Three Newly Recognized Likely Pathogenic Gene Variants Associated with Hereditary Transthyretin Amyloidosis.

INTRODUCTION: Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTRv [variant]) is a clinically heterogeneous, progressively debilitating, fatal disease resulting from the deposition of insoluble amyloid fibrils in various organs and tissues. Early diagnosis of ATTRv can be facilitated with genetic testing; however, such testing of the TTR gene identifies variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in a minority of cases, a small percentage of which have the potential to be pathogenic. The Akcea/Ambry VUS Initiative is dedicated to gathering molecular, clinical, and inheritance data for each TTR VUS identified by genetic testing programs to reclassify TTR variants to a clinically actionable status (e.g., variant likely pathogenic [VLP]) where appropriate. METHODS: Classification criteria used here, based on recommendations from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, are stringent and comprehensive, requiring distinct lines of evidence supporting pathogenesis. RESULTS: Three TTR variants have been reclassified from VUS to VLP, including c.194C>T (p.A65V), c.172G>C (p.D58H), and c.239C>T (p.T80I). In each case, the totality of genetic, structural, and clinical evidence provided strong support for pathogenicity. CONCLUSIONS: Based on several lines of evidence, three TTR VUS were reclassified as VLP, resulting in a high likelihood of disease diagnosis for those and subsequent patients as well as at-risk family members.

Long-term efficacy and safety of inotersen for hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis: NEURO-TTR open-label extension 3-year update.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis (hATTR/ATTRv) results from the deposition of misfolded transthyretin (TTR) throughout the body, including peripheral nerves. Inotersen, an antisense oligonucleotide inhibitor of hepatic TTR production, demonstrated a favorable efficacy and safety profile in patients with the polyneuropathy associated with hATTR in the NEURO-TTR (NCT01737398) study. We report longer-term efficacy and safety data for inotersen, with a median treatment exposure of 3 years. METHODS: Patients who satisfactorily completed NEURO-TTR were enrolled in its open-label extension (OLE) study. Efficacy assessments included the modified Neuropathy Impairment Score + 7 (mNIS + 7), Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QoL-DN) questionnaire total score, and the Short Form 36 (SF-36v2) Health Survey Physical Component Summary score. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Efficacy is reported for patients living in Europe and North America (this cohort completed the study approximately 9 months before the remaining group of patients outside these regions); safety is reported for the full safety dataset, comprising patients living in Europe, North America, and Latin America/Australasia. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02175004. RESULTS: In the Europe and North America cohort of the NEURO-TTR study, 113/141 patients (80.1%) completed the study, and 109 patients participated in the OLE study. A total of 70 patients continued to receive inotersen (inotersen-inotersen) and 39 switched from placebo to inotersen (placebo-inotersen). The placebo-inotersen group demonstrated sustained improvement in neurological disease progression as measured by mNIS + 7, compared with predicted worsening based on projection of the NEURO-TTR placebo data (estimated natural history). The inotersen-inotersen group demonstrated sustained benefit, as measured by mNIS + 7, Norfolk QoL-DN, and SF-36v2, compared with estimated natural history as well as compared with the placebo-inotersen group. With a maximum exposure of 6.2 years, inotersen was not associated with any additional safety concerns or increased toxicity in the OLE study. Platelet and renal monitoring were effective in reducing the risk of severe adverse events in the OLE study. CONCLUSION: Inotersen treatment for > 3 years slowed progression of the polyneuropathy associated with hATTR, and no new safety signals were observed.

Newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy in China: follow-up diagnosis and subsequent treatment.

BACKGROUND: Newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is currently being initiated in Zhejiang Province, China and is under consideration in other countries, including the United States. As China begins to implement DMD newborn screening (DMD-NBS), there is ongoing discussion regarding the steps forward for follow up care of positively identified patients as well as false positive and false negative results. DATA SOURCES: Relevant papers related to DMD-NBS, and NBS in China were reviewed in PubMed. RESULTS: The current state of DMD-NBS is discussed, along with the steps needed to effectively screen infants for this disease in China, recommendations for establishment of follow up care in patients with positive and negative screens, and measurement of patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Zhejiang Province, China is ready to implement DMD-NBS. Future challenges that exist for this program, and other countries, include the ability to track patients, assist with access to care, and ensure adequate follow-up care according to evidence-based guidelines. In addition, China's large rural population, lack of specialty providers, and difficulty in educating patients regarding the benefits of treatment create challenges that will need to be addressed.

Efficacy and tolerability of a hydrocodone extended-release tablet formulated with abuse-deterrence technology for the treatment of moderate-to-severe chronic pain in patients with osteoarthritis or low back pain.

This double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of hydrocodone extended release (ER) developed with abuse-deterrence technology to provide sustained pain relief and limit effects of alcohol and tablet manipulation on drug release. Eligible patients with chronic moderate-to-severe low back or osteoarthritis pain were titrated to an analgesic dose of hydrocodone ER (15-90 mg) and randomized to placebo or hydrocodone ER every 12 hours. The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline to week 12 in weekly average pain intensity (API; 0=no pain, 10=worst pain imaginable). Secondary measures included percentage of patients with >33% and >50% increases from baseline in weekly API, change from baseline in weekly worst pain intensity, supplemental opioid usage, aberrant drug-use behaviors, and adverse events. Overall, 294 patients were randomized and received ≥1 dose of placebo (n=148) or hydrocodone ER (n=146). Weekly API did not differ significantly between hydrocodone ER and placebo at week 12 (P=0.134); although, in post hoc analyses, the change in weekly API was significantly lower with hydrocodone ER when excluding the lowest dose (15 mg; least squares mean, -0.20 vs 0.40; P=0.032). Significantly more patients had >33% and >50% increase in weekly API with placebo (P<0.05), and mean weekly worst pain intensity was significantly lower with hydrocodone ER at week 12 (P=0.026). Supplemental medication usage was higher with placebo (86%) than hydrocodone ER (79%). Incidence of aberrant drug-use behaviors was low, and adverse events were similar between groups. This study did not meet the primary endpoint, although results support the effectiveness of this hydrocodone ER formulation in managing chronic low back or osteoarthritis pain. Use of the hydrocodone ER 15-mg dose, a robust placebo response, and use of supplemental analgesics, particularly in the placebo group, may have limited detection of a statistically significant treatment effect, and additional research is needed to clarify these findings.

National Breakthrough Pain Study: prevalence, characteristics, and associations with health outcomes.

The National Breakthrough Pain Study is a large observational study that assessed breakthrough pain (BTP) in a population of commercially insured community-dwelling patients with opioid-treated chronic pain. Eligible patients were identified from an administrative claims database, and consenting patients were asked to complete a structured telephone interview and several validated questionnaires. Questionnaires assessed pain interference with function (Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form), health status (Short Form 12 [SF-12] Health Survey), disability (Sheehan Disability Scale), work performance (World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire), and mood (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Screener [GAD-7] and Patient Health Questionnaire-2 [PHQ-2]). Of 2198 patients interviewed, 1278 patients had persistent pain controlled with opioid therapy; 1023 (80%) of these patients reported BTP. Patients had a median of 2.0 episodes of BTP per day (range, 1-50) and a median duration of BTP of 45 minutes (range, 1-720). Compared with patients without BTP, patients with BTP had more pain-related interference in function (Brief Pain Inventory, mean ± SD: 34.2 ± 15.6 vs 25.0 ± 15.7 [P < 0.001]), worse physical health (SF-12 physical component score: 29.9 ± 9.6 vs 35.1 ± 10.4 [P < 0.001]) and mental health (SF-12 mental component score: 47.4 ± 11.3 vs 49.3 ± 10.4 [P < 0.001]), more disability (Sheehan Disability Scale global impairment score: 15.1 ± 9.1 vs 10.6 ± 8.5; World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire absolute absenteeism: 12.4 ± 59.9 vs 7.7 ± 44.9 hours [both P < 0.001]), and worse mood (GAD-7 score: 7.4 ± 5.9 vs 5.9 ± 5.4; PHQ-2 anhedonia score: 1.2 ± 1.1 vs 0.9 ± 1.0 [both P < 0.001]). In this population of community-dwelling patients with opioid-treated chronic pain, BTP was highly prevalent and associated with negative outcomes. This burden of illness suggests the need for specific treatment plans.

Aberrant drug-related behavior observed during a 12-week open-label extension period of a study involving patients taking chronic opioid therapy for persistent pain and fentanyl buccal tablet or traditional short-acting opioid for breakthrough pain.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate aberrant drug-related behaviors in patients administering fentanyl buccal tablet or traditional short-acting opioids for breakthrough pain. DESIGN: Twelve-week open-label extension. SETTING: Forty-two US sites. SUBJECTS: Opioid-tolerant patients with chronic pain who completed the previous randomized, double-blind, crossover portion of a study comparing fentanyl buccal tablet and immediate-release oxycodone for treatment of breakthrough pain. METHODS: Patients were rerandomized to continue treatment with fentanyl buccal tablet or begin any traditional short-acting opioid. Assessments included Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain-Revised (SOAPP-R) at baseline and Addiction Behaviors Checklist and Current Opioid Misuse Measure at baseline and final visit. Case report forms were reviewed retrospectively to identify aberrant drug-related behaviors. RESULTS: One hundred thirty patients entered the open-label extension (fentanyl buccal tablet, N = 65; traditional short-acting opioid, N = 65). SOAPP-R scores were <18 (low risk of aberrant drug-related behavior) in 74% of patients; no significant differences in SOAPP-R scores were observed between treatment groups. At the final visit, ≤14% of patients in each treatment group had scores indicating potential aberrant drug-related behavior (Addiction Behaviors Checklist ≥3, Current Opioid Misuse Measure ≥9); no significant differences in scores were observed between treatment groups. Baseline SOAPP-R score ≥18 was not predictive of Addiction Behaviors Checklist ≥3 but was predictive of Current Opioid Misuse Measure ≥9. Aberrant behaviors were identified in 12 (18%) fentanyl buccal tablet patients and 13 (20%) traditional short-acting opioid patients. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of aberrant drug-related behaviors was similar between patients taking fentanyl buccal tablet and traditional short-acting opioids over 12 weeks.

Fentanyl buccal tablet compared with immediate-release oxycodone for the management of breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant patients with chronic cancer and noncancer pain: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study followed by a 12-week open-label phase to evaluate patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate analgesic efficacy, functional benefit, and patient satisfaction with fentanyl buccal tablet vs immediate-release oxycodone for breakthrough pain (BTP). DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, active-controlled crossover trial and 12-week open-label extension. SETTING: Forty-two U.S. sites. PATIENTS: Opioid-tolerant patients with predominantly chronic noncancer pain experiencing BTP. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to open-label titration periods with fentanyl buccal tablet followed by oxycodone or vice versa for BTP management. After titrating to a successful dose of both medications (single dose providing adequate analgesia without unacceptable adverse events), patients were re-randomized to treat 10 BTP episodes with one medication and 10 with the other. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy measure was pain intensity (PI) difference 15 minutes postdose. Secondary measures included PI difference 5, 10, 30, 45, and 60 minutes postdose; sum of PI differences 30 and 60 minutes postdose; ≥33% and ≥50% reduction in PI; and pain relief. Questionnaires assessed functional status/satisfaction. RESULTS: Of 213 patients enrolled, 149 achieved a successful dose of both medications; 131 completed the double-blind phase and 112 the open-label phase. PI difference at 15 minutes (mean [standard deviation]) was greater with fentanyl buccal tablet (0.88 [1.20]) vs oxycodone (0.76 [1.13]; P < 0.001). Patients preferred fentanyl buccal tablet (47%) over oxycodone (35%); 18% had no preference. Patients and clinicians reported consistently better functional improvement and satisfaction with fentanyl buccal tablet vs short-acting opioids (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Fentanyl buccal tablet was associated with rapid onset of analgesia and improvements in functional status and patient satisfaction compared with immediate-release oxycodone.

Treatment of breakthrough pain with fentanyl buccal tablet in opioid-tolerant patients with chronic pain: appropriate patient selection and management.

BACKGROUND: Opioids can be a safe and effective option for carefully selected patients with a structured treatment program that includes consistent monitoring. However, the benefits and risks of opioid therapy for patients with chronic pain, and society as a whole, have been sharply debated. A key component of this debate has involved the administration of rapid-onset opioids for the management of breakthrough pain. OBJECTIVE: Review key aspects of breakthrough pain management with fentanyl buccal tablet, with a focus on minimizing risk to optimize therapeutic outcomes. Recommendations that apply broadly to all rapid-onset opioids are also discussed. DESIGN: Available fentanyl buccal tablet clinical and post-marketing data were reviewed. RESULTS: Like other schedule II controlled substances, and because fentanyl buccal tablet is a highly potent opioid, its use is associated with risk of overdose, misuse, and diversion. As with all rapid-onset opioids, particular attention to patient selection and risk assessment is warranted. The inclusion and exclusion criteria in fentanyl buccal tablet clinical studies represent patient selection standards that should be translated to clinical practice, most importantly, that patients are opioid-tolerant before fentanyl buccal tablet initiation. Titration of fentanyl buccal tablet from a low starting dose to a successful dose allows the safe identification of a dose that provides the greatest pain relief without unacceptable adverse events. After initiating fentanyl buccal tablet therapy, all patients should continue to be regularly monitored for response, including analgesia, functioning, tolerability, and aberrant behavior. CONCLUSIONS: Fentanyl buccal tablet can be an effective and generally safe treatment for breakthrough pain when appropriate patient selection, administration, dosing, and monitoring are applied.

Research design considerations for confirmatory chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.

There has been an increase in the number of chronic pain clinical trials in which the treatments being evaluated did not differ significantly from placebo in the primary efficacy analyses despite previous research suggesting that efficacy could be expected. These findings could reflect a true lack of efficacy or methodological and other aspects of these trials that compromise the demonstration of efficacy. There is substantial variability among chronic pain clinical trials with respect to important research design considerations, and identifying and addressing any methodological weaknesses would enhance the likelihood of demonstrating the analgesic effects of new interventions. An IMMPACT consensus meeting was therefore convened to identify the critical research design considerations for confirmatory chronic pain trials and to make recommendations for their conduct. We present recommendations for the major components of confirmatory chronic pain clinical trials, including participant selection, trial phases and duration, treatment groups and dosing regimens, and types of trials. Increased attention to and research on the methodological aspects of confirmatory chronic pain clinical trials has the potential to enhance their assay sensitivity and ultimately provide more meaningful evaluations of treatments for chronic pain.

Ambulatory blood pressure and coronary artery calcification in middle-aged and younger adults.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate relationships between blood pressure (BP) determined by ambulatory monitoring and coronary artery calcification (CAC) determined by electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) in middle-aged and younger adults without symptoms of coronary artery disease. METHODS: Measures of office and ambulatory BP were analyzed in 298 asymptomatic adults (134 women and 164 men) from the white population of Rochester, MN, who were 20 to 60 years old (mean +/- SD, 40 +/- 9 years). For the ambulatory BP measurements, the active period of the day was defined as the daytime, out-of-bed hours and the inactive period as the nighttime, in-bed hours. Logistic regression was used to assess whether ambulatory measures of BP influenced the probability of having CAC detected by EBCT. RESULTS: After adjusting for sex, age, and office measures of BP, ambulatory diastolic BP during the active and inactive periods were each statistically significant additional predictors of the probability of having CAC. Similarly, after adjusting for sex, age, and ambulatory systolic BP, ambulatory diastolic BPs during each period were also statistically significant additional predictors of the probability of having CAC. In contrast, measures of ambulatory systolic BP, pulse pressure, and diurnal dipping of BP levels from the active to the inactive period did not make statistically significant additional contributions to the probability of having CAC. CONCLUSION: These findings emphasize the role that the hemodynamic stress of diastolic BP may play in the early development of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease.