Factors Influencing Infusion-Related Reactions Following Dosing of Reference Rituximab and PF-05280586, a Rituximab Biosimilar.

BACKGROUND: Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) are the most common adverse event (AE) associated with infusion of rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the impact of dosing/infusion patterns and certain baseline characteristics on IRR occurrence during the first rituximab infusion administered as the biosimilar PF-05280586 (RTX-PF) or reference rituximab sourced from the EU (RTX-EU, MabThera®) in patients with CD20+ low-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Rituximab (RTX-PF, n=196; RTX-EU, n=198) was administered (375 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (one cycle), with a follow-up period through 52 weeks. The relationships between infusion rate, drug exposure, and IRR incidence were assessed by logistic regression analysis and pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation. Baseline CD20 level, antidrug antibody (ADA) status, and tumor burden according to IRR occurrence (yes/no) were compared descriptively. RESULTS: Median rituximab infusion duration on day 1 was 3.50 h for each of the two groups. There was a positive correlation between infusion rate and all-grade IRRs occurring within 24 h after infusion (p < 0.0001). Patients who developed IRRs had a higher median baseline CD20+ level. IRR incidence was unaffected by baseline ADA status. Drug exposure did not predict IRR incidence. Baseline tumor burden was similar between patients with and without IRRs. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this analysis provide a better understanding of IRRs after the first rituximab (RTX-PF or RTX-EU) infusion and demonstrate a potential correlation of infusion rate and other factors with IRR at the individual and population levels. Infusion-rate escalation steps continue to be needed to manage IRRs. TRIAL REGISTRATION (DATE OF REGISTRATION): ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02213263 (11 August 2014); and EudraCT: 2014-000132-41 (10 October 2014).

Rituximab biosimilars in hematologic malignancies: the need for a real-world approach.

The introduction of rituximab biosimilars into healthcare systems can potentially help to control healthcare costs for the treatment of hematologic malignancies. However, there are currently several barriers to the uptake of biosimilars. This review discusses barriers to the adoption of rituximab biosimilars by stakeholders including patients and healthcare providers. We outline the importance of utilizing real-world evidence in providing additional clinical experience on rituximab biosimilars in hematologic malignancies to improve stakeholder confidence regarding their efficacy and safety. We conclude by offering recommendations for designing and conducting effective real-world studies. Such studies can provide evidence to help achieve lower-priced biologics and improved patient access to help sustain the treatment of hematologic malignancies with biologics, including rituximab biosimilars.

An Evidence-based Review of Anti-CD20 Antibody-containing Regimens for the Treatment of Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma, or Follicular Lymphoma.

Combination regimens with anti-CD20 agents might improve the outcomes of patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies; however, the available comparative clinical evidence is limited. The present review assessed the reported evidence on the efficacy of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies combined with chemotherapy for patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), follicular lymphoma (FL), or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), using a rapid evidence assessment approach. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 1997 to July 14, 2017 (English language only). The data identified from randomized controlled trials or single-arm prospective studies are reported as descriptive study summaries, grouped by anti-CD20 agent and outcome (overall response rate, including complete response and partial response; duration of response; survival, including overall survival and progression-free survival). Of 56 included reports, 32 reported on CLL/small lymphocytic lymphoma, 15 on FL, and 11 on DLBCL. Within the study period, 40, 11, and 7 studies evaluated rituximab, ofatumumab, and obinutuzumab, respectively. Substantially more data were available for rituximab-based combination regimens than for either ofatumumab or obinutuzumab. Moreover, substantial heterogeneity was recorded in the study design and backbone chemotherapy. Thus, the available data are inconclusive regarding any potential similarities or differences in efficacy among these anti-CD20 agents for each respective disease. More importantly, only 1 direct comparison among the anti-CD20 agents was identified, emphasizing the need for head-to-head randomized controlled trials of these drugs to inform clinical decision-making for patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders.

The Role of Rituximab in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treatment and the Potential Utility of Biosimilars.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is managed with observation for asymptomatic or clinically silent disease; pharmacologic intervention is generally required for symptomatic patients with clinically significant adenopathy or cytopenia. In the front-line treatment of CLL, the current standard-of-care includes chemotherapy in combination with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (e.g., rituximab, ofatumumab, or obinutuzumab) or ibrutinib as single agent. Despite the evolving treatment paradigm toward targeted therapy, it is likely that rituximab (plus chemotherapy), with or without targeted agents, will retain a significant role in CLL treatment. However, patents for many biologics, including rituximab, have expired or will expire in the near future. Furthermore, access to rituximab has remained challenging, particularly in countries with restricted resources. Together, these concerns have prompted the development of safe and effective rituximab biosimilars. The term "biosimilar" refers to a biologic that is highly similar to an approved reference (originator) product, notwithstanding minor differences in clinically inactive components, and for which there are no clinically meaningful differences in purity, potency, or safety. Biosimilars are developed to treat the same condition(s) using the same treatment regimens as an approved reference biologic and have the potential to increase access to more affordable treatments. We review the importance of rituximab in the current treatment of CLL, the scientific basis of its future role in combination with chemotherapy, and the role of new and emerging agents in the treatment of CLL, which could potentially be used in combination with rituximab biosimilars. We also discuss rituximab biosimilars currently in development. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Front-line treatments for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) include chemotherapy in combination with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (e.g., rituximab, ofatumumab, or obinutuzumab) or ibrutinib as single agent. Despite the evolving treatment paradigm, it is likely rituximab (plus chemotherapy) and targeted agents undergoing clinical evaluation will retain a significant role in CLL treatment. However, patents for many biologics, including rituximab, have expired or will expire in the near future and, in many regions, access to rituximab remains challenging. Together, these concerns have prompted the development of safe and effective rituximab biosimilars, with the potential to increase access to more affordable treatments.

Phase I study of intermittent oral dosing of the insulin-like growth factor-1 and insulin receptors inhibitor OSI-906 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: We determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary activity of OSI-906, a potent, oral, dual inhibitor of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) and insulin receptor (IR), in patients with advanced solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This was a multicenter, open-label, dose escalation phase I study evaluating three intermittent dosing schedules of once-daily OSI-906 [schedule (S) 1, days 1-3 every 14 days; S2, days 1-5 every 14 days; S3, days 1-7 every 14 days]. A fed-fasting expansion cohort was included in the study. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients were enrolled: 62 in S1, 4 in S2, and 13 in S3. S2 was discontinued. Dose-limiting toxicity comprised grade 3-4 hyperglycemia, vomiting, fatigue, and prolonged QTc interval. The MTD and recommended phase II dose of OSI-906 was 600 mg for both S1 and S3 schedules. Other common adverse events were grade 1-2 nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and diarrhea. The pharmacokinetics of OSI-906 was dose linear, and the terminal half-life ranged between 2 and 6 hours. High-fat meals had a moderate effect on the pharmacokinetics of OSI-906. At the MTD, inhibition of IGF1R and IR was observed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. An increase in plasma IGF1 concentrations, an indirect measure of IGF1R signaling inhibition, was seen at doses ≥ 450 mg. Two patients with adrenocortical carcinoma achieved partial responses. CONCLUSION: The MTD of 600 mg was well tolerated and associated with preliminary antitumor activity. These data support further evaluation of OSI-906 in solid tumors.

Reprogrammed FoxP3+ T regulatory cells become IL-17+ antigen-specific autoimmune effectors in vitro and in vivo.

Lymphocyte differentiation from naive CD4(+) T cells into mature Th1, Th2, Th17, or T regulatory cell (Treg) phenotypes has been considered end stage in character. In this study, we demonstrate that dendritic cells (DCs) activated with a novel immune modulator B7-DC XAb (DC(XAb)) can reprogram Tregs into T effector cells. Down-regulation of FoxP3 expression after either in vitro or in vivo Treg-DC(XAb) interaction is Ag-specific, IL-6-dependent, and results in the functional reprogramming of the mature T cell phenotype. The reprogrammed Tregs cease to express IL-10 and TGFbeta, fail to suppress T cell responses, and gain the ability to produce IFN-gamma, IL-17, and TNF-alpha. The ability of IL-6(+) DC(XAb) and the inability of IL-6(-/-) DC(XAb) vaccines to protect animals from lethal melanoma suggest that exogenously modulated DC can reprogram host Tregs. In support of this hypothesis and as a test for Ag specificity, transfer of DC(XAb) into RIP-OVA mice causes a break in immune tolerance, inducing diabetes. Conversely, adoptive transfer of reprogrammed Tregs but not similarly treated CD25(-) T cells into naive RIP-OVA mice is also sufficient to cause autoimmune diabetes. Yet, treatment of normal mice with B7-DC XAb fails to elicit generalized autoimmunity. The finding that mature Tregs can be reprogrammed into competent effector cells provides new insights into the plasticity of T cell lineage, underscores the importance of DC-T cell interaction in balancing immunity with tolerance, points to Tregs as a reservoir of autoimmune effectors, and defines a new approach for breaking tolerance to self Ags as a strategy for cancer immunotherapy.

GV-1001, an injectable telomerase peptide vaccine for the treatment of solid cancers.

GemVax AS, a subsidiary of Pharmexa A/S, is developing GV-1001, an injectable formulation of a promiscuous MHC class II peptide derived from the telomerase reverse transcriptase catalytic subunit (hTERT), for the potential treatment of solid tumors, including pancreatic, liver and NSCLC. GV-1001 is currently undergoing phase II clinical trials for pancreatic, liver and NSCLC as well as a phase III trial for pancreatic cancer.

Peptide vaccine given with a Toll-like receptor agonist is effective for the treatment and prevention of spontaneous breast tumors.

Our goal is to develop peptide vaccines that stimulate tumor antigen-specific T-cell responses against frequently found cancers. Previous work has shown that to generate effective T-cell responses, peptides have to be administered in combination with strong adjuvants such as Toll-like receptor agonists. However, most animal tumor model systems used to study peptide vaccines were not truly representative of malignant diseases in humans because they solely used transplantable tumor lines, and instead of true tumor antigens, they used highly immunogenic foreign proteins. Here, we describe a peptide vaccination strategy, which is highly effective in delaying or preventing the occurrence of spontaneous breast tumors. Transgenic female BALB-neuT mice that carry the activated rat HER-2/neu oncogene were vaccinated with a synthetic peptide from the rat HER-2/neu gene product, which represents an epitope for CTLs in combination with a Toll-like receptor agonist adjuvant. Our results show that to obtain tumor antigen-specific CTL responses and antitumor effects, the vaccine had to be administered repetitively, or the function of CD4/CD25 T regulatory cells had to be blocked with anti-CD25 antibody therapy. Mice that were vaccinated with this approach remained tumor-free or were able to control spontaneous tumor growth and exhibited long-lasting CTL responses, not only against the immunizing peptide but also against other peptides derived from rat HER-2/neu product (i.e., epitope spreading). These results suggest that similar strategies should be followed for conducting clinical studies in patients.