Assessing the Impact of Preoperative MRI-Based Vertebral Bone Quality Scores on 5-Year Prognosis in Lumbar Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To assess the utility of preoperative vertebral bone quality (VBQ) scores in predicting the 5-year clinical outcomes following lumbar spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Osteoporosis poses a significant concern in older adults undergoing spinal surgery. The VBQ score, assessed through preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is associated with subsequent osteoporotic fractures and postoperative complications. However, previous report on the impact of VBQ score on mid-term clinical outcomes after lumbar spine surgery remains lacking. METHODS: A total of 189 patients who underwent lumbar surgery (≤3-disc levels) for lumbar spinal stenosis between 2010 and 2016 were enrolled. Patients were classified into high (>3.35), middle (2.75 to 3.35), and low (<2.73) VBQ score groups based on tertiles. Clinical scores, including Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) and Short Form-36 (SF-36), were recorded preoperatively and 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Comparative analysis showed significant differences among the VBQ groups throughout the study period in low back pain (P=0.013), walking ability (P=0.005), social life function (P=0.010) of JOABPEQ, and physical component summary of the SF-36 (P=0.018) following lumbar spine surgery. A higher VBQ score was significantly correlated with worse 5-year postoperative outcomes for all domains except for lumbar function of the JOABPEQ using multiple linear regression analysis, adjusting for age, sex, BMI, hyperlipidemia, surgical procedures, and each preoperative score. CONCLUSION: A high preoperative VBQ score is a risk factor for poor 5-year clinical outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. Evaluation of the VBQ score through routine preoperative MRI facilitates osteoporotic screening in lumbar patients without radiation exposure and healthcare costs, while also demonstrating its potential as a prognostic indicator of postoperative clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Do different pathologies of adult spinal deformity (idiopathic lumbar scoliosis against de novo lumbar scoliosis) affect preoperative and postoperative selfimage?

Study Design: Retrospective single-center study. Purpose: This study aimed to examine the factors associated with the self-image domain of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 revised (SRS-22r) in patients who underwent corrective surgery for adult idiopathic scoliosis (AdIS). Overview of Literature: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) can be classified into AdIS and de novo scoliosis. However, no studies have investigated the effect of different ASD pathologies on self-image. Methods: This study enrolled 60 patients who underwent corrective surgery and were followed up for >2 years postoperatively. AdIS was defined as adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in patients who had no history of corrective surgery, had a primary thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curve, and were ≥30 years old at the time of surgery. Results: The AdIS (n=23; mean age, 53.1 years) and de novo (n=37; mean age, 70.0 years) groups were significantly different in terms of the main thoracic and TL/L curves, sagittal vertical axis, thoracic kyphosis, and thoracolumbar kyphosis preoperatively. The scores in the self-image domain of the SRS-22r (before surgery/2 years after surgery [PO2Y]) were 2.2/4.4 and 2.3/3.7 in the AdIS and de novo groups, respectively, and PO2Y was significantly different between the two groups (p<0.001). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that AdIS was an independent factor associated with self-image at PO2Y (p=0.039). Conclusions: AdIS, a spinal deformity pathology, was identified as a significant factor associated with the self-image domain of SRS- 22r in patients who underwent corrective surgery. AdIS is not solely classified based on pathology but also differs in terms of the clinical aspect of self-image improvement following corrective surgery.

Impact of Incident Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures on 5-Year Postoperative Outcomes and Spinal Alignment Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery.

Introduction: Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) are a significant problem among older patients who are undergoing spine surgery. This study examined the influence of incident OVFs on clinical outcomes and spinal alignment 5 years following short-segment fusion (SSF) for lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods: We studied 88 patients who underwent SSF (≤2-disc level) for lumbar spinal stenosis with instability and were followed up for more than 5 years postoperatively. Those with prior OVFs were excluded. We evaluated incident OVFs with plain whole-spine lateral radiography preoperatively (before) and at 5 years postoperatively (after). Using preoperative lumbar computed tomography, Hounsfield unit (HU) values were evaluated. The patients were classified into two groups according to the presence of incident OVFs. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was utilized to compare the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) and the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), and spinal parameters were recorded before and after. Multiple linear regression analyses were employed to investigate the association between the incident OVFs and the clinical scores and spinal alignment recorded after. Results: In the fracture group, the clinical course of low back pain score on the JOABPEQ, physical component summary SF-36 score, and spinal alignment including C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and pelvic tilt were significantly worse. Multiple linear regression revealed a significant correlation between incident OVFs and worse 5-year postoperative spinal alignment, which includes SVA and TK. The optimal threshold for the HU values for predicting the incidence of OVFs within 5 years postoperatively was 83.0 (area under the curve 0.701). Conclusions: Incident OVFs in patients following SSF were significantly correlated with the 5-year clinical outcomes and spinal alignment. Patients at risk of OVFs, especially those with HU values below 83, must take preventive measures against OVFs, as this could prevent deteriorating midterm postoperative clinical outcomes and spinal alignment. Level of Evidence: 3.

Lower preoperative Hounsfield unit values as a risk factor for poor 5-year clinical outcomes after lumbar spine surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Hounsfield Unit (HU) value has been associated with future osteoporotic fractures and postoperative complications. However, no studies on the impact of low HU values on mid-term clinical outcomes following lumbar spine surgery have been reported. We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of preoperative HU values for 5-year clinical outcomes following lumbar spine surgery. METHODS: We enrolled 200 patients who underwent lumbar surgery (≤ 3-disc levels) for lumbar spinal stenosis. HU values were assessed using preoperative lumbar computed tomography as part of routine preoperative planning for lumbar surgery. Patients were divided into two groups based on the cutoff value of the HU values obtained from the receiver operating characteristic curve for the incidence of vertebral fractures within five years postoperatively. Clinical scores preoperatively and 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively, including Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) and Short Form-36 (SF-36), were compared using a mixed-effects model. RESULTS: Comparative analysis indicated that all domains of JOABPEQ, except for lumbar function, and the physical component summary of the SF-36 were significantly worse in the low HU group than in the high HU group. Using multiple regression analysis, low HU values were significantly correlated with worse 5-year postoperative scores in all domains of JOABPEQ and SF-36. CONCLUSION: Low preoperative HU values are a risk factor for poor 5-year clinical outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. HU values are not only a valuable tool for analyzing bone mineral density but also may be a valuable poor prognostic factor of postoperative clinical outcomes.

Staged Corrective Surgery for a Patient With Sagittal Malalignment Related to Noonan Syndrome: A Case Report.

CASE: A 20-year-old man with Noonan syndrome had rigid cervical kyphosis caused by cervical myelopathy and thoracic lordosis caused by pulmonary disfunction. Two-staged corrective surgery, which involved initial posterior spinal fusion (PSF) in T2-L2 followed by PSF in C3-T2, had been performed without any complications. The radiographs before surgery and 2 years after surgery showed that cervical lordosis (C2-7) changed form -56° to -29°, and thoracic kyphosis (T5-12) improved from -49° to 10°. CONCLUSION: Initial realignment surgery in the caudal lesion should be better for improving global spinal alignment in patients with rigid spinal deformities at different locations.

Direct Lateral Corpectomy and Reconstruction Using an Expandable Cage Improves Local Kyphosis but Not Global Sagittal Alignment.

Recently, an expandable cage equipped with rectangular footplates has been used for anterior vertebral replacement in osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF). However, the postoperative changes in global alignment have not been elucidated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate local and global spinal alignment after anterior and posterior spinal fixation (APSF) using an expandable cage in elderly OVF patients. This retrospective multicenter review assessed 54 consecutive patients who underwent APSF for OVF. Clinical outcomes were compared between postoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA) > 95 mm and ≤95 mm groups to investigate the impact of malalignment. SVA improved by only 18.7 mm (from 111.8 mm to 93.1 mm). VAS score of back pain at final follow-up was significantly higher in patients with SVA > 95 mm than SVA ≤ 95 mm (42.4 vs. 22.6, p = 0.007). Adjacent vertebral fracture after surgery was significantly more frequent in the SVA > 95 mm (37% vs. 11%, p = 0.038). Multiple logistic regression showed significantly increased OR for developing adjacent vertebral fracture (OR = 4.76, 95% CI 1.10-20.58). APSF using the newly developed cage improves local kyphotic angle but not SVA. The main cause for the spinal malalignment after surgery was postoperative development of adjacent vertebral fractures.

Spontaneous Improvement of Postoperative Coronal Imbalance Following Selective Thoracolumbar-Lumbar Fusion in Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prevalence and prognosis of postoperative coronal imbalance (CIB) and factors related to its onset and spontaneous improvement in patients with Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent selective thoracolumbar-lumbar fusion. METHODS: We measured radiographic parameters and evaluated clinical outcomes using the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire in patients with Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and a minimum 2-year follow-up. CIB was defined as >2 cm distance between C7 plumb line and central sacral vertical line. We compared parameters between patients with CIB (CIB group) and without CIB (coronal balanced group). RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 29 patients (mean age at surgery:17.0 years; average follow-up period: 45.6 months). CIB was found in 10 patients 1 week after surgery (34.5%); this decreased to 6.9% at final follow-up. Comparative analysis indicated significant values as follows: age at surgery (17.5 years vs. 14.7 years, P = 0.005), lumbosacral curve (5.9° vs. 11.2°, P = 0.02), and L5 tilt (-3.6° vs. -8.1°, P = 0.02) in bending film. Greater changes of lowest instrumented vertebra disc angle, which means scoliotic angles between LIV and LIV+1, were significantly associated with spontaneous improvement of CIB (P = 0.04). Clinical outcomes were comparable between the coronal balanced and CIB groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although CIB was frequently detected in the early postoperative period after selective thoracolumbar-lumbar fusion, it mostly corrected spontaneously. Relatively younger age at surgery and less flexible lumbosacral curve may be related to postoperative CIB, and greater changes of LIV disc angle may be associated with spontaneous improvement of CIB.

Gender-specific analysis for the association between trunk muscle mass and spinal pathologies.

We investigated the relationship between trunk muscle mass and spinal pathologies by gender. This multicenter cross-sectional study included patients aged ≥ 30 years who visited a spinal outpatient clinic. Trunk and appendicular muscle mass were measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) score for low back pain, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ5D) score were investigated to evaluate spinal pathology. The association between trunk muscle mass and these parameters was analyzed by gender using a non-linear regression model adjusted for patients' demographics. We investigated the association between age and trunk muscle mass. We included 781 men and 957 women. Trunk muscle mass differed significantly between men and women, although it decreased with age after age 70 in both genders. Lower trunk muscle mass was significantly associated with ODI, SVA, and EQ5D score deterioration in both genders; its association with VAS was significant only in men. Most parameters deteriorated when trunk muscle mass was < 26 kg in men and < 19 kg in women. Lower trunk muscle mass was associated with lumbar disability, spinal imbalance, and poor quality of life in both genders, with significant difference in muscle mass.

Risk factors of the poor long-term prognosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: A multicenter cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The presence of existing osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) increases the mortality risk. However, the influence of the characteristics of OVF is unclear. This study aimed to investigate the influence of new OVF on patients' long-term prognosis using our past cohort study. METHOD: This is an extension study of our cohort study carried out between 2005 and 2007. In the present extension study, of 420 patients, 197 whose contact information was available at the 6-month follow-up were included in the telephone survey in 2018. Five patients refused to participate in the survey, and 82 could not be contacted. Eventually, 110 patients were enrolled. Of the Demographic data, radiological findings, medical history, and clinical outcome were investigated at injury onset and at the 6-month follow-up. A proportional hazard model was used to investigate the risk factors for mortality. RESULTS: Among 110 patients, 33 died. Male sex and low body mass index (BMI <18.5 kg/m2) were significant risk factors for mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 6.40, 1.01-40.50; 5.24, 1.44-19.04, respectively]. The history of stroke and liver disease increased the risk of mortality (HR = 13.37, 1.93-92.7; 6.62, 1.15-38.14, respectively). As regards radiological findings, local kyphosis progression per 1° or ≥7° were significant risk factors of mortality (HR = 1.20, 1.06-1.36; 5.38, 1.81-16.03, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A telephone survey at 12 years after the occurrence of OVF analyzed risk factors for mortality and showed that a progression of local kyphosis in fractures between injury onset and 6 months after injury was a risk factor of poor prognosis.

Relationship between number of radiological risk factors for delayed union after osteoporotic vertebral fracture and clinical outcomes.

This study demonstrated that number of three specific radiological risk factors (MR T2WI confined high-intensity pattern and diffuse low-intensity pattern, thoracolumbar vertebrae involvement, middle column injury) added prognostic information for delayed union, kyphotic deformity, and prolonged pain. PURPOSE: Delayed union after osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) causes prolonged pain, QOL impairment, progression of collapse, kyphotic deformity, and neurologic impairment. Some specific radiological findings can be useful for predicting delayed union. We aimed to explore the prevalence and concomitance of various types of radiological risk factors for delayed union after osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) and to assess the impact of risk factor number on clinical outcomes. METHODS: A total of 508 patients with fresh OVF from 25 institutes were evaluated. All patients were treated conservatively without surgical interventions. At the 6-month follow-up, the patients were classified into bone union and delayed union groups based on plain X-ray findings. We examined the presence and absence of three specific radiological risk factors (MR T2WI confined high-intensity pattern and diffuse low-intensity pattern, thoracolumbar vertebrae involvement, middle column injury) and analyzed clinical outcomes according to numbers of radiological risk factors. RESULTS: Delayed union was observed in 101 patients (19.9%) at the 6-month follow-up. The most common radiological risk factor was thoracolumbar vertebrae involvement (73.8%), followed by middle column injury (33.9%) and specific MRI findings (T2WI confined high-intensity pattern and diffuse low-intensity pattern) (29.7%). Overall, 85 (16.7%) patients had zero radiological risk factors, 212 (42.7%) had one, 137 (27.0%) had two, and 69 (13.6%) had three. When assessing the number of radiographic risk factors which included the MRI findings (the 3-risk factor method), the odds ratio for delayed union after acute OVF was 5.8 in the 2/3-risk factor group and 13.1 in the 3/3-risk factor group. Even when assessing the number of radiographic risk factors without MRI findings (2-risk factor method), the odds ratio was 3.2 in the 1/2-risk factor group and 10.2 in the 2/2-risk factor group. CONCLUSION: Number of radiological risk factors added prognostic information for delayed union, kyphotic deformity, and prolonged pain.

Comparative Study of the Spinopelvic Alignment in Patients With Idiopathic Lumbar Scoliosis Between Adulthood and Adolescence.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the natural history of the spinopelvic alignment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is important in developing surgical strategies for patients with adult idiopathic lumbar scoliosis (AdLS). Because it is challenging to follow individuals without any treatments, we sought to estimate its natural history by comparing radiographic characteristics of patients with AIS and AdLS. METHODS: We included patients with Lenke 5 AIS and patients with AdLS who were diagnosed with Lenke 5 AIS in adolescence. The Cobb angle of the curve and spinopelvic parameters were measured by whole spine radiographs. The AdLS patients were divided into 2 groups according to age <50 years (AdLS<50) or ≥50 years (AdLS≥50). Radiographic parameters were compared among the AIS, AdLS<50, and AdLS≥50 groups. The relationship between age and each parameter was analyzed using nonlinear regression analysis. RESULTS: We analyzed 40 patients with AIS (all female, mean age 16.8 ± 3.2 years) and 35 patients with AdLS (34 female and 1 male, mean age 55.4 ± 12.1 years). Thoracolumbar/lumbar curve and thoracolumbar kyphosis was significantly greater in the AdLS<50 group compared with the AIS group, without progression after age 50 years. Lumbar lordosis and pelvic tilt deteriorated linearly with age. AIS and AdLS<50 patients maintained sagittal balance, which deteriorated in AdLS≥50 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results may predict the following natural course of Lenke 5 AIS: (1) progression of scoliotic deformity of thoracolumbar/lumbar curve with increased thoracolumbar kyphosis; (2) subsequent lumbar hypolordosis followed by pelvic retroversion; and (3) sagittal imbalance after failure of compensation.

Differences in surgical outcome after anterior corpectomy and reconstruction with an expandable cage with rectangular footplates between thoracolumbar and lumbar osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

BACKGROUND: Anterior and posterior spinal fixation (APSF) can provide rigid structural anterior column support in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF). A new rectangular footplate designed based on biomechanical studies of endplates provides better resistance to subsidence. However, differences in characteristics exist between the thoracolumbar and lower lumbar spine. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes following APSF using an expandable cage with rectangular footplates in the thoracolumbar/lumbar region. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent APSF for OVF at multiple centers were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed by dividing the patients into thoracolumbar (TL, T10-L2) and lumbar (L, L3-L5) groups. Surgical indications were incomplete neurologic deficit or intractable back pain with segmental spinal instability. Surgical outcomes including the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and reoperation rate were compared between TL and L groups. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were followed-up for more than 12 months and analyzed. Operative intervention was required for 35 patients in the TL group and 34 patients in the L group. Mean ages in the TL and L groups were 76.5 years and 75.1 years, respectively. Intra-vertebral instability was more frequent in the TL group (p<0.001). Screw fixation range was significantly longer in the TL group (p=0.012). The rate of cage subsidence did not differ significantly between the TL group (46%) and L group (44%). Reoperation rate tended to be higher in the TL group (p=0.095). Improvement ratio of JOA score was significantly better in the L group (60%) than in the TL group (46.9%, p=0.029). CONCLUSION: APSF using an expandable cage was effective to treat OVF at both lumbar and thoracolumbar levels. However, the improvement ratio of the JOA score was better in the L group than in the TL group.

Risk Factor for Poor Patient Satisfaction After Lumbar Spine Surgery in Elderly Patients Aged Over 80 years.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To clarify the poor patient satisfaction after lumbar spinal surgery in elderly patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: As the global population continues to age, it is important to consider the surgical outcome and patient satisfaction in the elderly. No studies have assessed patient satisfaction in elderly patients undergoing surgical treatment and risk factors for poor satisfaction in elderly patients after lumbar spinal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective multicenter survey was performed in 169 patients aged above 80 years who underwent lumbar spinal surgery. Patients were followed up for at least 1 year after surgery. We assessed patient satisfaction from the results of surgery by using a newly developed patient questionnaire. Patients were assessed by demographic data, surgical procedures, complications, reoperation rate, pain improvement, and risk factors for poor patient satisfaction with surgery for lumbar spinal disease. RESULTS: In total, 131 patients (77.5%, G-group) were satisfied and 38 patients (22.5%, P-group) were dissatisfied with surgery. The 2 groups did not differ significantly in baseline characteristics and surgical data. Postoperative visual analog scale score for low back pain and leg pain were significantly higher in the P-group than in the G-group (low back pain: G-group, 1.7±1.9 vs. P-group, 5.2±2.5, P<0.001; leg pain: G-group, 1.4±2.0 vs. P-group, 5.5±2.6, P<0.001). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that postoperative vertebral fracture (P=0.049; odds ratio, 3.096; 95% confidence interval, 1.004-9.547) and reoperation (P=0.025; odds ratio, 5.692; 95% confidence interval, 1.250-25.913) were significantly associated with the patient satisfaction after lumbar spinal surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative vertebral fracture and reoperation were found to be risk factors for poor patient satisfaction after lumbar spinal surgery in elderly patients, which suggests a need for careful treatment of osteoporosis in addition to careful determination of surgical indication and procedure in elderly patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Factors related to postoperative coronal imbalance in adult lumbar scoliosis.

OBJECTIVE: The object of this study was to analyze the prevalence of postoperative coronal imbalance (CIB) and related factors in patients with adult lumbar scoliosis. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center study of data from patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) who had undergone corrective surgery performed by a single surgeon between 2009 and 2017. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) age at surgery > 40 years, 2) Cobb angles of the thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curve > 40°, 3) upper instrumented vertebra of T9 or T10, 4) lowest instrumented vertebra of L5 or the pelvis, and 5) minimum 2-year follow-up period. Radiographic parameters were measured before surgery, 2 weeks after surgery, and at the latest follow-up. Curve flexibility was also assessed using side bending radiographs. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the 22-Item Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire (SRS-22) and the SF-36. CIB was considered to have occurred if the C7 plumbline was more than 2.5 cm lateral to the central sacral vertical line (i.e., coronal vertical axis [CVA] > 2.5 cm) at the final follow-up. Parameters between the patients with (CIB group) and without (coronal balance [CB] group) CIB were compared, and factors related to CIB were evaluated. RESULTS: From among 66 consecutively treated ASD patients, a total of 37 patients (mean age at surgery 66.3 years, average follow-up 63 months) met the study inclusion criteria. CIB was found in 6 patients at the final follow-up (16.2%), and the CVA of all patients in the CIB group shifted to the convex side of the TL/L curve. A comparative analysis between the CB and CIB groups, respectively, at the final follow-up indicated the following factors were related to CIB: lumbosacral (LS) curve, 11.0°/16.5° (p = 0.02); LS correction rate (CR), 61%/47% (p = 0.02); and CR ratio (LS vs TL/L), 0.93/0.67 (p = 0.0002). Regarding clinical outcomes, the satisfaction domain of the SRS-22 (CB 4.4 vs CIB 3.5) showed a significant difference between the CIB and CB groups (p = 0.02), and patients in the CB group tended to score better on the pain domain (CB 4.3 vs CIB 3.7), but the difference was not significant (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative CIB negatively impacted patients' HRQOL. An imbalanced correction ratio between the TL/L and LS curves may cause postoperative CIB. Therefore, adequate correction of the LS curve may prevent postoperative CIB.

Posterior vertebral column resection with short-segment fusion for the patients with congenital kyphoscoliosis.

The purpose of this study was to assess the surgical outcomes of posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) with short-segment fusion for pediatric patients with congenital kyphoscoliosis (CKS). The medical records of 12 consecutive pediatric patients with CKS due to hemivertebrae located in thoracolumbar and lumbar area that had undergone PVCR and presented for follow-up at a minimum of 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. The mean follow-up period was 56.2 months, and the mean age at the surgery was 9.2 years. We evaluated radiographic parameters using plain radiographs, and evaluated segmental correction using computed tomography imaging. The mean values of the preoperative Cobb angle (cranial curve, main curve, and caudal curve) were 16.0°, 41.3°, and 25.0°, respectively. The main curve was reduced 5.4° after surgery and was maintained at 6.3° at the time of the most recent follow-up. The overall correction rate of main curve was 86.6%. Spontaneous correction rate in the cranial curve and caudal curve were calculated as 55.9 and 80.8%, respectively. The mean segmental scoliosis in the osteotomized segments and fused segments at preoperative/postoperative/final follow-up (FFU) were 40.8°/7.8°/9.2° and 34.3°/3.9°/5.1°, respectively. The mean segmental kyphosis in the osteotomized segments and fused segments at the preoperative/postoperative/FFU were 36.0°/3.8°/4.0° and 27.5°/-1.3°/0.7°, respectively. Our data indicate that PVCR with short-segment fusion for CKS can provide good correction in the main curve and spontaneous correction in the compensatory curves after a minimum 2-year follow-up. Further investigation over the long term is mandatory for pediatric patients.

Surgical Outcomes of Multilevel Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Correction of Adult Spinal Deformity: A Comparative Clinical Study.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case control study. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes of multilevel lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) and multilevel posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity (ASD) and to evaluate the sagittal plane correction by combining LIF with posterior-column osteotomy (PCO). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The surgical outcomes between multilevel LIF and multilevel PLIF in ASD patients remain unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 31 ASD patients who underwent multilevel LIF combined with PCO (LIF group, n=14) or multilevel PLIF (PLIF group, n=17) and with a minimum 2-year follow-up. In the comparison between LIF and PLIF groups, their mean age at surgery was 69.4 vs. 61.8 years while the mean follow-up period was 29.2 vs. 59.3 months. We evaluated the transition of pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) and disc angle (DA) in the LIF group, in fulcrum backward bending (FBB), after LIF and after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with PCO. The spinopelvic radiographic parameters were compared between LIF and PLIF groups. RESULTS: Compared with the PLIF group, the LIF group had less blood loss and comparable surgical outcomes with respect to radiographic data, health-related quality of life scores and surgical time. In the LIF group, the mean DA and PI-LL were unchanged after LIF (DA, 5.8°; PI-LL, 15°) compared with the values using FBB (DA, 4.3°; PI-LL, 15°) and improved significantly after PSF with PCO (DA, 8.1°; PI-LL, 0°). CONCLUSIONS: In the surgical treatment of ASD, multilevel LIF is less invasive than multilevel PLIF and combination of LIF and PCO would be necessary for optimal sagittal correction in patients with rigid deformity.

Autogenic Rib Graft for Atlantoaxial and Occipitocervical Fixation in Pediatric Patients.

Study Design: Retrospective case series. Purpose: To evaluate surgical outcomes and effectiveness of an autogenic rib graft for upper cervical fixation in pediatric patients. Overview of Literature: Autogenic bone grafts have long been considered the 'gold standard' bone source for posterior cervical fusion in pediatric patients. However, there are some unsolved problems associated with donor-site morbidity and amount of bone grafting. Methods: We studied five consecutive pediatric patients who underwent atlantoaxial fixation or occipitocervical fixation (OCF) using an autogenic rib graft with at least 2 years of follow-up (mean age, 9.8 years; mean follow-up period, 73.0 months). Two patients underwent OCF without screw-rod constructs and three patients with screw-rod constructs. Autogenic rib grafts were used in all patients. We evaluated the surgical outcomes including radiographic parameter, bony union, and perioperative complications. Results: The atlantoaxial interval (ADI) was corrected from 11.6 to 6.0 mm, and the C1-2 angle was corrected -14.8° to 7.8°. The C2-7 angle was reduced from 31° to 9° spontaneously. Two patients with OCF required revision surgery due to loss of correction. Patients did not experience any complication associated with the donor sites (rib bone grafts). Six months postoperation X-rays clearly showed regeneration of the rib at the donor sites. Bony fusion was achieved in all patients; however, bony fusion occurred more slowly in patients without screw-rod constructs compared with patients with screw-rod constructs. Bone regeneration of the rib was observed in all patients with no complications at the donor site. Conclusions: Autogenic rib grafts have advantages of potential bone regeneration, high fusion rate, and low donor-site morbidity. In addition, a screw-rod construct provides better bony fusion in pediatric patients with OCF and atlantoaxial fixation.

ISSLS PRIZE IN CLINICAL SCIENCE 2019: clinical importance of trunk muscle mass for low back pain, spinal balance, and quality of life-a multicenter cross-sectional study.

STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVES: To clarify the relationship of trunk muscle mass with low back pain, spinal sagittal balance, and quality of life. Few reports have investigated the relationship of trunk muscle mass with lumbar spine function and spinal balance, and the clinical significance of trunk muscle mass remains unclear. METHODS: Patients attending spinal outpatient clinics at 10 different medical institutions were enrolled in this study. Patient demographics, trunk muscle mass and appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), body mass index (BMI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ5D) score were investigated. Multivariate nonlinear regression analysis was used to investigate the association of trunk muscle mass with the ODI, VAS score, SVA, and EQ5D score. RESULTS: Of 2551 eligible patients, 1738 (mean age 70.2 ± 11.0 years; 781 men and 957 women) were enrolled. Trunk muscle mass was significantly correlated with the ODI, VAS score, SVA, and EQ5D score (P < 0.001) when adjusted for age, sex, BMI, ASM, CCI, and history of lumbar surgery. Patient deterioration was associated with a decrease in trunk muscle mass, and the deterioration accelerated from approximately 23 kg. CONCLUSIONS: Trunk muscle mass was significantly associated with the ODI, VAS score, SVA, and EQ5D score. Trunk muscle mass may assume an important role to elucidate and treat lumbar spinal dysfunction and spinal imbalance. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Does sagittal imbalance impact the surgical outcomes of short-segment fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar scoliosis?

BACKGROUND: The degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) patients who mainly complained about neurogenic claudication due to spinal canal stenosis are well-indicated for short segment fusion (SSF) at the affecting levels. However, it is unclear whether we should consider global sagittal balance or not. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of sagittal balance on the surgical outcomes of degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) patients who underwent SSF. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 70 DLS patients who underwent SSF (less than 3 levels) and could be followed for at least 2 years. The PI-LL, PT, SVA, and T1 pelvic angle (TPA) were measured using standing whole spine X-rays preoperatively (PreO) and at final follow-up (FFU). Surgical outcomes were assessed with the improvement in Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOAs) for low back pain (LBP), and the level of LBP was measured using the visual analogue scale (LBP-VAS). We analysed the relationships between the radiographic parameters and the surgical outcomes. RESULTS: We divided the patients into the three groups (poor/fair/good) based on the JOAs. The analysis with the Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test indicated that the following radiographic parameters had a significant trend with surgical outcomes in each group: (poor/fair/good; p value); PreO PI-LL (26/20/17°; P = 0.04), SVA (46/75/35.5 mm; P = 0.02), TPA (28/27/23°; p = 0.04), FFU PI-LL (33/25/8.5°; P = 0.004), SVA (93/90.5/32.5 mm; P = 0.001), and TPA (33/29/25°; P = 0.007). Additionally, LBP-VAS had a significant correlation between the three groups at final follow-up (P = 0.004). There were significant correlations between improvement in JOAs and PI-LL, SVA, and TPA both PreO and at FFU (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Sagittal spinal imbalance and spinopelvic malalignment significantly impact the surgical outcomes of SSF for DLS. Preoperative evaluation of spinopelvic alignment and sagittal balance is of critical importance when SSF are performed for DLS patients.

Effect of Different Types of Upper Instrumented Vertebrae Instruments on Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Pedicle Screw versus Transverse Process Hook.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. PURPOSE: To compare the incidence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) between transverse process hooks (TPHs) and pedicle screws (PSs) at the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The choice of UIV implant type may be important for avoiding PJK; however, few comparative clinical studies have evaluated the incidence of PJK according to the type of UIV implant used in ASD surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 39 consecutive patients with ASD (mean age, 67 years; mean follow-up period, 41 months) who underwent corrective surgery between 2009 and 2013. TPH was used in 17 patients and PS in 22 patients. PJK was defined as the presence of a UIV or UIV±1 fracture, or a change in the proximal junctional angle (PJA) of >20°. Data of patients with TPH and PS were compared. RESULTS: The TPH group had a PJK incidence of 17.6% compared with 27.3% in the PS group (p =0.47). In the TPH group, PJK was a result of UIV fracture in one patient, UIV-1 fracture in one patient, and ligamentous failure in one patient. In the PS group, six patients developed PJK because of UIV fracture. No differences in radiographic parameters were found between the two groups. After analyzing the PJA data in the patients with PJK, the changes in PJA were significantly higher in the PS group than in the TPH group (19.0°/5.0°, p =0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that using TPH as a UIV implant may not prevent PJK; however, using TPH as the UIV anchor may prevent vertebral collapse if cases of UIV fracture. The increased risk of UIV fracture collapse in the PS group may be a result of a higher mechanical load on UIV when using PS.