Lipoprotein(a) testing in lipid clinics across the UK: Results of a national survey.

Lipoprotein(a) is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and its use is recommended in national and international guidelines for cardiovascular disease risk stratification. We undertook a survey to understand the availability and application of lipoprotein(a) measurement across UK lipid clinics. Fifty-three out of an estimated 200 lipid clinics (27%) provided responses. 81% of fifty-three clinics had access to lipoprotein(a) measurement. 27 clinics disclosed the number of lipoprotein(a) tests ordered annually with approximately half of the clinics (52%) requesting 0-250 tests per year. 60% measured lipoprotein(a) once per patient and the leading indication was a personal or family history of premature history of cardiovascular disease in those <60 years old. 63% of clinics that provided comments with lipoprotein(a) results graded cardiovascular risk as per the HEART UK consensus statement. 60% of clinics performed family cascade testing on lipoprotein(a) results ≥200nmol/L. Lipoprotein(a) was reported in nmol/L, mg/dL or mg/L by 48%, 24% and 28% of responding clinics, respectively. National effort is required to provide universal access to Lipoprotein(a) measurement and to harmonise the clinical application of this data.

Lipoprotein(a) and cardiovascular disease: sifting the evidence to guide future research.

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a genetically determined causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease including coronary heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, ischaemic stroke, and calcific aortic valve stenosis. Clinical trials of specific and potent Lp(a)-lowering drugs are currently underway. However, in clinical practice, widespread assessment of Lp(a) is still lacking despite several guideline recommendations to measure Lp(a) at least once in a lifetime in all adults to identify those at high or very high risk due to elevated levels. The present review provides an overview of key findings from observational and genetic Lp(a) studies, highlights the main challenges in observational Lp(a) studies, and proposes a minimum set of requirements to enhance the quality and harmonize the collection of Lp(a)-related data. Adherence to the recommendations set forth in the present manuscript is intended to enhance the quality of future observational Lp(a) studies, to better define thresholds for increased risk, and to better inform clinical trial design. The recommendations can also potentially assist in the interpretation and generalization of clinical trial findings, to improve care of patients with elevated Lp(a) and optimize treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease.

How should public health recommendations address Lp(a) measurement, a causative risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD)?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Elevated concentrations of Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is an inherited, causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This study aims to investigate the clinical utility for patients, and the economic benefit to healthcare systems and society of measuring Lp(a) concentrations more widely today. METHODS: We conducted a structured literature review to identify the economic and health benefits and costs of measuring the Lp(a) concentration, potential barriers hindering the uptake of the measure, and potential solutions to address them. These findings were then discussed in an advisory board attended by experts and patient organisations. RESULTS: It was found that if Lp(a) concentration is measured more widely today, patients, healthcare system and society would experience clinical and economic benefits even before specific Lp(a) lowering pharmacological treatments become available. Furthermore, a wider uptake of the Lp(a) measurement would support the development of epidemiological data. CONCLUSIONS: For Lp(a) measurement to be more widely used, key barriers which are hindering its uptake need to be addressed. These include i) the perception that the measure may have limited clinical value, ii) lack of awareness on Lp(a), iii) lack of data on the CV benefit of reducing Lp(a), iv) technical and clinical guidelines barriers, and v) healthcare system barriers. Scientific communities and industry should collaborate to address technical challenges and deficiencies in clinical guidelines. However, policy intervention will be crucial for national ASCVD plans to acknowledge the importance of Lp(a).

Lp(a): When and how to measure it.

Lipoprotein(a) has long been regarded as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease; however, its routine use in clinical practice has been hampered by difficulties inherent in the measurement of this complex lipoprotein. The major challenges relate to its size heterogeneity and related issues including (1) use of appropriate calibrators (2) standardization of calibration protocols (3) traceability and (4) reporting units. In the UK, results from the current EQA schemes for lipoprotein(a) suggest that there is considerable work required to standardize lipoprotein(a) measurement. This is becoming increasingly pertinent with the increasing recognition of lipoprotein(a) as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease in international guidelines and the emergence of novel antisense therapies to effectively reduce lipoprotein(a). This article raises awareness of the importance of measurement of lipoprotein(a) for the assessment of cardiovascular disease risk and gives guidance to clinical laboratories regarding choice of appropriate assays.

HEART UK consensus statement on Lipoprotein(a): A call to action.

Lipoprotein(a), Lp(a), is a modified atherogenic low-density lipoprotein particle that contains apolipoprotein(a). Its levels are highly heritable and variable in the population. This consensus statement by HEART UK is based on the evidence that Lp(a) is an independent cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor, provides recommendations for its measurement in clinical practice and reviews current and emerging therapeutic strategies to reduce CVD risk. Ten statements summarise the most salient points for practitioners and patients with high Lp(a). HEART UK recommends that Lp(a) is measured in adults as follows: 1) those with a personal or family history of premature atherosclerotic CVD; 2) those with first-degree relatives who have Lp(a) levels >200 nmol/l; 3) patients with familial hypercholesterolemia; 4) patients with calcific aortic valve stenosis and 5) those with borderline (but <15%) 10-year risk of a cardiovascular event. The management of patients with raised Lp(a) levels should include: 1) reducing overall atherosclerotic risk; 2) controlling dyslipidemia with a desirable non-HDL-cholesterol level of <100 mg/dl (2.5 mmol/l) and 3) consideration of lipoprotein apheresis.

Study to Improve Cardiovascular Outcomes in high-risk older patieNts (ICON1) with acute coronary syndrome: study design and protocol of a prospective observational study.

INTRODUCTION: The ICON1 study (a study to Improve Cardiovascular Outcomes in high-risk older patieNts with acute coronary syndrome) is a prospective observational study of older patients (≥75 years old) with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome managed by contemporary treatment (pharmacological and invasive). The aim of the study was to determine the predictors of poor cardiovascular outcomes in this age group and to generate a risk prediction tool. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Participants are recruited from 2 tertiary hospitals in the UK. Baseline evaluation includes frailty, comorbidity, cognition and quality-of-life measures, inflammatory status assessed by a biomarker panel, including microRNAs, senescence assessed by telomere length and telomerase activity, cardiovascular status assessed by arterial stiffness, endothelial function, carotid intima media thickness and left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, and coronary plaque assessed by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. The patients are followed-up at 30 days and at 1 year for primary outcome measures of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, unplanned revascularisation, bleeding and rehospitalisation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the regional ethics committee (REC 12/NE/016). Findings of the study will be presented in scientific sessions and will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01933581: Pre-results.

PCSK9 inhibitors in the prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Reducing plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) remains the cornerstone in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, lack of efficacy and adverse effects mean that a substantial proportion of patients fail to achieve acceptable LDL-C levels with currently available lipid-lowering drugs. Over the last decade, inhibition of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy to reduce residual cardiovascular disease risk. Binding of PCSK9 to the LDL receptor targets the receptor for lysosomal degradation. The recognition that inhibition of PCSK9 increases LDL receptor activity has led to the development of a number of approaches to directly target PCSK9. Numerous monoclonal antibodies against PCSK9 are currently being evaluated in phase 3 trials, involving various patient categories on different background lipid-lowering therapies. Current evidence shows reductions in LDL-C levels of up to 70 % may be achieved with PCSK9 inhibition, independent of background statin therapy. This review examines the most recent evidence and future prospects for the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in the prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Phaeochromocytoma and ACTH-dependent cushing's syndrome: tumour crf secretion can mimic pituitary cushing's disease.

INTRODUCTION: 10% of corticotrophin (ACTH)-dependent Cushing's syndrome arises from secretion by extrapituitary tumours, with phaeochromocytoma implicated in a few cases. Ectopic secretion by phaeochromocytoma of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRF), with secondary corticotroph hyperplasia, is even rarer, with only five cases in the literature hitherto. However, such cases may be classified as 'ectopic ACTH' due to incomplete verification. CLINICAL CASES: We describe three patients with phaeochromocytoma and ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome in whom biochemical cure was achieved following unilateral adrenalectomy. Although unable to access a validated CRF assay within the timeframe for sample storage, we nevertheless inferred CRF secretion in 2 of 3 cases by tumour immunostaining (positive for CRF; negative for ACTH), supported in one case by pre-operative inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS) indicative of pituitary ACTH source. Both cases were characterized by rapid postoperative wean off glucocorticoids, presumed to reflect the pituitary stimulatory-effect of CRF outweighing central negative feedback inhibition by hypercortisolaemia. By contrast, the tumour excised in a third case exhibited positive immunostaining for ACTH - negative for CRF - and postoperative recovery of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis took significantly longer. DISCUSSION: Ectopic CRF production is biochemically indistinguishable from ectopic ACTH secretion, except that IPSS mimics pituitary Cushing's disease and cortisol dynamics may normalize rapidly postadrenalectomy. CRF secretion can be inferred through tumour immunohistochemistry, even if no CRF assay is available. Unrecognized phaeochromocytoma ACTH secretion may underpin some cases of cardiovascular collapse postadrenalectomy through acute hypocortisolaemia. Despite advances in phaeochromocytoma genetics since previous reports, we were unable to identify somatic DNA defects associated with either ACTH or CRF secretion.

PCSK9, apolipoprotein E and lipoviral particles in chronic hepatitis C genotype 3: evidence for genotype-specific regulation of lipoprotein metabolism.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) associates with lipoproteins to form "lipoviral particles" (LVPs) that can facilitate viral entry into hepatocytes. Initial attachment occurs via heparan sulphate proteoglycans and low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR); CD81 then mediates a post-attachment event. Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) enhances the degradation of the LDLR and modulates liver CD81 levels. We measured LVP and PCSK9 in patients chronically infected with HCV genotype (G)3. PCSK9 concentrations were also measured in HCV-G1 to indirectly examine the role of LDLR in LVP clearance. METHODS: HCV RNA, LVP (d<1.07g/ml) and non-LVP (d>1.07g/ml) fractions, were quantified in patients with HCV-G3 (n=39) by real time RT-PCR and LVP ratios (LVPr; LVP/(LVP+non-LVP)) were calculated. Insulin resistance (IR) was assessed using the homeostasis model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR). Plasma PCSK9 concentrations were measured by ELISA in HCV-G3 and HCV-G1 (n=51). RESULTS: In HCV-G3 LVP load correlated inversely with HDL-C (r=-0.421; p=0.008), and apoE (r=-0.428; p=0.013). The LVPr varied more than 35-fold (median 0.286; range 0.027 to 0.969); PCSK9 was the strongest negative predictor of LVPr (R(2)=16.2%; p=0.012). HOMA-IR was not associated with LVP load or LVPr. PCSK9 concentrations were significantly lower in HCV-G3 compared to HCV-G1 (p<0.001). PCSK9 did not correlate with LDL-C in HCV-G3 or G1. CONCLUSIONS: The inverse correlation of LVP with apoE in HCV-G3, compared to the reverse in HCV-G1 suggests HCV genotype-specific differences in apoE mediated viral entry. Lower PCSK9 and LDL concentrations imply upregulated LDLR activity in HCV-G3.

Omega-3 fatty acids and/or fluvastatin in hepatitis C prior non-responders to combination antiviral therapy - a pilot randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) utilises cholesterol and lipoprotein metabolism for replication and infectivity. Statins and omega-3 (n-3) polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) have been shown to have antiviral properties in vitro. This open label pilot study evaluated the efficacy of fluvastatin (Lescol(®) 40-80 mg) and n-3 PUFA (Omacor(®) 1 g and 2-4 g) on HCV-RNA and lipoviral particles (LVP) in difficult to treat prior non-responders. METHODS: Patients (n = 60) were randomly allocated in a factorial design to: no active drug; low-dose n-3 PUFA; high-dose n-3 PUFA; fluvastatin; low-dose n-3 PUFA + fluvastatin; or high-dose n-3 PUFA + fluvastatin. 50/60 completed study drugs for 12 weeks and followed up to week 24. Comparison was made between fluvastatin (n = 24) vs no fluvastatin (n = 26) and n-3 PUFA high-dose (n = 17) vs low-dose (n = 17) vs none (n = 16). The primary outcomes were change in total HCV-RNA, LVP and ALT at week 12 compared with baseline. Secondary outcome was change in interferon-gamma-inducible protein-10 (IP10) as a measure of interferon activation. RESULTS: 35% had compensated cirrhosis and 45% were prior null responders. There was no significant change in total HCV RNA, LVP, non-LVP or LVP ratio in patients receiving fluvastatin or n-3 PUFAs. ALT was not significantly different in those treated with fluvastatin or n-3 PUFAs. 12 weeks of low-dose n-3 PUFA decreased median IP10 concentration by -39 pg/ml (-111, 7.0 pg/ml Q1-Q3). CONCLUSIONS: Fluvastatin and n-3 PUFAs have no effect on plasma HCV-RNA or LVP. The effect of low-dose n-3 PUFA on IP10 warrants further prospective evaluation as a supplemental therapy to enhance interferon sensitivity.

Hepatitis C virus and lipids in the era of direct acting antivirals (DAAs).

The six different HCV-genotypes have marked differences in response to therapy with pegylated interferon-α and ribavirin. The introduction of the direct acting antiviral (DAA) protease inhibitors, telaprevir and boceprevir in combination with pegylated interferon-α and ribavirin has become the new standard of care for genotype 1 infection. Several host factors associated with response to pegylated interferon-α and ribavirin are not as important in predicting response to triple therapy, and yet low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) and statin use remain important associations of outcome with DAAs. This review focuses on the clinical associations between lipids and treatment response to interferon based antiviral treatments. We consider how understanding the interactions of HCV and host lipid metabolism remains relevant in the era of DAAs for genotype 1 infection and for treatment of non-genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C.

Apolipoprotein-E and hepatitis C lipoviral particles in genotype 1 infection: evidence for an association with interferon sensitivity.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) interacts with apolipoproteins B (apoB) and E (apoE) to form infectious lipoviral particles (LVP). Response to peginterferon is influenced by interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) and IL28B genotype. LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) also predicts interferon response, therefore we hypothesised that LVP may also be associated with interferon sensitivity. METHODS: LVP (HCV RNA density ≤1.07 g/ml) and 'non-LVP' (d >1.07 g/ml) were measured in 72 fasted HCV-G1 patients by iodixanol density gradient ultracentrifugation and the LVP ratio (LVP/LVP+non-LVP) was calculated. Fasting lipid profiles and apolipoproteins B and E were measured. Interferon-gamma-inducible protein 10 kDa (IP10), a marker of ISGs, was measured by ELISA. RESULTS: Complete early virological response (EVR) was associated with lower apoE (23.9±7.7 vs. 36.1±15.3 mg/L, p=0.013), higher LDL-C (p=0.039) and lower LVP ratios (p=0.022) compared to null responders. In multivariate linear regression analysis, apoE was independently associated with LVP (R(2) 19.5%, p=0.003) and LVP ratio (p=0.042), and negatively with LDL-C (p<0.001). IP10 was significantly associated with ApoB (p=0.001) and liver stiffness (p=0.032). IL28B rs12979860 CC was associated with complete EVR (p=0.044), low apoE (CC 28±11 vs. CT/TT 35±13 mg/L, p=0.048) and higher non-LVP (p=0.008). Logistic regression analysis indicated that patients with high LVP ratios were less likely to have EVR (odds ratio 0.01, p=0.018). CONCLUSIONS: In HCV-G1, interferon sensitivity is characterised by low LVP ratios and low apoE levels in addition to higher LDL-C and IL28B rs12979860 CC. Null-response is associated with increased LVP ratio. The association of apoE and LVP with peginterferon treatment response suggests that lipid modulation is a potential target to modify interferon sensitivity.

HCV and the hepatic lipid pathway as a potential treatment target.

Atherosclerosis has been described as a liver disease of the heart [1]. The liver is the central regulatory organ of lipid pathways but since dyslipidaemias are major contributors to cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes rather than liver disease, research in this area has not been a major focus for hepatologists. Virus-host interaction is a continuous co-evolutionary process [2] involving the host immune system and viral escape mechanisms [3]. One of the strategies HCV has adopted to escape immune clearance and establish persistent infection is to make use of hepatic lipid pathways. This review aims to: • update the hepatologist on lipid metabolism • review the evidence that HCV exploits hepatic lipid pathways to its advantage • discuss approaches to targeting host lipid pathways as adjunctive therapy.

Insulin resistance and low-density apolipoprotein B-associated lipoviral particles in hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection.

BACKGROUND: The density of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in plasma is heterogeneous but the factors which influence this are poorly understood. Evidence from animal models and cell culture suggest that low-density apolipoprotein B (apoB)-associated HCV lipoviral particles (LVP) are more infectious than high-density HCV. Objective To measure LVP in patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 (CHC-G1) and examine metabolic determinants of LVP load. Patients 51 patients with CHC-G1 infection. METHODS: Fasting lipid profiles and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) were determined in 51 patients with CHC-G1. LVP and non-LVP viral load were measured by real-time PCR of plasma at density <1.07 g/ml and >1.07 g/ml, respectively, following iodixanol density gradient ultracentrifugation. The LVP ratio was calculated using the formula: LVP/(LVP + non-LVP). RESULTS: The mean LVP ratio was 0.241 but varied 25-fold (from 0.029 to 0.74). Univariate analysis showed that the LVP ratio correlated with HOMA-IR (p=0.004) and the triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TG/HDL-C) ratio (p = 0.004), but not with apoB. In multivariate analysis, HOMA-IR was the main determinant of LVP load (log10IU/ml) (R²=16.6%; p = 0.037) but the TG/HDL-C ratio was the strongest predictor of the LVP ratio (R² = 24.4%; p = 0.019). Higher LVP ratios were associated with non-response to antiviral therapy (p = 0.037) and with greater liver stiffness (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: IR and associated dyslipidaemia are the major determinants of low-density apoB-associated LVP in fasting plasma. This provides a possible mechanism to explain why IR is associated with more rapidly progressive liver disease and poorer treatment outcomes.

Intravascular transfer contributes to postprandial increase in numbers of very-low-density hepatitis C virus particles.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The physical association of hepatitis C virus (HCV) particles with lipoproteins in plasma results in distribution of HCV in a broad range of buoyant densities. This association is thought to increase virion infectivity by mediating cell entry via lipoprotein receptors. We sought to determine if factors that affect triglyceride-rich lipoprotein (TRL) metabolism alter the density and dynamics of HCV particles in the plasma of patients with chronic HCV infection. METHODS: Fasting patients (n = 10) consumed a high-fat milkshake; plasma was collected and fractionated by density gradients. HCV- RNA was measured in the very-low-density fraction (VLDF, d < 1.025 g/mL) before and at 7 serial time points postprandially. RESULTS: The amount of HCV RNA in the VLDF (HCV(VLDF)) increased a mean of 26-fold, peaking 180 minutes after the meal (P < .01). Quantification of HCV RNA throughout the density gradient fractions revealed that HCV(VLDF) rapidly disappeared, rather than migrating into the adjacent density fraction. Immuno-affinity separation of the VLDF, using antibodies that recognize apolipoprotein B-100 and not apolipoprotein B-48, showed that HCV(VLDF) is composed of chylomicron- and VLDL-associated HCV particles; peaking 120 and 180 minutes after the meal, respectively. Plasma from fasting HCV-infected patients mixed with uninfected plasma increased the quantity of HCV(VLDF), compared with that mixed with phosphate-buffered saline, showing extracellular assembly of HCV(VLDF). CONCLUSIONS: Dietary triglyceride alters the density and dynamics of HCV in plasma. The rapid clearance rate of HCV(VLDF) indicates that association with TRL is important for HCV infectivity. HCV particles, such as exchangeable apolipoproteins, appear to reassociate with TRLs in the vascular compartment.

Healthy individuals carrying the PCSK9 p.R46L variant and familial hypercholesterolemia patients carrying PCSK9 p.D374Y exhibit lower plasma concentrations of PCSK9.

BACKGROUND: We measured plasma PCSK9 concentrations in healthy men with a PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) loss-of-function variant (p.R46L), in statin-treated patients with a clinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and carrying a PCSK9 gain-of-function mutation (p.D374Y), and in statin-treated patients with FH due to different genetic causes. METHODS: PCSK9 was measured with a previously described ELISA. RESULTS: In 81 healthy middle-aged Caucasian men, the PCSK9 concentration was significantly associated with the concentrations of total cholesterol (r = 0.42; P < 0.0001), LDL cholesterol (r = 0.34; P = 0.01), and triglycerides (r = 0.25; P = 0.02). In p.R46L carriers, mean (SD) concentrations of PCSK9 were 15% lower than in RR individuals [65.5 microg/L (21.6 microg/L) vs 77.5 microg/L (18.2 microg/L); P = 0.03]. In patients with the p.D374Y variant (n = 7), the mean PCSK9 concentration was significantly lower than in the combined group of patients with an LDLR (low density lipoprotein receptor) mutation (n = 25), an APOB [apolipoprotein B (including Ag(x) antigen)] variant encoding p.R3527Q (n = 6), or no detectable mutation (n = 14) [96.4 microg/L (42.5 microg/L) vs 151.6 microg/L (69.6 microg/L); P = 0.02]. Two of the 14 patients with no mutation had PCSK9 concentrations below the mean for p.D374Y carriers; sequencing of the PCSK9 gene and promoter revealed no mutations. Among 409 FH patients, we identified 6 carriers of the promoter variant -287G>A (1.5%), a frequency similar to that (1.0%) previously reported for 2772 healthy men in the UK. In neither group was the -287G>A variant associated with differences in lipid traits. CONCLUSIONS: The loss-of-function p.R46L variant is associated with the expected lower concentrations of circulating PCSK9; the gain-of-function p.D374Y mutation is also associated with lower concentrations, presumably because of the higher affinity of this variant for the LDL receptor and its more rapid clearance. In treated FH patients, a low plasma PCSK9 concentration does not appear to be a useful screening tool for identifying novel PCSK9 mutations.