Reduction in omission events after implementing a Rapid Response System: a mortality review in a department of gastrointestinal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Hospitals worldwide have implemented Rapid Response Systems (RRS) to facilitate early recognition and prompt response by trained personnel to deteriorating patients. A key concept of this system is that it should prevent 'events of omission', including failure to monitor patients' vital signs, delayed detection, and treatment of deterioration and delayed transfer to an intensive care unit. Time matters when a patient deteriorates, and several in-hospital challenges may prevent the RRS from functioning adequately. Therefore, we must understand and address barriers for timely and adequate responses in cases of patient deterioration. Thus, this study aimed to investigate whether implementing (2012) and developing (2016) an RRS was associated with an overall temporal improvement and to identify needs for further improvement by studying; patient monitoring, omission event occurrences, documentation of limitation of medical treatment, unexpected death, and in-hospital- and 30-day mortality rates. METHODS: We performed an interprofessional mortality review to study the trajectory of the last hospital stay of patients dying in the study wards in three time periods (P1, P2, P3) from 2010 to 2019. We used non-parametric tests to test for differences between the periods. We also studied overall temporal trends in in-hospital- and 30-day mortality rates. RESULTS: Fewer patients experienced omission events (P1: 40%, P2: 20%, P3: 11%, P = 0.01). The number of documented complete vital sign sets, median (Q1,Q3) P1: 0 (0,0), P2: 2 (1,2), P3: 4 (3,5), P = 0.01) and intensive care consultations in the wards ( P1: 12%, P2: 30%, P3: 33%, P = 0.007) increased. Limitations of medical treatment were documented earlier (median days from admission were P1: 8, P2: 8, P3: 3, P = 0.01). In-hospital and 30-day mortality rates decreased during this decade (rate ratios 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92-0.98) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.99)). CONCLUSION: The RRS implementation and development during the last decade was associated with reduced omission events, earlier documentation of limitation of medical treatments, and a temporal reduction in the in-hospital- and 30-day mortality rates in the study wards. The mortality review is a suitable method to evaluate an RRS and provide a foundation for further improvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered.

Nationwide implementation of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes and long-term survival in a population-based cohort.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials show similar outcomes after open surgery and laparoscopy for colon cancer, and confirmation of outcomes after implementation in routine practice is important. While some studies have reported long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery from single institutions, data from large patient cohorts are sparse. We investigated short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for treating colon cancer in a large national cohort. METHODS: We retrieved data from the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Registry for all colon cancer resections performed in 2007-2010. Five-year relative survival rates following laparoscopic and open surgeries were calculated, including excess mortality rates associated with potential predictors of death. RESULTS: Among 8707 patients with colon cancer that underwent major resections, 16 % and 36 % received laparoscopic procedures in 2007 and 2010, respectively. Laparoscopic procedures were most common in elective surgeries for treating stages I-III, right colon, or sigmoid tumours. The conversion rate of laparoscopic procedures was 14.5 %. Among all patients, laparoscopy provided higher 5-year relative survival rates (70 %) than open surgery (62 %) (P = 0.040), but among the largest group of patients electively treated for stages I-III disease, the approaches provided similar relative survival rates (78 vs. 81 %; P = 0.535). Excess mortality at 2 years post-surgery was lower after laparoscopy than after open surgery (excess hazard ratio, 0.7; P = 0.013), but similar between groups during the last 3 years of follow-up. Major predictors of death were stage IV disease, tumour class pN+, age > 80 years, and emergency procedures (excess hazard ratios were 5.3, 2.4, 2.1, and 2.0, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Nationwide implementation of laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer was safe and achieved results comparable to those from previous randomized trials.

Influence of microsatellite instability and KRAS and BRAF mutations on lymph node harvest in stage I-III colon cancers.

Lymph node (LN) harvest is influenced by several factors, including tumor genetics. Microsatellite instability (MSI) is associated with improved node harvest, but the association to other genetic factors is largely unknown. Research methods included a prospective series of stage I-III colon cancer patients undergoing ex vivo sentinel-node sampling. The presence of MSI, KRAS mutations in codons 12 and 13, and BRAF V600E mutations was analyzed. Uni- and multivariate regression models for node sampling were adjusted for clinical, pathological and molecular features. Of 204 patients, 67% had an adequate harvest (≥ 12 nodes). Adequate harvest was highest in patients whose tumors exhibited MSI (79%; odds ratio [OR] 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-4.9; P = 0.007) or were located in the proximal colon (73%; 2.8, 1.5-5.3; P = 0.002). In multiple linear regression, MSI was a significant predictor of the total LN count (P = 0.02). Total node count was highest for cancers with MSI and no KRAS/BRAF mutations. The independent association between MSI and a high LN count persisted for stage I and II cancers (P = 0.04). Tumor location in the proximal colon was the only significant predictor of an adequate LN harvest (adjusted OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2-4.9; P = 0.01). An increase in the total number of nodes harvested was not associated with an increase in nodal metastasis. In conclusion, number of nodes harvested is highest for cancers of the proximal colon and with MSI. The nodal harvest associated with MSI is influenced by BRAF and KRAS genotypes, even for cancers of proximal location. Mechanisms behind the molecular diversity and node yield should be further explored.

Qualitative and quantitative issues of lymph nodes as prognostic factor in colon cancer.

For patients undergoing curative resections for colon cancer, the nodal status represents the strongest prognostic factor, yet at the same time the most disputed issue as well. Consequently, the qualitative and quantitative aspects of lymph node evaluation are thus being scrutinized beyond the blunt distinction between 'node positive' (pN+) and 'node negative' (pN0) disease. Controversy ranges from a minimal or 'least-unit' strategy as exemplified by the 'sentinel node' to a maximally invasive or 'all inclusive' approach by extensive surgery. Ranging between these two extremes of node sampling strategies are factors of quantitative and qualitative value, which may be subject to modification. Qualitative issues may include aspects of lymph node harvest reflected by surgeon, pathologist and even hospital performance, which all may be subject to modification. However, patient's age, gender and genotype may be non-modifiable, yet influence node sample. Quantitative issues may reflect the balance between absolute numbers and models investigating the relationships of positive to negative nodes (lymph node ratio; log odds of positive lymph nodes). This review provides an updated overview of the current controversies and a state-of-the-art perspective on the qualitative and quantitative aspects of using lymph nodes as a prognostic marker in colon cancer.

Diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein for intraabdominal infections after colorectal resections.

BACKGROUND: Intraabdominal infections are caused mainly by anastomotic leaks and represent a serious complication. Diagnosis is usually made when patients become critically ill. Though inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood count (WBC), may contribute to an early diagnosis, their clinical roles remain unclear. The diagnostic accuracy of continuous tests depends on the choice of cut-off values. We analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of serial CRP and WBC measurements to detect infectious complications after colorectal resections. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The CRP and WBC were routinely measured postoperatively in 231 consecutive patients undergoing colorectal resection. Clinical outcome was registered with regard to postoperative complications. The diagnostic accuracy of CRP and WBC was analyzed by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis with intra- and extraabdominal infectious complications as the outcome. RESULTS: Increased CRP levels on postoperative day (POD) 3 were associated with intraabdominal infections. The best cut-off value was 190 (sensitivity, 0.82; specificity, 0.73). The area under the ROC curve was 0.82. On POD 5 and 7, the diagnostic accuracy of CRP was similar. CONCLUSION: Serial CRP measurements are helpful for detecting intraabdominal infections after colorectal resection. Persistently elevated CRP values after POD 3 should be investigated for intraabdominal infection.

Endoscopy, morphology, morphometry and molecular markers: predicting cancer risk in colorectal adenoma.

The evaluation of short- and long-term risk for developing cancer in patients with colorectal adenomas is controversial. Good, reliable predictors of cancer risk in any adenoma are currently lacking and are limited to adenoma size, number and histologic type. In fact, the evaluation of any adenoma or precancer lesion (e.g., hyperplastic polyps, serrated adenoma or aberrant crypt foci) within the colorectum may be assessed by a number of techniques ranging from direct visualization through the endoscope, to microscopic assessment, and to evaluation at the molecular level. Emerging techniques may yield improved methods of adenoma risk-assessment in the near future. For one, newer endoscopy technologies include chromoendoscopy or endocytoscopy, which now render endoscopists able to resolve the surface and subsurface mucosa at cellular resolution in vivo and in real time - thus, bringing the microscope to the patient's bedside. This new era in endoscopic imaging is dubbed 'histoendoscopy'. Further, while traditional views of classifying protruding and sessile lesions include those of Haggitt, the sm-classification, the Japanese and the so-called Vienna classifications to evaluate neoplasia, the development of new molecular techniques may give way to new methods of classifying preneoplasia and precancerous lesions. This review discusses some pros and cons of risk evaluation technologies in the colorectal tract by endoscopy, microscopy, and quantitative and molecular features. The morphometry-based studies performed over the past decades for the quantitative assessment of cellular and nuclear features within adenomas have failed to yield results amenable for clinical translation and are unlikely to improve further and gain widespread use with current technology. Rather, emerging knowledge of pathway-specific markers through the outlining of a molecular classification will likely be the basis for improved detection and diagnosis. The emerging genomic and proteomic technologies allowing for noninvasive tests to detect (asymptomatic) cancer and neoplasia are discussed. Lastly, the importance of recognizing bias and pitfalls and the adherence to guidelines for biomarker research are addressed.

Evolving molecular classification by genomic and proteomic biomarkers in colorectal cancer: potential implications for the surgical oncologist.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequent cancers in the Western world and represents a major health burden. CRC development is a multi-step process that spans 10-15years, thereby providing an opportunity for early detection and even prevention. As almost half of all patients undergoing surgery develop recurrent disease, surveillance is advocated, albeit with various means and intervals. Current screening and surveillance efforts have so far only had limited impact due to suboptimal compliance. Currently, CEA is the only biomarker in clinical use for CRC, but has suboptimal sensitivity and specificity. New and better biomarkers are therefore strongly needed. Non-invasive biomarkers may develop through the understanding of colorectal carcinogenesis. Three main pathways occur in CRC, including chromosomal instability (CIN), microsatellite instability (MSI) and epigenetic silencing through the CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP). These pathways have distinct clinical, pathological, and genetic characteristics, which can be used for molecular classification and comprehensive tumour profiling for improved diagnostics, prognosis and treatment in CRC. Molecular-biological research has advanced with the sequencing of the human genome and the availability of genomic and proteomic high-throughput technologies using different chip platforms, such as tissue microarrays, DNA microarrays, and mass spectrometry. This review aims to give an overview of the evolving biomarker concepts in CRC, with concerns on methods, and potential for clinical implications for the surgical oncologist.