High sensitivity troponin-I threshold to predict perioperative myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity Troponin I (hs-cTnI) has largely replaced conventional troponin assays in an effort to improve detection of myocardial infarction. However, the mean displacement of hs-cTnI following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and the optimal threshold to detect perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) is unclear. Our objective is to describe mean hs-cTnI values at 6-12 h post-CABG and to determine the highest specificity while maintaining 100% sensitivity hs-cTnI cut-off values for diagnosis of perioperative or type-5 MI. METHODS: Between 2016 and 2018, 374 patients underwent non-emergent, isolated CABG. Pre-operative and 6 h post-operative hs-cTnI values were recorded as well as ECG, echocardiographic and angiographic data. RESULTS: Of 374 patients, 151 (40.3%) had normal and 224 (59.7%) had elevated preoperative hs-cTnI. Patients with normal preoperative hs-cTnI had a mean 6 h hs-cTnI of 9193 ng/l or 270X the upper normal value. Eleven patients (7.3%) presented with post-operative MI with a mean 6 h hs-cTnI of 50,218 ng/l or 1477X the upper normal value. Patients with elevated preoperative hs-cTnI had a mean 6 h hs-cTnI of 9449 ng/l or 292X the upper normal value. Eleven patients (4.9%) who presented with post-operative MI had a mean 6 h hs-cTnI of 26,823 ng/l or 789X the upper normal value. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest hs-cTnI threshold of 80-fold in patients with normal pre-operative hs-cTnI and 2.7-fold in patients with elevated pre-operative hs-cTnI. These results have important implications for perioperative care and for surgical trial reporting.

Biological Therapies in Inflammatory Myopathies.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are a rare group of disorders that feature progressive immune-mediated skeletal muscle destruction along with skin, lung, and joint involvement. Management of IIMs necessitates glucocorticoid therapy followed by conventional steroid-sparing agents to control disease activity. In the settings of refractory myositis or life-threatening manifestations, e.g. lung involvement or oropharyngeal dysphagia, second-line therapies are needed to minimize disease burden, avoid end-organ damage and steroid toxicity, and decrease mortality. These therapies may include biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), and to a lesser extent, targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (TSD). This article reviews the current use of bDMARDs, e.g. intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab, and a TSD-Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKI)-along with their indications, efficacy, and safety in managing IIM.

Antibiotic modification versus withhold in febrile patients without evidence of bacterial infection, unresponsive to initial empiric regimen: a multicentre retrospective study conducted in Israel.

Prescribing antibiotics for febrile patients without proof of bacterial infection contributes to antimicrobial resistance. Lack of clinical response in these patients often leads to antibiotic escalation, although data supporting this strategy are scarce. This study compared outcomes of modifying, withholding, or continuing the same antibiotic regimen for such patients. Febrile or hypothermic stable patients with suspected infection, unresponsive to empiric antibiotic treatment, admitted to one of 15 internal medicine departments in three hospitals during a 5-year study period, were included. Patients with a definitive clinical or microbiological bacterial infection, malignancy, immunodeficiency, altered mental status, or need for mechanical ventilation were excluded. Participants were divided into groups based on treatment strategy determined 72 h after antibiotic initiation: antibiotic modified, withheld or continued. Outcomes measured included in-hospital and 30-day post-discharge-mortality rates, length of hospital stay (LOS) and days of antimicrobial therapy (DOT). A total of 486 patients met the inclusion criteria: 124 in the Antibiotic modified group, 67 in the Antibiotic withheld group and 295 in the Initial antibiotic continued group. Patient characteristics were similar among groups with no differences in mortality rates in-hospital (23% vs. 25% vs. 20%, p = 0.58) and within 30 days after discharge (5% vs. 3% vs. 4%, p = 0.83). Changing antibiotics led to longer LOS (9.0 ± 6.8 vs. 6.2 ± 5.6 days, p = 0.003) and more DOT (8.6 ± 6.0 vs. 3.2 ± 1.0 days, p < 0.001) compared to withholding treatment. Withholding as compared to modifying antibiotics, in febrile patients with no clear evidence of bacterial infection, is a safe strategy associated with decreased LOS and DOT.