From receptor binding kinetics to signal transduction; a missing link in predicting in vivo drug-action.

An important question in drug discovery is how to overcome the significant challenge of high drug attrition rates due to lack of efficacy and safety. A missing link in the understanding of determinants for drug efficacy is the relation between drug-target binding kinetics and signal transduction, particularly in the physiological context of (multiple) endogenous ligands. We hypothesized that the kinetic binding parameters of both drug and endogenous ligand play a crucial role in determining cellular responses, using the NK1 receptor as a model system. We demonstrated that the binding kinetics of both antagonists (DFA and aprepitant) and endogenous agonists (NKA and SP) have significantly different effects on signal transduction profiles, i.e. potency values, in vitro efficacy values and onset rate of signal transduction. The antagonistic effects were most efficacious with slowly dissociating aprepitant and slowly associating NKA while the combination of rapidly dissociating DFA and rapidly associating SP had less significant effects on the signal transduction profiles. These results were consistent throughout different kinetic assays and cellular backgrounds. We conclude that knowledge of the relationship between in vitro drug-target binding kinetics and cellular responses is important to ultimately improve the understanding of drug efficacy in vivo.

Kinetics for Drug Discovery: an industry-driven effort to target drug residence time.

A considerable number of approved drugs show non-equilibrium binding characteristics, emphasizing the potential role of drug residence times for in vivo efficacy. Therefore, a detailed understanding of the kinetics of association and dissociation of a target-ligand complex might provide crucial insight into the molecular mechanism-of-action of a compound. This deeper understanding will help to improve decision making in drug discovery, thus leading to a better selection of interesting compounds to be profiled further. In this review, we highlight the contributions of the Kinetics for Drug Discovery (K4DD) Consortium, which targets major open questions related to binding kinetics in an industry-driven public-private partnership.

Kinetic Profile of Neuropeptide-Receptor Interactions.

Currently, drug discovery focusses only on quantifying pharmacological parameters, sometimes including binding kinetics, of drug candidates. For a complete understanding of a drug's desired binding kinetics, the kinetics of both the target and its endogenous ligands should be considered. This is because the release and binding kinetics of endogenous ligands in addition to receptor internalization rates are significant contributors to drug-target interactions. Here, we discuss the kinetic profile of three neuropeptides and their receptors; gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (GnRHR), neuropeptide Y receptors, and corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1 (CRF1R). These three examples provide new insights into the importance of kinetic profiles which could improve the understanding of desired drug-target binding kinetics and advance drug discovery for various neurological and psychiatric illnesses.

Mechanistic models enable the rational use of in vitro drug-target binding kinetics for better drug effects in patients.

INTRODUCTION: Drug-target binding kinetics are major determinants of the time course of drug action for several drugs, as clearly described for the irreversible binders omeprazole and aspirin. This supports the increasing interest to incorporate newly developed high-throughput assays for drug-target binding kinetics in drug discovery. A meaningful application of in vitro drug-target binding kinetics in drug discovery requires insight into the relation between in vivo drug effect and in vitro measured drug-target binding kinetics. AREAS COVERED: In this review, the authors discuss both the relation between in vitro and in vivo measured binding kinetics and the relation between in vivo binding kinetics, target occupancy and effect profiles. EXPERT OPINION: More scientific evidence is required for the rational selection and development of drug-candidates on the basis of in vitro estimates of drug-target binding kinetics. To elucidate the value of in vitro binding kinetics measurements, it is necessary to obtain information on system-specific properties which influence the kinetics of target occupancy and drug effect. Mathematical integration of this information enables the identification of drug-specific properties which lead to optimal target occupancy and drug effect in patients.

Characterization of 12 GnRH peptide agonists - a kinetic perspective.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Drug-target residence time is an important, yet often overlooked, parameter in drug discovery. Multiple studies have proposed an increased residence time to be beneficial for improved drug efficacy and/or longer duration of action. Currently, there are many drugs on the market targeting the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor for the treatment of hormone-dependent diseases. Surprisingly, the kinetic receptor-binding parameters of these analogues have not yet been reported. Therefore, this project focused on determining the receptor-binding kinetics of 12 GnRH peptide agonists, including many marketed drugs. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: A novel radioligand-binding competition association assay was developed and optimized for the human GnRH receptor with the use of a radiolabelled peptide agonist, [(125) I]-triptorelin. In addition to radioligand-binding studies, a homogeneous time-resolved FRET Tag-lite™ method was developed as an alternative assay for the same purpose. KEY RESULTS: Two novel competition association assays were successfully developed and applied to determine the kinetic receptor-binding characteristics of 12 high-affinity GnRH peptide agonists. Results obtained from both methods were highly correlated. Interestingly, the binding kinetics of the peptide agonists were more divergent than their affinities with residence times ranging from 5.6 min (goserelin) to 125 min (deslorelin). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Our research provides new insights by incorporating kinetic, next to equilibrium, binding parameters in current research and development that can potentially improve future drug discovery targeting the GnRH receptor.

Multiple binding sites for small-molecule antagonists at the CC chemokine receptor 2.

The chemokine receptor CCR2 is a G protein-coupled receptor that is activated primarily by the endogenous CC chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2). Many different small-molecule antagonists have been developed to inhibit this receptor, as it is involved in a variety of diseases characterized by chronic inflammation. Unfortunately, all these antagonists lack clinical efficacy, and therefore a better understanding of their mechanism of action is warranted. In this study, we examined the pharmacological properties of small-molecule CCR2 antagonists in radioligand binding and functional assays. Six structurally different antagonists were selected for this study, all of which displaced the endogenous agonist (125)I-CCL2 from CCR2 with nanomolar affinity. Two of these antagonists, INCB3344 [N-(2-(((3S,4S)-1-((1r,4S)-4-(benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl)-4-hydroxycyclohexyl)-4-ethoxypyrrolidin-3-yl)amino)-2-oxoethyl)-3-(trifluoromethyl)benzamide] and CCR2-RA, were radiolabeled to study the binding site in greater detail. We discovered that [(3)H]INCB3344 and [(3)H]CCR2-RA bind to distinct binding sites at CCR2, the latter being the first allosteric radioligand for CCR2. Besides the binding properties of the antagonists, we examined CCR2 inhibition in multiple functional assays, including a novel label-free whole-cell assay. INCB3344 competitively inhibited CCL2-induced G protein activation, whereas CCR2-RA showed a noncompetitive or allosteric mode of inhibition. These findings demonstrated that the CCR2 antagonists examined in this study can be classified into two groups with different binding sites and thereby different modes of inhibition. We have provided further insights in CCR2 antagonism, and these insights are important for the development of novel CCR2 inhibitors.