The Safety and Efficacy of Epicardial Carbon Dioxide Insufflation Compared With Conventional Epicardial Access.

BACKGROUND: Epicardial (Epi) access is commonly required during ventricular tachycardia ablation. Conventional Epi (ConvEpi) access targets a "dry" pericardial space presenting technical challenges and risk of complications. Recently, intentional puncture of coronary venous branches with Epi carbon dioxide insufflation (EpiCO2) has been described as a technique to improve Epi access. The safety of this technique relative to conventional methods remains unproven. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to compare the feasibility and safety of EpiCO2 to ConvEpi access. METHODS: All patients at a high-volume center undergoing Epi access between January 2021 and December 2023 were included and grouped according to ConvEpi or EpiCO2 approach. Access technique was according to the discretion of the operator. RESULTS: Epi access was attempted in 153 cases by 17 different operators (80 ConvEpi vs 73 EpiCO2). There was no difference in success rate whether the ConvEpi or EpiCO2 approach was used (76 [95%] cases vs 67 [91.8%] cases; P = 0.4). Total Epi access time was shorter in the ConvEpi group compared with the EpiCO2 group (16.3 ± 11.6 minutes vs 26.9 ± 12.7 minutes; P < 0.001), though the total procedure duration was similar. Major Epi access-related complications occurred in only the ConvEpi group (6 [7.5%] ConvEpi vs 0 [0%] EpiCo2; P = 0.02). Bleeding ≥80 mL was more frequently observed following ConvEpi access (14 [17.5%] cases vs 4 [5.5%] cases; P = 0.02). After adjusting for age, repeat Epi access, and antithrombotic therapy, EpiCO2 was associated with a reduction in bleeding ≥80 mL (OR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.08-0.89; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: EpiCO2 access is associated with lower rates of major complication and bleeding when compared with ConvEpi access.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Preprocedural Planning for Left Atrial Procedures in Atrial Fibrillation.

This document summarizes the relevant literature for the selection of preprocedural imaging in three clinical scenarios in patients needing endovascular treatment or cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. These clinical scenarios include preprocedural imaging prior to radiofrequency ablation; prior to left atrial appendage occlusion; and prior to cardioversion. The appropriateness of imaging modalities as they apply to each clinical scenario is rated as usually appropriate, may be appropriate, and usually not appropriate to assist the selection of the most appropriate imaging modality in the corresponding clinical scenarios. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Long-Term Freedom From Ventricular Arrhythmias in ARVC With Endocardial Only Ablation: Predictors of Success.

BACKGROUND: Although the epicardial predominance of substrate abnormalities has been well demonstrated in early stages of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), endocardial (ENDO) ablation may suffice to eliminate ventricular tachycardia (VT) in some patients. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to report the long-term outcomes of ENDO-only ablation in ARVC patients and factors that predict VT-free survival. METHODS: We included consecutive patients with Task Force Criteria diagnosis of ARVC undergoing a first ENDO-only VT ablation between 1998 and 2020. Ablation was predominantly guided by activation/entrainment mapping for mappable VTs and pace mapping/targeting abnormal electrograms for unmappable VTs. The primary endpoint was freedom from any recurrent sustained VT after the last ENDO-only ablation. RESULTS: Seventy-four ARVC patients underwent ENDO-only VT ablation. VT noninducibility was achieved in 49 (66%) patients. During median follow-up of 6.6 years (Q1-Q3: 3.4-11.2 years), 40 (54.1%) patients remained free from any VT recurrence with rare VT ≤2 episodes in additional 12.2%. Among patients with noninducibility, VT-free survival was 75.5% during long-term follow-up. In multivariable analysis, >45 y of age at diagnosis (HR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.17-0.98) and VT noninducibility (HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.16-0.80) were predictors of VT-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term VT-free survival can be achieved in over half of ARVC patients following ENDO-only VT ablation, increasing to over 75% if VT noninducibility is achieved. Our results support consideration of a stepwise ENDO-only approach before proceeding to epicardial ablation if VT noninducibility can be achieved particularly in older patients.

Lipomatous Metaplasia Is Associated With Ventricular Tachycardia Recurrence Following Ablation in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurrence rates remain high following ablation among patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to define the prevalence of lipomatous metaplasia (LM) in patients with NICM and VT and its association with postablation VT recurrence. METHODS: From patients who had ablation of left ventricular VT, we retrospectively identified 113 consecutive NICM patients with preprocedural contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomography (CECT), from which LM was segmented. Nested within this cohort were 62 patients that prospectively underwent CECT and cardiac magnetic resonance from which myocardial border zone and dense late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) were segmented. A control arm of 30 NICM patients without VT with CECT was identified. RESULTS: LM was identified among 57% of control patients without VT vs 83% of patients without VT recurrence and 100% of patients with VT recurrence following ablation. In multivariable analyses, LM extent was the only independent predictor of VT recurrence, with an adjusted HR per 1-g LM increase of 1.1 (P < 0.001). Patients with LM extent ≥2.5 g had 4.9-fold higher hazard of VT recurrence than those with LM <2.5 g (P < 0.001). In the nested cohort with 32 VT recurrences, LM extent was independently associated with VT recurrence after adjustment for border zone and LGE extent (HR per 1 g increase: 1.1; P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial LM is prevalent in patients with NICM of a variety of etiologies, and its extent is associated with postablation VT recurrence independent of the degree of fibrosis.

Understanding the Utility of Endocardial Electrocardiographic Imaging in Epi-Endocardial Mapping of 3D Reentrant Circuits.

Background: Studies of VT mechanisms are largely based on a 2D portrait of reentrant circuits on one surface of the heart. This oversimplifies the 3D circuit that involves the depth of the myocardium. Simultaneous epicardial and endocardial (epi-endo) mapping was shown to facilitate a 3D delineation of VT circuits, which is however difficult via invasive mapping. Objective: This study investigates the capability of noninvasive epicardial-endocardial electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) to elucidate the 3D construct of VT circuits, emphasizing the differentiation of epicardial, endocardial, and intramural circuits and to determine the proximity of mid-wall exits to the epicardial or endocardial surfaces. Methods: 120-lead ECGs of VT in combination with subject-specific heart-torso geometry are used to compute unipolar electrograms (CEGM) on ventricular epicardium and endocardia. Activation isochrones are constructed, and the percentage of activation within VT cycle length is calculated on each surface. This classifies VT circuits into 2D (surface only), uniform transmural, nonuniform transmural, and mid-myocardial (focal on surfaces). Furthermore, the endocardial breakthrough time was accurately measured using Laplacian eigenmaps, and by correlating the delay time of the epi-endo breakthroughs, the relative distance of a mid-wall exit to the epicardium or the endocardium surfaces was identified. Results: We analyzed 23 simulated and in-vivo VT circuits on post-infarction porcine hearts. In simulated circuits, ECGI classified 21% as 2D and 78% as 3D: 82.6% of these were correctly classified. The relative timing between epicardial and endocardial breakthroughs was correctly captured across all cases. In in-vivo circuits, ECGI classified 25% as 2D and 75% as 3D: in all cases, circuit exits and entrances were consistent with potential critical isthmus delineated from combined LGE-MRI and catheter mapping data. Conclusions: ECGI epi-endo mapping has the potential for fast delineation of 3D VT circuits, which may augment detailed catheter mapping for VT ablation.

Risk scores for prediction of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is crucial for secondary prevention in patients with recent strokes of unknown etiology. This systematic review and meta-analysis assess the predictive power of available risk scores for detecting new PAF after acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Methods: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched until September 2023 to identify relevant studies. A bivariate random effects meta-analysis model pooled data on sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) for each score. The QUADAS-2 tool was used for the quality assessment. Results: Eventually, 21 studies with 18 original risk scores were identified. Age, left atrial enlargement, and NIHSS score were the most common predictive factors, respectively. Seven risk scores were meta-analyzed, with iPAB showing the highest pooled sensitivity and AUC (sensitivity: 89.4%, specificity: 74.2%, AUC: 0.83), and HAVOC having the highest pooled specificity (sensitivity: 46.3%, specificity: 82.0%, AUC: 0.82). Altogether, seven risk scores displayed good discriminatory power (AUC ≥0.80) with four of them (HAVOC, iPAB, Fujii, and MVP scores) being externally validated. Conclusion: Available risk scores demonstrate moderate to good predictive accuracy and can help identify patients who would benefit from extended cardiac monitoring after AIS. External validation is essential before widespread clinical adoption.

Class 1C Antiarrhythmics for Premature Ventricular Complex Suppression in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators.

BACKGROUND: Premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) are common and associated with worse outcomes in patients with heart failure. Class 1C antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) effectively suppress PVCs, but guidelines currently restrict their use in structural heart disease. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of class 1C AADs in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). METHODS: All patients with NICM and an ICD treated with flecainide or propafenone at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between 2014 and 2022 were identified. PVC burden, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and biventricular pacing percentage were compared before and during class 1C AAD treatment. Safety outcomes included sustained atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, heart failure admissions, and death. RESULTS: We identified 34 patients, 23 receiving flecainide and 11 propafenone. Most patients (62%) had failed other AADs or catheter ablation (68%) prior to class 1C AAD initiation. PVC burden decreased from 20% ± 13% to 6% ± 7% (P < 0.001), LVEF increased from 33% ± 9% to 37% ± 10% (P = 0.01), and biventricular pacing percentage increased from 85% ± 9% to 93% ± 7% (P = 0.01). Sustained ventricular tachycardia (2 vs 9 patients) and admissions for decompensated heart failure (2 vs 3 patients) decreased compared with the 12 months prior to class 1C AAD initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Class 1C AADs effectively suppressed PVCs in patients with NICM and ICDs, leading to increases in LVEF and biventricular pacing percentage. In this limited sample, their use was safe. Larger studies are needed to confirm the safety of this approach.

Evaluation of organized atrial arrhythmias after cryptogenic stroke.

Background: Long-term rhythm monitoring to detect atrial fibrillation (AF) following a cryptogenic stroke (CS) is well established. However, the burden of organized atrial arrhythmias in this population is not well defined. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence and risk factors for organized atrial arrhythmias in patients with CS. Methods: We evaluated all patients with CS who received an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) between October 2014 and April 2020. All ICM transmissions categorized as AF, tachycardia, or bradycardia were reviewed. We evaluated the time to detection of organized AF and the combination of either organized atrial arrhythmia or AF. Results: A total of 195 CS patients with ICMs were included (51% men; mean age 66 ± 12 years; mean CHA2DS2-VASC score 4.6). Over mean follow-up of 18.9 ± 11.2 months, organized atrial arrhythmias lasting ≥30 seconds were detected in 45 patients (23%), of whom 62% did not have AF. Seventeen patients had both organized atrial arrhythmia and AF, and another 21 patients had AF only. Compared to those with normal left atrial size, patients with left atrial enlargement had a higher adjusted risk for development of atrial arrhythmias (mild left atrial enlargement: hazard ratio 1.99; 95% confidence interval 1.06-3.75; moderate/severe left atrial enlargement: hazard ratio 3.06; 95% confidence interval 1.58-5.92). Conclusion: Organized atrial arrhythmias lasting ≥30 seconds are detected in nearly one-fourth of CS patients. Two-thirds of these patients did not have AF. Further studies are required to evaluate the impact of organized atrial arrhythmias on recurrent stroke risk.

Sarcoid heart disease and imaging.

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) can mimic any cardiomyopathy due to its ability to manifest with a variety of clinical presentations. The exact prevalence of CS remains unknown but has been reported ranging from 2.3% to as high as 29.9% among patients presenting with new onset cardiomyopathy and/or atrioventricular block. Early and accurate diagnosis of CS is often challenging due to the nature of disease progression and lack of diagnostic reference standard. The current diagnostic criteria for CS are lacking in sensitivity and specificity. Here, we review the contemporary role of advanced imaging modalities such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in diagnosing and prognosticating patients with CS.

SCMR expert consensus statement for cardiovascular magnetic resonance of patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a proven imaging modality for informing diagnosis and prognosis, guiding therapeutic decisions, and risk stratifying surgical intervention. Patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) would be expected to derive particular benefit from CMR given high prevalence of cardiomyopathy and arrhythmia. While several guidelines have been published over the last 16 years, it is important to recognize that both the CIED and CMR technologies, as well as our knowledge in MR safety, have evolved rapidly during that period. Given increasing utilization of CIED over the past decades, there is an unmet need to establish a consensus statement that integrates latest evidence concerning MR safety and CIED and CMR technologies. While experienced centers currently perform CMR in CIED patients, broad availability of CMR in this population is lacking, partially due to limited availability of resources for programming devices and appropriate monitoring, but also related to knowledge gaps regarding the risk-benefit ratio of CMR in this growing population. To address the knowledge gaps, this SCMR Expert Consensus Statement integrates consensus guidelines, primary data, and opinions from experts across disparate fields towards the shared goal of informing evidenced-based decision-making regarding the risk-benefit ratio of CMR for patients with CIEDs.

Predictors of nonpulmonary vein triggers for atrial fibrillation: A clinical risk score.

BACKGROUND: Targeting non-pulmonary vein triggers (NPVTs) after pulmonary vein isolation may reduce atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. Isoproterenol infusion and cardioversion of spontaneous or induced AF can provoke NPVTs but typically require vasopressor support and increased procedural time. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for the presence of NPVTs and create a risk score to identify higher-risk subgroups. METHODS: Using the AF ablation registry at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, we included consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation between January 2021 and December 2022. We excluded patients who did not receive NPVT provocation testing after failing to demonstrate spontaneous NPVTs. NPVTs were defined as non-pulmonary vein ectopic beats triggering AF or focal atrial tachycardia. We used risk factors associated with NPVTs with P <.1 in multivariable logistic regression model to create a risk score in a randomly split derivation set (80%) and tested its predictive accuracy in the validation set (20%). RESULTS: In 1530 AF ablations included, NPVTs were observed in 235 (15.4%). In the derivation set, female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-2.03; P = .080), sinus node dysfunction (OR 1.67; 95% CI 0.98-2.87; P = .060), previous AF ablation (OR 2.50; 95% CI 1.70-3.65; P <.001), and left atrial scar (OR 2.90; 95% CI 1.94-4.36; P <.001) were risk factors associated with NPVTs. The risk score created from these risk factors (PRE2SSS2 score; [PRE]vious ablation: 2 points, female [S]ex: 1 point, [S]inus node dysfunction: 1 point, left atrial [S]car: 2 points) had good predictive accuracy in the validation cohort (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.728; 95% CI 0.648-0.807). CONCLUSION: A risk score incorporating predictors for NPVTs may allow provocation of triggers to be performed in patients with greatest expected yield.

Substrate and arrhythmia characterization using the multi-electrode Optrell mapping catheter for ventricular arrhythmia ablation-a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: The use of a multi-electrode Optrell mapping catheter during ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular complex (PVC) ablation procedures has not been widely reported. OBJECTIVES: We aim to describe the feasibility and safety of using the Optrell multipolar mapping catheter (MPMC) to guide catheter ablation of VT and PVCs. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective evaluation of patients who underwent VT or PVC ablation between June and November 2022 utilizing the MPMC. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients met the inclusion criteria (13 VT and 7 PVC ablations, 80% male, 61 ± 15 years). High-density mapping was performed in the VT procedures with median 2753 points [IQR 1471-17,024] collected in the endocardium and 12,830 points [IQR 2319-30,010] in the epicardium. Operators noted challenges in manipulation of the MPMC in trabeculated endocardial regions or near valve apparatus. Late potentials (LPs) were detected in 11 cases, 7 of which had evidence of isochronal crowding demonstrated during late annotation mapping. Two patients who also underwent entrainment mapping had critical circuitry confirmed in regions of isochronal crowding. In the PVC group, high-density voltage and activation mapping was performed with a median 1058 points [IQR 534-3582] collected in the endocardium. CONCLUSIONS: This novel MPMC can be used safely and effectively to create high-density maps in LV endocardium or epicardium. Limitations of the catheter include a longer wait time for matrix formation prior to starting point collection and challenges in manipulation in certain regions.

Accuracy of symptoms and pulse checking for detecting atrial fibrillation following catheter ablation.

BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in the possibility of discontinuing oral anticoagulation following successful catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it remains unknown whether patients can accurately detect arrhythmia recurrences following ablation. We therefore sought to characterize the accuracy of pulse checking and arrhythmia symptoms for the identification of AF following ablation. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included patients at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania with an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) treated with catheter ablation for AF who recorded the results from minimum twice daily pulse checks and additionally with arrhythmia symptoms into a diary for 2 months following their procedure. Accuracy of this self-assessment protocol was determined by comparison to ICM-detected AF. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients (age 69 ± 8 years, 30 (55%) male, CHA2DS2VASc score 3.2 ± 1. 5) were included. Patients recorded a total of 5911 pulse checks, and there were 280 episodes of ICM-documented AF among 26 patients with an average duration of 2.5 ± 3.3 h. Among 362 episodes of patient-suspected AF, 134 correlated with ICM-identified AF (37% true positive rate). Of the 5549 pulse checks that did not identify AF, 196 correlated with ICM-identified AF (4% false negative rate). Twice daily pulse checking had a sensitivity of 47% and a specificity of 96% for identifying each episode of AF. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that a strategy of pulse checks and symptom assessment is insufficient to identify all episodes of AF in many patients following catheter ablation.

One-year outcomes after stereotactic body radiotherapy for refractory ventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising noninvasive treatment for refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the safety and effectiveness of SBRT for VT in refractory to extensive ablation. METHODS: After maximal medical and ablation therapy, patients were enrolled in a prospective registry. Available electrophysiological and imaging data were integrated to generate a plan target volume. All SBRTs were planned with a single 25 Gy fraction using respiratory motion mitigation strategies. Clinical outcomes at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months were analyzed and compared with the 6 months prior to treatment. VT burden (implantable cardioverter-defibrillator [ICD] shocks and antitachycardia pacing sequences) as well as clinical and safety outcomes were the main outcomes. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled and underwent planning. Fourteen (93%) underwent treatment, with 12 (80%) surviving to the end of the 6-week period and 10 (67%) surviving to 12 months. From 6 week to 12 months, there was recurrence of VT, which resulted in either appropriate antitachycardia pacing or ICD shocks in 33% (4 of 12). There were significant reductions in treated VT at 6 weeks to 6 months (98%) and at 12 months (99%) compared to the 6 months before treatment. There was a nonsignificant trend toward lower amiodarone dose at 12 months. Four deaths occurred after treatment, with no changes in ventricular function. CONCLUSION: For a select group of high-risk patients with VT refractory to standard therapy, SBRT is associated with a reduction in VT and appropriate ICD therapies over 1 year.

Intraoperative ultrasound-guided pectoral nerve blocks for cardiac implantable device procedures.

BACKGROUND: Pectoral nerve (PECs) blocks are established regional anesthesia techniques that can provide analgesia to the anterior chest wall. Although commonly performed preoperatively by anesthesiologists, the feasibility of electrophysiologist-performed PECs blocks from within cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) pockets at the time of implantation has not been established. The objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of routine PECs blocks performed by the electrophysiologist from within the exposed device pocket at the time of CIED procedures. METHODS: Patients undergoing CIED procedures underwent a PECs I block (15 cc of 1% lidocaine/0.25% bupivacaine) injected between the pectoralis major and minor muscles guided by ultrasound placed in the device pocket, or PECs II block, which included a second injection (15 cc) between pectoralis minor and serratus anterior muscles. Postoperatively, pain was assessed on a numeric scale (0-10) at 1, 2, 4, and 24 h, and 2 weeks after the procedure. RESULTS: Among 20 patients (age 65 ± 16 years, 70% male, 55% with history of chronic pain), PECs I (75%) and PECs II (25%) blocks were performed. The procedures were de novo implantation (n = 17) or device revision (n = 3). The average pain score in the first 4 h was 0.4 ± 0.8 and 0.3 ± 0.6 at 24 h after the procedure. During the 24-h postoperative period, 4 patients received opioids. Two patients were discharged with opioids for pain unrelated to the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative PECs blocks can be feasibly performed from within an exposed pocket at the time of CIED procedures with minimal postoperative pain.