RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In India, a significant scarcity of published data exists regarding chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and its management, especially among the elderly population. CLTI, often accompanied by frailty poses a significant healthcare challenge. While endovascular interventions offer hope, there remains a dearth of outcome data for this age group. This study seeks to address this critical gap by investigating the impact of frailty on outcomes, emphasizing amputation-free survival (AFS), wound healing, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS: Our study included 131 elderly CLTI patients aged ≥70 years who underwent infrainguinal endovascular interventions between April 2018 and August 2021, with a follow-up period of 2 years. Among the patients, 93.9% had diabetes mellitus and 82.4% had hypertension. Clinical frailty was assessed using the clinical frailty scale (CFS). Patients were categorized into group 1 (CFS 1-5) and group 2 (CFS 6-9). Primary outcomes were AFS, wound healing, HRQoL, and their association with frailty. Secondary outcomes included technical success, procedure-related complications, major adverse limb events, major adverse cardiac events, vessel patency, re-intervention rates, and mortality rates including periprocedural and overall mortality. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 86.3% of patients, with frailty significantly influencing this outcome. Group 2 exhibited reduced technical success (80.8%) compared to group 1 (93.1%). The major amputation rate was 9.2%, with higher rates in group 2 [univariate hazard ratio: 5.20; P = 0.033]. Similarly, group 2 showed elevated overall mortality [univariate hazard ratio: 5.18; P < 0.001]. AFS at 1 and 2 years were 67.9% and 55%, respectively, with higher rates in group 1. Wound healing was achieved in 76.1% of patients (83/109), with frailty significantly associated with delayed wound healing (P < 0.001). Vessel patency at 1 year was observed in 88.8% of patients. HRQoL significantly improved postintervention, with vascular quality of life questionnaire-6 (VascuQol-6) scores increasing from an average of 9 of 24 at baseline to 20 of 24 at 2 years. Frailty score significantly correlated with VascuQol-6 scores at 1 and 2 years (P < 0.0012). Group 1 exhibited higher VascuQol-6 scores than group 2, indicating improved HRQoL during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Successful endovascular treatments in high-risk CLTI patients promote improved wound healing and post-treatment quality of life. Frailty should be assessed before endovascular interventions as it correlates with adverse outcomes, including amputations and mortality. While revascularization holds promise, caution is advised for frailer patients, emphasizing the importance of personalized care and tailored treatments for elderly CLTI patients.
Assuntos
Amputação Cirúrgica , Isquemia Crônica Crítica de Membro , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Idoso Fragilizado , Fragilidade , Salvamento de Membro , Doença Arterial Periférica , Qualidade de Vida , Cicatrização , Humanos , Idoso , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/mortalidade , Fragilidade/complicações , Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Fragilidade/mortalidade , Fragilidade/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Feminino , Isquemia Crônica Crítica de Membro/cirurgia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fatores de Tempo , Fatores de Risco , Doença Arterial Periférica/fisiopatologia , Doença Arterial Periférica/mortalidade , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Resultado do Tratamento , Medição de Risco , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Etários , Avaliação Geriátrica , Índia , Intervalo Livre de ProgressãoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Hemodialysis forms the most common replacement therapy for majority of Indians suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD). Multiple access failure and central vein stenosis has become commonplace in Indian dialysis access patients and there is a burgeoning need for more advanced hemodialysis (HD) access options. Upper thigh arterio-venous grafts (AVG) are seldom inserted due to fear of infection and limb ischemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single institutional, retrospective, descriptive case study of consecutive patients who underwent upper thigh prosthetic AVG over a period of 7 years. All these patients had exhausted options of upper limb access and or had central vein stenosis. AVG from the proximal superficial femoral artery (SFA) to the proximal great saphenous vein (GSV) in a loop configuration using polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) was carried out in the upper thigh. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients had undergone upper thigh loop AVG. Their age varied from 24 to 77 years. The median follow-up period was 3 years. Five of these grafts developed infection (21%) which led to primary failure. A primary patency of 71% (17/24 patients) was achieved at 1 year. Thrombosis developed at a mean of 16.7 months after the primary procedure. Adjunctive procedures such as thrombectomy, segmental replacement of graft, patch angioplasty, balloon angioplasty, and stenting were required in 75% of patients to achieve a secondary patency of 86% at 1 year. Three grafts were explanted without limb loss. CONCLUSION: Upper thigh loop AVG forms a reliable alternate dialysis access option for patients with failed upper limb access sites or central vein occlusion. Adjunctive procedures are key to maintaining patency in these grafts. Good secondary patency is achievable, and the infection rates are similar to arm AVG. Close follow-up and timely intervention are key to long term dialysis through these grafts.
Assuntos
Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Coxa da Perna/irrigação sanguínea , Diálise Renal , Prótese Vascular , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Derivação Arteriovenosa Cirúrgica/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Constrição Patológica , Grau de Desobstrução Vascular , Resultado do Tratamento , Veia Femoral , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/etiologia , Oclusão de Enxerto Vascular/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Introduction: Hemoptysis presents as a primary complaint in 8-15% of chest clinic patients. The etiology of hemoptysis varies among different series according to the time of publication, geographic location, and diagnostic tests employed. Aim: To study the clinical profile of patients hospitalized with hemoptysis at a tertiary respiratory care center in New Delhi, India. Methods: The study was a cross-sectional, observational, hospital-based study. Patients admitted with hemoptysis in emergency from November 2017 to April 2018 were enrolled. A total of 129 patients were evaluated by a detailed clinical history and necessary investigations deemed required for arriving at the diagnosis. Subjects' hospitalized details were recorded using structured evaluation proforma. Data were evaluated using SPSS version 22.0. The 'p' value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 129 patients were recruited, with a mean age of 42.67 years, 59.7% were male. Mild, moderate, severe, and massive hemoptysis were seen in 15.5%, 46.5%, 25.6% and 12.4% cases, respectively. History of pulmonary tuberculosis treatment was present in 40.3%, recurrent hemoptysis in 38% and bilateral chest x-ray involvement in 62.6% cases. Tuberculosis (active and sequelae) was the most common cause (51.9%) of hemoptysis. Recurrent hemoptysis and low hemoglobin were found to be independent risk factors associated with the severity of hemoptysis. Conclusion: Tuberculosis remains a significant cause of hemoptysis in our country. Even one episode of hemoptysis should not be ignored and investigated properly as it can potentially cause massive hemoptysis and life-threatening complications in the future.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The study aimed to analyze frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs) and other reasons for interruption of treatment and loss to follow up (LTFU) during first six months of treatment among tuberculosis patients on bedaquiline containing regimens. METHODS: This pilot exploratory observational study included 275 patients enrolled consecutively over two years who received bedaquiline containing regimen under programmatic conditions in India. RESULTS: Among 275 patients with median age of 25 years, 86 (31.3%) patients had at least one interruption with 122 total episodes of interruption. Among these 70 were temporary, 35 were permanent interruptions and 17 were LTFU. The AEs due to drugs were the commonest reason for interruption observed in 81.4% of temporary interruption group and 97.1% of permanent interruption group. Among a total 192 adverse event episodes, (49.5%) were minor (grade 1-2) and (50.5%) were serious (grade 3-5). Personal factors were the commonest reason for interruption observed in LTFU (94.1%) group. The most common temporarily interrupted drug was bedaquiline in 8.7% and permanently stopped drug was linezolid in 5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study observed that drug related AEs are important risk factors associated with treatment interruptions in bedaquiline containing regimens. Bedaquiline is the most common temporarily interrupted drug due to AEs.
Assuntos
Tuberculose Resistente a Múltiplos Medicamentos , Adulto , Antituberculosos/efeitos adversos , Diarilquinolinas/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Tuberculose Resistente a Múltiplos Medicamentos/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Multiple drugs taken for long duration in tuberculosis (TB) treatment, especially drug resistant TB (DR-TB), may produce adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Although any anti-TB drug can cause ADRs, but these are more common with drugs used for treatment of DR-TB. However, most of ADRs with these drugs are mild or moderate and can be managed if adequate supervision and monitoring is done. However, few ADRs can be severe or potentially life-threatening and may require removal of the offending drug(s). TB patients having comorbidities and on treatment for them may experience drug interaction with anti TB drugs and may require dose modification or change of drug. For a good TB treatment outcome patient's compliance should be ensured, and adverse events and drug interactions should be appropriately addressed by the clinicians. This article outlines the majority of the possible ADRs to anti-TB drugs used for management of DR-TB and their common drug interactions with practical recommendations to identify the possible drug(s) responsible and the most adequate management in each situation.