Remoteness, models of primary care and inequity: Medicare under-expenditure in the Northern Territory.

Objective To analyse Medicare expenditure by State/Territory, remoteness, and Indigenous demography to assess funding equality in meeting the health needs of remote Indigenous populations in the Northern Territory. Methods Analytic descriptions of Medicare online reports on services and benefits by key demographic variables linked with Australian Bureau of Statistics data on remoteness and Indigenous population proportion. The Northern Territory Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations were compared with the Australian average between the 2010/2011 and 2019/2020 fiscal years in terms of standardised rates of Medicare services and benefits. These were further analysed using ordinary least squares, simultaneous equations and multilevel models. Results In per capita terms, the Northern Territory receives around 30% less Medicare funds than the national average, even when additional Commonwealth funding for Aboriginal medical services is included. This funding shortfall amounts to approximately AU$80 million annually across both the Medicare Benefits Schedule and Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. The multilevel models indicate that providing healthcare for an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander person in a remote area involves a Medicare shortfall of AU$531-AU$1041 less Medicare Benefits Schedule benefits per annum compared with a non-Indigenous person in an urban area. Indigenous population proportion, together with remoteness, explained 51% of the funding variation. An age-sex based capitation funding model would correct about 87% of the Northern Territory primary care funding inequality. Conclusions The current Medicare funding scheme systematically disadvantages the Northern Territory. A needs-based funding model is required that does not penalise the Northern Territory population based on the remote primary health care service model.

Providing opioid substitution treatment to Indigenous heroin users within a community health service setting in Adelaide.

In the late 1990s there was major concern regarding heroin use among the Nunga community in Adelaide. [Nunga is a generic term used for Aboriginal people from South Australia, similar to Koori's from Victoria and Nyungars from south-western Australia.] Heroin use was so common that community members reported that most families were affected by it in some way. There were few Nunga specific services provided, and those mainstream services available were not seen as culturally appropriate or for other reasons were difficult to access. In response to this, the Parks Community Health Centre, together with the Drug and Alcohol Services Council (DASC) [in 2005 the Drug and Alcohol Services Council (DASC) changed its name to Drug and Alcohol Services South Australia (DASSA)], and with the assistance of Nunkuwarrin Yunti Aboriginal Health Service [Adelaide's Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Service, based in the City Centre], commenced a programme offering treatment interventions for Nunga heroin users. The 'Way Out' Program commenced in March 1999. It is multi-faceted and includes an opioid substitution programme which is attracting and maintaining Nunga clients in greater numbers than ever before in South Australia. The programme locates the drug problem within a holistic view of the individual's health. It utilises networks throughout the Nunga community and in recent years has formed a strong working partnership with the Aboriginal Kinship Program [the Aboriginal Kinship Program (Department of Human Services, Metropolitan Health Division) works with Aboriginal families and individuals seeking support for family members in relation to illicit drug issues by providing support, referral, follow-up and advocacy services]. The 'Way Out' Program is succeeding in making essential treatment services available to Aboriginal people using heroin within Adelaide. This article provides an overview of the programme.