Radiation therapy for de novo anorectal cancer in patients with a history of prostate radiation therapy.

Introduction: Radiation therapy (RT) for anorectal cancer after prior prostate cancer RT is usually avoided due to concern for complications. Data on this topic is scarce. Our aim was to evaluate tolerability, toxicity, and clinical outcomes associated with a second course of pelvic radiation in men with de novo anorectal cancers previously treated with RT for prostate cancer. Materials/methods: We conducted a single-institution retrospective study of men treated with RT for rectal or anal cancer after prior prostate RT. Toxicity data were collected. Treatment plans were extracted to assess doses to organs at risk and target coverage. Cumulative incidence was calculated for local and distant progression. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: We identified 26 patients who received anorectal RT after prostate cancer RT: 17 for rectal cancer and 9 for anal cancer. None had metastatic disease. Prior prostate RT was delivered using low dose rate brachytherapy (LDR), external beam RT (EBRT), or EBRT + LDR. RT for rectal cancer was delivered most commonly using 50.4Gy/28 fractions (fr) or 1.5 Gy twice-daily to 30-45 Gy. The most used RT dose for anal cancer was 50Gy/25 fr. Median interval between prostate and anorectal RT was 12.3 years (range:0.5 - 25.3). 65% and 89% of rectal and anal cancer patients received concurrent chemotherapy, respectively. There were no reported ≥Grade 4 acute toxicities. Two patients developed fistulae; one was urinary-cutaneous after prostate LDR and 45Gy/25fr for rectal cancer, and the other was recto-vesicular after prostate LDR and 50Gy/25fr for anal cancer. In 11 patients with available dosimetry, coverage for anorectal cancers was adequate. With a median follow up of 84.4 months, 5-yr local progression and OS were 30% and 31% for rectal cancer, and 35% and 49% for anal cancer patients, respectively. Conclusion: RT for anorectal cancer after prior prostate cancer RT is feasible but should be delivered with caution since it poses a risk of fistulae and possibly bleeding, especially in patients treated with prior LDR brachytherapy. Further studies, perhaps using proton therapy and/or rectal hydrogel spacers, are needed to further decrease toxicity and improve outcomes.

Factors Associated With Premature Ovarian Insufficiency in Young Women With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated With Pelvic Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Pelvic radiation therapy (RT) is standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) in premenopausal women is a possible side effect. The purpose of our study was to evaluate factors associated with POI in women younger than 50 years, treated with pelvic RT for LARC, including those who underwent ovarian transposition (OT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of women younger than 50 years treated with pelvic RT for LARC at our institution between 2001 and 2019. Clinical and hormonal data were used to determine ovarian function. The ovaries and uterus were contoured and dose volume histograms were generated. Association of clinical and dosimetric factors with POI within 12 months of RT was evaluated using Wilcoxon-rank sum test and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: We identified 76 premenopausal women at time of RT with median age of 43 years (range, 20-49). Twenty-six women (34%) underwent OT. Neoadjuvant, concurrent, and adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 56 (74%), 69 (91%), and 26 (34%) women, respectively. Median RT dose was 50 Gy/25 fractions. Among 75 women with 12 months of follow-up, 25% had preservation of ovarian function, all in the OT group. Ovarian function was preserved in 19 (76%) women who underwent OT. The median of ovarian mean dose was 1.7 Gy in the OT group versus 44.8 Gy in the non-OT group (P < .001). OT and age at RT were significantly associated with POI (P < .001). No patient with ovarian mean dose less than 1.36 Gy developed POI. CONCLUSIONS: OT was significantly associated with reduced risk of POI by enabling lower radiation doses to the ovaries. OT should be considered in young patients undergoing pelvic RT. Although there appears to be a significant association between ovarian mean dose and POI, larger studies are needed to find a dosimetric threshold. Our results suggest keeping the dose to the ovaries as low as reasonably achievable in patients who undergo OT and pelvic RT.

Ablative radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with reduced treatment- and tumor-related liver failure and improved survival.

BACKGROUND: More than 70% of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are not candidates for curative therapy or recur after curative-intent therapy. There is growing evidence on the use of ablative radiation therapy (RT) for liver tumors. We aimed to analyze outcomes of HCC patients treated with conventional versus ablative RT. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed medical records of HCC patients treated with liver RT from 2001 to 2019. We defined ablative RT as biologically effective dose (BED) ≥80 Gy. RECIST 1.1 was used to define early responses at 3-6 months after RT, and local control (LC) at last follow-up (FU). Data was analyzed using Fisher exact test, Kaplan-Meier, cumulative incidence rates, Cox proportional hazards model and Fine-Gray competing risks. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were identified, of whom 14 (31.1%) received ablative RT using a stereotactic technique. With median FU of survivors of 10.1 months, 1-year cumulative incidence of LC was 91.7% for ablative and 75.2% for BED <80 Gy. At early FU, patients treated with ablative RT had better responses compared to BED <80 Gy, with 7% progressing versus 19%, and 21.4% with complete response versus none (P=0.038). On univariate analysis (UVA), Child-Pugh (CP) score [hazard ratio (HR): 3 for CP-B, HR: 16 for CP-C] and BED (HR: 7.69 for BED <80 Gy) correlated with deterioration of liver function, leading to liver failure. Most liver failure cases were due to disease progression. No RT-related liver failure occurred in the ablative RT group. On UVA, only BED ≥80 Gy was associated with improved overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.4; P=0.044). Median OS (mOS) and 1-year OS were 7 months and 35% respectively for BED <80 Gy compared to 28 months and 66% for BED ≥80 Gy. No grade 3+ bowel toxicity was reported in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Greater than 90% LC was achieved after stereotactic ablative RT, which was associated with minimized tumor- and treatment-related liver failure and improved survival for highly selected inoperable HCC patients.