Development and preliminary validation of a new task-based objective procedure-specific assessment of inguinal hernia repair procedural safety.

BACKGROUND: Surgical videos coupled with structured assessments enable surgical training programs to provide independent competency evaluations and align with the American Board of Surgery's entrustable professional activities initiative. Existing assessment instruments for minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair (IHR) have limitations with regards to reliability, validity, and usability. A cross-sectional study of six surgeons using a novel objective, procedure-specific, 8-item competency assessment for minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair (IHR-OPSA) was performed to assess inter-rater reliability using a "safe" vs. "unsafe" scoring rubric. METHODS: The IHR-OPSA was developed by three expert IHR surgeons, field tested with five IHR surgeons, and revised based upon feedback. The final instrument included: (1) incision/port placement; (2) dissection of peritoneal flap (TAPP) or dissection of peritoneal flap (TEP); (3) exposure; (4) reducing the sac; (5) full dissection of the myopectineal orifice; (6) mesh insertion; (7) mesh fixation; and (8) operation flow. The IHR-OPSA was applied by six expert IHR surgeons to 20 IHR surgical videos selected to include a spectrum of hernia procedures (15 laparoscopic, 5 robotic), anatomy (14 indirect, 5 direct, 1 femoral), and Global Case Difficulty (easy, average, hard). Inter-rater reliability was assessed against Gwet's AC2. RESULTS: The IHR-OPSA inter-rater reliability was good to excellent, ranging from 0.65 to 0.97 across the eight items. Assessments of robotic procedures had higher reliability with near perfect agreement for 7 of 8 items. In general, assessments of easier cases had higher levels of agreement than harder cases. CONCLUSIONS: A novel 8-item minimally invasive IHR assessment tool was developed and tested for inter-rater reliability using a "safe" vs. "unsafe" rating system with promising results. To promote instrument validity the IHR-OPSA was designed and evaluated within the context of intended use with iterative engagement with experts and testing of constructs against real-world operative videos.

Using video-based assessment (VBA) to document fellow improvement in safely completing the jejunojejunostomy portion of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgical assessment instruments are used for formative and summative trainee evaluations. To characterize the features of existing instruments and a novel 12-item objective, procedure-specific assessment tool for Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB-OPSA), we evaluated the progress of a single surgical fellow over 17 consecutive surgeries. METHODS: Seventeen consecutive RYGB videos completed between 8/2021 and 1/2022 by an academic hospital surgical fellow were de-identified and assessed by four board-certified bariatric surgeons using Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS), General Assessment of Surgical Skill (GASS), and RYGB-OPSA which includes the reflection of transverse colon, identification of ligament of Treitz, biliopancreatic and Roux limbs orientation, jejunal division point selection, stapler use, mesentery division, bleeding control, jejunojejunostomy (JJ) anastomotic site selection, apposition of JJ anastomotic site, JJ creation, common enterotomy closure of JJ, and integrity of anastomosis. The GASS measured economy of motion, tissue handling, appreciating operative anatomy, bimanual dexterity, and achievement of hemostasis. RYGB-OPSA and GASS items were scored "poor-unsafe," "acceptable-safe," or "good-safe." Change in performance was measured by linear trendline slope. RESULTS: Over the course of 17 procedures, significant improvement was demonstrated by three GOALS items, GOALS overall score, GASS bimanual dexterity, and three RYGB-OPSA tasks: JJ creation, jejunal division point selection, and stapler use. Achievement of hemostasis declined but never rated "poor-unsafe." Overall RYGB-OPSA and GOALS trendlines documented significant increase across the 17 procedures. CONCLUSION: This examination of a bariatric surgery fellow's operative training experience as measured by three surgical assessment instruments demonstrated anticipated improvements in general skills and safe completion of procedure-specific tasks. Effective surgical assessment instruments have enough sensitivity to show improvement to enable meaningful trainee feedback (low-stakes assessments) as well as the ability to determine safe surgical practice to enable promotion to greater autonomous practice.

Global assessment of surgical skills (GASS): validation of a new instrument to measure global technical safety in surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND: Broad implementation of the American Board of Surgery's entrustable professional activities initiative will require assessment instruments that are reliable and easy to use. Existing assessment instruments of general laparoscopic surgical skills have limited reliability, efficiency, and validity across the spectrum of formative (low-stakes) and summative (high-stakes) assessments. A novel six-item global assessment of surgical skills (GASS) instrument was developed and evaluated with a focus upon safe versus unsafe surgical practice scoring rubric. METHODS: The GASS was developed by iterative engagement with expert laparoscopic surgeons and includes six items (economy of motion, tissue handling, appreciating operative anatomy, bimanual dexterity, achievement of hemostasis, overall performance) with a uniform three-point scoring rubric ("poor-unsafe", "adequate-safe", "good-safe"). To test inter-rater reliability, a cross-sectional study of four bariatric surgeons with experience ranging from 4 to 28 years applied the GASS and the global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills (GOALS) to 30 consecutive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure operative videos. Inter-rater reliability was assessed for a simplified dichotomous "safe" versus "unsafe" scoring rubric using Gwet's AC2. RESULTS: The GASS inter-rater reliability was very high across all six domains (0.88-1.00). The GASS performed comparably to the GOALS inter-rater reliability scores (0.96-1.00). The economy of motion and bimanual dexterity items had the highest percentage of unsafe ratings (9.2% and 5.8%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The GASS, a novel six-item instrument of general laparoscopic surgical skills, was designed with a simple scoring rubric (poor-safe, adequate-safe, good-safe) to minimize rater burden and focus feedback to trainees and promotion evaluations on safe surgical performance. Initial evaluation of the GASS is promising, demonstrating high inter-rater reliability. Future research will seek to assess the GASS against a broader spectrum of laparoscopic procedures.

Surgeon experience with insurance barriers to offering gastric bypass as an evidence-based operation for pathologic GERD.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is an increasingly prevalent public health problem often associated with poorly controlled gastroesophageal reflux disease. Fundoplication has been shown to have limited long-term efficacy in patients with morbid obesity and does not address additional weight-related co-morbidities. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the gold standard operation for durable resolution of GERD in patients with obesity, and is also used as a salvage operation for GERD after prior foregut surgery. Surgeons report access to RYGB as surgical treatment for GERD is often limited by RYGB-specific benefit exclusions embedded within insurance policies, but the magnitude and scope of this problem is unknown. METHODS: A 9-item survey evaluating surgeon practice and experience with insurance coverage for RYGB for GERD was developed and piloted by a SAGES Foregut Taskforce working group. This survey was then administered to surgeon members of the SAGES Foregut Taskforce and to surgeons participating in the SAGES Bariatrics and/or Foregut Facebook groups. RESULTS: 187 surgeons completed the survey. 89% reported using the RYGB as an anti-reflux procedure. 44% and 26% used a BMI of 35 kg/m2 and 30 kg/m2 respectively as cutoff for the RYGB. 89% viewed RYGB as the procedure of choice for GERD after bariatric surgery. 69% reported using RYGB to address recurrent reflux secondary to failed fundoplication. 74% of responders experienced trouble with insurance coverage at least half the time RYGB was offered for GERD, and 8% reported they were never able to get approval for RYGB for GERD indications in their patient populations. CONCLUSION: For many patients, GERD and obesity are related diseases that are best addressed with RYGB. However, insurance coverage for RYGB for GERD is often limited by policies which run contrary to evidence-based medicine. Advocacy is critical to improve access to appropriate surgical care for GERD in patients with obesity.

The impact of COVID-19 on medium term weight loss and comorbidities in patients undergoing bariatric surgery and its association with psychological wellbeing.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 epidemic imposed significant stressors on individuals and changed how medical care is delivered. The affect that this stress has placed on the field of bariatric surgery and the associated outcomes is not well established. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database from a single academic institution was conducted. Weight loss and comorbidity outcomes were compared between a cohort of patients operated on during the pandemic and a matched group operated on prior to COVID-19. GAD-7 and PHQ-9 questionnaires were used to assess for anxiety and depression, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 329 and 155 patients were enrolled in the pre-pandemic and COVID-19 groups respectively. There were no significant differences in pre-operative BMI (p = 0.437) or comorbidities: Type II DM (p = 0.810), hypertension (p = 0.879), sleep apnea (p = 0.502), and hyperlipidemia (p = 0.227). Post-operatively, weight loss was comparable at all time points out to 1 year. Type II DM resolution rates were higher in the control cohort at 6 months (p = 0.007), but not at 12 months (p = 1.000). There was no statistically significant difference in resolution rates between the control group and the COVID-19 group for the other measured comorbidities. There was no difference in objective measures of anxiety and depression when comparing the two groups (both p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has fundamentally changed how society and medical systems function. Focusing on pre-operative dietary training and screening for inadequately managed psychological comorbidities yielded similar weight loss outcomes notwithstanding the significant societal and individual stressors with which patients were faced.

Small molecule SWELL1 complex induction improves glycemic control and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in murine Type 2 diabetes.

Type 2 diabetes is associated with insulin resistance, impaired pancreatic ß-cell insulin secretion, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Tissue-specific SWELL1 ablation impairs insulin signaling in adipose, skeletal muscle, and endothelium, and impairs ß-cell insulin secretion and glycemic control. Here, we show that ICl,SWELL and SWELL1 protein are reduced in adipose and ß-cells in murine and human diabetes. Combining cryo-electron microscopy, molecular docking, medicinal chemistry, and functional studies, we define a structure activity relationship to rationally-design active derivatives of a SWELL1 channel inhibitor (DCPIB/SN-401), that bind the SWELL1 hexameric complex, restore SWELL1 protein, plasma membrane trafficking, signaling, glycemic control and islet insulin secretion via SWELL1-dependent mechanisms. In vivo, SN-401 restores glycemic control, reduces hepatic steatosis/injury, improves insulin-sensitivity and insulin secretion in murine diabetes. These findings demonstrate that SWELL1 channel modulators improve SWELL1-dependent systemic metabolism in Type 2 diabetes, representing a first-in-class therapeutic approach for diabetes and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Optimizing Bariatric Surgery outcomes: the impact of preoperative elevated hemoglobin A1c levels on composite perioperative outcome measures.

INTRODUCTION: The use of bariatric surgery in the management of obesity and its related morbidity has significantly increased in the US over the past decade. There is a lack of data on the impact of optimal preoperative glycemic control on the morbidity and mortality following bariatric surgery. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of hemoglobin (Hb) A1c > 7 on outcomes among patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG). METHODS: Data were extracted from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (2017) and limited to patients undergoing an elective laparoscopic RYGB or SG. Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to adjust for other preoperative variables. RESULTS: A total number of 31,060 (69.3%) patients underwent SG, while 13,754 (30.7%) received RYGB. Patients who were older, male, non-Hispanic, smokers, and those with a higher American Society of Anesthesiologist Classification (ASA) score were more likely to have elevated HbA1c levels. Compared to individuals with normal HbA1c levels, patients with elevated levels had no significant difference in mortality (p = 0.902) but did have a difference in composite morbidity and mortality (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, elevated HbA1c, older age, increasing body mass index (BMI), elevated creatinine, longer operations, African American race, receiving RYGB, and having a trainee as surgical assistant were found to increase the odds of having an adverse outcome. No significant difference was found within smoking status, sex, ASA Classification, robotic vs laparoscopic, or if a second attending surgeon was assisting. CONCLUSIONS: HbA1c levels and presence of trainees in the OR are modifiable preoperative risk factors for adverse events following bariatric surgery. Improving preoperative glycemic control may be an effective and achievable quality improvement measure.

Unstable Lumbar Spine Osteomyelitis Caused by Trans-Foraminal Migration of Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band Connection Tubing: A Case Report.

Background: Disconnection of the tubing between the port and LAGB is a well-known complication in general surgery and accounts for up to 17% of LAGB complications. Typically, when this complication occurs patients present with abdominal or pelvic complaints. A complication of spinal infection due to trans-foraminal migration has not been previously reported. The aim of this study is to highlight an unusual infection of the thoracolumbar spine due to laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) intragastric erosion, and migration into the lumbar spine causing epidural abscesses, discitis, and osteomyelitis. This case underscores the importance of a thorough surgical history, complete imaging, and multi-disciplinary approach in management of complex spine infections. Methods: We report a case of LAGB tubing migration into the spinal canal through the left L2/L3 neural foramen resulting in symptomatic epidural abscesses and osteomyelitis. Results: Although dislodgement and migration of LAGB tubing has been reported previously, this is the first report of trans-foraminal migration and erosion of lumbar vertebrae, causing osteomyelitis of the spine and epidural abscess formation, subsequent instability and neurologic deficit requiring urgent operative intervention. Conclusions: Dislodgement and migration of LAGB tubing is a known complication. While it most commonly leads to abdominal and pelvic sequelae, in rare circumstances it may acutely affect the spine. Careful history, imaging, and multidisciplinary approach are paramount for the successful management.Level of Evidence: V.

Sarcopenia is associated with increased mortality but not complications following resection and reconstruction of sarcoma of the extremities.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Evidence regarding the impact of sarcopenia on operative outcomes in patients with sarcoma is lacking. We evaluated the relationship between sarcopenia and postoperative complications or mortality among patients undergoing tumor excision and reconstruction. ​ METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 145 patients treated with tumor excision and limb reconstruction for sarcoma of the extremities. Sarcopenia was defined as psoas index (PI) < 5.45 cm2 /m2 for men and <3.85 cm2 /m2 for women from preoperative axial CT. Regression analyses were used to assess the association between postoperative complications or mortality with PI, age, gender, race, body mass index, tumor histology, grade, depth, location, size, and neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy. RESULTS: There were 101 soft tissue tumors and 44 primary bone tumors. Sarcopenia was present in 38 patients (26%). Sarcopenic patients were older (median age: 72 vs 59 years, P = .0010) and had larger tumors (86.5%, >5 cm vs 77.7%, P = .023). Seventy-three patients experienced complications (51%) and 18 patients died within 1 year. Sarcopenia and metastatic disease were associated with increased 12-month mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 6.68, P < .001; HR: 8.51, P < .001, respectively) but not complications (HR 1.45, P = .155, odds ratio, 1.32, P = .426, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia and metastatic disease were independently associated with postoperative mortality but no complications following surgery.

Optimizing bariatric surgery outcomes: a novel preoperative protocol in a bariatric population with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: The Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) isuery ID="Q1" Text="Author:Kindly check the edit made in the article title." -->the most efficacious procedure of choice for obese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has high rates of worsening GERD post operatively. Little evidence exists as to whether the use of objective foregut investigations has a meaningful impact on surgical procedure selection. This study examined whether a standard preoperative foregut evaluation protocol effected procedure selection in bariatric patients presenting for surgical evaluation with subjective symptoms of GERD. METHODS: Patients presenting for bariatric surgery evaluation with subjective symptoms of GERD entered into a predetermined protocol of foregut evaluation. Patients initially underwent upper endoscopy and esophagram. If the patient desired a LSG, further testing with esophageal pH testing and high-resolution manometry was ordered. If significant pathology was discovered on any of these investigations RYGB was recommended, if investigations were normal LSG was felt to be permissible. Data were collected prospectively from July 2016 to December 2018 and reviewed. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three patients were identified as being eligible to have progressed through the protocol. Pathology was commonly discovered on preoperative evaluations. On EGD Barrett's esophagus was discovered in 4%, grade C or D esophagitis in 18% and hiatal hernia in 36% of patients. On esophagram, hiatal hernia was discovered in 42.3% of patients. Abnormal esophageal motility was discovered in 41% and abnormal DeMeester scores in 83% of tested patients. Of the 133 patients evaluated, the final procedure the patient ultimately underwent was primarily determined based on protocol test results in 24.8% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Foregut pathology is common in bariatric patients with subjective symptoms of GERD. Implementing a comprehensive protocol to objectively assess these patients leads to a significant clinical impact on which procedure these patients ultimately undergo.

A Comparison of the Effects of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy on Body Mass Composition as Measured by Air Displacement Plethysmography.

BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is now the most commonly performed bariatric surgery in the world. Multiple studies have demonstrated the equivalence between the LSG and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with regard to weight loss and comorbidity resolution. Few studies have examined the differences in body mass composition change between the two procedures. METHODS: Sixty-three patients undergoing either LSG or RYGB underwent calculation of total body mass, ideal body mass, lean mass, and fat mass by air displacement plethysmography (BodPodtm) prior to surgery and at 12 months postoperatively. Calculations of excess body weight, % excess weight loss, change in % fat mass, and change in % lean mass were then performed at each time interval. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients underwent LSG and 30 patients underwent RYGB. Mean percent excess weight loss in the LSG and RYGB group was 47.2% and 53.4% respectively (p = 0.165, 95% CI - 14.8-2.6). Mean percent change in fat mass for the LSG group and RYGB group was 9.2% and 10.51% respectively (p = 0.249, 95% CI - 0.86-3.2). Mean percent change in lean mass for the LSG group and RYGB group was 9.4% and 10.49% respectively (p = 0.383, 95% CI 2.85-1.13). CONCLUSION: The LSG and RYGB both impart dramatic meaningful loss in excess body weight. In addition, both the LSG and RYGB impart dramatic reductions in fat mass. However, both procedures induce loss of lean mass and there appears to be no difference between the two procedures in this regard despite their anatomic and physiologic differences.

Experience with Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia and Spastic Esophageal Motility Disorders at a Tertiary U.S. Center.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a novel procedure for the treatment of achalasia and spastic esophageal disorders. Experience with POEM is limited, but its reported outcomes are excellent. It is deemed safe even for patients with prior interventions. METHODS: This retrospective review included patients who underwent POEM at a tertiary US center. POEM was performed in a multidisciplinary approach by advanced endoscopists and foregut surgeons. Clinical success was defined as a post-POEM Eckardt score ≤3. RESULTS: A total of 125 patients were included. Median follow-up period was 18 months (interquartile range, 10-22 months). Clinical success was achieved in 92% of patients and persisted at 12 months in 88% of patients. Mucosal barrier failure (MBF) occurred in 7 patients, 2 of whom required surgical intervention. MBF was more common in patients with prior laparoscopic Heller myotomy (19% vs. 3%, p=0.015). MBF requiring surgical intervention occurred early in the learning curve. CONCLUSION: POEM is safe and effective in the treatment of achalasia and spastic esophageal disorders even after failed prior interventions.

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy Is Feasible and Safe in a Gastric Bypass Population.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is public health problem of epidemic proportions. Esophageal dysmotility including achalasia is more commonly seen in an obese population. Standard therapy for achalasia can be complicated by hepatomegaly and a post-surgical anatomy in a pre- and post-bariatric population. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has not been adequately studied in this population. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was completed. Patients who had undergone a Roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGB) prior to or following a POEM were enrolled. Patient demographics, operative information and post-operative course data was collected. RESULTS: Six patients underwent POEM prior to or after RYGB. There were no peri-operative complications with an average length of stay of 1.2 days. Five patients experienced a clinical success with excellent symptom resolution. The one failure was in the setting of type III achalasia, but did have objective evidence of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation post-operatively. CONCLUSION: POEM in the setting of bariatric surgery is safe and feasible. The potential increase in GERD following POEM is obviated by RYGB anatomy. In an obese individual, a staged POEM prior to or following a RYGB is an appropriate treatment algorithm for obese and achalasia.

Sarcopenia is a risk factor for complications and an independent predictor of hospital length of stay in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes in critically ill patients. The impact of sarcopenia on morbidity and length of stay in a trauma population has not been completely defined. This project evaluated the influence of sarcopenia on patients admitted to the trauma service. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 778 patients presenting as a trauma alert at a single institution from 2012-2014 was completed. Records were abstracted for comorbidities and hospital complications. The Hounsfield Unit Area Calculation was collected from admission computed tomography scans. Criteria for sarcopenia were based on the lowest 25th percentile of muscle density measurements. Relationships to patient outcomes were evaluated by univariate and multivariable regression or analyses of variance, when applicable. RESULTS: A total of 432 (55.6%) patients suffered a complication. Sarcopenia was associated with overall complications (P < 0.0001, relative risk 2.54, confidence interval 1.78-3.61) and was an independent risk factor for catheter-associated urinary tract infections (P = 0.011), wound infections (P = 0.011), need for reintubation (P = 0.0062), and length of hospitalization (P = 0.0007). Incorporating sarcopenia into a novel length of stay calculator showed increased prognostic ability for prolonged length of stay over Abbreviated Injury Scale alone (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia is an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes and increased length of stay in trauma patients. Prognostic algorithms incorporating sarcopenia better predict hospital length of stay. Identification of patients at risk may allow for targeted interventions early in the patient's hospital course.

Sarcopenia is a Predictor of Surgical Morbidity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is associated with an increased risk of operative morbidity and mortality. The impact of sarcopenia in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been evaluated. This study assessed the role of sarcopenia on operative outcomes in IBD. METHODS: A retrospective review of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data of patients with IBD was completed. Records were abstracted for comorbidities and perioperative complications. The Hounsfield unit average calculation was used from preoperative computed tomography (CT). Criteria for sarcopenia were based on the lowest 25th percentile. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Statistical analysis was completed using SAS. RESULTS: There were 178 patients included. Sarcopenic patients were more likely to be older (P = 0.001), have hypertension (odds ratio = 2.23), and be diabetic (5.27). In those patients younger than 40 years, sarcopenia was an independent predictor of complications. This subset was significantly more likely to have a normal or elevated body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: In this population, the average age of sarcopenic patients is increased from those who do not meet criteria. Among patients younger than 40 years, sarcopenia affects surgical outcomes. Assessment of sarcopenia can be used to improve preoperative management and describe risks before surgery in patients with IBD.

The impact of sarcopenia on survival and complications in surgical oncology: A review of the current literature.

Sarcopenia is the subclinical loss of skeletal muscle and strength and has been extensively studied in both the cancer and surgical literature. Specifically, sarcopenia has gained significant recognition as an important prognostic factor for both complications and survival in cancer patients. Herein, we review the current literature to date highlighting the specific impact of sarcopenia in patients undergoing oncologic procedures.

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is associated with an increased exposure to ionizing radiation.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery provides for a reliable and sustainable solution to the obesity epidemic. The gold standard bariatric surgical procedure is the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). Assessment of this population preoperatively and work-up of postoperative complications often includes radiographic evaluation. Repeated exposure to radiation is not without complication. OBJECTIVE: Assess the association between the RYGB and exposure to ionizing radiation. SETTING: Academic medical center. METHODS: Patients were identified by their ICD-9 code as having had a RYGB at the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) from 2002 to 2012. The number of abdominal and pelvis (A/P) computed tomography (CT) scans performed was determined and converted into an effective dose (ED) and expressed as milliSeiverts (mSv) to illustrate the biologic effects of radiation. RESULTS: From 2002 to 2012, 1789 primary laparoscopic RYGBs were completed. Fifty-five revisional operations were completed on 51 patients. Of these, 38 had both their index and second operation at the MGH. A total of 1065 A/P CTs were completed in the laparoscopic RYGB population (mean = .6), and 106 A/P CTs were done in the revisional surgery cohort (mean = 2.8). The mean ED of radiation was 56.1 mSv and 19.5 mSv for the index and revisional populations, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the significant cumulative radiation exposure attributable to A/P CTs. This exposes the patient to a potential increased risk of malignancy as well as imposing a financial burden on the healthcare system. The findings of this study raise the awareness of an increased risk of radiation exposure for this population and the necessity of creation of a dedicated algorithm for the mindful utilization of CT imaging.

Scheduled intravenous acetaminophen reduces postoperative narcotic analgesic demand and requirement after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous (i.v.) acetaminophen has the potential to reduce postoperative narcotic analgesic requirement but this has not been reported in bariatric surgery. As lower dosages could reduce undesirable narcotic side effects, we investigated the opioid-sparing effect of concomitant i.v. acetaminophen in bariatric surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of our electronic medical records of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses (LRYGB) performed for severe obesity between 2011 and 2013. We identified 183 patients that received scheduled i.v. acetaminophen in addition to morphine sulfate (MSO4) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). A cohort of 229 patients from the preceding 2 years who were treated with MSO4 PCA but not acetaminophen was used as a historical control. Patient demographic characteristics and narcotic use data were extracted from electronic medical records. Student's t test or linear regression was used as appropriate (P< .05). RESULTS: During the first 24-hour postoperative period after LRYGB, narcotic analgesic demand (total PCA demand including nondelivery of narcotic due to lock-out) was reduced by 25% with the concomitant use of i.v. acetaminophen (40.5 versus 30.9 average pushes; P<.05). During the same period, narcotic analgesic dosage requirement was cut down by 20% in the study group (average of 29.9 versus 24.1 mg of MSO4; P<.05). Linear regression analysis confirmed that these changes were independent of age, gender, and body mass index distribution, or type 2 diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSION: Scheduled i.v. acetaminophen reduces the demand for and the requirement of narcotic analgesia after LRYGB. We provide new evidence in support of the routine use of multimodal analgesia that includes scheduled i.v. acetaminophen in the initial 24-hour period after bariatric surgery.

Minimally invasive pancreatectomy for cancer: a critical review of the current literature.

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has transformed operative practices by offering patients procedures with reduced hospital stay and recovery compared to that of open operations. In spite of the advantages of a MIS approach, the application to pancreatectomy has only recently emerged. This review aims to analyze and discuss available comparative studies as they relate to resection techniques for treatment of malignant disease. A PubMed search was used to obtain original studies and meta-analyses relating to MIS pancreatectomy from 2008 to 2013. Several studies were identified that reported on the application of MIS specifically to the treatment of cancer, many of which were retrospective, single-institution studies. Notwithstanding an inherent selection bias, several studies suggest that MIS can provide equivalent R0 resection rates, number of lymph nodes harvested, and survival to that of open resection. Furthermore, parameters such as blood loss and length of stay are significantly reduced in patients treated with MIS. The current literature supports the conclusion that MIS is safe and effective as a treatment for cancer in well-selected patients in the hands of experienced surgeons. However, the published studies to date are observational in nature and therefore higher quality studies will be needed to support the application and generalizability of MIS in the treatment of pancreatic malignancies.