Immunophenotypic Analysis Reveals Differences in Circulating Immune Cells in the Peripheral Blood of Patients with Segmental and Nonsegmental Vitiligo.

Accumulating studies have indicated immune-based destruction of melanocytes in both segmental vitiligo (SV) and non-SV (NSV). Whereas SV often occurs unilaterally during childhood and stabilizes after an initial period of activity, the disease course of NSV is usually slowly progressive, with new lesions occurring bilaterally during life. This suggests an involvement of distinct pathophysiology pathways, specifically increased systemic immune activation in patients with NSV but not in patients with SV. This research aimed to identify the differences in immune cells in the blood of patients with SV and NSV through immunophenotyping of circulating cells. Regulatory T cells were unaffected in patients with SV compared with that in healthy controls but decreased in patients with NSV. In patients with NSV, the reduction in regulatory T cells was associated with the presence of other systemic autoimmune comorbidities, which were less present in SV. Similarly, the absence of a melanocyte-specific antibody response in patients with SV suggests less involvement of B-cell immunity in SV. These data show that in contrast to patients with NSV, no increased systemic immunity is found in patients with SV, indicating that SV pathogenesis is associated with a localized cytotoxic reaction targeting epidermal melanocytes.

IFN-γ-induced PD-L1 expression on human melanocytes is impaired in vitiligo.

Mounting evidence shows that the PD-1/PD-L1 axis is involved in tumor immune evasion. This is demonstrated by anti-PD-1 antibodies that can reverse tumor-associated PD-L1 to functionally suppress anti-tumor T-cell responses. Since type I and II interferons are key regulators of PD-L1 expression in melanoma cells and IFN-γ-producing CD8+ T cells and IFN-α-producing dendritic cells are abundant in vitiligo skin, we aimed to study the role of PD-1/PD-L1 signalling in melanocyte destruction in vitiligo. Moreover, impaired PD-1/PD-L1 function is observed in a variety of autoimmune diseases. It is, therefore, hypothesized that manipulating PD-1/PD-L1 signalling might have therapeutic potential in vitiligo. The PD-1+ T cells were abundantly present in situ in perilesional vitiligo skin, but expression of PD-L1 was limited and confined exclusively to dermal T cells. More specifically, neither melanocytes nor other epidermal skin cells expressed PD-L1. Exposure to IFN-γ, but also type I interferons, increased PD-L1 expression in primary melanocytes and fibroblasts, derived from healthy donors. Primary human keratinocytes only showed increased PD-L1 expression upon stimulation with IFN-γ. More interestingly, melanocytes derived from non-lesional vitiligo skin showed no PD-L1 upregulation upon IFN-γ exposure, while other skin cells displayed significant PD-L1 expression after exposure. In a vitiligo skin explant model, incubation of non-lesional vitiligo skin with activated (IFN-γ-producing) T cells from vitiligo lesions was previously described to induce melanocyte apoptosis. Although PD-L1 expression was induced in epidermal cells in these explants, this induction was completely absent in melanocytes. The lack of PD-L1 upregulation by melanocytes in the presence of IFN-γ-producing T cells shows that melanocytes lack protection against T-cell attack during vitiligo pathogenesis. Manipulating PD-1/PD-L1 signalling may, therefore, be a therapeutic option for vitiligo patients.

Patient reported outcomes for intensified versus conventional NB-UVB treatment in non-segmental vitiligo.

Introduction: Treatment of non-segmental vitiligo (NSV) remains a challenge. Efficacy of NB-UVB treatment may increase with more frequent use or in combination with topical agents. Currently, data on the most effective treatment regimen lacking. Our objective is to retrospectively compare NB-UVB treatment regimens for non-segmental vitiligo. Methods: Patients with NSV treated with NB-UVB therapy were included in two time periods. Group I received NB-UVB therapy twice a week (conventional treatment) and group II received NB-UVB thrice a week, combined with topical agents (intensified treatment). Patients completed a questionnaire regarding the degree and onset of repigmentation, satisfaction and side effects. Results: Repigmentation scores did not differ significantly between the two groups. Onset of repigmentation in the first three months seemed higher in group II, but this difference was not significant (23.4% vs 51.1%; p = .11). In both groups the majority of the patients were moderately to very satisfied (group I: 70.2% group II: 73.3%). The occurrence of adverse effects was comparable. Conclusions: This study indicates that conventional and intensified treatment for NSV seem to be comparable. The intensified treatment might be more effective to speed up the onset of repigmentation, but larger prospective studies are needed to objectify these findings.