SAFESTEREO: phase II randomized trial to compare stereotactic radiosurgery with fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a frequently chosen treatment for patients with brain metastases and the number of long-term survivors is increasing. Brain necrosis (e.g. radionecrosis) is the most important long-term side effect of the treatment. Retrospective studies show a lower risk of radionecrosis and local tumor recurrence after fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS, e.g. five fractions) compared with stereotactic radiosurgery in one or three fractions. This is especially true for patients with large brain metastases. As such, the 2022 ASTRO guideline of radiotherapy for brain metastases recommends more research to fSRS to reduce the risk of radionecrosis. This multicenter prospective randomized study aims to determine whether the incidence of adverse local events (either local failure or radionecrosis) can be reduced using fSRS versus SRS in one or three fractions in patients with brain metastases. METHODS: Patients are eligible with one or more brain metastases from a solid primary tumor, age of 18 years or older, and a Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 70. Exclusion criteria include patients with small cell lung cancer, germinoma or lymphoma, leptomeningeal metastases, a contraindication for MRI, prior inclusion in this study, prior surgery for brain metastases, prior radiotherapy for the same brain metastases (in-field re-irradiation). Participants will be randomized between SRS with a dose of 15-24 Gy in 1 or 3 fractions (standard arm) or fSRS 35 Gy in five fractions (experimental arm). The primary endpoint is the incidence of a local adverse event (local tumor failure or radionecrosis identified on MRI scans) at two years after treatment. Secondary endpoints are salvage treatment and the use of corticosteroids, bevacizumab, or antiepileptic drugs, survival, distant brain recurrences, toxicity, and quality of life. DISCUSSION: Currently, limiting the risk of adverse events such as radionecrosis is a major challenge in the treatment of brain metastases. fSRS potentially reduces this risk of radionecrosis and local tumor failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClincalTrials.gov, trial registration number: NCT05346367 , trial registration date: 26 April 2022.

Early passage bone marrow stromal cells express genes involved in nervous system development supporting their relevance for neural repair.

PURPOSE: The assessment of the capacity of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC) to repair the nervous system using gene expression profiling. The evaluation of effects of long-term culturing on the gene expression profile of BMSC. METHODS: Fourty four k whole genome rat microarrays were used to study gene expression of cultured BMSC at passage (P)3 and to compare expression profiles between P3 and P14 BMSC. Quantitative PCR was employed to validate the microarray results. RESULTS: P3 BMSC expressed genes involved in neural developmental events such as glial differentiation, neuron proliferation, and neurite formation. They also express genes encoding for growth factors and for proteins involved in growth factor signaling. A total of 6687 genes were co-expressed in P3 and P14 BMSC. Of these co-expressed genes, 3% (202 genes) was differentially expressed with 159 genes higher in P3 BMSC and 43 genes higher in P14 BMSC. The gene expression patterns were independently validated using quantitative PCR. Functional data mining by Gene Ontology (GO)-analysis revealed that 85/159 and 22/43 genes were annotated in the GO database. In P3 BMSC, 53 GO-classes were overrepresented with several involved in organ development, cell proliferation, and neural repair. In P14 BMSC, three GO-classes were overrepresented with one involved in organ development. CONCLUSIONS: Our gene profiling results suggested a decreased plasticity and repair aptitude of long-term cultured BMSC. Our data indicated the use of early passage BMSC for neural repair approaches.

The perioperative use of oral anticoagulants during surgical procedures for carpal tunnel syndrome. A preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the feasibility of designing a randomized controlled study whether open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) surgery can be performed safely under systemic anticoagulant therapy using acetylsalicylacid (ASA) or acenocoumarol (ACM), this preliminary, observational study was performed. METHODS: Prospectively, during 1 year, data were collected from all patients who underwent conventional OCTR at the neurosurgical department of the Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Patients continued anticoagulant treatment perioperatively. RESULTS: A total of 364 patients were operated on, of whom 45 continued ASA and seven ACM treatment. Only one patient using ASA complained of a postoperative subcutaneous hemorrhage. In the control group without anticoagulants, none of the patients had a bleeding postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Continuation of anticoagulant treatment is safe for OCTR. The adverse effects of stopping treatment for surgery can be severe. As a result of this study, we have changed our surgery protocol for OCTR and continue anticoagulant treatment perioperatively.