RESUMO
Introduction: Radical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma; however, only a minor fraction of patients are eligible for resection. Induction therapy may be offered to patients, but the response rate in cases with significant vascular involvement is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of modified of FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy (mFFX) + stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in combination as induction therapy for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma. The primary endpoints were the resection rate and one-year overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and quality of live (QoL). Material and methods: Thirty patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated with 6 cycles of mFFX, followed by SBRT and additional 3 cycles of mFFX. The response was measured prior to SBRT and after regimen completion. In the absence of disease progression, the patients were referred for surgery. The patients were requested to complete quality of life questionnaires (QLQ)-C30 and QLQ-PAN26 questionnaires biweekly. Results: On the first evaluation, disease control was noted in 26 (86.7%) patients. Stereotactic body radiotherapy was performed in 20 patients. Twelve patients underwent laparotomy, with radical resection possible in 3 cases. The one-year OS rate was 63.3%. Overall, 11 grade ≥ 3 adverse events were noted. No deterioration in the overall QoL was observed. The median PFS was 7.53 months. Conclusions: The expected resection rate of ≥ 30% was not achieved. However, the combination was associated with good local control, low adverse event rate, and good QoL, which advocate its further investigation in this clinical situation.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Cancer itself and its treatment have a multifaceted impact on patients' daily lives. The aim of the study was to determine unmet non-medical needs among Polish cancer patients. METHODS: Survey research using a 23-item Needs Evaluation Questionnaire (NEQ) was carried out among 1062 cancer patients from different regions of Poland. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed. RESULTS: The quantitative analysis showed that 48% of the NEQ items (11/23) were expressed as unmet needs by at least half of patients. Unmet information needs were indicated by patients most often: information about their diagnosis, exams, treatment, future condition, funding and economic support. Cancer patients would like to get more attention from medical staff. Unmet needs were most frequently expressed by respondents who were men, with a lower level of education, living in village, pensioners. Qualitative analysis showed that each need may be understood in a variety of different ways across the cohort. Some patients added comments that the completing NEQ helped them to notice their non-medical needs. CONCLUSION: Polish cancer patients have some unmet non-medical needs, especially informative needs.