was drawn from 676 patients potentially eligible. The structured and validated Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-4 items was used for measuring medication adherence. An analysis of risk factors for non-adherence to AHT was performed using a two-step approach: univariate, then multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 280 patients out of the 428 analyzed patients participated in the survey, yielding a response rate of 65.4% [60.9-69.9]. The prevalence of adherence to AHT was estimated at 68.6% [63.1-74.0], corresponding to a high level of adherence. Three risk factors for non-adherence to AHT were identified: > 2 medications to treat comorbidities (p-value = 0.003), age less than 65 years (p-value = 0.008), and patient management in a university hospital setting (p-value = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Non-adherence is a common, complex, and multidimensional healthcare problem. This better understanding and knowledge of risk factors will allow healthcare providers (such as oncologists, general practitioners, pharmacists) to more easily identify patients at risk for non-adherence and help them provide appropriate information about AHT and its management, thus improving medication adherence in their patients.

[Prevalence and management of pain in patients with metastatic cancer in Franche-Comté]. / Prévalence et prise en charge de la douleur chez les patients présentant un cancer métastatique en Franche-Comté.

INTRODUCTION: Pain management is a major public health problem, especially in oncology. In order to assess professional practice, the IRFC-FC conducted a survey amongst patients with metastatic osteophilic solid tumor in Franche-Comté. The aims were to assess the pain prevalence, and its characteristics, its management and its impact on patients' quality of life in patients in pain. METHODS: An observational, prospective and multicenter survey was conducted using a self-report questionnaire. Patients with metastatic breast or prostate cancer managed in 5 day-hospitals of the IRFC-FC over a period of three months were included. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-three questionnaires were analyzed. Pain prevalence rate was 48.5%. Three quarters of patients in pain had chronic background pain, moderate to severe, with or without breakthrough pain. Considering their pain intensity and their analgesic therapy, 42.0% of patients seem to have an inadequate treatment. Eighty-five percent of treated patients reported to be compliant and felt that their pain was well managed despite a strong impact on their quality of life. CONCLUSION: The setting of a specific clinical pathway is essential to secure the standardized, optimal and efficient management of patients in pain. The assessment of patient satisfaction and quality of life must be integrated in clinical practice to identify patients in pain for which the treatment is inappropriate.

[Satisfaction of Breast Cancer patients treated by chemotherapy outpatient clinics: Results of the TemporELLES survey]. / Satisfaction des patientes traitées par chimiothérapie en hôpital de jour pour un cancer du sein : résultats de l'enquête TemporELLES.

Three thousand eight hundred and twelve patients participated in the TemporELLES survey; these patients were treated for breast cancer with intravenous chemotherapy in 105 different outpatient clinics in France. The survey shows that patients spend on average 3hours in the outpatient clinic per chemotherapy session, which includes on average 50minutes of waiting time. Forty percent of patients would like to reduce this waiting time. Availability of new dosage forms and ready to use medications will address the need for reduced waiting time while freeing up time for providing support to the patients.

[Economic assessment of the routine use of Oncotype DX® assay for early breast cancer in Franche-Comte region]. / Évaluation économique de l'utilisation en routine du test Oncotype DX® dans la prise en charge des cancers du sein en Franche-Comté.

Oncotype DX® has been validated as quantifying the likelihood of distant recurrence at 10 years and overall chemotherapy benefit in patients with estrogen-receptor-positive and HER-2-negative early breast cancer. In 2012, this genomic signature was routinely available for patients in Franche-Comté, France. Patients eligible for Oncotype DX(®) testing had a ER-positive, HER-2-négative early breast cancer with a nodal involvement limited to 0 or 1 positive-node without extracapsular spread; an adjuvant chemotherapy was indicated based on usual prognostic factors. The aim was to assess the economic impact of Oncotype DX(®) testing in a French region. A cost-minimisation analysis from the French Public Healthcare System perspective was performed. The availability of Oncotype DX(®) in Franche-Comté, France, and its use in clinical routine allowed a decrease of 73 % of adjuvant chemotherapy without increase of the cost of the patients' management and with a potential reduction of the cost for the French Public Healthcare System. This strategy was successful and may allow the reimbursement of this test in France for patients with early breast cancer.

Organizing medical oncology care at a regional level and its subsequent impact on the quality of early breast cancer management: a before-after study.

BACKGROUND: One of the main measures of the French national cancer plan is to encourage physicians to work collectively, and to minimize territorial inequities in access to care by rethinking the geographical distribution of oncologists. For this reason, cancer care services are currently being reorganized at national level. A new infrastructure for multidisciplinary cancer care delivery has been put in place in our region. Patients can receive multidisciplinary health care services nearer their homes, thanks to a mobile team of oncologists. The objective of our study was to assess, using a quality approach, the impact on medical management and on the costs of treating early breast cancer, of the new regional structure for cancer care delivery. METHODS: Before-and-after study performed from 2007 to 2010, including patients treated for early breast cancer in three hospitals in the region of Franche-Comté in Eastern France. The main outcome measures were quality criteria, namely delayed treatment (>12 weeks), dose-intensity and assessment of adjuvant chemotherapy. Other outcomes were 24-month progression-free survival (PFS) and economic evaluation. RESULTS: This study included 667 patients. The rate of chemotherapy tended to decrease, but not significantly (49.3% before versus 42.2% after, p=0.07), while the use of taxanes increased by 38% across all centres (59.6% before versus 98.0% after, p < 0.0001). There was a non-significant reduction in the time between surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (6.0 ± 3.0 weeks before versus 5.6 ± 3.6 weeks after, p=0.11). Dose-dense chemotherapy improved slightly, albeit non significantly (86.3% versus 91.1% p=0.22) and time to treatment tended to decrease. The new regional infrastructure did not change 24-month PFS, which remained at about 96%. The average cost of treatment was estimated at € 7000, with no difference between the two periods. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a shortage of oncologists, the new organization put in place in our region for the provision of care for early breast cancer makes it possible to maintain local community-based treatment, without negative economic consequences. This new structure for cancer care delivery offers cancer services of similar quality with no modification of 24-month PFS in early breast cancer.