Surgical Approach for Partial Nephrectomy in the Management of Small Renal Masses: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Background: A variety of surgical and nonsurgical management options for small renal masses (SRMs) now exist. Surgery in the form of partial nephrectomy (PN) has three different approaches. It is unclear which PN approach, if any, offers superior clinical outcomes. Aim: The aim of this study is to compare outcomes in patients with SRMs <4 cm undergoing PN through the open partial nephrectomy (OPN), laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), or robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) approach and to establish the advantages and disadvantages of the various approaches. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted for studies comparing at least two of the above techniques. Eighteen studies and 17,013 patients were included in our study. A network meta-analysis with a frequentist framework was performed. OPN was used as the baseline comparator. The prespecified primary outcome was R0 resection rates. Secondary outcomes included operating time, ischemia time, blood loss, transfusion rates, urine leak rates, significant morbidity, length of stay, and recurrence. Results: There was no significant difference between the techniques in terms of R0 rates, tumor recurrence, urine leak rates, renal function, and >3a Clavien-Dindo complications. LPN had a longer ischemic time and operating time. OPN had a longer length of stay and higher average intraoperative blood loss. RPN had lower blood transfusion rates. Discussion: All approaches are acceptable from an oncological perspective. The minimally invasive approaches (i.e., RPN and LPN) offer advantages in terms of morbidity; however, LPN may increase ischemic time and operative duration. Variations between perioperative outcomes may influence the choice of approach on a case-by-case and institutional basis.

Long-term Outcomes for Drug-eluting Balloons versus Drug-eluting Stents in the Treatment of Small Vessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis compares long-term outcomes follow-up data comparing drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) in interventional treatment of small coronary artery disease (<3 mm). Methods: A systematic review was undertaken along with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The primary outcome was 1-3-year performance of DEB versus DES in major adverse cardiac events. Secondary outcomes include all-cause mortality, MI, cardiac death, vessel thrombosis, major bleeding, target vessel revascularisation and target lesion revascularisation. Two independent reviewers extracted data. All outcomes used the Mantel-Haenszel and random effects models. ORs are presented with a 95% CI. Results: Of 4,661 articles, four randomised control trials were included (1,414 patients). DEBs demonstrated reduced rates of non-fatal MI at 1 year (OR 0.44; 95% CI [0.2-0.94]), and BASKET-SMALL 2 reported a significant reduction in 2-year bleeding rates (OR 0.3; 95% CI [0.1-0.91]). There was no significant difference in all other outcomes. Conclusion: Long-term follow-up of DEB and DES use in small coronary arteries demonstrates DEBs be comparable with DESs in all outcomes at 1, 2 and 3 years of follow-up. A significant reduction was found in rates of non-fatal MI at 1 year in the DEB arm, and a reduction in major bleeding episodes at 2 years in the BASKET-SMALL 2 trial. These data highlight the potential long-term utility of novel DEBs in small coronary artery disease revascularisation.

Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy; a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is the malignant transformation of urothelial cells, from the renal calyces to the ureteral orifices. While the benefits of minimally invasive nephroureterectomy over their open counterpart have been established, the optimal technique remains a debate. We aimed to assess current evidence in the literature and compare outcomes between robotic-assisted (RANU) and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU). Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed for studies comparing RANU and LNU for bladder cancer. Outcome measurements were recurrence rates (local and distal), positive margins, positive lymph node yield and perioperative outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5. Results: Our results demonstrate a significantly higher mortality rate in patients undergoing laparoscopic nephroureterectomy when compared with the robotic-assisted approach for the treatment of UTUC (1.8% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.008); however, these results were inconsistent on sensitivity analysis and should therefore be interpreted with caution. No significant difference was observed for other outcomes. Conclusion: The ideal approach to minimally invasive radical nephroureterectomy remains undetermined. Future research, ideally prospective randomised studies, should focus on long-term outcomes, in particular recurrence, recurrence-free survival, overall survival and the correlation between surgical technique and survival.

Standard Transurethral Resection vs Transurethral Laser Surgery for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Clinical Outcomes and Complications.

Introduction: Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) remains the gold standard method of diagnosing and treating nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Laser resection has been demonstrated as a safe and efficacious alternative; however, its mainstream use remains limited. The aim of this review is to comparatively evaluate clinical outcomes of TURBT and laser resection of bladder tumor (LRBT) for bladder cancer. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed for studies comparing TURBT and LRBT for bladder cancer. Outcome measurements were recurrence rates, complication rates, patient demographics, operative duration, and inpatient stay. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5. Results: Twenty studies on 2621 patients (n = 1364 for TURBT and n = 1257 for LRBT) met inclusion criteria. Demographics, including age and gender ratio and follow-up period, were similar in both groups. Recurrence rates were similar between TURBT and LRBT (29.1% vs 28.2%, p = 0.12). TURBT had a significantly greater obturator kick rate (11.5% vs 0.4%, p < 0.0001) and perforation rate (3.7% vs 0.009%, p = < 0.0001). In the six studies which reported on presence of detrusor muscle in the specimen, it was significantly greater in the LRBT group (96.6% vs 88.1%, p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in operative time between the two groups. TURBT was associated with a significantly longer catheter duration (mean difference [MD] 0.98 days shorter in LBRT group; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] -1.45 to -0.5, p = < 0.00001), and length of stay (MD 1.12 days shorter in LRBT group, 95% CI -1.7 to -0.54, p = 0.0001). Conclusions: LRBT for bladder cancer has the benefit of reduced catheter duration, length of stay, and perforation without impacting negatively on operation duration, recurrence rates, or specimen quality.

Endoscopic management versus transanal surgery for early primary or early locally recurrent rectal neoplasms-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Both endoscopic techniques and transanal surgery are viable options that allow organ preservation for early rectal neoplasms. Whilst endoscopic approaches are less invasive and carry less morbidity, it is unclear whether they are as oncologically effective. AIM: To compare endoscopic techniques with transanal surgery in the management of early rectal neoplasms. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed for randomised and observational studies comparing these techniques. The pre-specified main outcomes measured were en bloc and R0 resection rates and recurrence. Pair-wise meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: This review included 1044 patients. Transanal surgery had increased R0 resection rates (odds ratio (OR) 2.66; 95% CI 1.64; 4.31; p < 0.001) versus endoscopic management. The latter was associated with higher rates of incomplete resection (OR 2.25; 95% CI 1.14, 4.46; p = 0.02) and further intervention (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.09, 2.88; p = 0.02). There was no difference in the rates of late recurrence (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.53, 1.91; p = 0.99) or further major surgery (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.39, 1.94; p = 0.73) between the groups. Endoscopic treatment was associated with a shorter operating time (weighted mean difference (WMD) - 12.08; 95% CI - 18.97, - 5.19; p < 0.001) and LOS (WMD - 1.94; 95% CI - 2.43, - 1.44; p < 0.001), as well as lower rates of urinary retention post-operatively (OR 0.12; 95% CI 0.02, 0.63; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic techniques should be favoured in the setting of benign early rectal neoplasms given their decreased morbidity and increased cost-effectiveness. However, where malignancy is suspected transanal surgery should be the preferred option given the superior R0 resection rate.